Tracing its historical growth, this in-depth look at e-learning’s function and influence in modern Education highlights its transition into a potent force in the 21st century. The research dives into three main areas: E-learning Frameworks, Learning Outcomes, and the Integration of Instructional Strategies with Technologies. The many facets of e-learning are made apparent by the fact that it is depicted not only as a technological breakthrough but as an interdisciplinary area that blends pedagogy with cutting-edge technology. E-learning frameworks are discussed, and the ADDIE, SAM, and Agile models are examined for their relevance regarding their features, strengths, limits, and practical applications. The discussion then moves to Learning Outcomes, emphasizing how crucial they are for guiding decisions about what to teach and how to teach it. According to the findings, having well-defined goals for the educational process increases students’ interest, motivation, and success. Learning management systems, virtual reality, and AI-powered personalized learning platforms are just some of the technological tools that can be explored as part of an investigation into integrating instructional strategies with technologies. The findings, as a whole, highlight the promise of virtual reality (V.R.) to promote problem-based learning and provide examples of institutions that have successfully integrated technological tools and tactics to boost student engagement and outcomes. The study’s key suggestions centre on providing teachers with ongoing training and support to ensure they have the skills necessary to make the most of developing technology. The need to conduct requirements assessments to ensure that acquired technologies align with long-term organizational goals is stressed in the context of strategic technology tool procurement. To ensure the continued efficiency of technological resources, it is advised that a post-integration feedback structure be put in place.
Introduction
The origins of e-learning may be traced back to mid-century experiments in computer-based Education, and its development has unfolded against a historical backdrop distinguished by technical advances and the digital revolution. The broad availability of the internet, advanced learning management systems, and the incorporation of multimedia components into educational platforms have all contributed to e-learning’s meteoric rise in the 21st century. E-learning has evolved from its previous status as a complement to conventional schooling to become a significant and revolutionary force in its own right today. To succeed in this digital environment, it is crucial to have a firm grasp on the fundamentals of widely used e-learning frameworks like ADDIE, SAM, and Agile. This task delves into the current educational debate, particularly emphasizing e-learning outcomes, pedagogical approaches, and tools. It explores their function in curriculum design, interaction with teaching practices, and influence on assessment results. Strategies and teaching technologies, such as problem-based learning, flipped classrooms, blended learning, and virtual reality (V.R.) technology, are also discussed. The assignment’s final section includes recommendations for professional development programs and the potential of e-learning to revolutionize Education.
Main Body
E-learning Frameworks
1.1 Definition and Significance of E-learning:
E-learning is more than a technological innovation; it is at the front of today’s educational landscape. Because of its importance, it might be considered a multidisciplinary effort (Ashwin and Guddeti, 2020). Constructivism, experiential learning, and other pedagogical philosophies have met state-of-the-art technological tools in e-learning, transcending simple digitalization. The online environment is transformed into a living, breathing area that may be adjusted to accommodate the most effective forms of instruction. Furthermore, e-learning uses design principles, emphasising graphic design, animation, and user-centric design to provide visually appealing and engaging information. Recognizing the importance of social connections in the learning process, it combines sociological viewpoints by integrating elements like discussion forums and peer reviews (Badrul et al., 2021). Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development is a prime example of how cognitive psychology and technology may work together, and adaptive learning via e-learning technologies demonstrates this integration. The scalability and economic feasibility of the e-learning framework are consistent with the concepts of economic efficiency. In addition, e-learning places a premium on cultural and linguistic inclusion, making it imperative that information be made culturally neutral or localized to overcome linguistic hurdles and allow for widespread worldwide distribution. To sum up, e-learning is developing into a multifaceted field that draws from and influences many other areas of study.
