Introduction
Many women who have given birth have PTSD and depression, which is a big problem for their health. Ertan et al. (2021) talk about how having a baby affects how you feel; they looked at how many people have postpartum PTSD and what things might make it more likely for someone to have it. They affirmed it is essential to find and help people with postpartum PTSD as soon as possible. Likewise, Xue et al. (2023) explore what makes it hard or easy for doctors to send women with signs of perinatal depression for more tests and treatment in China. The study points out how complicated health systems stop pregnant and new mothers from getting good mental health support. Both studies show how important it is to understand the specific experiences of women after giving birth and the healthcare providers who help them. This allows us to create interventions and policies that can provide good support for women’s mental health.
Article 1: Post-traumatic stress disorder following childbirth
Identification of Study Purpose and Selection of Appraisal Tool
The study’s goal was to find out how many women experience post-traumatic stress disorder after giving birth and what things might be linked to it. The research looked at how women felt after giving birth. They needed to pick the right way to ask them questions to do this. Ertan et al. (2021), chose the CASP quality checklist because it matched the type of study we were doing. As outlined by Long et al. (2020), this tool helps to examine how qualitative research is done carefully and ensures the study is valid, reliable, and essential. The CASP quality control helps review and analyze the study’s methods, results, and what they mean for medical practice and future research.
Analysis of Validity and Credibility of the Study
Ertan et al. (2021), being well-known authors from respected institutions and published in the critical journal BMC Psychiatry, backed the study’s trustworthiness. This makes the research method and results more believable. However, it is essential to consider the study and any possible mistakes, mainly because it was small and only took place in one location. These things might make it hard to use the study’s results for all women who have had a baby. While a strict process for publishing research makes us trust the study more, we should be careful when applying the results to a different situation than the one the study looked at. This study as suggested by Bisson et al. (2021) needs more research with more extensive and varied groups to ensure the findings are correct and can be applied to more people.
Analysis of Methods
The research looked at women’s PTSD experiences after giving birth using qualitative methodology to get more information. This helps us understand people’s stories and feelings more deeply and fully. However, as outlined by Finlayson et al. (2020) because the study only had 15 participants, it may not fully represent women’s different opinions and experiences after giving birth. Also, not knowing who the participants are makes it difficult to understand the results and how other factors like age, gender, and social status affect PTSD experiences. Even though there were some restrictions, the qualitative study helped understand the psychological effects of childbirth in detail. It showed that it is essential to have customized support services for each person. More research is needed to include a broader range of people and more information about their backgrounds. This, according to Ahsan et al. (2023), will help us better understand and treat postpartum PTSD.
Synthesis of Study Outcomes, Limitations, and Conclusions
Ertan and others 2021) discovered that postpartum PTSD affects many women. Finding them and helping them as fast as possible is fundamental. Nonetheless, the examination and how it may be applied to different circumstances is restricted because the concentration just incorporated a few individuals, and their conditions were not assorted. Although the review could not test a few things, it gives us significant data about how having youngsters can influence individuals’ emotional wellness. This can assist us with tracking down better ways of supporting individuals battling to adapt to this present circumstance. The outcomes show the significance of helping moms with emotional well-being issues as suggested by Modak et al. (2023). We want ways of distinguishing these issues and making a difference. Later on, concentrating on additional matters and including more different members could make research more exact and helpful. This might assist us in tracking down better ways of helping moms with post-pregnancy PTSD feel quite a bit improved.
Overall Evaluation
Ertan et al. (2021) give significant data about PTSD after labor. This shows that finding and supporting the individuals who have it is fundamental. The research helps us understand how a mother’s mental health is vital. However, we need to be careful when looking at the results because the study was small and only done in one place. We need more studies with a more extensive and varied group of people to ensure the results can apply to everyone and are dependable. Even though there are some problems, the research shows that it is crucial to prevent and treat PTSD in new mothers to make sure they and their babies are healthy. Erta and others found. The study gives important information. In the future, studies should try to fix problems with how the study was done so we can better understand and help women with postpartum PTSD.
