Introduction
Enhancing the criminal justice system’s comprehension of the intricate dynamics between the work performance of police officers and their dispositions would be advantageous. The information is crucial for fostering public confidence, reducing fraudulent activities, and enhancing law enforcement efficiency. Violence, extreme tension, and trauma are some of the complications that the police encounter in particular (Burke & Oberman, 2019)—assessing an officer’s character in terms of their aptitude for stress management, public interaction, and sound decision-making while under duress is essential. An awareness of the influence of personality traits on law enforcement facilitates the creation of educational programs and treatment strategies that assist officers in improving their skills while minimizing their flaws, thereby bolstering the credibility and safety of the police. Various research depicts a correlation between personality traits and favorable policy outcomes. Ideally, Law enforcement personnel require problem-solving, empathy, and resilience. These skills are correlated with conscientiousness and emotional stability.
In contrast, excessive force, a lack of professionalism, and dissatisfaction at work are associated with neuroticism and extraversion. A thorough investigation strategy is recommended to examine this relationship. This involves a thorough literature study that includes theoretical frameworks, empirical studies, and meta-analyses. Practical insights into how personality traits influence policing can be gained through interviews with police personnel, supervisors, and experts in personality psychology. This multimodal research approach investigates the relationship between police officer behavior, performance, and public interactions and personality. The research of this analysis should identify personality factors linked to police inefficiency and efficiency. By concentrating on officer skills and lowering concerns, the findings may help police departments improve hiring, training, and evaluation. The research aims to provide law enforcement professionals with helpful information by contrasting positive attributes like empathy and effective problem-solving with destructive features like excessive force use and unprofessional conduct. By comprehending police misbehavior and public opinion.
Research question: How can police departments utilize personality assessments to enhance officer selection, training, and performance management?
The relevance of this study subject stems from my internship, which looked at the influence of police officers’ personalities on their actions (Burke & Oberman, 2019). This research intends to clarify how personality tests impact police recruitment and development. Law enforcement organizations constantly seek methods to enhance officer performance and public trust. Researchers are looking into how well personality tests predict future police officers. In order to identify qualified applicants with desired qualities, the research will also look at the most effective ways to use personality testing in police employment practices. The project will also examine how evaluating police officers’ personalities could help them better understand their strengths and shortcomings during individualized training. The project will also look at how personality tests might be used to evaluate work, offer helpful feedback, and direct career advancement. In order to develop a more prosperous and balanced police force, the research tackles these sub-questions in order to offer a more methodical and evidence-based police personality evaluation procedure.
Literature review
In a research by pencer, et al. (2016) conducted a comprehensive examination of how police personnel’s disposition impacts their job performance and disrupts their mental state. In their scholarly article titled “To what extent does the personality of police officers influence their well-being and performance? An article titled “A Meta-Analysis” was published in a police journal. By integrating all of the components, they obtained a more comprehensive understanding of the interconnections among them. Self-control, accountability, and carrying out one’s word assisted officers in performing and feeling better.
Additionally, liking individuals and not constantly worrying improved their work performance and increased their job satisfaction. Being social did not affect their performance, but it did increase their enjoyment, suggesting that it may have helped to calm them down or made them happier to be there. Therefore, who they are on the inside significantly impacts how police officers perform their duties and feel about it. The meta-analysis enhances the personality-law enforcement debate (Joshua et al.2007). The highlighted elements can be targeted to improve police career promotion, training, and recruiting. Additionally, examining officers’ mental health, work satisfaction, and performance shows police complexity and the importance of non-task performance factors. The meta-analysis establishes the framework for evidence-based initiatives to improve police officer productivity and health in response to law enforcement’s need for more comprehensive approaches.
published their research in Criminal Justice and Behaviour on the difficult use-of-force decisions made by police officers. The analysis unveiled a multifaceted correlation, wherein neuroticism influenced force decisions most significantly. More frequently, the force was applied by neurotic police personnel. Individuals who exhibited higher levels of neuroticism were more likely to use excessive physical force in the workplace. The findings revealed an inverse correlation between the application of force and emotional stability, a trait associated with low levels of neuroticism. This indicates that emotionally stable officers employed less force and further illustrates the extent to which personality traits impact policing conduct. Conscientiousness was found to impact police force utilization, according to the study. The relationship between consciousness and the use of force was not statistically significant, in contrast to neuroticism. This implies that the conscientiousness personality trait might not substantially influence law enforcement’s use of force. The comprehensive results of the study elucidate the intricacies of decision-making and the diversity of personalities within law enforcement. Policing training programs that aim to optimize responses while minimizing the need for field force could be influenced by this comprehension.