The online classroom has replaced the traditional classroom, and the options available to students have increased dramatically. Traditional classrooms, constrained by physical restrictions, have been redesigned through digital platforms, enabling ‘anytime, anywhere’ learning and transcending boundaries and time zones. This transition is not merely aspirational but a daily reality for many, breaking down geographical borders. E-learning systems set themselves apart by allowing users to pursue individualized learning paths based on their unique skills, limitations, preferences, and pace. This contrasts the cookie-cutter approach taken by many conventional forms of Education. Multimedia elements such as films, animations, simulations, and interactive quizzes are used in e-learning to increase interest and appeal to a wide range of learners (Regmi and Jones, 2020). The revolutionary effects extend to encouraging lifelong learning, challenging the status quo of age-based educational systems (Jarvis, 2004). Through online discussion boards and forums, e-learning platforms encourage collaborative learning by bringing together students from various cultural and socioeconomic backgrounds. One significant accomplishment has been the democratization of Education, which has increased access to top-notch Education for students of all socioeconomic backgrounds and locations. Subtitles, variable playback rates, and screen readers can help make content more accessible to students with varying learning styles. E-learning also allows people to integrate their Education into their busy schedules because of its adaptability (Yunusa and Umar, 2020).
1.2 Major Components of Prevalent E-learning Frameworks:
The e-learning landscape is backed by basic frameworks that give distinct ways to develop, execute, and assess learning experiences. The ADDIE model, which has its roots in the 1970s, is one such framework, and it provides a solid basis for developing engaging educational materials. Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation are the sequential steps of ADDIE (Chen, 2021). The Successive Approximation Model (SAM) is an alternative to ADDIE that allows for additional flexibility in the face of shifting needs by utilizing iterative cycles of design, development, and assessment. Agile Learning Design is another paradigm that takes cues from agile software development; it prioritizes adaptability, teamwork, and quick prototyping to accommodate learner input and shifts in the knowledge environment (Chen, 2021).
ADDIE guarantees a thorough course development process with clearly delineated phases thanks to its controlled, methodical, and linear evolution. This methodical design and execution approach ensures that no crucial details are missed. However, its proficiency in methodical development is a weakness when adaptability is essential. El-Sabagh (2021) points out that ADDIE’s linear structure might make it difficult to accommodate modifications after the design phase has concluded, forcing designers to go back to the beginning of the process to make necessary tweaks. The iterative, reactive, and cyclical nature of the Successive Approximation Model (SAM) promotes prototyping at all stages of the design and development process. SAM’s strength is its flexibility, which enables constant improvement via feedback. But there is a catch: SAM necessitates deeper cooperation and regular touchpoints due to its emphasis on iteration and reactivity. Ghanem (2020) points out that this requirement for constant participation might be difficult for geographically distributed teams. Agile Learning Design is lauded for its adaptability because of its iterative cycles, collaboration-centric procedures, and emphasis on quick prototyping and feedback. It encourages stakeholder participation and makes it possible to make changes as they are made. However, the degree of freedom available may also be restrictive. Conrad suggests that the absence of structure in Agile Learning Design, compared to frameworks like ADDIE, might result in scope creep if the project is not carefully controlled. This highlights the need for good project management to prevent unchecked growth throughout development.
Scholarly commentary on the efficacy and use of e-learning frameworks gives significant insights into their practical implications and applicability for varied situations. Shurygin et al. (2021) underscore the lasting significance of the ADDIE paradigm, highlighting its organized approach as crucial, particularly for rookie instructional designers. Comprehensive course creation is supported by a solid framework emphasising methodical movement through several phases of analysis, design, development, implementation, and assessment. This realization highlights the ever-present value of ADDIE in instructional settings. Additional depth is added by Allen’s 2012 investigation of SAM (Successive Approximation Model). Allen cites SAM’s flexibility as a major virtue, especially in dynamic classroom settings. SAM’s iterative and reactive design, with its capacity for continual adjustment based on input, is well suited to the ever-changing demands of today’s classrooms. Because of its malleability, SAM can replace inflexible course design models such as ADDIE. Although Conrad’s 2014 research lauds Agile’s adaptability, it raises issues about the methodology’s generalizability. While Agile is often praised for its flexibility, it is also questioned when strict curricular rules must be followed. Insinuating that there is no universally applicable blueprint for e-learning, the criticism invites a careful review of the contextual appropriateness of Agile.
