Introduction
Incisive investment decisions focus on understanding risks and rewards in a global landscape shaped by economic intricacies (Maris, 2022). As the CEO entrusted with choosing between a £100 million investment in Poland and Greece, this analysis explores the distinctive risk profiles of each nation. Despite comparable long-term returns, our decision’s core lies in navigating each country’s unique challenges and economic benefits. Gomułka’s (2021) economic analysis accentuates Poland’s robust GDP growth, averaging 4% annually over the past decade. This highlights Poland’s economic resilience while Greece has emerged from the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis and exhibits a slower yet steady recovery (Krajewski, 2018). This analysis navigates the complexities of political stability, regulatory frameworks, and environmental factors. Critical thinking and economic theories will illuminate the path toward an informed and judicious investment choice.
Economic Overview
Poland’s economic landscape has navigated a convergence path, narrowing the development gap with advanced European economies. From 2013 to 2022, Poland’s GDP rose steadily from USD 499 billion to USD 654 billion, reflecting a consistent annual growth rate (Maris et al., 2022). Diversification is a key strength, with sectors like manufacturing and information technology propelling economic expansion. The GDP per capita climbed from USD 13,137 in 2013 to USD 17,380 in 2022, indicative of improving living standards per neoclassical economic principles emphasizing private enterprise.
Poland’s EU integration contributes significantly to its economic narrative. 2025, the country is forecasted to face a general government deficit of 3.9% of GDP, reflecting ongoing fiscal challenges (Korzeb & Niedziółka, 2020). The application of Keynesian principles is evident as policymakers grapple with inflation (16.6% in 2022) through strategic fiscal and monetary measures. Poland’s economic overview is a story of resilience and convergence, guided by market-oriented reforms and EU collaboration. Gomułka (2021) highlights its economic trajectory, portraying a nation strategically positioned for continued growth amidst global economic dynamics.
Greece ranks the 53rd largest global economy, showcasing a nominal GDP of $242.385 billion. The nation’s economic structure primarily relies on the service sector (contributing 80%) and industry (16%), with agriculture comprising 4% of the total output (Toplišek, 2020). Integral industries include tourism and shipping, bolstering the economy and contributing to Greece’s position as a significant agricultural producer in the European Union.
Greece implemented substantial debt restructuring, reducing the sovereign debt burden from €356 billion to €280 billion in 2012. Following the economic decline, the country achieved modest growth rates, with an 8.4% GDP rebound in 2021 and 5.9% in 2022 after the COVID-19-induced global recession (Zimon & Tarighi, 2021). Exiting the EU’s enhanced surveillance framework in August 2022 marked a pivotal moment, granting Greece greater economic autonomy. The later downturn reflects the challenges of sustaining growth and managing external debt. The impact of austerity measures during the crisis aligns with theories emphasizing the role of fiscal policy in economic recovery. Despite recent economic successes, Greece faces enduring challenges, including high unemployment, bureaucratic inefficiencies, and low global competitiveness. Institutional economics and public choice theories concur on the need for structural reforms and efficient governance.
Regulatory Environment and Currency Risk
Poland has implemented reforms to align with European Union standards, promoting a business-friendly atmosphere. Notable initiatives include simplifying administrative procedures, enhancing legal frameworks, and encouraging foreign investment. According to the World Bank’s Doing Business report, Poland ranked 40th globally in 2021, reflecting its commitment to fostering an efficient and transparent business environment (World Bank, 2021). Vyshnevskyi et al. (2020) Poland’s efforts to maintain a stable regulatory environment, attracting foreign investors and fostering economic growth. The correlation between regulatory reforms and increased foreign direct investment as economic theories emphasize the role of institutions in promoting economic development.
Poland’s currency risks are primarily associated with its national currency, the Polish złoty (PLN). Currency risk arises due to fluctuations in exchange rates, impacting the value of transactions, investments, and debt (Bitzenis, 2020). Poland’s currency has experienced both periods of appreciation and depreciation, influenced by global economic conditions and domestic factors.
Greece has undergone transformative changes aimed at simplifying bureaucratic processes and enhancing legal frameworks have been evident. According to the World Bank’s Doing Business report, Greece improved its business efficiency, ranking from 100th in 2020 to 79th in 2021 (World Bank, 2019). Such advancements suggest a commitment to fostering a more business-friendly environment, which, over time, can stimulate economic activities. The Greek economy contends with currency risk, with the euro (EUR) as its official currency. World Bank (2021) illustrates Greece’s experience with currency challenges, particularly during the European debt crisis. The Mundell-Fleming model navigated the currency risks using fiscal and monetary policies. Greece’s adoption of the euro eliminates individual control over monetary policy, adding complexity to managing economic shocks.
Political Stability and Environmental Structure
Poland has established itself as a politically stable country in recent decades. The transition from communism to democracy in 1989 laid the foundation for political stability. The country’s commitment to the European Union (EU) and NATO has further solidified its political framework. With the Modernization Theory, Poland’s political institutions have evolved, contributing to stability (Rosati & Wiliński, 2019). The peaceful transfer of power through democratic elections reflects the consolidation of democratic norms. Poland’s environmental structure balances economic development with environmental sustainability. The country has implemented policies that shift towards renewable energy sources, and efforts to reduce carbon emissions showcase a commitment to environmental responsibility. The EU’s influence and environmental governance theories have shaped Poland’s environmental policies, promoting conservation and sustainable resource management.
