Eteocles
Eteocles is one of the least-known characters in Greek mythology, yet he plays a central role, and his significance should not be overshadowed by other more prominent figures, such as Oedipus or Antigone, who belong to the Theban Cycle. Nevertheless, Eteocles participates in the tragic events of Thebes; they occur primarily in the play “Seven Against Thebes,” which is written by Aeschylus. The following interpretive paper intends to focus on the character of Eteocles and his motivational underlying actions, as well as their wider implications in relation to the whole play tryptic along with Greek tragic tradition.
Eteocles was the son of the union between Oedipus and Jocasta, which was doomed to end in incest with both father-mother prohibition and a curse over patricide offspring among his family members. Oedipus’s unconscious sins, the shadowy shape of which hangs heavily over Eteocles. The darkness that opens the House of Oedipus serves as a haunted backdrop for Eteocles’ own suffering and decisions, placing his narrative under direct lines with an unbroken chain in which everyone within the family continues to be trapped between two claims—for life or death.
The play “Seven Against Thebes” puts Eteocles smack in the middle of battle, which means if he drops dead or loses this fight, everything that is set to take place after meets a sudden death as well. As a consequence, the curse dictates that Antigone’s brothers, Polynices and Eteocles, fight for the throne, with neither coming out of it alive, which is unexpectedly triggered. According to the agreement reached between the brothers, they take turns leading as rulers, with one brother rising to the throne for a whole year. On the other hand, when Eteocles refuses to give up power to Polynices, events begin with a propensity for tragic fights.
Act 1, Scene 9 of the play, is one of its most significant moments because Eteocles’ defiance of a given agreement with Polynices creates a turning point for both characters and the entire storyline. His decision to not give up the royal crown, in turn, becomes a setting fire and an incendiary of the main battle that is spawned over as the other seven men, titled Seven Against Thebes, eager to liberate their homeland, advance forward. Based on his knowledge of the commencement of war, Eteocles takes his war armaments and fights alone to defend and shield his city.
The civic responsibility versus personal ambition contradiction is the most convincing explanation of Eteocle’s actions. Although Eteocles understands what his decision encompasses, he is more dedicated and committed to Thebes than his own family ties. It portrays Eteocles as a loyal and devoted leader torn between civic obligation, family loyalty, and creating dimension for his personality. It is the conflicts and parallels between the welfare of the public and individual wants that face the most tragic characters in the Greek tragedy.
Lastly, Eteocles’ willpower to defend Thebes is seen in his dialogues, where he opposes and acknowledges their enemies. Under the impact of misfortune, Eteocles holds his head high and rules out signs of demonstrating his own pride, mirrored by virtue in one’s willpower. This iron determination, despite what it meant for him, is positive, although, in a way, it also proves to be his downfall. With regards to the Greek disaster, Eteocles is a character with a tragic flaw who reflects himself as an embodiment similar to “hamartia,” whose acts are technically coming from his side.
Innovatively, Eteocles’ hamartia is his overweening pride and blind trust in the righteousness of himself. His unwillingness to negotiate or give away the kingdom shows his respect for Thebans, as well as a complete lack of humility that leads him to believe he could not simply accept another position. The tragic irony is the realization that it was Eteocle’s defense of his city to preserve it by all means, which led him and the already dead Thebes into ruins.
The influence between personal will and cosmic destiny is a common idea in Greek tragedy, and Eteocles’s development becomes an emblematic representation of this interplay. Although he performs his agency by protecting Thebes from invaders, the certainty of such a pronouncement of misfortune leads to a deadly fate about achievements involving even relations under a cursed prophecy.
Finally, for the cycle of Theban, Eteocles passed through a tough time but transformed into a terrifying personality. Attempting to sacrifice his children, he fails to accomplish the one eternal sacrifice, and thanks to the Greek tragedy, he is set free. But he is not worried about the result of his conduct; thus, he depicts humans’ evil character. Iolaius’ constant fight for the people of the city against their foe is the fight for personal emotions against the public duty or face of cowardice. It starts with Heracles in the position of a servant who defies all the odds and then is stronger than himself. Eteocles turns into a character whose defining feature is pride. His defiance predicts, however, that egotism and arrogance hold the dangers and perils. His story is a type of fable exposing an image comparable to “Achilles heel” in mythological Greek. Owing to the deity’s power to control his time capsule and death, he becomes immortal through the myth by saying goodbye to his bereavement.
References
Torrance, I. (2023). Seven against Thebes. A Companion to Aeschylus, 88-98. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119072348.ch7
write