Learning Outcomes
2.1 Understanding Learning Outcomes:
To clearly articulate the information, abilities, and attitudes that learners are expected to gain by the end of a learning experience, learning outcomes are an essential part of curricular design. They are the capstone of the learning process, providing objective evidence of a student’s progress and the course’s success. Learning outcomes are essential to every well-thought-out curriculum since they convey the course’s intended effect. Learning objectives are future-focused; they highlight what students should know, be able to accomplish, and show off once a course is over. This viewpoint differs from the more common input-focused methods by changing the emphasis from what is taught to what is learnt. Learning outcomes are developed with the SMART criteria in mind to facilitate the process of assessing and evaluating student progress (Zhang et al., 2020).
For Education to be successful, course goals and student expectations must coincide with learning results. While course objectives provide an overview of the bigger picture, learning outcomes provide a more granular look at what students will perform by the end of the course. Because of the alignment, students can follow a clear and consistent educational path in which every topic is directly related to their long-term objectives. According to El-Sabagh (2021), students will be more engaged and motivated if the lessons they take away from them align with their personal goals and objectives. When learners understand what is expected of them and can see the skills and information they will obtain, they are more likely to be actively involved in the learning process. This harmony aids in creating an education that is both purposeful and relevant to the learner’s life.
In a nutshell, learning outcomes direct course structure, evaluation methods, and pedagogical techniques. Teachers rely on them to plan engaging lessons, pick valid measures of student progress, and adjust their approach to the classroom accordingly. The specificity of learning objectives enables targeted and effective evaluation, giving learners and educators important feedback on the learning process. The processes of quality assurance and accreditation also rely heavily on learning outcomes. They form the basis for impartial assessments, which in turn help schools prove the worth and use of their offerings. Furthermore, accountability is increased, and educational efforts are linked with society’s demands when learning results are communicated openly to stakeholders such as students, employers, and accrediting authorities.
2.2 Learning Outcomes Guiding Learning and Assessment
Educational design relies heavily on learning outcomes because it gives students focus, direction, and meaning throughout the learning process. Their impact on students’ ability to learn is significant. According to van Alten et al. (2019), learning outcomes let teachers and students know exactly where they’re headed by the end of a program or course. Students are more likely to put out effort when they have clear goals to aim toward, which is what this alignment does. Curriculum planners rely heavily on learning outcomes to arrange lesson material. The curriculum can be organized hierarchically, beginning with basic skills and moving on to more complicated ones, guaranteeing a consistent progression towards the desired goals. In addition, instructors might combine various instructional strategies, such as classroom discussions and laboratory exercises, to maximize students’ progress toward the desired learning goals. Assessment procedures are also designed with the learning goals in mind. To ensure that evaluations are both relevant and valid, Hartikainen et al. (2019) argue that they should be designed to directly evaluate the amount to which the learning outcomes have been attained. The feedback loop inherent in assessment is fine-tuned depending on learning outcomes. It offers useful insights for students to understand their progress and what they must do to attain the targeted results.
One of the most often utilized frameworks for defining learning outcomes is Bloom’s Taxonomy. The cognitive processes are ranked in this taxonomy according to their complexity: knowledge, understanding, application, analysis, synthesis, and assessment. Specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and timely (SMART) learning objectives may be developed using Bloom’s Taxonomy. By the end of the course, students will be able to use marketing concepts to design a marketing plan for a new product or service, for instance, a learning outcome aligned with Bloom’s Taxonomy. This course objective is well-defined (students will be able to apply marketing concepts), observable (they will be able to create a marketing strategy), attainable (students will have the essential knowledge and abilities), central to the course’s content (marketing), and time-bound (the conclusion of the course will achieve it). Instructional techniques may be modified to better aid in attaining learning goals after they have been identified (Firman et al., 2020). Case studies, simulations, and group projects are all examples of effective teaching tactics that might be used to help students understand and implement marketing ideas.
Learning outcomes should also guide assessment development. Students’ mastery of higher-order cognitive abilities like application, analysis, and assessment may not be accurately measured by tests that focus on lower-order cognitive skills like memory and recall. Assessment results can be utilized to adjust teaching methods and raise students’ achievement. Assessment outcomes can also guide decisions about modifying learning objectives and curricula. For instance, if several students fail a test, it might be time to reevaluate the lesson’s objectives or try a new approach to teaching the material. If, on the other hand, students routinely do well on tests, this might indicate that the learning objectives are reasonable and that the teaching methods are successful. Continuously improving the quality of teaching and learning is possible through the feedback loop between learning outcomes, instructional techniques, and assessments (Ardoin, Bowers, & Gaillard, 2020).