Greece has experienced political challenges, particularly during the economic crisis from 2010 to 2018. In recent years, we have seen efforts to restore stability. The country’s return to economic growth and resolving its debt crisis indicate a gradual restoration of political stability (Fakiolas, 2023). Greece, endowed with diverse ecosystems, faces environmental management complexities. The country faces Challenges, including wildfires and climate change, necessitating a proactive approach.
Investment Comparison
In comparing potential investments, Poland emerges as a robust contender, boasting a resilient economy with consistent GDP growth, diversification across sectors, and a commitment to market-oriented reforms. Greece, emerging from the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis, showcases a slower but steady recovery. The nation has implemented significant debt restructuring and achieved positive GDP growth rates post-COVID-19. Exiting the EU’s enhanced surveillance framework marks a key milestone, granting Greece greater economic autonomy. However, persistent challenges, including high unemployment and bureaucratic inefficiencies, underscore the importance of targeted policies for sustained growth.
Both Poland and Greece have made strides to enhance their business-friendly atmospheres. Poland, ranked 40th globally in the World Bank’s Doing Business report, showcases efforts to simplify administrative procedures and improve legal frameworks, fostering a transparent regulatory environment. With an improved ranking of 79th in 2021, Greece demonstrates a commitment to similar reforms, stimulating economic activities over time (World Bank, 2021). With the Polish złoty, Poland faces fluctuations influenced by global and domestic factors. Greece, utilizing the euro, navigates challenges arising from the Eurozone framework, limiting individual control over monetary policy.
Poland has a history of stability since its transition from communism to democracy in 1989. Commitment to the European Union and NATO further solidifies its political framework. While gradually restoring stability, Greece has faced challenges, particularly during the economic crisis. Poland aligns with environmental theories, emphasizing sustainable development, renewable energy, and carbon emission reduction. Greece, facing environmental challenges like wildfires and climate change, implements conservation strategies influenced by EU directives.
Conclusion
Considering the comprehensive analysis of Poland and Greece, the investment decision for £100 million leans towards Poland. Poland’s robust economic growth, diversification, stable regulatory environment, and commitment to environmental sustainability position it as an attractive investment destination. While Greece exhibits positive economic trends post-crisis, persistent challenges and a slower recovery suggest a higher level of risk. The decision should align with risk tolerance and long-term objectives, recognizing Poland’s resilience and convergence as key factors in making an informed and judicious investment choice.
References
Bitzenis, A. (2020). Sovereign debt crisis in Greece and its relation with foreign direct investment and competitiveness in Greece. Economic growth in the European Union: Analyzing SME and investment policies, pp. 155-166. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-48210-7_11
Dumitrescu, A. L., & Iordache, L. (2015). Poland’s Performance in Building a Sustainable Market Economy. Revista de Economie Mondiala/The Journal of Global Economics, 7(2). https://ideas.repec.org/a/iem/journl/v7y2015i2id2822000009356035.html
Fakiolas, R. (2023). Interest groups: An overview. Political Change in Greece, pp. 174-188. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781003457954-12/in
Gomułka, S. (2021). THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF POLAND AND GREECE: SHORT-TERM POLICY ERRORS VERSUS LONGER-TERM RATIONALITY. EKONOMICZNA, p. 31. https://mysl.lazarski.pl/fileadmin/user_upload/oficyna/Mys__l_EiP_1-21_akcept.pdf#page=31
Korzeb, Z., & Niedziółka, P. (2020). Resistance of commercial banks to the crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic: the case of Poland. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 15(2), 205-234. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=898620
Krajewski, S. (2018). Assessment of Poland’s Economic Policy During the Crisis. Olsztyn Economic Journal, 8(3), 195-210. https://doi.org/10.31648/OEJ.3230
Maris, G. (2022). Introduction: Eurozone and the Greek economic crisis in 2020: current challenges and prospects. European Politics and Society, 23(4), 443–446. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/23745118.2021.1895551
Maris, G., Sklias, P., & Maravegias, N. (2022). The political economy of the Greek economic crisis in 2020. European Politics and Society, 23(4), 447-467. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/23745118.2021.1895552
Napiórkowski, T. M. Foreign Direct Investment in Poland and Polish Investment Abroad. Focus on Entrepreneurship and Competitive Advantages, 77. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Arkadiusz-Kowalski-3/publication/374931977
Rosati, D., & Wiliński, W. (2019). Outward foreign direct investments from Poland. In Facilitating Transition by Internationalization (pp. 175-204). https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315255583-10/outward-foreign-direct-investments-poland-dariusz-rosati-witold-wili%C5%84ski
Skordoulis, M., Ntanos, S., & Arabatzis, G. (2020). Socioeconomic evaluation of green energy investments: Analyzing citizens’ willingness to invest in photovoltaics in Greece. International Journal of Energy Sector Management, 14(5), 871-890. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJESM-12-2019-0015/full/html
Toplišek, A. (2020). The political economy of populist rule in post-crisis Europe: Hungary and Poland. New Political Economy, 25(3), 388–403. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13563467.2019.1598960
Vyshnevskyi, O., Stashkevych, I., Shubna, O., & Barkova, S. (2020). Economic growth in the conditions of digitalization in the EU countries. Studies of Applied Economics, 38(4). https://ojs.ual.es/ojs/index.php/eea/article/view/4041
World Bank. (2021). Return on Investment of Public Support to SMEs and Innovation in Poland. World Bank. https://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/abs/10.1596/33550
Zimon, G., & Tarighi, H. (2021). Effects of the COVID-19 global crisis on the working capital management policy: Evidence from Poland. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(4), 169. https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/14/4/169
write