Introduction
Courtly love represents the ultimate fusion of medieval chivalric ideals, aristocratic fashions, and romantic fantasies, captivating nobles and commoners alike. Among the undisputed pioneers of this popular genre was the 12th-century French poet Chrétien de Troyes, who wrote commentaries on Arthurian classics such as The Legend of Lancelot and The Quest for the Holy Grail[1]. But his most significant impact came from his portrayal of a social relationship devoid of drama, lack of emotion, deep passion, imagination, and morality. Charioteer’s Tale embodies Chretien’s signature innovation in narrative. The story follows Lancelot trying to rescue Queen Guinevere after she is kidnapped, forcing him to reconcile his conflicting feelings about his duty to King Arthur and his secret love for the queen. Although he always played King Arthur, Chrétien used the space to engage in deep conversations and discuss political and social issues. Lancelot and Guinevere’s relationship transcends the boundaries of courtly love and conflict with religion. This article analyses the development of the theme of courtly love in “Chariots” as a historical change in the creation of medieval historical literature.[2] His endorsement of adultery sparked controversy and led to the emergence of a modern philosophy defined by the concept of freedom. Equally radical is Chretien’s exploration of the conflict between desire, virtue, and duty, pushing the conflict into chaotic territory.
A controversial work from the 12th century, it expresses the idea of human sensitivity and the meaning of personal morality by showing the oppression of loved ones. This study begins with an analysis of the Chretien Amendment law, which is regularly documented in court. The cultural environment’s response to provocative content will also be discussed. Based on this, analyze Lancelot and Guinevere’s actions through dialogue.[3] His story describes the struggle for personal honor, reputation, inner truth, and the conflict of love. The Knight’s Tale, the subject of discussion, is an important historical text that forms the psychological basis of Medieval Romantic literature.[4]
Historical Context
Chrétien de Troyes and His Pioneering Vision
Today’s scholarly analysis broadly recognizes Chrétien de Troyes’ seminal role as a pioneer in transforming ancient Breton legends of the founding of King Arthur into sophisticated tools for creative expression.[5] While previous interpretations of Celtic legends focused on portraying Arthurian conquests and military victories in a famous tone, Chrétien pioneered a shift in these legends to explore the complexities of human relationships and human psychology. His Arthurian romances thus marked a break with tradition not only because of their pioneering focus on matters of the heart but also because of their vague acceptance of the principle of fairness. Chrétien sought to depart from the established canon by consciously emphasizing the contradictions of secondary characters such as Lancelot. In the process, he pioneered the first humanist sensibility of personal thought, which was beautiful, given the medieval setting where public obligations took precedence over individual agency.
Chrétien, in particular, was the first writer to describe in detail the famous legend of the rescue of Lancelot. Guinevere and her subsequent love story add a new dimension to the Arthurian legend. Through careful construction, their restrained attempts are imbued with an urgent, dangerous, and almost unquenchable desire that fires the reader’s imagination. These forward-thinking additions add psychological depth to archetypal medieval romantic heroes and bring their flaws to life. In this way, Chretien reflects today’s philosophy’s interest in analyzing conflict in life by subverting the simple opposition between virtue and work that characterizes religious thought. The unexpected balance is his slightly loud and playful self-narrating voice, which brings out the beauty in the canons of fantasy writing. Subverting the conventions of grand epics with almost irreverent fluidity, he created a distinctive narrative style that still resonates today.
The Charioteer’s Tale is a prime example of how Chretien transforms the myth into a powerful prism of cultural commentary.[6]. Lancelot’s unity as an example of chivalry destroyed by the weakness of humanity is particularly radical; It is accurate to add moral ambiguity to the ancient historical background. The redemptive power of love counteracts its capacity to cause violence. His exploration of desire, rejection, shame, and redemption—the core of the moral dilemma—makes the Riddle think about modern-day relationships and informs his decision in the feudal era. This world born of emotional resonance makes the Arthurian legend a cultural classic. In this tradition, Chrétien de Troyes is a seminal figure whose visionary ideas on romanticism and characterization took medieval literature into a new chapter.[7]
Tumultuous Forces Reshaping Social Order
Chretien wrote his patriotism against social changes that swept medieval Europe, where the country was changing from a fragmented feudal order to a solid bureaucratic order in new monarchies. Opposition to this change was strongly advocated by conservatives among the clergy and politicians who saw this trend as a serious threat to long-term relations and security. The rapid rise of love, especially in the court of royal women, became a phenomenon that attracted much attention and hypocrisy. Religious authorities spoke out against women’s romantic love and sexual freedom as a moral rebellion against God’s patriarchal order. For this reason, the minstrel culture that encouraged social liberty and the salon discussions where erotic desire was discussed was once again condemned.[8]
Interestingly, this punishment was combined with love in the court’s control over collective thought. Stories of brave knights fighting under the command of women continue to circulate on public channels, their views at odds with their doctrines.
