Introduction
Seoul, the capital of South Korea, has several qualities that make it a world-class City. Like what many writers in the field of world cities have, it is in the area of globalization and the development of urban areas. Through the prism of the global metropolitan grade classification of the City of Seoul, we can learn where the City is in the urban hierarchy of the world, what similarities and differences the City have with the top of the hierarchical cities such as Shanghai and Chicago, and whether or not the current classification represents the broad globalization impact on the city.
Background
Seoul, formerly called Seoul municipality, serves as South Korea’s nerve centre, carrying the spirit of the past and moving as fast as the future. The City’s population is 9,909,371 as per the 2020 census, and thus, it continues to retain its position as the country’s political and economic rendezvous. The Baekje Dynasty founded Seoul in 18 BC, as it flourished as a capital under the Joseon Dynasty, surrounded by the magnificent circular wall of Seoul. Due to the sorrowful experience of long-term occupation by the Japanese Empire and the devastation faced during the Korean War, Seoul has shown strong resilience to transform itself into Asia’s top livable City with a GDP per capita of around US$40000. The town can easily be seen to have a dynamic skyline, which is mainly punctuated by local architectural marvels such as the N Seoul Tower and Lotte World Tower. Among these, the most distinguished brand names worldwide are such companies as Samsung and Hyundai (FG 500’s), established by Korean people. Together with the magnificent mountainous scenery and being designated world heritage sites by UNESCO, such as Changdeok Palace and Hwaseong Fortress, Seoul puts on display how tradition and modernity complement each other in perfect harmony, being a centre for cultural, economic and technological development at the world scale.
Fitting Within the World Class City Paradigm
Seoul’s rise as a World Class City can easily be traced to globalization and a global City perspective, as explained in Friedmann’s and Sassen’s works (Friedmann, 1986; Sassen, 1991, as cited in Beaverstock et al., 2000). As Seoul’s economic, cultural and infrastructural transformation is reviewed in greater depth, the City is manifestly seen as an archetype of a global centre characterized by the modern metropolis’s knitted networks of finance, commerce and innovation.
Seoul’s recognition of its City status in the international system is due to its strategic position in the global economic system. According to Beaverstock et al. (2000), world cities rose to own a new international division of labour that revolved around global economic accumulation activities, where cities became centres for control of world capital. Seoul, which is prosperous economically and has many multinational companies, is an example of this in the globalized world. The City plays the role of one of the leaders in East Asia’s economy, mainly welcoming foreign investors and traders going through and inside the region.
In addition, the City’s success is based on a technology industry that combines its innovation initiatives and makes Seoul one of the global leaders in technology development (Joo, 2023). Samsung, LG and Hyundai, these software companies headquartered in Seoul, are known for their innovative technologies and household appliances. The dependency on this high concentration of technological expertise initiates economic growth in the City. It also aids the City in leading international business by pioneering semiconductor manufacturing, telecommunications, and robotics.
Seoul still holds the economically and culturally significant status that earned it its reputation as a world-class City, which is widely acknowledged. The City’s booming cultural parade, through its active entertainment section and rich artistic heritage, fascinates people worldwide. Furthermore, in recent years, K-pop has established itself as a global musical concept, with K-pop groups attaining unmatched acclaim and popularity worldwide (Parc & Kim, 2020). This export of culture by Seoul not only earns considerable revenue but also enhances international outreach and soft power, making Seoul more well-known and attractive worldwide.
Moreover, the BRT rail network and Seoul’s highly developed infrastructure and connectivity help to reinforce the City’s position as a world-class hub. For example, Incheon International Airport, rated the World” ‘s Best Airport, is the main gateway for over 80 local and international airlines that provide flights from Seoul to cities worldwide. (Lee et al., 2024). This airport thus provides for inconspicuous air travel but also stands as the symbol of Seoul’s integration into the world and accessibility. Moreover, the City’s fame for its fast, efficient subway system, which covers many areas, offers many good transport options for residents and visitors to commute to other parts of the metropolitan area.
Furthermore, Seoul’s IT infrastructure is exemplary – it gives high-speed internet access and digital innovation develops. Such mastery of technologies makes Seoul one of the world’s leaders in the digital economy. The digital environment produced by this opens ample space for both businesses, including those of start-ups and citizens, to flourish in an interconnected world.
Similarities and Differences with Shanghai and Chicago
Seoul, Shanghai and Chicago are three cities with very different approaches and strategies to City branding and global positioning. Although each City develops its own planning framework and comes up with a set of peculiar problems, comparative insight would still reveal both shared and unique solutions for urban development and creating the City’s identity.
As City branding and international message conveyors, the two cities have similarities in their efforts to use mega-events. The Shanghai World Expo 2010 acted as a trigger for Shanghai’s branding endeavours, wherein the City was presented as a global, human-oriented City that cares for sustainable urban living (Wang et al., 2012). This is also the case for Seoul, which employed the same strategy for staging the Olympics and the World Cup to highlight its energy level and development in the world arena. Despite that, while Shanghai focused on its historical tradition and tune-in facility, Seoul is considered a technology innovation centre and cultural connection point.
In addition, besides Shanghai and Seoul, tourism development has been the core upon which both cities build their identity. A lot of Shanghai investment has been made to develop infrastructure and promotional activities aiming at attracting both local and international tourists to see what their City is all about it, its historical significance, and modern features (Wang et al., 2012). Likewise, Seoul is the leading promoter of its traditional and modern heritage by boosting cultural amenities and technology, targeting the global market.
