Abstract:
This study investigates the complex relationship between leadership and power in the continuing Russian military battles. This study examines President Vladimir Putin, Yevgeniy Prigozhin, senior military officials, and ground commanders to examine leadership and power in battles. Transformational, dispersed, and adaptive leadership paradigms can explain conflict-related leadership dynamics. The Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) and power and influence theories help examine leadership and power dynamics. This paper examines the distinct and indistinct differences between leadership and power. It provides examples of leaders who use their power to demonstrate exemplary leadership and instances where power struggles and conflicting interests blur the line between effective leadership and power manipulation. This study also examines power tensions, opposing interests, dynamic coalitions, resource inequities, and ethical difficulties, all of which make leadership difficult. This paper discusses ways to navigate the context’s difficulties. Negotiation, inclusive decision-making, trust-building, and empowerment are these tactics. This study examines power and leadership to understand Russian military battles. This study helps leaders, policymakers, and scholars in conflict resolution and organizational leadership understand leadership and power dynamics in complex military and political environments.
Introduction:
The ongoing confrontations between various military factions, President Vladimir Putin, and Yevgeniy Prigozhin, the leader of Wagner, have received international attention. These tensions illuminate the intricate relationship between leadership and power. Understanding leadership difficulties in this setting requires comprehending the roles and interactions of critical actors beyond senior leaders.[1].
This paper examines the complex relationship between leadership and power in ongoing conflicts. To understand how Putin, Prigozhin, and other key figures relate to leadership and how multiple leaders in different forms either help or hinder leadership. We also want to see how power manifests in the setting and where leadership and power overlap. This study recognizes that leadership goes beyond formal jobs and hierarchical organizations. Russian military battles show leadership through influence, strategic alliances, and resource and network control. The goal is to understand the complex dynamics of leadership and power and how they affect such confrontations.
This study also explores the power and its effects on conflict-related leadership. Power struggles, conflicting interests, and shifting coalitions can complicate leadership, hinder decision-making, and blur the line between effective and ineffective leadership. The aim is to illuminate leaders’ challenges in managing power relations in conflict situations by analyzing these complexities. This study seeks to improve academic understanding of Russian military leadership and power dynamics despite ongoing wars. A comprehensive understanding of leadership dynamics in complex military and political contexts can be gained by analyzing the interconnections between key individuals, power manifestations, and the complex factors that impede effective leadership.[2].
Leadership in Conflict: Theoretical Framework
Conflict outcomes and dynamics depend on leadership. Leadership theory can help explain Russia’s military conflicts. Leadership study widely acknowledges transformational leadership. Transformational leaders communicate a compelling vision and instil a sense of purpose in their followers. These leaders can inspire innovation, novelty, and steadfast adherence to mutually agreed-upon goals in conflict. Charisma helps people overcome challenges and stay focused. Distributed leadership is also important. Leadership in crises can come from any employee. Each leader brings unique skills, influence, and abilities to leadership dynamics. Distributed leadership recognizes that several people or organizations can lead different aspects of a dispute using their specific skills and expertise. These folks enhance the leadership strategy. Conflict situations require adaptive leadership.[3].
Adaptive leaders can handle complex conditions. Organizations can anticipate, allocate, and respond to changes. In the context of the ongoing conflicts within the Russian military establishment, characterized by dynamic and unpredictable circumstances, adaptive leaders are crucial to effectively guiding their organizations and followers through various challenges. Contingency theories shed light on varied leadership approaches in conflict situations. These theories suggest leadership success depends on several aspects, including leader and follower traits and contextual conditions. Conflict leadership styles depend on the situation and problems.[4]. Leaders that capitalize on their abilities and adapt to the situation are effective.
Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) emphasizes leaders’ dynamic interactions with followers. Leaders interact with followers in diverse ways, creating in-groups and out-groups. Conflict leader-follower relationships affect collaboration, loyalty, and support.[5]. Leaders that build positive, inclusive relationships with their subordinates foster collaboration, trust, and effective communication, which improves their conflict management skills.[6]. Power and influence theories illuminate leadership and power dynamics. Leaders have legitimate, expert, referent, and coercive power. Power dynamics are crucial to understanding conflict leadership. Leaders inspire, influence, and resolve disagreements. However, misusing authority can damage confidence and leadership. Conflicts require ethical leadership. Leaders must traverse complex moral situations and make ethical decisions. Ethical leaders prioritize their subordinates’ well-being and consider the wider societal effects of their activities. Ethical leaders inspire trust, credibility, and a positive workplace culture amid the turmoil.
Key Actors in the Ongoing Conflicts within the Russian Military Establishment:
Many major people impact the dynamics of leadership and power struggles in the Russian military establishment. Understanding these people’s relationships and leadership can help explain the disputes. President Vladimir Putin, a powerful figure, dominates the current confrontations[7]. President Putin’s leadership style and tactics strongly impact military strategy. Putin prioritizes control and centralization as a leader. The ability to consolidate authority and control the armed forces greatly affects leadership dynamics in conflicts.[8]. Wagner CEO Yevgeniy Prigozhin is also notable. Prigozhin’s control over a privately owned military firm that works with the Russian military gives him leverage in the wars. Prigozhin’s leadership role in Wagner gives him some military power, though not as much as Putin’s. Prigozhin’s private military command may differ from Putin’s. Prigozhin’s leadership style may emphasize decentralized decision-making and flexibility.[9].
Leadership goes beyond the top executives of an organization. Many other entities influence leadership dynamics during conflicts. This category includes military commanders, intelligence operatives, and political officials. Leadership relationships vary by military duty and position. High-ranking Russian military officers have authority and specialized knowledge. Military campaigns depend on their leadership. These people have strategic insight, operational expertise, and conflict management skills. Individual leadership styles may include authoritative command, collaborative decision-making, and inspiring and motivating subordinates.[10]. Commanders on the battlefield are crucial because they lead their forces and execute operational strategies. Leaders may prioritize tactical competence, effective communication, troop morale, and unity in challenging and confrontational situations.[11].
Intelligence operators shape conflict leadership. These positions collect and analyze data, advise leaders, and coordinate intelligence efforts. Leadership in this context includes information sharing, strategic thought, and discreet operational conduct to achieve goals. Political figures influence Russian military officers. These positions involve policymaking, political manoeuvring, and long-term planning.[12]. The leader can negotiate, establish coalitions, and reconcile political and military aims. Understanding the complicated dynamics requires understanding the relationships between these major individuals and their authority in the confrontations. These individuals’ interactions, leadership styles, and power positions shape the leadership framework and conflict outcomes. A complete analysis of various players’ leadership styles can help explain the complex dynamics of the Russian military establishment’s continuing disputes.[13].
Leadership and Power Dynamics in Ongoing Conflicts within the Russian Military Establishment:
Complex leadership and power dynamics drive the contemporary Russian military confrontations. Leadership and power must be examined to understand conflict dynamics. Conflicts link leadership and power. Although leadership entails the capacity to motivate and steer individuals towards an objective, power denotes the aptitude to govern the actions of others. Leaders use their power to achieve goals, overcome obstacles, and make decisions that affect disputes. President Vladimir Putin, Yevgeniy Prigozhin, key military officials, and field commanders are involved.[14]. These leaders’ formal authority, knowledge, and resource access shape their power bases. Multiple leaders’ power conflicts, alliances, and areas of influence complicate leadership dynamics.
Leadership and power have many expressions. Coercive power involves using physical force or threats to dominate people. Military leaders can coerce during wartime. This authority maintains discipline, enforces obedience, and frightens opponents. This type of power affects leadership-follower relationships, impacting loyalty, obedience, and command structure. Conflicts have expert power. Competent and credible leaders with specific knowledge, abilities, or expertise can influence others. Senior military officials and commanders with fighting experience and strategic ability exemplify this. These experts can guide military operations and decision-making.[15]. Expert authority grants respect and influence over conflicts. Charisma, respect, and admiration give referent power. Referent power gives leaders who build trust and loyalty significant influence.