Chrétien de Troyes wrote his romance in a period of conflicting zeitgeist and contradictory views. Considering the more conservative views prevalent then, the Chevalier’s Tale’s sympathetic positioning of Lancelot and Guinevere’s adultery can be viewed as a success.[9] The story does not make honest decisions about the lovers caught in the middle, and their separation is unfortunate. Guinevere’s courage to assert her power at all costs to her reputation shows the cracks in the rigid structure that limits women’s desires. This idea showed compassion for the hypocrites in the human heart, replacing the modern religious tradition that viewed the body as a sin. Acknowledging the incredible power of love, Chretien gently invites people to analyze why some relationships face outside criticism when it comes to mutual success.
Such comments in the Chevalier’s Tale show that Chrétien de Troyes, along with his characters, became a controversial figure of his time. Lancelot and Guinevere’s enduring adventures are as effective as a harsh lesson. A delicate melancholy pervades his writings and a hint of mourning over the disintegration of old feudal certainties.[10] Told through these two lenses, the story shows the fragile transition of European civilization, caught between entering and exiting new characters, trying to express itself against promises that restrict personal freedom.
Visionary Legacy: Charting New Literary Frontiers
Chrétien de Troyes pioneered the foundational structure that ensured the longevity of medieval literature, creating innovations in beauty and thematic depth.[11] The Horseman’s Tale is a text that directly inspired explorations of romance and sexuality by later poets such as Gottfried von Strasberg, whose Subplots developed into his German epic Tristan in the early 13th century.[12]
In keeping with Chretien’s aesthetic beauty, Strasbourg expands on the need to delimit the central event with evocative descriptions and lyrical lines. It also celebrates the salvation achieved when two lovers come together. Although the plot is different, Eros’ freedom clearly shows an unshakable passion for death, which suggests that Chretien’s dispassionate words inspired him. Therefore, the two writers differ from previous generations in supporting the superiority of love over worldly rules and social conventions.
Centuries later, interest in the pivotal relationship of Lancelot and Guinevere continues to inspire modern daydreams that attempt to reconstruct medieval themes for a direct audience.[13] The 1960 Broadway musical “Camelot,” written by Alan Jay Lerner and Frederick Loewe, was based on the romance “Coachman,” the famous creative work on the story.[14] Camelot transformed emotional emotions into catchy songs and music, creating a pop culture scene, including Hollywood movies. It’s a testament to the wonder of Chretien’s 12th-century story, which touched hearts with lyrical performances centuries later. After all, Lancelot remains one of the text’s most beloved characters after his romance progresses in Chretien’s hands.[15] While early French narratives are careful not to mention the romantic rumors surrounding this Arthurian warrior, Chrétien defiantly places him at the center of the narrative. The daily commentary states that this bold move was made with the well-known knowledge that the forbidden fruit does not hold any appeal for the audience. As a result, Lancelot is given a new vulnerability, courage, and charisma, making him an ideal example. The model of conflict between irreconcilable love and fidelity that Chretien pioneered continues to influence the popular imagination in the Romantic tradition today.