Article 2: Barriers and facilitators for referring women with positive perinatal depression Screening Results in China: A Qualitative Study
Identification of Study Purpose and Selection of Appraisal Tool
Xue et al. (2023) conducted a study to find out what makes it hard or easy for women to get counseling when they screen positive for perinatal depression. They focus on the referral process because their research is based on real experiences and not just numbers (Tato Fernandes et al., 2023). The CASP checklist was used to check how well the study was done. This tool was picked to see if it could be used to check if the qualitative parts of the study, like how the research was done, how the data was collected, and how it was analyzed, were good enough. Xue et al. (2023) used the CASP quality control; they checked the study carefully to ensure good quality. This made their findings more believable and trustworthy.
Analysis of Validity and Credibility of the Study
The research shows that it can be trusted because it uses open ways to report and share information, like how they found people to be in the study and how they looked at and understood the data. Researchers from well-known institutions published The survey in the BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth journal. However, scientists’ personal experiences and viewpoints may affect how they understand information. Although there may be some unfair influences, the study’s careful methods and being published in a well-respected journal make it more believable. This shows the importance of carefully considering results and being open and honest in research. In general, the study gives important information about how women with perinatal depression get help in China. Recognizing and dealing with any possible prejudices as suggested by Taheri et al. (2021) is essential to ensure the study’s results are accurate and trustworthy.
Analysis of Methods
Xue et al. (2023) talked to healthcare workers to learn about how pregnant women with depression get referred for help. This way of looking at things gives us detailed information, but it does not consider the thoughts and experiences of pregnant women. This limits how much we can learn and understand about the topic. Also, when members do not have control, it is hard to know if the data is being interpreted correctly.Zeroing in just on specialists and medical attendants may not show every one of the various sorts of perinatal sadness or that it is so challenging to get psychological well-being help (Dutta et al. 2022). Accordingly, this study gives valuable data about the difficulties and supports in treating perinatal wretchedness. Notwithstanding, this strategy has specific restrictions. Listening to them is essential to assist perinatal women better.
Synthesis of Study Outcomes, Limitations, and Conclusions
The authors concentrated on the various things that make it troublesome or simple for pregnant ladies and new moms to treat melancholy. As outlined by Zaman et al., (2022), the study focuses on how doctors’ need for more information, stigma, and a lack of resources can make it harder for them to get help. Although this study gave essential data, its restricted extension, absence of perinatal ladies’ viewpoints, and lack of part control diminished the unwavering quality of the outcomes. Staying by listening to the assessments of critical individuals can prevent off-base outcomes and keep innovative thoughts from working out as expected. As a result, even though this study provides helpful information regarding the treatment of perinatal depression, its limitations suggest that additional research is required to consider various perspectives and employ multiple strategies—vigorous techniques to guarantee solid outcomes and backing excellent practices.
Overall Evaluation
As a result of the concepts of Xue et al. (2023), we study the perplexing reasons prompting perinatal sadness in China. Albeit this study makes huge commitments, we should consider its inadequacies, for example, not controlling the review members and getting possibly restricted conclusions from the members while checking on the outcomes. Future exploration should zero in on utilizing different viewpoints and vigorous approval techniques to make the outcomes more dependable and appropriate. These efforts are essential to help create better treatments and policies for depression during and after pregnancy to make sure that mothers have good mental health. By using a more complete and inclusive approach, researchers can understand perinatal depression referrals better (Cheng et al., 2020). This will help health systems be ready to support people at risk with the right help at the right time.
Conclusion
Both studies provide important insights about how mothers feel during and after giving birth. Ertan et al. (2021) show how common postpartum PTSD is and how it affects people. We also want to push for better ways to check for it and help those affected. On the other side, Xue et al. (2023) study what makes it hard for women in China to get help for depression before and after giving birth and show what issues in the system stop them from getting treatment on time.Even though we have discovered a few significant things, additional research into evidence-based treatments is required due to the research’s limitations, such as the need for a comprehensive perspective and small sample sizes. To guarantee both the mother and infant are doing well, dealing with the psychological well-being of moms needs to take a gander at their encounters, the medical services framework, and the community they live in.