Instructional Strategies and Technologies
3.1 Introduction to Instructional Strategies and Technologies:
In recent years, several novel approaches intend to enhance the learning process by augmenting student engagement and bolstering retention rates. Problem-Based Learning (PBL) is an educational approach that emphasizes active learning. Ajjawi et al. (2019) believe implementing problem-based learning (PBL) has positively affected students’ cognitive and metacognitive capacities. The Flipped Classroom Paradigm signifies a significant change in instructional approach, wherein the conventional learning structure is reversed. Digital access to preliminary information allows students to allocate more time during classroom sessions for engaging in debates, problem-solving activities, and collaborative projects. This practice enhances student engagement and fosters collaborative learning, facilitating a deeper understanding of fundamental topics. The Blended Learning Model refers to the strategic integration of conventional face-to-face instruction with contemporary digital resources and technologies, resulting in an enhanced educational approach. Blended learning is regarded as an adaptable and efficient instructional approach because it integrated the most advantageous aspects of conventional face-to-face classroom discourse with the ease and accessibility offered by online resources.
The integration and effectiveness of these instructional methods are enhanced by the utilization of technology resources in the field of Education. Blackboard, Canvas, and Moodle are three prominent learning management systems (LMSs) that are central hubs for Online Education. These technologies facilitate the consolidation of information, facilitate the monitoring of student success, and foster communication, all of which collectively lead to establishing a more cohesive classroom environment. When implemented in the field of Education, virtual reality (V.R.) emerges as an innovative technology that has the potential to transform abstract concepts into actual experiences. As a result of its immersive characteristics, virtual reality (V.R.) enables students to engage in scientific simulations, explore historical reconstructions, and experience enhanced levels of depth and interactivity in their educational endeavours (Szymkowiak et al., 2021). Artificial intelligence-powered customized learning platforms employ data analytics techniques to compile knowledge tailored to individual learners. These platforms employ ongoing assessment methods and implement immediate modifications to ensure personalized learning trajectories. According to Szymkowiak et al. (2021), the quality of Education is enhanced by using an adaptable approach that addresses pupils’ individual needs.
3.2 Integration of Strategies and Technologies for Meaningful Learning:
The advent of new technologies has sparked a wave of creativity in the classroom, leading to new ways of teaching and learning. For instance, virtual reality (V.R.) technology offers a novel way to improve problem-based learning (PBL). Virtual reality (V.R.) helps students prepare for real-world situations by immersing them in realistic virtual surroundings. Students can, for instance, participate in simulations set on the Martian surface, perform research in virtual laboratories, or digitally visit historical sites. This interactive environment improves understanding and encourages the development of analytical and deliberative thinking in a safe, controlled environment. Another potent technological integration with pedagogical approaches is that of adaptive learning platforms, which are powered by artificial intelligence (A.I.) (nal, 2021). Learning on these platforms is individualized for each student by providing a path through the material that changes as the learner does. Data-driven insights provide each student with the right amount of challenge and assistance, allowing them to reach their full academic potential.
Numerous instances have been documented when educational institutions have employed technology to augment certain pedagogical approaches with favourable outcomes regarding student engagement and academic attainment. An example of an institution that has implemented a blended learning approach is Metropolia University of Applied Sciences in Finland. This technique combines conventional face-to-face lectures with online tutorials. This approach has enhanced participation, attendance, and graduation rates. Nanyang Technological University in Singapore showcases another noteworthy illustration. The educational institution has used the pedagogical approach known as the flipped classroom, wherein students are required to do online assignments before attending class sessions to utilise face-to-face interactions to engage in discussions and collaborative problem-solving activities. The new approach has increased student engagement and led to an enhanced grasp of the subject matter.