Many modern novelists are most interested in this kind of emotional reflection in The Rider’s Tale when reinterpreting its themes. Chrétien is unafraid to reveal the dark, chaotic undercurrents beneath the clichés of courtly romance, creating a relevant literary work 900 years after its creation.[16]
Critical Review
Core Thematic Strands
After explaining the unique medieval literary historical doctrine that supports the practice of courtship by the Charioteer, this analysis will explore its role in expanding and reiterating important notions of courtly love.[17]
Nuanced Depiction of Courtly Romance Ideals
Undoubtedly, Lancelot remains the best of the events in Chretien’s story. It describes the virtues valued in courtly romance (courage, modesty, devotion) and confirms the scholar Frap Pierre’s view that Lancelot is a guide for amateurs. Lancelot’s willingness to risk disdain and embarrassment in his discovery points to a sense of purpose and self-control that characterizes courtly relations.[18] However, when Lancelot’s role comes into conflict, this also reveals cracks in the ideals of chivalry and echoes Frappier’s criticism of him as a villain; this conflict is the one that once became brave but was destroyed by love. This duality reflects the strange dissonance between altruism and privileged selfishness, which coexist uneasily in court traditions. Thus, Lancelot’s nobility is magnified by his incompetence, and he gains the understanding of a wider audience. Chrétien, therefore, departed from the Romantic archetype and refused to conceal the apparent contradiction of his hero’s crime against conservative values.[19]
This modern marvel reflects the personal evolution of medieval architecture and the execution of courtly love. Moreover, Lancelot’s suffering challenges the convention of reducing courtly lovers to idealistic archetypes. Chretien describes Lancelot’s struggle with humanity and says that even the noblest people have consciousness. The purpose of the mystery dates back to human thought from the medieval history of the 12th century.[20] Moreover, the failure of Lancelot’s courage also shows the difference between the dream and the reality of love in the court. Ideal love is complicated for flesh-and-blood women because relationships limit personal relationships. While exploring this distance, Chrétien touches upon the diseases and conflicts beneath the flashy exterior of courtly love. Finally, Lancelot’s confusion about adultery suggests that it is a moral sin rather than a severe sin. His guilt made him realize that even if he followed the rules of the court, he was violating Christianity. This nuance reflects many of the tensions of the transitional period when courtly and religious values coexisted uneasily. Lancelot’s character, therefore, has many types of relationships. Ultimately, Chrétien explores the depths of the hero’s heart while questioning the strict rules of courtly love.
Transformative Force of Love
“Cars” demonstrates the power of classic love themes to change moral behavior. Lancelot transforms from a poor warrior into a tale of virtue, while Guinevere transforms into a strong woman who opposes her lover’s goals. As researcher William Woods noted, the change in their love had a more significant impact; people tend to resist rigid culture, leading to a lack of self-esteem.[21]
Thus, the redemptive power of love expands the meaning beyond metaphor and draws a precious flower for your feelings today. This romantic theme also shows that the subtle seeds of feminism have taken root. Considering the patterns of oppression experienced by women in the Middle Ages, Guinevere’s use of the language of love to control her body and mind in the palace is compelling. Her struggle shows that solidarity and sisterhood best achieve women’s power today. Moreover, Chretien breaks convention by portraying Guinevere as more than an object of desire. The wisdom she shows in training Lancelot allows him to enjoy more wealth than a heterosexual woman. Guinevere’s development coincides with the first appearance of proto-feminist in 12th-century court documents and provides a more visceral view of women.
Additionally, Guinevere’s reluctance to find harmony in love leads to subtle changes. The hope of success gave women’s desires a place similar to the rigidity of Christianity. This emphasis on unity and equality also criticizes the inconsistency of romantic men’s roles in dating. Moreover, Guinevere uses herself to manipulate the institution of marriage to prove her feelings for him without the benefit of the woman who gave it to him. Lancelot’s desire for respect and transparent communication exemplifies the woman’s acceptance of freedom in the relationship.
Guinevere also rejects the idea that an innocent woman uses her passion to control her relationship. Her diplomacy combined with the defining character of early feminism’s view of the power that comes from women’s solidarity. This revisionist feminist subtext reaches its peak when Guinevere does not hesitate to risk public humiliation to save Lancelot.[22] Her struggle against patriarchal norms demonstrates the power of love to create social change through the act of justice. In addition, those who wanted to break the feudal system and observe marriage and establishment were also against the old conservatives. Their actions support scholar Woods’ claims about the redemptive power of love and suggest a cultural awareness that helps human faith and free will. More importantly, when Lancelot and Guinevere engage in emotional love, there are signs that they accept the role of love. This nuance prevents the excesses that lead to love at court rather than hindering the transformation in people’s moral consciousness. As a result, Chretien’s proto-feminist style captures embryonic forms of change driven by the incredible power of love. Its subtle changes reflect the audience’s transformation into the complexities of middle-class people’s changing morals and desires.
Tensions between Duty, Desire and Morality
At the heart of Lancelot and Guinevere’s emotional journey is reconciling their common interests with the demands of duty and the code of honor. Philosopher Roger Sherman Loomis interpreted this tension as a responsibility towards the freedom of love.[23] On the contrary, Joseph Bevier lives in the depths of the psychology of passion and reason. Such various interpretations by scholars show how the story resonates when dealing with moral questions. As a rule, its open-ended ending avoids direct value judgment, inviting readers to interpret the workforce complex. The main struggle is not the specific unfolding of events but the struggle deep within the characters.
