Part One: Working Style
According to the 5 Dynamics Energy Map, my working style is deliberate in Execute and Excite and extreme in Explore. I am lucky that I don’t have the stress-energy energy of my life’s nervous and erratic energy. I regard myself as creative, autonomous, and flexible in my academic and personal life. Being extreme in Explore, one of my particular strengths is that I have a lot of creative and innovative drive. Therefore, I am incredibly open-minded. As a result, I am pretty good at thinking about innovative thoughts and starting assignments and activities. I appreciate attempting a variety of new and fascinating enterprises. I can organize and plan a family event down to minor details (Ekström et al., 2018). I like large gatherings and innovating and creating various events to perform. Another quality is that I have the “last to jump ship” type of personality because I have a high level of exploratory energy. I dislike conflict and am loyal. I will be willing to compromise and be adaptable to discover workable solutions.
Two particular issues related to my working style are that Sometimes I struggle to keep motivated to complete the several projects that I commence and that I might be overly highly loyal. Because I have a high level of Explore energy, I purport to become caught in it because I find it simple to start numerous things. Still, I need to exercise refocusing and putting effort into finishing them (Bäcklander, 2019). I tend to become so enthused about various ideas and sketch out several details concerning them that I prefer to leap from one to the next (Ekström et al., 2018). One task might take me a long time to finish. Also, because I am frequently overly loyal, I often want everybody I work with or those around me to get along. I devote so much effort to avoiding confrontation or thinking solutions that may become exhausting for me. I also have a habit of overextending myself and ending up all over.
I want my colleagues to adopt a collaborative working style. A collaborative working style is one in which the members of particular groups come together and harness their strengths to accomplish particular tasks. Additionally, weaknesses are identified and rectified during the process. When working on a class project, for instance, it may be divided into different parts and assigned to individuals depending on their strengths (Bäcklander, 2019). In the end, each individual educates the rest of the team.
Part Two: Communication
This lesson has taught me that I am an excellent communicator and listener. I have an exceptional capacity to listen intensely and effectively, which results in incorrectness and honesty in my talks. Even though I do not often put it into practice with individuals I speak with, I recognize that with exercise, I can continue improving as an effective communicator.
For instance, as a medical practitioner, I can listen closely to my patients’ problems, which is critical to facilitating better results in their treatment. Being an active listener enables me to effectively perceive and comprehend the patients’ demands, vocally and through gesture, by giving them my undivided attention. When I took care of my spouse not long ago, I used a typical example of authentic listening (Ekström et al., 2018). He’d caught a cold and inquired what I considered the best way to treat his signs and symptoms. He also mentioned many things that he frequently hears from previous chats. For example, he should avoid touching his face, use hand sanitizer and wash his hands. He describes it as “softly harassing him.” He anticipated my typical barrage of “I told you so” after finishing his prattling. However, I greeted him with, “I’m sorry to hear you’re not well. I comprehend what you’re saying, and I know you are in a bad mood; I’m here to make you feel better whenever necessary. What else can I do to make you feel at ease? Please take this medication as directed.” He didn’t expect that from me, but he did anticipate judgment. Nevertheless, he welcomed me as the outcome of my active listening to him and responding from a position of truthfulness (Bäcklander, 2019). This lesson has taught me that being able to listen correctly leads to better results.
I’ve been talking on the pretense level and in a waste cycle with my family and friends. I’m not very open, and I’m not very good at communicating my concerns and thoughts. It has often been more straightforward to say, “I am OK,” rather than explain how I genuinely feel even though the emotions on my face reveal my true feelings regularly. I’ve realized that I can’t keep up this degree of deception for much longer since it will inevitably worsen my relationships. This course has taught me that being real increases our friendships and communication.
When I have to explain what troubles me, I fall into the cycle of waste. I now understand that the first step in resolving this issue is determining what has stymied my development (Ekström et al., 2018). I will be sincere and honest and sincere about my sentiments to shift from pretense to speaking with sincerity. I will not keep things to myself but will be forthcoming when asked about them.
When communicating with individuals around us, particularly individuals who rely on me, I strive for sincerity. In the hospital, I want my patients to understand every aspect of the treatment I am providing them. Speaking from a place of honesty is critical since it communicates to everybody that I am available in whatever capacity they require and results in a greater comprehension, which promotes better results (Men & Yue, 2019). Naturally, I am an individual who wants to assist and repair things; I have learned to put this knowledge into effect in this course; I can be more compassionate and less judgmental. These characteristics will assist me in being more accurate and, in general, being great traits to be a better human being.
Part Three: Reflection/Hero’s Journey
Overall, this course has equipped me with a lot of knowledge that will be a valuable tool in the school environment and my daily life at home and work. I was suspicious of the learning at first since I thought I was an outstanding leader and communicator since I had worked in a healthcare facility during the holiday. I was aware that I was well-liked, personable, and often prepared to assist when required. Via group discussions, videos for the learning modules, and readings, I learned how to be more successful with my speaking and listening abilities. I also learned a lot about my Dynamic learning style. I discovered that I am extreme on Excite at times, and therefore, I may be obligated to tone it down to embrace some of the other practical and efficient working methods. Too much of one type is terrible, and I must include tiny amounts of the other working styles to maximize my achievement. Some of the essential takeaways that I will constantly utilize from this include my Dynamic learning type analysis, the cycle of waste vs. cycle of value principles, the five dynamic energy groups, and the fact that we have company during our struggles. It was an invaluable experience for me, and it will help shape how I interact and behave with individuals in my life, be it at home, work, or school.
I could help those immediately around me through attentive listening to some of their small talks. I could pick out a problem and offer a solution wherever I could help. Additionally, teamwork is necessary; I may urge them to use a collaborative working style to solve the problem where everyone offers their best. Further, I need to develop certain aspects of my communication and leadership skills. For instance, I need to improve my discipline to allow me to remain motivated through all the tasks I have been assigned. I plan to improve on this area through gradual exercise. Whenever I feel demotivated, I may develop targets to allow me to perform as much as I can every day. Also, I need to censor my loyalty. Loyalty is a double-edged sword. Therefore, I need to reduce the number of individuals and tasks I am loyal to. I will cut off all aspects that are not worth my time.
References
Bäcklander, G. (2019). Doing complexity leadership theory: How agile coaches at Spotify practise enabling leadership. Creativity and Innovation Management, 28(1), 42–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12303
Ekström, M., Patrona, M., & Thornborrow, J. (2018). Right-wing populism and the dynamics of style: a discourse-analytic perspective on mediated political performances. Palgrave Communications, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-018-0132-6
Men, L. R., & Yue, C. A. (2019). Creating a positive emotional culture: Effect of internal communication and impact on employee supportive behaviors. Public Relations Review, 45(3), 101764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2019.03.001
write