There is a lot to gain by incorporating technology into teaching methods, but certain issues also need to be resolved. Maintaining a focus on providing kids with equal access to technology is essential. Educators, school leaders, and lawmakers must work together to ensure every kid has access to the technology they need to learn. Another crucial factor is ongoing professional development for educators (Fidan and Tuncel, 2019). Teachers require ongoing professional development to best use technology in their lessons. Learn how to pick the right tech for the job, create exciting lessons, and evaluate your students’ growth in a digital classroom. In order to guarantee that technology integration is a transformational force that improves the quality of Education as a whole, it is crucial to invest in teacher training. By negotiating these difficulties, educators may harness the full potential of technology to create meaningful and powerful learning experiences for their students.
Recommendations and Conclusion
Three major trends have emerged as crucial to constructing contemporary educational discourse in modern pedagogical research. While originally intended to complement more traditional forms of Education, e-learning frameworks have since developed into the structural backbone of systematic, scalable online Education. These frameworks guarantee that digital Education is pedagogically sound, learner-centric, and outcome-oriented, regardless of whether it is developed using the more rigid ADDIE method or the more adaptable Agile methodology. Second, the importance of well-defined learning outcomes has grown, serving as a beacon for curriculum development. Students will have learning experiences that are intentional, focused, and evaluable because the defined outcomes match the curriculum’s aim with the instructional technique and assessment design. The merging of time-tested instructional methodologies with cutting-edge technologies delivers not just novelty but transformational learning experiences. For instance, integrating Virtual Reality with problem-based learning goes beyond mere immersion, allowing learners to ‘experience’ issues and make abstract concepts palpable. Collectively, these results highlight the importance of e-learning frameworks, well-defined learning objectives, and the possibilities of integrating instructional practices with technology.
Strong professional upgrading programs should be a top priority for any institution transitioning to online Education. These efforts should be crafted to provide instructors with cutting-edge pedagogical resources, technical competencies, and online learning methods. Since the educational environment is always changing, teachers need ongoing training to guarantee they can effectively use new technology. Dinc (2019). Workshops, seminars, and even online classes might all be part of these initiatives to encourage teachers to keep learning throughout their careers. Equally important for institutions dipping their toes into e-learning is the strategic acquisition of technological tools. Institutions should not blindly acquire technology without first doing thorough needs assessments. Taking this precaution may assure you that the acquired technology will serve your institution’s goals, pedagogical tenets, and students’ varying requirements. With so many options in educational technology, schools need to exercise caution when making purchases to ensure they provide students with resources that will help them study rather than distract them. Furthermore, it is critical to create a feedback system for use once integration occurs. This system permits ongoing assessment, assuring that the technological resources are effective and useful in addressing the ever-evolving requirements of teachers and students (Daz et al., 2020). Institutions may improve the quality of their e-learning platforms by including regular feedback loops in their operations.
By going beyond its original function as a delivery mechanism, e-learning has become a paradigm-shifting movement that will shape the threads that weave the future of Education worldwide. It’s more than just a technological improvement; it’s a democratizing force offering inclusivity, flexibility, and relevance to the demands of the modern student. As educators, policymakers, and stakeholders, we find ourselves at the cusp of this educational transformation, serving as both architects and beneficiaries of a movement that holds the potential to break down traditional barriers, foster inclusivity, and redefine the educational landscape for generations to come. E-learning is doing more than changing the face of schooling; it is rewriting the history of how information is disseminated and accepted worldwide.
References
Ajjawi, R., Tai, J., Huu Nghia, T.L., Boud, D., Johnson, L. and Patrick, C.-J. (2019). Aligning assessment with the needs of work-integrated learning: The challenges of authentic assessment in a complex context. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(2), pp.1–13. doi https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1639613.
Ardoin, N.M., Bowers, A.W. and Gaillard, E. (2020). Environmental education outcomes for conservation: A systematic review. Biological Conservation, [online] 241(108224), p.108224. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108224.
Ashwin, T.S. and Guddeti, R.M.R. (2020). Impact of inquiry interventions on students in e-learning and classroom environments using affective computing framework. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-019-09254-3.
