Introduction
From a vast depth of research, dementia stands as a critical concern in Michigan and this has enabled a robust approach to do away with its implications. For this paper, much effort will be tailored toward probing epidemiological data as per the objectives outlined in Healthy People 2030 (HP2030). Besides, the paper will additionally investigate population-based interventions focused on reducing dementia-correlated morbidity and even mortality in Michigan. With a population that is aging, subsequently, the rates of dementia-related complications go high; Michigan is therefore faced with mounting pressure to put into force effective measures that can address the complex aspects of such a concern (Marson et al., 2011). By immersing into the epidemiological landscape and comprehending HP 2030 goals in addition to assessing evidence-based interventions, the paper tries to unravel insights into the intricacies of dementia management and deliver avenues for a tailored public health plan to ameliorate the well-being of the infected individuals and the communities across Michigan (Bloom et al., 2021).
Overview of the Problem in Michigan
In research compiled by Loustalot et al. (2009), dementia is one of the fatality challenges in Michigan. It has impacted a considerable fraction of the population, and its hallmark is cognitive reduction and memory loss. According to the Alzheimer’s Association, approximately 190,000 people who are aged 65 years and above in Michigan are at the moment grappling with Alzheimer’s disease. The highlighted represents a broader population suffering from dementia condition. According to research, the figures are anticipated to surge by 2025 to levels of 260,000, and this highlights the dire need to push for effective intervention measures (Ritchie et al., 2015). Due to the ever-rising prevalence cases of dementia, there have been severe repercussions for people, families and the wider Michigan healthcare stream. Because the population continues to age and cases of dementia continue to shoot, the state is being faced with imminent trouble in dispensing adequate care and support for the individuals impacted (Fox et al., 2022). Furthermore, there is an economic aspect and burden that is linked to dementia-associated complications. Therefore, healthcare costs are projected to escalate, and this further stresses the significance of implementing a targeted intervention to address this burgeoning public health concern in Michigan.
Review of Descriptive Epidemiological and Demographic Data
Looking at the epidemiological data, we can see compelling insights regarding the tremendous aftermaths of dementia as far as morbidity and mortality rates are concerned in Michigan (Marson et al., 2011). Persons who are infected with dementia undergo elevated threats of growing comorbid conditions, which encompass cardiovascular illnesses, which research has over the period proven to increase the risks of mortality levels among the population segment under probation. Besides, the economic ramifications of dementia go beyond personal levels and impose a heightened risk and even burden on both families and the healthcare systems. In the year 2020, Michigan as a state allocated an estimated $4.68 billion to cater to dementia care, and this highlights the magnitude of the financial constrain that the diseases have caused according to (Aggarwal et al.,2022). The abovementioned statistics and data are enough proof that there is an urgent and dire need to put proactive measures in place to handle such complex concerns posed by dementia within Michigan (Fox et al., 2022). Through leveraging descriptive epidemiological data, policymakers and healthcare professionals are able to intercept valuable insights regarding the data trends and the demographic patterns related to dementia, hence informing the development and also implementation of a tailored intervention that can mitigate the hostile outcomes on public health in Michigan.
HP2030 Goals and Objectives
According to Healthy People 2030, ambitious objectives have been delineated to improve brain health and reduce the previous, alternatively n, negative impacts,s related to dementia. At the center of the objectives, is the primary goal to enhance life’s quality for persons with dementia and their care providers. The critical objectives outlined within the framework entail the augmentation of early detection and diagnosis, championing risk reduction and mitigation approaches, and bolstering resources and efforts to meet the immediate needs of the risk population and their families (Healthy People 2030, n.d.). Through clear goals and objectives, the framework by Healthy People 2030 gives a strategic blueprint and roadmap to addressing the multidimensional challenges posed by dementia, enabling the development and implementation of targeted interventions that can alleviate societal effects.
