Introduction
On the one hand, Canadian society celebrates an inflow of international students with their positive influence on the academic environment. In contrast, these students generate discussions on the further impact of their collective consumption of living space and health care. This dispute is exacerbated by the measure taken by the Canadian government in 2024 when the world was already in a competitive position, and critics were quick to point out that the decision to cap the international students’ visas was harsh because such problems traced back to the systemic factors rather than the international students. This article will assess the reasons for and against the article ” International Students Cap Wrongly Attributes Them Bothering of Canada’s Housing and Healthcare Woes ” and its relations between and within the discourse on immigration and higher education. Summary of Source
The writer, therefore, assigns the plummeting in the health and housing sector to the fact that there is a significant concern over a Canadian government decree that seeks to increase the number of international students allowed to study in Canada. However, it contends against the above-suggested perspective and argues that people find it so convenient to dismiss and criticize international students. At the same time, the natural source of the situation, an unfair governmental policy, and the already established social structures need to be fixed. They claim that international students should not be accused of homeless confinement and a deficient healthcare system because they do not treat a current situation aggressively and professionally.
Strengths and Flaws
Strengths: An article that objectively sources data and arguments from experts in charge of reshaping the government’s ideas into feasible solutions is written (Schildt, 2020). Through renting various reasons behind education and overall health problems, authors can deliver a high-quality, compelling story that will blend in with the existing discourse of school-age students because the author is an academic in the respective field, making them a reputable source. Moreover, the reader is convinced and trustworthy.
Flaws: The article precisely examines the government’s drawbacks by exposing flaws in this policy. However, to address each governance problem, it sacrifices providing specific solutions or policy recommendations, which may be an avenue worth exploring for future articles. Moreover, the fact that the subject is restricted to the national context inhibits the consideration of the topic from a broader perspective for global student immigration and a higher education system worldwide. Therefore, instead of simply stating one side of the topic, the essay could also have looked at the counterarguments or alternative side to make it comprehensive.
Discussion of Arguments
An honest and grounded article that, in turn, defuses the idea that the problematic sociological issues like housing and health problems in Canada are, to a great extent, implanted into other students’ souls (Henaghan et al.,2023). By emphasizing the systematic nature of the problems, the author makes the readers contemplate the story arc from a broader perspective and in a multi-dimensional manner as opposed to the conventional narrative. This is a way of conveying the message that implies all the participants in such a way that they will identify the causes of the problems and not only point them to the specific groups.
Even though such a perspective might be targeted with accusations by those who think that international students contribute to the deterioration of the Canadian housing market and push the local health services over their capacities, it is clear that the article does not mean to slander international students. Rather than trying to catch the particular fish and the magical solution, the essay looks to appreciate the bigger picture by focusing on the systemic factors behind these challenges to embrace inclusive and equitable solutions.
Nevertheless, some can only doubt the efficiency of systemic decisions as a total anti-crisis tool if it is coupled with specific policies suggested in the article. What is to be answered is whether the presented ideas could be effectively implemented, and we will know if it would be possible to solve the housing and healthcare problems and whether there will be international students or local Canadian students.
Likewise, proponents of the author’s view could strongly support authenticity and stress the step of barring international students out to alleviate resources and address residents’ needs. This point of view also stresses the complexity of the problem and emphasizes how significant it is to consider all viewpoints while making an all-inclusive solution. That being said, the article has successfully achieved its goal of debunking the common perceptions of international students in aggravating the housing and healthcare-related crises in general. However, it could be done with more suggestions in a detailed policy to help the readers seek system change. By renting a bigger picture of these problems and bringing various actors across stakeholders, the public will be more affluent and have more prosperous and wholesome conversations about immigration and social policy.
Discussion of Narratives
Through narration regarding immigration and the problem of housing and healthcare, an angle that is sometimes commonly neglected is brought to the fore. The article refutes the dominant storyline that put them under the limelight, only as those who harm society without any control (Kareem, 2024). The narrative of these students in the article pulls away the shroud of institutionalized inequalities obscured in immigration policies and broader social constructs, thus providing insights into the scenario.
In addition, discussing the intersection of race, class, and various immigration statuses would introduce the issue to the story with more levels of detail, making it more relatable. With a focus on how these identities intersect, the article will reveal the double (or even triple) challenges that marginalized groups face and give the notion of housing and health access within the broad context. Such intersectional analysis will contribute to identifying root systemic problems and ultimately enlighten policymakers to propose context-specific solutions that will affect the systemic barriers.
In the end, through comprehensive narratives that account for multiple perspectives and intersected analysis, the article challenges the viewpoints on the matter, presenting a broader and deeper understanding. The article is essential because it can trigger profound conversations within the ecosystem to champion a better society with room for everyone.
Conclusion
This final statement, posing a questioning skepticism on the existing pathways connecting increased immigration exposure and higher education, calls forth a deeper reflection of the causes of housing and healthcare problems in Canada. The article is skillfully crafted to highlight the role overseas students play in aggravating the housing and healthcare systems of the county, revealing the true complexities in the mentioned systems. Though the article needs to do more than state the facts to convince its readers that this problem needs immediate attention, it could be more effective by presenting the opposing viewpoints with accompanying comments and suggesting immediate actions that the policymakers can undertake. While the article supports its claims by naming specific solutions to these problems, it could do more in terms of contributing constructive ideas to the ongoing discussions on immigration issues, the housing system, and healthcare services. However, this discourse leaves readers to realize that the topic has layers, which calls for a balanced approach to come up with lasting solutions. First and foremost, policymakers must put fairness and inclusiveness at the top of their list to serve a given community’s needs better, as well as that of international students, so that there can be a more equitable and accommodating society for everyone.
References
Kareem, S. A. (2024). The Defective Image of Man in Modern Drama: A Critical Study of August Strindberg’s The Father. International Journal of Literature Studies, 4(1), 52–63.https://www.al-kindipublisher.com/index.php/ijls/article/view/6830
Kha, H., & Henaghan, M. (Eds.). (2023). Teaching Family Law: Reflections on Pedagogy and Practice. Taylor & Francis.https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=ZbzHEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PT9&dq=An+honest+and+grounded+article+that,+in+turn,+defuses+the+idea+that+the+difficult+sociological+issues+like+housing+and+health+problems+in+Canada+are+to+a+great+extent+implanted+into+other+students%E2%80%99+souls.&ots=SNGsT59Lwf&sig=NfiBGa1YHwjGPpFpJf14jBDIxKc
Schildt, H. (2020). The data imperative: How digitalization reshapes management, organizing, and work. Oxford University Press, USA.https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=gNUBEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=An+article+which+objectively+source+data+and+arguments+from+experts+in+charge+of+reshaping+government%27s+ideas+into+feasible+solutions+is+written.&ots=N1nISv2eZJ&sig=SG-u_PbTqaNiLHj0zEcIbrsPBSw
write