Badrul, K., Saida, A., Soheil, H.S. and Zuheir, N.K. (2021). Challenges and Opportunities for the Global Implementation of E-Learning Frameworks. [online] Google Books. IGI Global. Available at: https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=ehosEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR1&dq=E-learning+Frameworks [Accessed 14 Nov. 2023].
Chen, C.-C. (2021). Effects of Flipped Classroom on Learning Outcomes and Satisfaction: An Experiential Learning Perspective. Sustainability, 13(16), p.9298. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169298.
Díaz, L.E., Caminero, G.F., Lloret, C.-M.H., Gonzalez, H.G. and Alvarez-Castillo, J.-L. (2020). Analyzing the Impact of COVID-19 on Education Professionals. Toward a Paradigm Shift: ICT and Neuroeducation as a Binomial of Action. Sustainability, 12(14), p.5646. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145646.
Dinc, E. (2019). Prospective Teachers’ Perceptions of Barriers to Technology Integration in Education. Contemporary Educational Technology, 10(4), pp.381–398. doi: https://doi.org/10.30935/cet.634187.
El-Sabagh, H.A. (2021). Adaptive e-learning environment based on learning styles and its impact on the development students’ engagement. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, [online] 18(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00289-4.
Fidan, M. and Tuncel, M. (2019). Integrating augmented reality into problem-based learning: The effects on learning achievement and attitude in physics education. Computers & Education, [online] 142, p.103635. doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103635.
Firman, F., Aswar, N., Sukmawaty, S., Mirnawati, M. and Sukirman, S. (2020). Application of the Two Stays Two Stray Learning Model in Improving Indonesian Language Learning Outcomes in Elementary Schools. Jurnal Studi Guru dan Pembelajaran, [online] 3(3), pp.551–558. Available at: https://e-journal.my.id/jsgp/article/view/621 [Accessed 14 Nov. 2023].
Ghanem, S. (2020). E-learning in Higher Education to Achieve SDG 4: Benefits and Challenges. 2020 Second International Sustainability and Resilience Conference: Technology and Innovation in Building Designs(51154). doi https://doi.org/10.1109/ieeeconf51154.2020.9319981.
Hartikainen, S., Rintala, H., Pylväs, L. and Nokelainen, P. (2019). The Concept of Active Learning and the Measurement of Learning Outcomes: A Review of Research in Engineering Higher Education. Education Sciences, 9(4), p.276. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9040276.
Logan, R.M., Johnson, C.E. and Worsham, J.W. (2020). Development of an e-learning module to facilitate student learning and outcomes. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 16(2). doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2020.10.007.
Önal, N.T. (2021). Investigation of technology integration knowledge of Science teachers: a case study: Investigation of technology integration knowledge. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, [online] 13(1), pp.773–793. Available at: https://ijci.globets.org/index.php/IJCI/article/view/613 [Accessed 14 Nov. 2023].
Regmi, K. and Jones, L. (2020). A systematic review of the factors – enablers and barriers – affecting e-learning in health sciences education. BMC Medical Education, [online] 20(1), pp.1–18. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02007-6.
Shurygin, V., Berestova, A., Litvinova, T., Kolpak, E. and Nureyeva, A. (2021). Universal Models and Platforms in E-Learning. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), [online] 16(9), pp.63–75. Available at: https://www.learntechlib.org/p/220015/.
Szymkowiak, A., Melović, B., Dabić, M., Jeganathan, K. and Kundi, G.S. (2021). Information technology and Gen Z: The role of teachers, the internet, and technology in the Education of young people. Technology in Society, 65(65). doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101565.
van Alten, D.C.D., Phielix, C., Janssen, J. and Kester, L. (2019). Effects of flipping the classroom on learning outcomes and satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, [online] 28, p.100281. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.05.003.
Yunusa, A.A. and Umar, I.N. (2020). A scoping review of Critical Predictive Factors (CPFs) of satisfaction and perceived learning outcomes in E-learning environments. Education and Information Technologies, 26. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10286-1.
Zhang, T., Shaikh, Z.A., Yumashev, A.V. and Chłąd, M. (2020). Applied Model of E-Learning in the Framework of Education for Sustainable Development. Sustainability, 12(16), p.6420. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166420.
write