Introduction
Richard Baraniuk co-founded Open schools, a nonprofit that helps teachers use open-source software to create and share instructional materials. He is also the director of the open-source learning research center at the University of Pittsburgh and the author of several books on open-source technology in education. In his talk at the TED conference in 2017, Baraniuk describes the origin of the open-source movement. He provides a powerful argument for the benefits of using open-source learning resources in the classroom. In the video, Baraniuk explains the origins and core principles of the open-source movement, and he also provides a compelling argument for the importance of open-source software in education. He begins by identifying the fundamental differences between proprietary software and open-source software. For example, he points out that open-source software is generally free of cost and can be used by anyone at any time for any purpose. He also explains that open-source software is built from the contributions of many different individuals, which helps ensure its quality and effectiveness.
Summary
In his Ted talk, Richard Baraniuk argues that the birth of open-source learning has been a boon to society. It has facilitated the spread of knowledge and improved the quality of education. He notes several advantages of online learning, such as its ability to be accessible and affordable. Also, its flexibility enables learners to tailor their learning experience according to their needs and interests. However, he also argues that online learning has significant drawbacks, such as its lack of interaction and the absence of a human element in the learning process. Despite the disadvantages, he argues that embracing the positive aspects of online learning is worthwhile and working towards overcoming its limitations.
At first glance, it seems complicated to argue that open-source software development models and educational methodologies can go together. However, as explained by Richard in his TED Talk, the two complement each other quite well. Unlike traditional educational models, which are highly structured and rigidly designed, the open-source movement is characterized by a flexible approach. The flexible approach encourages collaborative development. Open-source software projects often follow a process known as agile development, in which changes and updates are implemented incrementally. The changes are implemented as they are being developed rather than applied after the entire project.
The software development approach has revolutionized the world of information technology by making it quicker and easier to change software applications (Madakam, Holmukhe & Jaiswal, 2019). It is due to response to changing user needs and preferences. In recent years, a similar approach has been adopted in the education sector in the form of open online courses and online classrooms. Students and teachers interact through a series of digital forums and discussion forums. As digital learning environments become more widely used, there is a potential for both teachers and students to develop a strong sense of community. The community can extend beyond the classroom and carries on long after the final examination has been taken.
Advantages and Disadvantages
According to Richard, there are several reasons why it is becoming increasingly relevant for the educational system to embrace a more comprehensive approach that recognizes the importance of balancing learning with social interaction. One of the main advantages of such an approach is that it allows students to develop a sense of agency over their learning process. It gives them the freedom to choose the type of content they want to learn and how they wish to learn it.
Students are no longer bound by the limitations of a particular curriculum and can instead pursue their interests and develop their skills at their own pace. It, in turn, allows them to acquire a much greater personal fulfillment from their educational experiences and improves their motivation and self-esteem. Schools can go a long way toward improving their effectiveness by encouraging students to make greater use of digital technology. At the same time, cutting costs and making the system more environmentally friendly can make the school go a long way. Indeed, access to free online resources makes it possible for students and educators to connect globally and provide mutually-beneficial support during the learning process.
The principles, he says, have enabled the open-source movement to have a tremendous impact on a wide range of industries, including education (Giotitsas, 2019). However, he believes these contributions have not been realized in the educational setting because of the high cost of proprietary textbooks and other educational materials. The high cost, he claims, prevents many teachers from purchasing these materials, which hinders their ability to teach their students effectively. Ultimately, he suggests that the goal of the open-source movement is to put the power of innovation in the hands of everyone by eliminating the barriers to innovation. The barriers to innovation continue to persist in education today.
Critique
While Baraniuk’s approach has the potential to make education more accessible and affordable, it is ultimately self-defeating because it undermines the virtues it seeks to promote. Baraniuk’s argument is built on the assumption that open-source learning will essentially be the only way people learn in the future. Although it may be the case for many colleges and universities in the future, it is unrealistic to think that it will be the only way people learn for much longer. As the world becomes more technologically developed, students will increasingly likely rely more heavily on technology in their education than traditional methods. It is harder for me to believe that open-source learning will significantly affect the future of higher education.
In his TED TALK, Richard Baraniuk argues that open-source software has been so successful that it will change how students learn (Baraniuk, 2006). Also, the way knowledge is disseminated throughout the world. He believes free and open access to educational materials will enable more people to learn. It ensures that everyone can have the opportunity to achieve their full potential. I think it reflects the core values of the open-source movement in general. Open-source software is based on the idea that information should be shared freely and without restrictions.
In the same way, open educational resources should be freely accessible to anyone who wants to use them. Additionally, it is widely believed that open-source methods have far more potential for revolutionizing education than traditional methods. It is especially true regarding online education, which is much more accessible to many people worldwide than traditional brick-and-mortar schools.
However, the most important reason I think open-source learning has a bright future is that it has the potential to fulfill one of the main goals of the open education movement. The goal is to increase access and affordability to education for all people worldwide. The open-source community has done an incredible job of developing high-quality educational materials that are available free of charge to anyone who wishes to use them. However, it is essential to remember that open-source projects are often more successful when they function primarily as communities rather than top-down organizations. It will be essential to encourage broad participation in its development and implementation for open-source learning to be successful in the future.
Conclusion
Moral concepts such as justice and fairness play a central role in shaping people’s understanding of right and wrong behavior. While moral theories may differ in the view of human nature and the source of morality, they all share a common goal of promoting altruism. There are several reasons why open-source learning represents a significant shift away from educational practices. It creates more flexible learning environments by providing educators with the tools needed to develop their curriculum. Opensource software offers educators control over the learning process by eliminating the limitations of proprietary software companies.
References
Baraniuk, R. (2006). The Birth of the Open-Source Learning Revolution. Retrieved from: https://www.ted.com/talks/richard_baraniuk_the_birth_of_the_open_source_learning_revolution
Giotitsas, C. (2019). Open source agriculture: Grassroots technology in the digital era. Springer Nature.
Madakam, S., Holmukhe, R. M., & Jaiswal, D. K. (2019). The future digital work force: robotic process automation (RPA). JISTEM-Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management, 16.
write