Alister McGrath’s Christianity’s Dangerous Idea is one of the bold and audacious critiques of the protestant reformation released in recent years. The book’s central idea analyzes the effects of human interpretation of the Bible and how they have been doing so from the perspective of protestant reformation throughout history. These interpretations have locked the church into a series of smaller debates that seem to lead to no resolution, even though the Bible has instigated increased awareness and expansion of the church. This paper will summarize the book and critique its strengths and weaknesses from a Christian perspective. While McGrath offers a skillful analysis of the historical evolution of Protestantism and the use of science and art to review the sociological perfective of reformed movements, the author’s analysis still lacks historical groundwork of the real issues of the church and over relies on the Anglo-American interpretation of Protestantism.
Book’s Summary
The book is set into three major sections: origination, consolidation, and transformation of Protestantism. Origination traces the history of the protestant movement using references from French, Swiss, English, and German reformers. This history is also linked to contributions made by Martin Luther King and John Calvin. According to McGrath (2007), Martin Luther was not the first individual to bring the first reform as it started in Germany. The author denotes Martin Luther King’s movement as “an accidental revolution .”The sections after that offer a detailed review of the role of Protestantism in the twentieth century. McGrath assesses how the world adopted Pentecostalism and how these can impact the future of Christianity. The transformation occurred as a result of people experiencing dilemmas due to the high rate of corruption that was experienced within the church. McGrath (2007) states that “Power tends to corrupt, as Lord Acton remarked.” It was challenging for people to follow everything deemed religious under the pope’s authority, so they sought the correct interpretation of the Bible. The book’s final part reviews the basic roles and ideas of Protestantism and how it has shaped both Western culture and Europe.
The Book’s Strengths
One notable strength of the book is how McGrath has explained the history of Protestantism. It is learned why certain aspects of religion have always been diverse, with dissimilar groups reading and interpreting the Bible differently. The author brings forth the idea that Protestantism is made up of many different groups who all started as a result of trying to read and understand the Bible and theology without the influence and threats from catholic powers (McGrath, 2007). Since the Bible was given to ordinary people, the associated risks was that they changed its interpretation to fit different situations and needs. They changed it to reach different cultures and newer generations.
Another strength is how the author has encapsulated the sociological perspective of religion using reformation movements and how they addressed certain aspects of the culture. McGrath has used art and science correlating with Protestantism to elaborate on various ecclesiological and theological characteristics. For instance, the final chapters of the book present that the Darwinian identity is what is truly present within Protestantism. This means that Protestantism is founded on the ability to mutate and adapt to the surrounding situations and times, denoting it as “Darwinian Restlessness” (McGrath, 2007). There is no fixed dogma or purpose, and Protestantism is evolving. Initially, it was unified by the need to counter the threats posed by Catholic rule, although it has changed over time. Currently, there has been a shift towards forging an identity against radical Islam and secularism.
The Book’s Weaknesses
A clear weakness of McGrath’s book analysis of Protestantism is its emphasis on the historical and theological perspective of the church without delving deeper into its real issues. Much of the emphasis is on centuries of protestant existence and not personal or historical groundwork of the church. Protestantism’s major role was meant to do good for the community as a whole, an area McGrath underemphasized. Instead, the author bases his critics on how much Protestantism has become too personal and too obsessed with their own beliefs (McGrath, 2007). For instance, the author looks at priesthood from the perspective of what one believes in instead of acknowledging that priesthood is meant to be directed at the people and its preaches about the message of God. Therefore, the “dangerous idea” of having an individualistic interpretation of the Bible is not the only challenge. Still, the main question is whether the doctrine has fulfilled its purpose to reach people and improve their lives through Christianity.
Another area for improvement is how the book has disappointedly followed an Anglo-American perspective in its analysis. Even though McGrath touched on the universality of the protestant faith and how its existence has led to the division and conflicts among those holding it, it still leaves out how other regions feel and interpret it. Other parts of the world, like Latin America, Africa, and the South, also adopted Protestantism at high rates. Still, all seem to prefer a more conservative and traditionalist view of Christianity than Europe and America (Gladwin, 2020). However, it could be argued that it supports McGrath’s thesis that the unified mores in the global south are directly opposed to those of American Anglicans, leading to a tension that will never be settled.
Overall, McGrath’s book has given an excellent examination of Protestantism’s evolution and historical evolution and has used art and science to culminate the arguments further. However, his analysis has some startling and unsettling implications. For instance, it lacks the personal and historical groundwork that delves into the real issues of the church and majorly follows the Anglo-American perspective in its analysis. In the academic setting, the book demonstrates the magnitude and power of humans and what occurs when truth is lacking. Power can corrupt the minds of people if left unchecked; however, through the reformation, Protestantism received that check and brought a balance that reconciled people back to God.
References
Gladwin, R. R. (2020). Streams of Latin American Protestant Theology. Brill Research Perspectives in Theological Traditions, 1(2), 1-116. https://brill.com/view/journals/rptt/1/2/article-p1_1.xml
Mcgrath, A. E. (2007). Christianity’s dangerous idea: The Protestant revolution–a history from the sixteenth century to the twenty-first. Harperone.
write