Population-Level Prevention and Health Promotion
Population-based interventions play a vital role as far as mitigating the burdens related to dementia and its conditions are concerned in Michigan. One such approach that is extensively applied is lifestyle change, which reduces the chances or risk factors for contracting dementia. They are not limited to inadequate dietary intake, inadequate physical activity, smoking and social isolation. In addition, community-based education programs Moehead et al., (2020) can aid in raising awareness in regard to dementia threat factors and encourage healthier lifestyles among the Michigan populaces. In addition, specific interventions tailored to improve healthcare access services coupled with early detection of cognitive decline are indispensable. A wide depth of research also shows that Tan et al. (2017) collaborative efforts between healthcare practitioners and social service providers, in addition to organizations, have proven to be essential as they see a timely diagnosis plan, thus improving the results for people with dementia.
Data Tracking for Interventions
Robust data tacking devices gave been critical in Michigan to assessing the efficacy of the interventions above that target dementia. The tracking metrics are not limited to several parameters: the prevalence of prompt detection, the utilization rates of the support services and the degree of care provider burden. Through systematic collection and data point analysis, healthcare providers and policymakers can glimpse the effectiveness of intervention initiatives.
Alternatively, through monitoring the rates of early diagnosis, we are offered vital information regarding success pointers of the outreach and screening programs, and this shows whether the individuals are receiving diagnostic services in a prompt manner or not. In the bargain, by tracking the application of the support services, insights are gathered into the accessibility and adequacy of the valuable resources for people with dementia and their care providers. Moreover, knowing care giver burden aids in quantifying the effects of dementia on respective families and recognizes areas in which extra support may be required. Through putting in place and leveraging detailed data tracking systems, stakeholders can arrive at informed decisions regarding resource allocation besides intervention refinement approaches. Lastly, vigorous data gathering and analysis has proven to be pivotal as far as driving a continuous improvement program on dementia care and support services throughout Michigan state is out to question.
Conclusion
Bringing this discussion to a conclusion, the paper has shown that dementia is a threat in Michigan, and this has called for interventions to address the intricate challenges posed by the disease. The strategies vary from early detection and tracking elements to mitigation factors aimed at reducing its burden on public health. Also, implementation of population-based health education programs has proven to be effective as they align with Healthy People 2030 objectives, hence leveraging epidemiological data. In a nutshell, Michigan can improve brain health by having early detection initiatives and support services for afflicted individuals and their families. By implementing the above, Michigan can mitigate morbidity and mortality rates correlated with dementia and ultimately improve the general well-being of its residents.
References
Aggarwal, H., Chaware, S., & Aggarwal, H. (2022). A Critical Study on the Impact of Dementia on Older People Undergoing Treatment in Care Homes. Cureus, 14(10), e30056. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.30056
Bloom, D., Chen, S., Counts, N., Han, R., Malik, S., Nandi, A., … & Vigo, D. (2021). Addressing Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias to realize the promise of the UN’s ‘Decade of Healthy Ageing.’ VoxEU. Org, 26.
Fox, M. P., Murray, E. J., Lesko, C. R., & Sealy-Jefferson, S. (2022). On the Need to Revitalize Descriptive Epidemiology. American journal of epidemiology, 191(7), 1174–1179. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwac056
Loustalot, F., Carlson, S. A., Fulton, J. E., Kruger, J., Galuska, D. A., & Lobelo, F. (2009). Prevalence of self-reported aerobic physical activity among US states and territories—Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2007. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 6(s1), S9-S17.
Marson, D. C., Hebert, K., & Solomon, A. C. (2011). Assessing civil competencies in older adults with dementia. Forensic neuropsychology: A scientific approach, p. 401.
Moehead, A., DeSouza, K., Walsh, K., & Pit, S. W. (2020). A web-based dementia education program and its application to an Australian web-based dementia care competency and training network: integrative systematic review—Journal of medical Internet research, 22(1), e16808.
Ritchie, C. W., Terrera, G. M., & Quinn, T. J. (2015). Dementia trials and dementia tribulations: methodological and analytical challenges in dementia research. Alzheimer’s research & therapy, 7(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-015-0113-6
Tan, Z. S., Damron‐Rodriguez, J., Cadogan, M., Gans, D., Price, R. M., Merkin, S. S., … & Chodosh, J. (2017). Team‐based interprofessional competency training for dementia screening and management. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 65(1), 207-211.
https://health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives/dementias