Chrétien humanizes the noble, heroic figures by focusing on desire and shame. His passion for adultery criticizes rigid standards that do not accept human error in the name of love. The agreement reflects a change in attitude towards the church’s ban on romance as a restriction on freedom. Moreover, the text avoids the simple villain/victim dichotomy and portrays Guinevere as torn between justice and desire. The honest expression of romantic love and sensual longing adds a surprising dimension to women’s thoughts about sexuality, albeit a small part of feudal literature. Chretien’s ideas were consistent with the 12th-century humanist view of women’s emotions.
Additionally, his love shows his lover’s pain and self-doubt, showing meaning rather than judgment. The scene where Lancelot breaks down and cries in Guinevere’s room shows the passion of mutual love without the drama. Chrétien countered the opposition to the need to combat negativity by emphasizing the importance of the truth of the practice.[24]
However, the whispers in the hearts of the two lovers prevent adultery from being celebrated without criticism. Lancelot’s guilt seems to testify to his knowledge of sin and his shame at violating the beliefs of his community. This ethics shows a nuance that places its ethics in the context of human limitations. Additionally, Chrétien avoids Guinevere’s desire to punish Lancelot for physical weakness by insisting on good behavior despite the affair. Her self-control allows her to refocus on the spiritual side of courtly love rather than sex or lust.[25] This topic includes preferences to facilitate marriage in the literature. The story is still grounded in morality and emotional truth. When their loved ones are dissatisfied, the public will be shocked, unlike the weak soldiers who are only satisfied with their outward politeness. Above all, Chrétien respects the desire to find meaningful communication, no matter how limited the situation. Overall, the text resonates with an elegant blend of empathy and moral subtlety. Chrétien does not condone or condemn but sheds light on the internal struggle of the conflict. His complex ambivalence so poignantly reflects the tensions of evolving medieval society.
Conclusion
Exploring the key elements that contribute to the literary significance of The Knight’s Tale, this analysis reveals its essential role in expanding household culture. Chrétien’s visionary approach to the story combines moral and psychological depth, creating a new aesthetic model for medieval writers. The story’s rich themes, conflicting characters, and insight into the paradoxes of love have made it a cult classic. In fact, for today’s readers, “The Coachman” is an example of the rescue and destruction of love throughout civilization. Eight centuries after its birth, modern subjectivity still struggles to reconcile the Romantic opposition to the individual. Chretien’s 12th-century epic shows, above all, naked eroticism, stripping away the mythic reflections around the Western understanding of love and justice. Their insights into relationships outside the gay world still resonate with today’s broader themes of love, passion, and identity. Eventually, Chrétien de Troyes brought the Arthurian legend back to the world and transformed it with his avant-garde representation of court debates.
This great creativity continues through centuries of humanity’s imagination. Lancelot and Guinevere, in particular, remain cultural symbols of high status and repressed desires. Chrétien’s sympathy recasts their love as an evaluation of the morality of love rather than an evaluation of desire. Human thinking has led generations of artists to reinterpret popular models through new models that have been considered in many ways. Additionally, Chretien’s effective communication between psychological realism, commentary, and thematic depression created a new genre. His desire, duty, and quest for salvation inspired the Arthurian spirit, which still maintains a cult in today’s consciousness. By abandoning the promise of immutability, Chrétien expanded the infinite history that literature could effectively reveal. Ultimately, Charioteer encourages a new way of thinking about writing as an extension of the archetypal passion story. Eight centuries later, his immense power and cruelty towards humanity continue to haunt explorers. Chrétien’s story demonstrates literature’s ability to illuminate life’s conflicts. Inspiration inspires artists to continue pushing the boundaries of creativity.
Bibliography
André Le Chapelain. “Courtly Love | Literature.” In Encyclopædia Britannica, 2019. https://www.britannica.com/art/courtly-love.
Benson, Larry D. “‘Courtly Love and Chivalry in the Later Middle Ages.’” Harvard.edu, 2019. https://chaucer.fas.harvard.edu/pages/courtly-love-and-chivalry-later-middle-ages.
Breuer, Heidi, and Jo. “Crafting the Witch: Gendering Magic in Medieval and Early Modern England Item Type Text; Dissertation-Reproduction (Electronic),” 2021. https://repository.arizona.edu/bitstream/10150/280400/1/azu_td_3108889_sip1_m.pdf.
Bryson, Michael. Love and Its Critics. Www.academia.edu, 2018. https://www.academia.edu/34156042/Love_and_its_Critics.