In another research, Ruggs et al. (2023) investigate the intricate correlation between personality traits and racial justice inequity in police use of force evaluations in their Journal of Criminal Justice article. The data illustrates how specific personality traits increase the likelihood that police officers will employ force, especially when interacting with minorities. Research indicates that agreeableness and neuroticism significantly influence ethnic differences in the use of force (Joshua et al.2007). There is a significant correlation between racial disparities in the use of force and neuroticism, according to the study. Police were more likely to use force against Black suspects than White suspects with higher levels of neuroticism. This discovery suggests the potential correlation between ethnic emotional stability and how law enforcement interacts with different populations.
Additionally, this study provided evidence of the influence of agreeableness on police use-of-force actions (pencer, et al.2016). Black offenders were more likely to be subjected to physical force by police officers with lower agreeableness scores in comparison to their White counterparts. The interplay between agreeableness and racial disparities in applying force obscures our comprehension of how personality traits may contribute to inequitable regulation. The current research highlights the importance of incorporating personality characteristics into discussing racial inequalities in law enforcement. This may benefit political figures, educational initiatives, and programmers designed to confront and correct systemic shortcomings within the police force.
The primary objective of the current investigation was to assess the potential predictive value of personality assessments concerning police officers’ job satisfaction, performance, and propensity for attrition. The meta-analysis unveiled a positive correlation between personality assessments and these critical variables, substantiating their utility in police recruitment. The study demonstrated the diverse advantages of personality assessments by demonstrating their ability to predict police officer job performance, job satisfaction, and attrition rate. This extensive examination of personality assessments is valuable to the ongoing dialogue regarding improving the police recruitment process (Piquero et al., 2018). The research underscored the importance of tailoring personality assessments to align with the unique demands of individual employment agencies, notwithstanding their association with numerous outcomes. This astute suggestion underscores the necessity for individualized personality assessments while recognizing the vast array of duties and obligations within the law enforcement profession (pencer, et al.2016). Using Oswald, Mitchell, and Kinicki’s meta-analysis will aid law enforcement agencies in enhancing their officer selection processes (Cooley, 2020). On account of the predictive validity of personality assessments and the importance of organizational adaptation, the study offers practical recommendations for enhancing the selection and deployment of police officers. Personal qualities that align more closely with the requirements of the employment.
The European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology published a 2021 meta-analysis by Heggestad and Forest that examined the relationship between fatigue and police officer character. After low agreeableness and conscientiousness, neuroticism emerged as the second most significant predictor of fatigue (pencer, et al.2016). The influence of extraversion and openness on fatigue was not observable. Law enforcement agencies possess an extensive understanding of personality characteristics, enabling them to devise individualized interventions and support strategies to averter burnout among police officers.
Conclusion
The establishment of public confidence in law enforcement, the reduction of malfeasance, and the improvement of police effectiveness are all contingent upon a comprehension of personality and conduct. Empirical evidence suggests that police job performance is adversely affected by extraversion and neuroticism, whereas agreeableness, emotional stability, and conscientiousness are positively correlate (Cooley, 2020). Utilizing personality tests to select and train officers with the necessary qualities that require individualized attention to succeed can be advantageous for police departments. It is possible to reduce racial disparities in police misconduct and the use of force through an appreciation of personality traits. meta-analysis, published in the European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, examines the relationship between police officer burnout and personality attributes. Because neuroticism predicts fatigue most accurately, emotional instability and reactivity are detrimental to law enforcement. Agreeableness, interpersonal cooperation, thoroughness, and low conscientiousness all reduce fatigue among law enforcement personnel (pencer, et al.2016). The absence of a significant correlation among openness, extraversion, and exhaustion prompts inquiries regarding the potential benefits of sociability and receptiveness to novel experiences about the holistic welfare of police officers. The comprehensive findings shed light on the most common indications and manifestations of exhaustion among police officers, thereby facilitating the development of more targeted interventions and support networks. By establishing an environment that actively strives to prevent exhaustion and values individual diversity, these findings can assist law enforcement agencies in enhancing the well-being of their officers. This enhances the effectiveness and durability of law enforcement.
References
Ruggs, Enrica N. ; Marshburn, Christopher K. ; Summerville, Karoline M. ; Grenier, Kelcie
Journal of Business and Psychology, 2023, Vol.38 (1), p.25-44
pencer, Katherine B. ; Charbonneau, Amanda K. ; Glaser, Jac Social and personality psychology compass, 2016, Vol.10 (1), p.50-63
Joshua; Park, Bernadette; Judd, Charles M; Wittenbrink, Bernd ; Sadler, Melody S ; Keesee, Tracie; Dovidio, John Journal of personality and social psychology, 2007, Vol.92 (6), p.1006-1023
Cooley, Erin; Hester, Neil; Cipolli, William; Rivera, Laura I.; Abrams, Kaitlin; Pagan, Jeremy Sommers, Samuel R.; Payne, Keith Social psychological & personality science, 2020, Vol.11 (6), p.761-769
Greene, Jack Raymond; Greene, Jack R 2006
write