President Putin has intentionally built a strong public persona and gained widespread support, allowing him to organize his supporters and influence politics. A leader’s ability to inspire and encourage improves conflict resolution. Conflicts can blur the boundaries between leadership and power. Leaders can deliberately use their authority to exhibit extraordinary leadership, motivating followers and achieving their aims. Leadership with influence, foresight, and motivation advances conflicts.[16]. However, power can be used for personal gain, blurring the line between leadership and power. Leaders’ aims and motivations may need to be clarified, eroding trust and hindering leadership. Conflict leadership is complicated by power. Power struggles among leaders can cause internal splits, rivalries, and conflicting agendas, hamper decision-making and coordination. Multiple leaders with different power sources may fragment leadership, making strategy and goal congruence difficult. Leadership in conflicts is greatly impacted by power dynamics, opposing interests, and leadership unity.[17].
Manifestations of Power in Ongoing Conflicts within the Russian Military Establishment:
Power drives Russian military battles. The component affects conflict dynamics, decision-making, and outcomes. This essay investigates how power manifests and affects conflicts in the context. Conflicts exhibit coercive force. Coercive power involves using force, intimidation, or punishment to control others.[18]. Russian military officers use coercive power to manage their subordinates through disciplinary actions, strict execution of regulations, or punitive measures as a deterrent. This power generates a hierarchical system of leadership in which leaders have authority and influence over their followers. Expert power is observable. Knowledge, abilities, and expertise give people expert power. Military strategy, tactics, and intelligence analysis experts can influence wartime leaders. Their knowledge allows them to influence military operations, guide decision-making, and build trust among subordinates.[19].
Conflicts show referent power. Referent power comes from charisma, respect, and admiration. Referent power leaders can inspire and motivate others through their ideals, traits, and attributes. Putin’s dominating and appealing persona has helped him build referent authority. This has garnered his followers’ undying support. Referent power allows leaders to inspire, mobilize, and shape disputes. Conflicts also show legitimate power from formal authorities. President Putin and other military leaders have legitimate power due to their jobs and obligations. This authority lets people decide, distribute resources, and lead. As leaders influence and shape disputes, legitimate power often mixes with other forms of power. Power expressions vary among conflicting parties. While leaders like President Putin may have multiple forms of authority, field commanders may prioritize certain sorts. Commanders might exercise authority due to their knowledge of the area’s geography, their ability to motivate and lead soldiers in dangerous conditions, or their strategic acumen[20].
Power can be used for leadership or misuse in conflicts. Effective leaders use their power to inspire confidence, reliance, and seamless collaboration in their subordinates. They use power for conflict aims and subordinate well-being. Power can also be abused, leading to corruption, censorship, or information manipulation for personal gain.
Clear and Ambiguous Distinctions: Leadership and Power in the Russian Military Conflicts:
Leadership and authority are sometimes clear and ambiguous in the context of the continuing Russian military establishment struggles. These distinctions affect conflict dynamics and leadership. This essay discusses situations where leadership and power blur. Leaders who use their power well display leadership. President Vladimir Putin’s leadership style and methods illustrate the distinction between his authority and power. Putin’s centralization, control, and mobilization demonstrate his leadership skills. The Russian president’s charisma, vision, and ability to inspire others make him an excellent leader in times of conflict. Other conflict leaders may also distinguish leadership from power.[21].
Military leaders with lawful power may have formal offices. However, their ability to mobilize, lead, make strategic decisions, and achieve military goals shows their leadership ability. Tactical experience, strategic thought, and the ability to inspire subordinates distinguish leaders from formal power. Conflicts can blur leadership-power lines. Leadership effectiveness and power manipulation become ambiguous when people use power for profit. Leaders prioritizing their agendas over their subordinates’ well-being or the conflict’s aims create ambiguity. Leader power battles increase the uncertainty of leadership and authority. Divergent interests, rivalries, and the desire for personal power can weaken leadership, as leaders may emphasize their influence and authority over collective goals.[22]. Leaders may manipulate, coerce, or abuse power to achieve their goals, blurring the line between leadership and power.
