Virtue, as conceptualized within the realm of philosophy, refers to a moral attribute or characteristic that is regarded as inherently commendable and desirable. The acquisition of virtues can be examined through multiple theoretical frameworks. In his work titled Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle presents a traditional exposition of virtue. The author posits that the acquisition of virtues occurs through habituation, wherein individuals cultivate virtuous attributes by engaging in repetitive practice (Crisp 67). In order to cultivate courage, individuals must actively participate in acts of bravery until courage becomes an inherent aspect of their character. In the context of my personal experiences, I might establish a connection with this notion by reflecting on the development of patience. At the outset, my inclination towards patience was lacking; nevertheless, through consistent application of patience in diverse circumstances, it gradually assimilated into my disposition.
Audre Lorde posits that anger among marginalized persons might be considered a virtue due to its potential to act as a catalyst for both societal transformation and individual empowerment. In her essay entitled “The Uses of Anger,” Lorde focuses considerable emphasis on the constructive utilization of anger by individuals as a mechanism for aiding development. Nevertheless, the author agrees that mismanaged rage can result in detrimental outcomes, manifesting in harmful behaviors (Lorde 280). The discourse around the classification of rage as either a virtue or a vice extends beyond the perspectives articulated by Lorde. There exists a contention that rage is a noble reaction to instances of injustice, as it possesses the potential to instigate individuals to engage in proactive measures and rectify societal concerns. It is argued by some that uncontrolled anger has the potential to result in illogical behavior, acts of violence, and detrimental consequences for both the individual experiencing the anger and others around them.
I posit that rage can indeed have a place inside a virtuous existence; nevertheless, its virtuous manifestation is subject to the circumstances and motivations surrounding its expression. When skillfully harnessed and controlled, anger can catalyze good transformation and establish justice. The manifestation mentioned above of rage as a virtue encompasses the utilization of this emotional state to incite productive endeavors, enhance societal consciousness regarding pertinent matters, and confront instances of inequity. The foundation of this approach should be grounded on a profound moral conviction and a steadfast dedication to tackling the fundamental issues at hand. Nevertheless, unregulated or unmanaged rage can have adverse effects, resulting in harm and unfavorable outcomes (Sreenivasan 29). Therefore, the cultivation of anger as a moral quality necessitates a conscientious approach and a steadfast dedication to ethical values, in accordance with Audre Lorde’s perspective that rage, when employed judiciously, has the potential to effectuate substantial societal change.
The bond between virtue and feelings like irritation is intricate and convoluted in philosophy. Virtues are qualities thought to be morally upright and wanted, and they can be approached through diverse philosophical viewpoints, from Aristotle’s habit to modern examinations of emotions like anger. While some argue that anger might be a virtue when utilized constructively to address communal unfairness and fuel good improvement, others emphasize the potential for harm and unreason when anger stays uncontrolled. My outlook is closest to the idea that anger may be a virtue when channeled and governed in a manner that serves the greater well-being. This requires self-knowledge, emotional regulation, and a dedication to social justice, as highlighted by Audre Lorde’s perspective. In our quest for virtuous lives, the link between emotions and virtues remains an ongoing investigation, necessitating us to navigate the fine line amid constructive anger and its possible downsides.
References
Crisp, Roger, ed. Aristotle: nicomachean ethics. Cambridge University Press, 2014.
Lorde, Audre. “The uses of anger.” Women’s Studies Quarterly 25.1/2 1997: 278–285.
Sreenivasan, Gopal. Emotion and virtue. Princeton University Press, 2020.
write