Unlike Shanghai and Seoul, which position themselves as significant tourist and cultural hubs, the branding of Chicago departs from the ordinary by emphasizing the economy and the City’s revitalization. As a significant financial and commercial hub, the City is the capital of innovation and entrepreneurship. This particular emphasis can be traced back to such events as the 1893 World’s Columbian Exposition, which underscored the power of America to reign over the world once again (Domosh, 2002). At the exposition, American companies advertised their growing global supremacy, evidenced by the exhibits of American-made farm machinery aimed at American superiority in industry and finances. These exhibits signalled the selection of American products as a wedding symbol of progress and ingenuity, transitioning from nation-building to empire-building. The City’s branding efforts evoke the business-friendly environment, the world-class infrastructure and the numerous cultural offerings of the City, all of which could be associated with the discourse of civilization and the American identity conveyed at the exposition. When economic imperialism and urban development are in focus, Chicago’s branding narrative implies that it is a striving metropolis in the global context.
Although they have varied historical and cultural narratives, these cities need help with the implication of telling the official stories with the economic, climatic, and political realities. Shanghai \’s exaggerated fast economic growth has occurred along with environmental degradation and social inequality, calling for criticism and questioning among citizens and observers. As in Seoul, housing affordability and urban sprawl are the challenges the City faces, which have taken away its image of a sustainable City development model. The issues of persistent crime, infrastructure decay and fiscal ideas are obstacles that Chicago has to face to reach the status of a global leader.
Insights Gained and Limitations of the World-Class City Framework
Seoul’s evaluation as a world-class City within an international urban hierarchy can be attributed to its high ranking in urban structural excellence and global competitiveness. By analyzing Seoul’s distinctive features, such as economic growth, cultural heritage, and infrastructural elements, all of them to be observed from the point of international networking and competition, we will learn how the City acts in the modern City scene.
This analysis’s outcome becomes apparent: the most evident conclusion is the awareness of Seoul becoming a big City in the global network. The diverse mix of strong economic performance, abundant tech innovations, and enriched social life characterize Seoul as the prototype of a world-class City portrayed by Friedmann and Sassen. Thanks to its strategic position in the East Asia region and the global expansion of multinational corporations and cultural institutions, the City is characterized as a vantage point for trade, finance, and creativity worldwide.
Also, the entire concept of Seoul within the World-Class City scenario shows the level of developmental interdependence that cities worldwide are experiencing because of globalization. Indeed, it is essential to stress that Seoul’s transformation into a global City is just one of the numerous aspects of the larger context of social and economic processes. The City’s inclusion in the global web of trade, investments, and migrations has, in a way, configured its economy into a particular mould, has made a signature impression on its cultural identity, and has affected its physical environment, testifying that the interaction between local and global dynamics is often complicated.
Nevertheless, the World Class City framework needs to be impeccable regarding the static character of Seoul’s City displayed and the complexity being compromised. While the framework gives us a beneficial conceptual tool for the global image of urban development, it tends to pay more attention to some factors than others, which in turn leads to partial and, in some cases, skewed image representation of cities such as Seoul.
For example, World Class City’s framework mainly emphasizes economic indicators such as GDP growth, capital investments, and the presence of the corporate headquarters as the symbols of global status and competitiveness. The mentioned components matter, yet they may sometimes overwhelm other aspects of urban life, such as social cohesion, environmental protection, and cultural diversity, which also hold critical significance for the future City and its residents.
Another negative point is the theme of inter-city competition and hierarchy spread throughout the framework. It neglects the global network of cities and the fact that all of them are interdependent and interconnected. Moreover, Seoul is one of many world-class cities striving to win the competition. However, it is also ready to work with other cities to find joint solutions to common questions and shared ideals such as environment protection, social health and public acceptance.
Conclusion
In summary, Seoul has a unique strategy of using its advanced infrastructure and innovative digital services to bring its leadership position to the global digital economy. The City benefits from the wide-ranging unified transportation system, including the extensive subway system and the state-of-the-art Incheon International Airport, which provides smooth traffic and accessibility for residents and tourists. In addition, the City’s advanced telecommunications infrastructure, which can provide high-speed internet connection, lays the foundation for Digital entrepreneurship and state-of-the-art technology innovation. Seoul’s branding story reflects the City’s core value of agendas in innovation and renewal, which gathers investment and talent from everywhere. Considering Seoul to be a growing City on a world scale, the place it will have in the global economy will be determined by the effectiveness of its branding efforts, which will also influence the reputation of other cities in the world that wish to become at par with it or even supersede it.
References
Beaverstock, J. V., Smith, R. G., Taylor, P. J., Walker, D. R., & Lorimer, H. (2000). Globalization and world cities: some measurement methodologies. Applied geography, 20(1), 43–63.
Domosh, M. (2002). A ‘civilized’commerce: gender, ‘race’, and empire at the 1893 Chicago Exposition. cultural geographies, 9(2), 181-201.
Joo, Y. M. (2023). Developmentalist smart cities? The cases of Singapore and Seoul. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 27(sup1), 164–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2021.1925143
Lee, S., Kim, S., & Kim, J. (2024). Robustness Analysis of Public Transportation Systems in Seoul Based on General Multi-Layer Networks. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3960426/v1
Parc, J., & Kim, S. D. (2020). The Korean music industry’s digital transformation and K-pop’s global emergence. Sustainability, 12(18), 7790.https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187790
Wang, H., Xiaokaiti, M., Zhou, Y., Yang, Y., Liu, Y., & Zhao, R. (2012). Mega-events and City branding: A case study of Shanghai World Expo 2010. Journal of US-China Public Administration, 9(11), 1283–1293.
write