The conflicts’ complexities can also confuse leadership and power. Conflicts, with their numerous stakeholders and opposing interests, can make it hard for leaders to do their jobs. Power and leadership styles vary among actors. Ambiguity can make it hard to assess leadership and understand power’s motivations.[23].
The Complexities of Power and Their Impact on Effective Leadership:
Leadership in the continuing Russian military battles is complicated by power. Power disputes, competing interests, and shifting coalitions make leadership difficult. Leader power disputes complicate leadership. Leaders fight for power, influence, and resources, causing internal strife. Power battles can distract from conflict goals, hindering decision-making and collaboration. Leaders must negotiate power battles and reconcile conflicting interests to keep their organizations focused.[24]. Conflicting interests complicate leadership. Conflict players may have different objectives, priorities, or loyalties.
Diplomacy, negotiation, and strategic decision-making are needed to balance competing interests and achieve conflict goals. To unite various stakeholders, leaders must discover common ground and set goals. Power difficulties include fluctuating alliances and coalitions. New coalitions may form as conflicts evolve.[25]. Fluidity complicates leadership dynamics. Leaders must manage these shifting coalitions, develop strategic partnerships, and manage various relationships to enable effective coordination and cooperation among conflict participants. Through resource distribution and knowledge access, power difficulties can also hinder leadership. Leaders who control vital resources like money, weapons, and information can shape battles. Leaders with limited resources can lose power due to unequal resource allocation. Leaders must address these inequities and maximize resources. Leaders must navigate power’s ethical issues. Corruption, repression, and information manipulation can result from power abuse.[26].
Leaders must uphold morality and use power for the common benefit. Leaders must make challenging moral decisions to alleviate power inequalities in this situation. Leaders use numerous methods to overcome power’s complications. They seek win-win strategies to resolve power disputes and opposing interests. They encourage open debate and varied perspectives in decision-making to reduce power imbalances and improve leadership. Transparency and values-based leadership establish trust and confidence. They foster innovation, collaboration, and support in the workplace. Effective leaders empower and delegate responsibility to their teams, empowering them to respond to crises and make quick decisions.[27].
Conclusion:
In summary, the persistent conflicts within the Russian military establishment offer an opportune context for examining the complex interplay between leadership and power dynamics. The intricacies of power, encompassing power dynamics, conflicting interests, fluctuating alliances, resource disparities, and ethical dilemmas, present considerable obstacles to achieving effective leadership in conflicts. During this study, an analysis has been conducted on prominent figures, including President Vladimir Putin, Yevgeniy Prigozhin, senior military officials, and commanders present in the field, focusing on their associations with the notion of leadership.
The examination of power has encompassed an exploration of its diverse manifestations, such as coercive power, expert power, referent power, and legitimate power. Through this analysis, we have observed these manifestations’ impact on conflict dynamics. The differentiation between leadership and power in conflicts can vary in clarity or ambiguity, contingent upon how leaders utilize their power and navigate through power dynamics. The intricate nature of power poses a significant obstacle to effective leadership as it diverts attention, generates conflicting interests, and hampers coordination. Nevertheless, adept leaders can surmount these obstacles through negotiation, promoting inclusive decision-making, cultivating trust, and empowering their teams.
Through a comprehensive comprehension of the intricate nature of power and its consequential effects on leadership, we acquire significant and enlightening perspectives on the intricacies of conflicts and the formidable obstacles leaders encounter within the Russian military establishment. Examining these intricacies enhances our comprehension of leadership’s functioning in conflict situations, allowing us to discern tactics for proficient leadership and contribute to a more profound understanding of the dynamics of leadership and power in intricate military and political contexts.