Bryson, Michael, and Arpi Movsesian. “4. The Troubadours and Fin’amor: Love, Choice, and the Individual.” OpenEdition Books. Cambridge: Open Book Publishers, 2017. https://books.openedition.org/obp/4388.
Carns, Paula Mae. “Compilatio in Ivory: The Composite Casket in the Metropolitan Museum.” Gesta 44, no. 2 (January 2018): 69–88. https://doi.org/10.2307/25067115.
Cayley, Emma. “Gender in Debate from the Early Middle Ages to the Renaissance.” Www.academia.edu, January 1, 2022. https://www.academia.edu/65629848/Gender_in_debate_from_the_early_Middle_Ages_to_the_Renaissance.
Chrétien de Troyes. “Arthurian Romances.” Goodreads, 2020. https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/449589.Arthurian_Romances.
Cooper, Helen. “The Knight’s Tale.” Oxford University Press EBooks, August 10, 2023, 77–108. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198821427.003.0004.
Cristian, Radu. “Arthurian Legends and Their Impact on Medieval Culture.” TheCollector, January 15, 2023. https://www.thecollector.com/arthurian-legends-medieval/.
Digital Scholar, Marshall, and Jessica Grady. “Power, Courtly Love, and a Lack of Heirs : Guinevere and Medieval Queens,” 2019. https://mds.marshall.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1070&context=etd.
Ellam, Julie. “Love in Jeanette Winterson’s Novels.” brill.com. Brill, January 1, 2018. https://brill.com/downloadpdf/display/title/28503.pdf.
English, In, and Anne Thompson. “T. H. White: A Critical Biography,” 2018. http://www.tara.tcd.ie/bitstream/handle/2262/85148/T.%20H.%20White.final.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
Frost, Marie-Luise. “‘There Is a Silent War Going On’—African Religious Leaders’ Perspectives on Domestic Violence before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic.” Religions 14, no. 9 (September 1, 2023): 1197. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14091197.
Joshua J. Mark. “Chretien de Troyes.” World History Encyclopedia, 2019. https://www.worldhistory.org/Chretien_de_Troyes/.
Keith Busby. “Chrétien de Troyes.” obo, 2019. https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/display/document/obo-9780195396584/obo-9780195396584-0063.xml.
Levine, Peter. Reforming the Humanities. Palgrave Macmillan US EBooks, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230104693.
Moore, Erin. “Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations the Graduate School,” 2022. https://diginole.lib.fsu.edu/islandora/object/fsu:180526/datastream/PDF/view.
Paul Halsall. “Internet History Sourcebooks Project.” Fordham.edu, 2019. https://sourcebooks.fordham.edu/source/1170chretien-lancelot.asp.
Scholarworks@gvsu, Scholarworks@gvsu, Chrétien De, Troyes Le, Chevalier De La, Charette Chrétien, Chevalier De, La Charette, and Elizabeth Pafford. “The Romance That Didn’t Last: An Analysis of Language in the Romance That Didn’t Last: An Analysis of Language in ScholarWorks Citation ScholarWorks Citation,” 2017. https://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1837&context=theses.
Solly, Dominic. “How Claudian Changed Epic to Praise Stilicho,” 2023. https://oro.open.ac.uk/90766/1/How%20Claudian%20reshaped%20epic%20to%20praise%20Stilicho%20-%20Dominic%20Solly%20-%202023.pdf.
Wallis, Estelle. “The Once and Future Story.” Reinvention: An International Journal of Undergraduate Research 15, no. S1 (February 11, 2022). https://doi.org/10.31273/reinvention.v15is1.872.
Walton, Kathryn. “Religion and the Validation of Magic: Literary Magic in Middle English Literature,” 2019. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/322837947.pdf.
Will Hasty. “Book Details – Boydell and Brewer,” May 14, 2020. https://boydellandbrewer.com/9781571134462/a-companion-to-gottfried-von-strassburgs-itristani/.
www.slideshare.net. “Examples of Adultery in Courtly Love Poetry,” November 19, 2023. https://www.slideshare.net/tiffanygrahamkansasc/examples-of-adultery-in-courtly-love-poetry.
[1] Keith Busby, “Chrétien de Troyes,” obo, 2019, https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/display/document/obo-9780195396584/obo-9780195396584-0063.xml.
[2] “Examples of Adultery in Courtly Love Poetry,” www.slideshare.net, November 19, 2023, https://www.slideshare.net/tiffanygrahamkansasc/examples-of-adultery-in-courtly-love-poetry.