References
Ahsan, A., Nadeem, A., Habib, A., Basaria, A. A. A., Tariq, R., & Raufi, N. (2023). Post-traumatic stress disorder following childbirth: a neglected cause. Frontiers in Global Women’s Health, 4.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10733854/
Bisson, J. I., Wright, L. A., Jones, K. A., Lewis, C., Phelps, A. J., Sijbrandij, M., … & Roberts, N. P. (2021). Preventing the onset of post-traumatic stress disorder. Clinical psychology review, 86, 102004.https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272735821000477
Cheng, K. K., Xue, W. Q., Xu, D., Jin, X., & Gong, W. J. (2020). Uptake of referrals for women with positive perinatal depression screening results and the effectiveness of interventions to increase uptake: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences, 29, e143.https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/epidemiology-and-psychiatric-sciences/article/uptake-of-referrals-for-women-with-positive-perinatal-depression-screening-results-and-the-effectiveness-of-interventions-to-increase-uptake-a-systematic-review-and-metaanalysis/AED37A63CAA2FAECFD3C154E1DFFA872
Dutta, G. K., Sarker, B. K., Ahmed, H. U., Bhattacharyya, D. S., Rahman, M. M., Majumder, R., & Biswas, T. K. (2022). Mental healthcare-seeking behavior during the perinatal period among women in rural Bangladesh. BMC Health Services Research, 22(1), 310.https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12913-022-07678-z
Ertan, D., Hingray, C., Burlacu, E., Sterlé, A., & El-Hage, W. (2021). Post-traumatic stress disorder following childbirth. BMC Psychiatry, 21, 1-9.https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12888-021-03158-6
Finlayson, K., Crossland, N., Bonet, M., & Downe, S. (2020). What matters to women in the postnatal period: A meta-synthesis of qualitative studies. PloS one, 15(4), e0231415.https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0231415
Long, H. A., French, D. P., & Brooks, J. M. (2020). Optimizing the value of the critical appraisal skills program (CASP) tool for quality appraisal in qualitative evidence synthesis. Research Methods in Medicine & Health Sciences, 1(1), 31-42.https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/2632084320947559
Modak, A., Ronghe, V., Gomase, K. P., Mahakalkar, M. G., Taksande, V., & Dukare, K. P. (2023). A Comprehensive Review of Motherhood and Mental Health: Postpartum Mood Disorders in Focus. Cureus, 15(9).https://assets.cureus.com/uploads/review_article/pdf/187209/20231029-5142-zk4slj.pdf
Taheri, S., Tavousi, M., Momenimovahed, Z., Direkvand-Moghadam, A., Rezaei, N., Sharifi, N., & Taghizadeh, Z. (2021). Explaining the concept of maternal health information verification and assessment during pregnancy: a qualitative study. BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 21, 1-11.https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12884-021-03715-7
Tato Fernandes, F., de Almeida, A. B., Fernandes, M., Correia, R., Magalhães, R., Buchner, G., … & Freitas, P. (2023). Perinatal depression and mental health uptake referral rate in an obstetric service. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 10987.https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-33832-6
Xue, W., Cheng, K. K., Liu, L., Li, Q., Jin, X., Yi, J., & Gong, W. (2023). Barriers and facilitators for referring women with positive perinatal depression screening results in China: a qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 23(1), 230.https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12884-023-05532-6
Zaman, N., Mujahid, K., Ahmed, F., Mahmud, S., Naeem, H., Riaz, U., … & Cox, B. (2022). What are the barriers and facilitators to seeking help for mental health in NHS doctors: a systematic review and qualitative study. BMC psychiatry, 22(1), 595.https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12888-022-04202-9
write