Bibliographies
“Understanding Senior Leadership Dynamics within the Russian Military,” www.youtube.com, accessed July 7, 2023, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8q8LnKQcTBs&pp=ygVdTGVhZGVyc2hpcCBhbmQgUG93ZXIgRHluYW1pY3MgaW4gT25nb2luZyBDb25mbGljdHMgd2l0aGluIHRoZSBSdXNzaWFuIE1pbGl0YXJ5IEVzdGFibGlzaG1lbnQ6.
Bass, Barbara Lee. “What is leadership?.” Leadership in Surgery (2019): 1–10.
Brooks, Stefan, Ali Askerov, Stefan Brooks, and Lasha Tchntouridze. The Rise of Putin’s Russia and the Post-Soviet Conflicts. London, 2020.
Ciulla, Joanne B., and Joanne B. Ciulla. “Ethics and effectiveness: The nature of good leadership.” The search for ethics in leadership, business, and beyond (2020): 3-32.
Erdogan, Berrin, and Talya N. Bauer. “19 Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) Theory: The Relational Approach to Leadership.” The Oxford Handbook of Leadership and Organizations (2014): 407.
Fix, Liana, and Michael Kimmage. “Putin’s Last Stand: the Promise and Peril of Russian Defeat.” Foreign Aff. 102 (2023): 8.
Homan, Astrid C., Seval Gündemir, Claudia Buengeler, and Gerben A. van Kleef. “Leading diversity: Towards a theory of functional leadership in diverse teams.” Journal of Applied Psychology 105, no. 10 (2020): 1101.
Karpov, Mikhail V. “From “Chaos” to “Order” to Uncertainty.” Chaos 2019.
Lumby, Jacky. “Distributed leadership and bureaucracy.” Educational Management Administration & Leadership 47, no. 1 (2019): 5–19.
Mahnken, Thomas, and Gillian Evans. “STRATEGIC STUDIES QUARTERLY -PERSPECTIVE Ambiguity, Risk, and Limited Great Power Conflict *****,” n.d. https://www.airuniversity.af.edu/Portals/10/SSQ/documents/Volume-13_Issue-4/Mahnken.pdf.
National Defense University Press. “Great Power Competition: Understanding the Role of Leaders in French Joint Forces,” n.d. https://ndupress.ndu.edu/Media/News/News-Article-View/Article/3175480/great-power-competition-understanding-the-role-of-leaders-in-french-joint-forces/.
Pavlova, Rob Picheta, Simone McCarthy, Tara John, Mariya Knight, Lauren Kent, Katharina Krebs, Uliana Josh Pennington. “Putin Vows to Punish ‘Armed Uprising’ by Wagner Militia as Russia Is Plunged into Crisis.” CNN, June 23, 2023. https://www.cnn.com/2023/06/23/europe/russia-mod-wagner-yevgeny-prigozhin-intl/index.html.
Putin, Vladimir. “Vladimir Putin.” Rossija: nacionalnyj vopros [Vladimir Putin. Rusko: národní otázka] (2012).
Sakwa, Richard. “Heterarchy: Russian politics between chaos and control.” Post-Soviet Affairs 37, no. 3 (2021): 222–241.
Samimi, Mehdi, Andres Felipe Cortes, Marc H. Anderson, and Pol Herrmann. “What is strategic leadership? Developing a framework for future research.” The Leadership Quarterly 33, no. 3 (2022): 101353.
Shamiev, Kirill. “Understanding Senior Leadership Dynamics within the Russian Military.” www.csis.org, July 20, 2021. https://www.csis.org/analysis/understanding-senior-leadership-dynamics-within-russian-military.
Soldatov, Andrei, and Irina Borogan. “Why Putin Needs Wagner.” Foreign Affairs, May 12, 2023. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/russian-federation/why-putin-needs-wagner.
Tourish, Dennis. “Is complexity leadership theory complex enough? A critical appraisal, some modifications and suggestions for further research.” Organization Studies 40, no. 2 (2019): 219–238.