[3] Scholarworks@gvsu Scholarworks@gvsu et al., “The Romance That Didn’t Last: An Analysis of Language in the Romance That Didn’t Last: An Analysis of Language in ScholarWorks Citation ScholarWorks Citation,” 2017, https://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1837&context=theses.
[4] Helen Cooper, “The Knight’s Tale,” Oxford University Press EBooks, August 10, 2023, 77–108, https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198821427.003.0004.
[5] Joshua J. Mark, “Chretien de Troyes,” World History Encyclopedia, 2019, https://www.worldhistory.org/Chretien_de_Troyes/.
[6] Dominic Solly, “How Claudian Changed Epic to Praise Stilicho,” 2023, https://oro.open.ac.uk/90766/1/How%20Claudian%20reshaped%20epic%20to%20praise%20Stilicho%20-%20Dominic%20Solly%20-%202023.pdf.
[7] Radu Cristian, “Arthurian Legends and Their Impact on Medieval Culture,” TheCollector, January 15, 2023, https://www.thecollector.com/arthurian-legends-medieval/.
[8] Marie-Luise Frost, “‘There Is a Silent War Going On’—African Religious Leaders’ Perspectives on Domestic Violence before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic,” Religions 14, no. 9 (September 1, 2023): 1197, https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14091197.
[9] Chrétien de Troyes, “Arthurian Romances,” Goodreads, 2020, https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/449589.Arthurian_Romances.
[10] Paul Halsall, “Internet History Sourcebooks Project,” Fordham.edu, 2019, https://sourcebooks.fordham.edu/source/1170chretien-lancelot.asp.
[11] Kathryn Walton, “Religion and the Validation of Magic: Literary Magic in Middle English Literature,” 2019, https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/322837947.pdf.
[12] Kathryn Walton, “Religion and the Validation of Magic: Literary Magic in Middle English Literature,” 2019, https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/322837947.pdf.
[13] Paula Mae Carns, “Compilatio in Ivory: The Composite Casket in the Metropolitan Museum,” Gesta 44, no. 2 (January 2018): 69–88, https://doi.org/10.2307/25067115.
[14] In English and Anne Thompson, “T. H. White: A Critical Biography,” 2018, http://www.tara.tcd.ie/bitstream/handle/2262/85148/T.%20H.%20White.final.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
[15] Michael Bryson and Arpi Movsesian, “4. The Troubadours and Fin’amor: Love, Choice, and the Individual,” OpenEdition Books (Cambridge: Open Book Publishers, 2017), https://books.openedition.org/obp/4388.
[16] Michael Bryson, Love and Its Critics, Www.academia.edu, 2018, https://www.academia.edu/34156042/Love_and_its_Critics.
[17] André Le Chapelain, “Courtly Love | Literature,” in Encyclopædia Britannica, 2019, https://www.britannica.com/art/courtly-love.
[18] Larry D. Benson, “‘Courtly Love and Chivalry in the Later Middle Ages,’” Harvard.edu, 2019, https://chaucer.fas.harvard.edu/pages/courtly-love-and-chivalry-later-middle-ages.
[19] Julie Ellam, “Love in Jeanette Winterson’s Novels,” brill.com (Brill, January 1, 2018), https://brill.com/downloadpdf/display/title/28503.pdf.
[20] Estelle Wallis, “The Once and Future Story,” Reinvention: An International Journal of Undergraduate Research 15, no. S1 (February 11, 2022), https://doi.org/10.31273/reinvention.v15is1.872.
[21] Heidi Breuer and Jo, “Crafting the Witch: Gendering Magic in Medieval and Early Modern England Item Type Text; Dissertation-Reproduction (Electronic),” 2021, https://repository.arizona.edu/bitstream/10150/280400/1/azu_td_3108889_sip1_m.pdf.
[22] Erin Moore, “Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations the Graduate School,” 2022, https://diginole.lib.fsu.edu/islandora/object/fsu:180526/datastream/PDF/view.
[23] Peter Levine, Reforming the Humanities, Palgrave Macmillan US EBooks, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230104693.
[24] Emma Cayley, “Gender in Debate from the Early Middle Ages to the Renaissance,” Www.academia.edu, January 1, 2022, https://www.academia.edu/65629848/Gender_in_debate_from_the_early_Middle_Ages_to_the_Renaissance.
[25] Marshall Digital Scholar and Jessica Grady, “Power, Courtly Love, and a Lack of Heirs : Guinevere and Medieval Queens,” 2019, https://mds.marshall.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1070&context=etd.
write