Introduction
Suspension is a disciplinary measure in educational institutions wherein pupils are temporarily excluded from the classroom environment for a particular duration. In-school suspensions include relocating kids to a monitored area inside the school. In contrast, out-of-school suspensions prohibit students from accessing school premises for the whole term of their punishment (ACLU of Arizona). The primary objective is to tackle behavioural problems and maintain a secure and efficient learning atmosphere for fellow pupils. The punitive nature of suspension arises from pupils being deprived of critical education and academic activities during their absence. Students are placed in a controlled and monitored environment with little chance of disturbance. The primary emphasis is on eradicating problematic habits (Suspensions. web). Students may maintain their academic progress. Students do not get rewards in the form of time off from school.
Short term
According to due process, before a student can be placed on a 10-day or shorter suspension (“short-term suspension”), the school must inform the student and their parents of the alleged misconduct through written or verbal notice. The school must also schedule an informal hearing to explain the allegations made regarding the student, and the student will have the chance to refute them (Suspensions. web). The school is responsible for disclosing whatever proof it has against the learner while offering the kid a chance to express their side of the story if the student disputes the allegations (ACLU of Arizona). Except in cases where the student’s presence at school poses a persistent danger to people or property or an ongoing threat to academic process disruption, this informal hearing must occur before the student is suspended. In such cases, the student should be given notice and a chance for an unofficial conference as soon as practicable following the suspension.3 The Board of Trustees or the school’s authorizer may hear appeals from students’ (parents’) short-term suspensions.
Long term
If a student is subject to an expulsion or suspension lasting more than ten days, the school is required by due process to provide the student and their parents formal notice of the allegations against them (Public schools). The student has the right to an attorney, to question and cross-examine witnesses, and to present witnesses who corroborate his or her story before a hearing may be held to impose a long-term suspension or expulsion (ACLU of Arizona). With the bare minimum of due process safeguards, charter schools can set their standards for a short-term suspension (say, five days) and classify any punishment that exceeds that threshold as a long-term suspension.
The differences
A student is only removed from a single class or course for a shorter period (a “short-term suspension”) as opposed to being removed from all classes or courses (a “long-term suspension”). for as much as ten days in a row in the classroom. A “long-term suspension” means a temporary suspension will be in effect for at least ten more days than the original suspension (Public schools). In the case of a short-term suspension, a hearing is held informally. However, in the case of a long-term suspension, the student is allowed to submit evidence, including witness testimony, before a formal hearing.
Consistent with Goss V. Lopez
The requirement for the two types of suspension is consistent/ or aligned with the principles highlighted in the Goss v. Lopez case. Students have the right to a fair hearing before a suspension can take effect, as established in the Goss v. Lopez decision (Goss v. Lopez, 1975). The lawsuit centred on nine suspended children in Ohio, where the right to education is guaranteed. Schools were required to provide kids with due process in order to suspend them, according to the majority ruling. The first reason they align is the notice and opportunity to be heard. The two types of suspension grant the learner an opportunity to be heard before the suspension; thus, they are given notice earlier (Goss v. Lopez, 1975). The notice and opportunity to be heard were highlighted in the Goss v. Lopez ruling/hearing.
The learner should first be given an oral or written notice before the suspension. Another area where they align is the timing of the hearing, where there should be an informal hearing before the suspension, highlighted in the court’s urge to have a timely process (Suspensions. web). Also, the procedure aligns with the court’s concern of granting the individuals and their parents an appeal process, thus allowing them to challenge the disciplinary decisions. In addition, concerning long-term suspension, there are formal procedures before suspension or expulsion, which were highlighted in the Goss v. Lopez case (Goss v. Lopez, 1975).
References
ACLU of Arizona. (n.d.). https://www.acluaz.org/sites/default/files/documents/SRHFINAL.pdf
Goss v. Lopez, 419 U.S. 565, 95 S. Ct. 729, 42 L. Ed. 2d 725 (1975).
Public schools. Justia Law. (n.d.). https://law.justia.com/constitution/us/amendment-04/22-public-schools.html
Suspensions. Web. (n.d.). https://www.schools.nyc.gov/school-life/safe-schools/suspensions#:~:text=The%20suspension%20of%20students%20in,authorized%20by%20the%20Discipline%20Code.
write