Wu, Qiong, Kathryn Cormican, and Guoquan Chen. “A meta-analysis of shared leadership: Antecedents, consequences, and moderators.” Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies 27, no. 1 (2020): 49–64.
www.youtube.com. “A Purge at the Top of Russia’s Military Establishment? | DW News.” Accessed July 7, 2023. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WRSzTZdGfmQ&pp=ygVXTWFuaWZlc3RhdGlvbnMgb2YgUG93ZXIgaW4gT25nb2luZyBDb25mbGljdHMgd2l0aGluIHRoZSBSdXNzaWFuIE1pbGl0YXJ5IEVzdGFibGlzaG1lbnQ6.
www.youtube.com. “Furious Wagner Chief Accuses Russia of Killing His Forces and Vows Revenge.” Accessed July 7, 2023. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aHiymqGRQBU&pp=ygVXTWFuaWZlc3RhdGlvbnMgb2YgUG93ZXIgaW4gT25nb2luZyBDb25mbGljdHMgd2l0aGluIHRoZSBSdXNzaWFuIE1pbGl0YXJ5IEVzdGFibGlzaG1lbnQ6.
www.youtube.com. “Gravitas: Who Is Wagner Boss Yevgeny Prigozhin? Why Did He Turn against Russia? | US Edition.” Accessed July 7, 2023. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GNrsv0wgNCg&pp=ygWaAUV4cGxvcmUgbGVhZGVyc2hpcCBhbmQgcG93ZXIgaW4gdGhlIG9uZ29pbmcgY29uZmxpY3RzIGJldHdlZW4gZWxlbWVudHMgb2YgdGhlIFJ1c3NpYW4gbWlsaXRhcnkgZXN0YWJsaXNobWVudCwgcHV0aW4sIGFuZCB3YWduZXIgY2hpZWYsIFlldmdlbml5IFByaWdvemhpbi4%3D.
www.youtube.com. “Inside Prigozhin’s Wagner, Russia’s Secret War Company | WSJ Documentary.” Accessed July 7, 2023. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EMXnJMCoFYI&pp=ygVOS2V5IEFjdG9ycyBpbiB0aGUgT25nb2luZyBDb25mbGljdHMgd2l0aGluIHRoZSBSdXNzaWFuIE1pbGl0YXJ5IEVzdGFibGlzaG1lbnQ6.
www.youtube.com. “Power Struggles and Instability in the Kremlin: The Conflict Shaking Russia’s Elite.” Accessed July 7, 2023. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FUHhJAjuxhY&pp=ygVJTWFuaWZlc3RhdGlvbnMgb2YgUG93ZXIgaW4gT25nb2luZyBDb25mbGljdHMgd2l0aGluIHRoZSBSdXNzaWFuIE1pbGl0YXJ5IA%3D%3D.
www.youtube.com. “Russia’s Private Military Force, Explained.” Accessed July 7, 2023. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=65bNr6D0Db0&pp=ygVdTGVhZGVyc2hpcCBhbmQgUG93ZXIgRHluYW1pY3MgaW4gT25nb2luZyBDb25mbGljdHMgd2l0aGluIHRoZSBSdXNzaWFuIE1pbGl0YXJ5IEVzdGFibGlzaG1lbnQ6.
www.youtube.com. “Wagner Group Chief Openly Criticizes Russian Military Leaders.” Accessed July 7, 2023. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4uLIioHOQvY&pp=ygVZQ2xlYXIgYW5kIEFtYmlndW91cyBEaXN0aW5jdGlvbnM6IExlYWRlcnNoaXAgYW5kIFBvd2VyIGluIHRoZSBSdXNzaWFuIE1pbGl0YXJ5IENvbmZsaWN0czo%3D.
[1] Rob Picheta, Simone McCarthy, Tara John, Mariya Knight, Lauren Kent, Katharina Krebs, Josh Pennington, Uliana Pavlova, “Putin Vows to Punish ‘Armed Uprising’ by Wagner Militia as Russia Is Plunged into Crisis,” CNN, June 23, 2023, https://www.cnn.com/2023/06/23/europe/russia-mod-wagner-yevgeny-prigozhin-intl/index.html.
