In his analysis published on the Amnesty International website, Elias Rodriguez provides a comprehensive study that provides a nuanced perspective on the urgency of gun violence as a global problem (Rodrigues). He further shows its profound impact on human rights. He posits that there are over 600 lives lost every day due to gun violence globally. A significant portion of these victims are from marginalized communities. Looking at these numbers from a global perspective, they might appear small. However, these numbers represent shuttered lives, broken families, lost incomes for needy dependents, and communities left in fear and confusion.
In his analysis, Rodrigues outlines the advanced effects of the presence of guns in society, which go beyond the direct problem of injuries and deaths. He posits that the company of firearms in community has been a significant contributor to the inaccessibility of education and healthcare facilities. He argues that the presence of weapons in society encourages violence, thus making social areas like schools and hospitals generally more inaccessible in the gun-infested regions as compared to areas where firearms are more restricted (Rodrigues). As a result, Rodrigues suggests that the presence of guns in society has become a significant contributor to the erosion of fundamental human rights and freedoms. His analysis points toward a situation where guns could potentially become a source of the decline of more significant and more critical sociopolitical phenomena like democracy.
Parents have shared values of scrutiny, opportunity, and concern for the wellbeing wellbeing of children. The pressing need to address the issue of gun violence has become more evident now than ever. Parents, as the progenitors of society, are responsible for engaging and actively contributing to any discussion that touches or is associated with the right to life. Failure to do so surmounts the absconding from their fundamental duty – to create and nurture lives for the betterment of society (Rodrigues). The right to life is also the cornerstone of all fundamental human rights. For an individual to enjoy any rights, first, they must be alive. Dismissing the issue of gun violence is comparable to approving a communal genocide, which will end up consuming us, too. While the suburban areas might feel insulted by this discussion, there is urgency in the issue of gun violence, pressing for the need for stricter and responsible firearm regulations.
Now that we have established that there is indeed urgency in the matter of gun violence, it is critical to explore the current approaches in place. Suburban parents have been, for a long time, involved in discussions surrounding gun control reforms. However, in most cases, they have found themselves at a crossroads of complexities of the debate. Ramesh Ponnuru provides a thought-provoking opinion piece, “Why gun control advocates keep failing.” In this opinion, he offers insights into the various challenges those advocating for stricter gun regulations face. His analysis provides insights into why these approaches have failed to achieve their purpose, thus elucidating how they could be improved for better outcomes.
At the forefront of his analysis, Ponnuru raises valid concerns regarding the effectiveness of the current approaches to gun control, asserting that the advocates over the past decade. The community must acknowledge these failures if any strides are to be made moving forward. One common challenge that Ponnuru points out is the need for more urgency among those advocating for gun control policies (Ponnuru). This skepticism is rooted in the belief that proposed regulations might have a negligible effect. Such ideas have been at the core of numerous advocacy movements. As a result, these movements have failed to gain traction and momentum, thus failing to achieve their objectives. This skepticism also arises from the fact that current interventions have not been very effective in solving gun violence (Ponnuru). To bridge this gap, we must initiate a shift in the narrative that acknowledges the issue’s complexities while proposing evidence-based solutions. This can be achieved through openly engaging with the skeptics and thus having a more informed dialogue. We need to consider alternative approaches that maintain the urgency of the challenge, resonate with the values of individual freedoms, and align with the urgent need to create a safe environment for families to thrive without fear.
Some have resented compelling arguments against gun control. It is critical to examine their ideas, thus enabling the navigation of the concerns raised by those against the need for stricter gun control measures. One of the arguments posed is that gun control may not deter criminals who obtain their guns through illegal means (Nra-Ila). Those who argue in favor of individual freedom advancement usually put forward this perspective. However, this argument does not hold, considering that crime is not the only source of gun violence in suburban areas. Gun violence arises from a plethora of factors, including domestic conflict and mental conditions. Furthermore, the fact that criminals acquire guns through illegal means does point to the presence of availability of guns in society. Once access becomes limited, even illegal gun markets will suffer a shortage due to stricter gun control.
The solution to the current gun violence menace lies in evidence-based solutions. In an evidence-based solution, we only need to focus on facts and statistics, training the subject at hand and providing the most likely successful intervention. There has been numerous school shooting in the United States every year. Most of these school shootings have been conducted using registered and legally held firearms. These shootings have affected children whom parents have sought to nurture and make them into positive contributors to society. These shootings have been fueled by unrestricted access to firearms. The incident in Uvalde, Texas, which resulted in the death of 19 elementary school children and two teachers, was conducted using an AR-15-style rifle that was duly registered and licensed (Amnesty International). This heart-wrenching event serves as a stark reminder of the devastating consequences of unrestricted access to firearms. The authors assert that a shift in focus from arming teachers to implementing stricter regulations is imperative. Parents would not want to see such unfortunate events continue, especially in suburban areas.
As suburban parents invest in the safety of their families, they need support from the government and policymakers to ensure that the availability of guns is limited. People’s right to bear arms cannot supersede the right to life. It has become evident that allowing people to bear arms has come at a significant cost to human life. Failing to institute stricter gun controls has consistently led to the demise of many, and children have been a primary target. The relentless targeting of children has primarily arisen from the fact that they are defenseless. Reducing access to guns will not end gun violence. However, it will reduce it significantly and save many lives, including our children. While the proposal to increase restrictions on gun access could face resistance, we need to put to a scale the need to protect the lives of our children against the perceived freedom to bear arms. We would all agree that children’s lives are more important and, therefore, demand stricter gun control.
Works Cited
Editors, The. “The Science Is Clear: Gun Control Saves Lives.” Scientific American, 26 May 2023, www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-science-is-clear-gun-control-saves-lives1/.
Nra-Ila, and National Rifle Association. “Ila: Why Gun Control Doesn’t Work.” NRA, www.nraila.org/why-gun-control-doesn-t-work/. Accessed 13 Nov. 2023.
Ponnuru, Ramesh. “Opinion | Why Gun Control Advocates Keep Failing.” The Washington Post, WP Company, 23 Apr. 2023, www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2023/04/22/gun-control-advocates-failing/.
“We Need to Prioritise People over Guns.” Amnesty International, 29 Aug. 2023, www.amnesty.org/en/what-we-do/arms-control/gun-violence/.
write