With the prevailing health issues, Evidence-based practice is the way to go in healthcare organizations. Continuous research is also appropriate as a quality improvement measure. Therefore, nursing research is very critical to accommodate these changes. In the research process, the credibility and relevancy of evidence and sources must be considered tentatively; the report below will describe the diagnosis of CKD and provide criteria to analyze the credibility and relevance of sources. Further, the information will also provide an analysis of the authorities and identify the EBP model to address the chosen diagnosis.
Diagnosis of chronic kidney disease
Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD), which causes a decline in kidney functions over time, needs a complex and well-founded approach for reasonable control. Diagnosis is conducted through an assessment of health history, Physical examination, and specific lab tests (Arnold-Chamney et al., 2019). Vital assessment signs are long-lasting urine protein and a lower kidney filter rate. The necessary interventions involve dietary changes focusing on decreased consumption of salt, phosphorus, and potassium. In addition, maintaining blood pressure is also essential since it reduces the severity of the condition. When kidney disease gets severe, hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis is necessary. Educating patients on how to manage medicines correctly, making them follow instructions, and giving details about changes in their lifestyle is essential, as noted by Arnold-Chamney et al.,(2019).
Analysis of credibility and relevance of resources
The scope of the source content covers management guidelines of chronic kidney disease addressing diagnosis, treatment, and care, thus becoming relevant to managing CKD. Above all, the source is credible since it contains a review of pertinent other authorities relating to CDK. The article from the National Kidney Foundation (NKF), (2023) is a reliable and credible source for learning about chronic kidney disease (CKD). Its importance is shown by its current time, being found in December 2023. This makes the information new and shows all recent things about kidney problems (CKD). The source is more credible because it is connected to the National Kidney Foundation, a famous group that cares for kidney health. Being part of a big, respected group makes people trust that the facts are reliable. The article is fair for everyone since it uses simple terms which are easy to read and understand. The support of the National Kidney Foundation and no biases in what’s written makes this source trustworthy. The National Kidney Foundation’s website hosting the article makes it more credible. This is because health groups are dedicated to sharing correct and well-researched details. The report is a helpful and reasonable guide for research and learning basic information about CKD.
The source by Satyanarayana et al., (2022), is a reliable and helpful site to learn about Chronic Kidney Disease. This source is important because it can be found on PubMed, a well-known place for sharing studies. This shows that it follows the rules set by experts in medical research. The research was done in 2022 and thus has current information containing EPB about kidney disease (CKD). The range of the data is broad, including lots about kidney disease making it a good tool for research and a deep understanding of CKD. The link to the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) and PubMed site makes this source more relevant and credible. The authors of the head are expert professionals in kidney study, which makes what they wrote suitable and robust for knowledge reasons.
Evidence-Based Practice model
One widely recognized EBP model is the “Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Model.” This model consists of a three-step process involving Practice Questions, Evidence, and Translation. In the first step, caregivers find a relevant medical question to care for patients. The second step consists of looking for top-notch Evidence to answer that question while considering the reliability and usefulness of sources. The third step is turning the evidence into practice, integrating patient care plans, and monitoring patient outcomes. The reason for integrating reliable Evidence into the EBP model for CKD is to make sure that choices are made with the most relevant information (Alvin, 2021). CKD is a complicated and changing issue. Proven methods are needed to give good, secure care focused on the patient’s needs. Caregivers can make healthcare better by using reliable evidence. This helps patients do well and keep up with new CKD ideas in research and care management.
For chronic kidney disease, JHNEBP stages can be used to Incorporate the practice of CKD. During the first stage, a multidisciplinary team can create a question such as the PICOT framework with the mindset of solving the problem (Alvin, 2021). In the second stage of JHNEBP involving evidence, a team can conduct research, appraise, and evaluate the relevancy and credibility of the sources related to the management of CKD. Lastly, the transition phase may involve modifying an action plan by cooperating EBP plans, emphasizing the key interventions such as dietary modifications, medication adherence, and control of BP. Notably, this plan based on proof is carried out and kept checking how well it works in caring for CKD. The focus on personal use in this model makes sure that nurses who give direct care have the tools to put proven methods into practice when they work with people having kidney disease as noted by Alvin, (2021). Finally, the JHNEBP model gives a complete plan for ongoing feedback and betterment. It also helps to share proven improvements in CKD care practices which can lead to more patient successes.
Conclusion
These chosen sources give a strong base for knowing and discovering Chronic Kidney Disease. Using their importance and trustworthiness ensures that health workers, researchers, and people can get accurate information about the diagnosis from reliable sources which assist in decision-making, diagnosis, and management.
References
Center, a F. M. (2023). Comprehensive Review of Current Management Guidelines of… : Medicine. LWW. https://journals.lww.com/md-journal/fulltext/2023/06090/comprehensive_review_of_current_management.13.aspx
Satyanarayana R. Vaidya; Narothama R. Aeddula. (2022). Chronic kidney disease – statpearls – NCBI bookshelf. PubMed. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK535404/
Arnold-Chamney, M., Podham, M., & Anderson, J. (2019). Chronic kidney disease. Chronic care nursing: A framework for practice, 275-294.
Alvin, N. C. (2021). Improving Adherence to Hemodialysis Treatment among Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD)–A Recommendation for Better Practice (Doctoral dissertation, Regis College).
NKF. (2023, December 19). Facts about chronic kidney disease. National Kidney Foundation. https://www.kidney.org/atoz/content/about-chronic-kidney-disease
write