[2] Karpov, Mikhail V. “From “Chaos” to “Order” to Uncertainty.” Chaos 2019.
[3] Samimi, Mehdi, Andres Felipe Cortes, Marc H. Anderson, and Pol Herrmann. “What is strategic leadership? Developing a framework for future research.” The Leadership Quarterly 33, no. 3 (2022): 101353.
[4] Wu, Qiong, Kathryn Cormican, and Guoquan Chen. “A meta-analysis of shared leadership: Antecedents, consequences, and moderators.” Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies 27, no. 1 (2020): 49–64.
[5] Erdogan, Berrin, and Talya N. Bauer. “19 Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) Theory: The Relational Approach to Leadership.” The Oxford Handbook of Leadership and Organizations (2014): 407.
[6] Homan, Astrid C., Seval Gündemir, Claudia Buengeler, and Gerben A. van Kleef. “Leading diversity: Towards a theory of functional leadership in diverse teams.” Journal of Applied Psychology 105, no. 10 (2020): 1101.
[7] Putin, Vladimir. “Vladimir Putin.” Rossija: nacionalnyj vopros [Vladimir Putin. Rusko: národní otázka] (2012).
[8] Brooks, Stefan, Ali Askerov, Stefan Brooks, and Lasha Tchntouridze. The Rise of Putin’s Russia and the Post-Soviet Conflicts. London, 2020.
[9] “Gravitas: Who Is Wagner Boss Yevgeny Prigozhin? Why Did He Turn against Russia? | US Edition,” www.youtube.com, accessed July 7, 2023, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GNrsv0wgNCg&pp=ygWaAUV4cGxvcmUgbGVhZGVyc2hpcCBhbmQgcG93ZXIgaW4gdGhlIG9uZ29pbmcgY29uZmxpY3RzIGJldHdlZW4gZWxlbWVudHMgb2YgdGhlIFJ1c3NpYW4gbWlsaXRhcnkgZXN0YWJsaXNobWVudCwgcHV0aW4sIGFuZCB3YWduZXIgY2hpZWYsIFlldmdlbml5IFByaWdvemhpbi4%3D.
[10] Fix, Liana, and Michael Kimmage. “Putin’s Last Stand: the Promise and Peril of Russian Defeat.” Foreign Aff. 102 (2023): 8.
[11] “Inside Prigozhin’s Wagner, Russia’s Secret War Company | WSJ Documentary,” www.youtube.com, accessed July 7, 2023, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EMXnJMCoFYI&pp=ygVOS2V5IEFjdG9ycyBpbiB0aGUgT25nb2luZyBDb25mbGljdHMgd2l0aGluIHRoZSBSdXNzaWFuIE1pbGl0YXJ5IEVzdGFibGlzaG1lbnQ6.
[12] “Explaining the Chaos in Russia | the Listening Post,” www.youtube.com, accessed July 7, 2023, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BEoJStdKKWo&pp=ygU1S2V5IEFjdG9ycyBpbiB0aGUgT25nb2luZyBDb25mbGljdHMgd2l0aGluIHRoZSBSdXNzaWE%3D.
[13] Sakwa, Richard. “Heterarchy: Russian politics between chaos and control.” Post-Soviet Affairs 37, no. 3 (2021): 222–241.
[14] Kirill Shamiev, “Understanding Senior Leadership Dynamics within the Russian Military,” www.csis.org, July 20, 2021, https://www.csis.org/analysis/understanding-senior-leadership-dynamics-within-russian-military.
[15] Andrei Soldatov and Irina Borogan, “Why Putin Needs Wagner,” Foreign Affairs, May 12, 2023, https://www.foreignaffairs.com/russian-federation/why-putin-needs-wagner.
[16] “Understanding Senior Leadership Dynamics within the Russian Military,” www.youtube.com, accessed July 7, 2023, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8q8LnKQcTBs&pp=ygVdTGVhZGVyc2hpcCBhbmQgUG93ZXIgRHluYW1pY3MgaW4gT25nb2luZyBDb25mbGljdHMgd2l0aGluIHRoZSBSdXNzaWFuIE1pbGl0YXJ5IEVzdGFibGlzaG1lbnQ6.
[17] “Russia’s Private Military Force, Explained,” www.youtube.com, accessed July 7, 2023, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=65bNr6D0Db0&pp=ygVdTGVhZGVyc2hpcCBhbmQgUG93ZXIgRHluYW1pY3MgaW4gT25nb2luZyBDb25mbGljdHMgd2l0aGluIHRoZSBSdXNzaWFuIE1pbGl0YXJ5IEVzdGFibGlzaG1lbnQ6.
[18] “A Purge at the Top of Russia’s Military Establishment? | DW News,” www.youtube.com, accessed July 7, 2023, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WRSzTZdGfmQ&pp=ygVXTWFuaWZlc3RhdGlvbnMgb2YgUG93ZXIgaW4gT25nb2luZyBDb25mbGljdHMgd2l0aGluIHRoZSBSdXNzaWFuIE1pbGl0YXJ5IEVzdGFibGlzaG1lbnQ6.
[19] “Power Struggles and Instability in the Kremlin: The Conflict Shaking Russia’s Elite,” www.youtube.com, accessed July 7, 2023, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FUHhJAjuxhY&pp=ygVJTWFuaWZlc3RhdGlvbnMgb2YgUG93ZXIgaW4gT25nb2luZyBDb25mbGljdHMgd2l0aGluIHRoZSBSdXNzaWFuIE1pbGl0YXJ5IA%3D%3D.
[20] “Furious Wagner Chief Accuses Russia of Killing His Forces and Vows Revenge,” www.youtube.com, accessed July 7, 2023, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aHiymqGRQBU&pp=ygVXTWFuaWZlc3RhdGlvbnMgb2YgUG93ZXIgaW4gT25nb2luZyBDb25mbGljdHMgd2l0aGluIHRoZSBSdXNzaWFuIE1pbGl0YXJ5IEVzdGFibGlzaG1lbnQ6.
[21] Thomas Mahnken and Gillian Evans, “STRATEGIC STUDIES QUARTERLY -PERSPECTIVE Ambiguity, Risk, and Limited Great Power Conflict *****,” n.d., https://www.airuniversity.af.edu/Portals/10/SSQ/documents/Volume-13_Issue-4/Mahnken.pdf.
[22] “Great Power Competition: Understanding the Role of Leaders in French Joint Forces,” National Defense University Press, n.d., https://ndupress.ndu.edu/Media/News/News-Article-View/Article/3175480/great-power-competition-understanding-the-role-of-leaders-in-french-joint-forces/.
[23] “Wagner Group Chief Openly Criticizes Russian Military Leaders,” www.youtube.com, accessed July 7, 2023, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4uLIioHOQvY&pp=ygVZQ2xlYXIgYW5kIEFtYmlndW91cyBEaXN0aW5jdGlvbnM6IExlYWRlcnNoaXAgYW5kIFBvd2VyIGluIHRoZSBSdXNzaWFuIE1pbGl0YXJ5IENvbmZsaWN0czo%3D.
[24] Lumby, Jacky. “Distributed leadership and bureaucracy.” Educational Management Administration & Leadership 47, no. 1 (2019): 5–19.
[25] Bass, Barbara Lee. “What is leadership?.” Leadership in Surgery (2019): 1–10.
[26] Ciulla, Joanne B., and Joanne B. Ciulla. “Ethics and effectiveness: The nature of good leadership.” The search for ethics in leadership, business, and beyond (2020): 3-32.
[27] Tourish, Dennis. “Is complexity leadership theory complex enough? A critical appraisal, some modifications and suggestions for further research.” Organization Studies 40, no. 2 (2019): 219–238.
write