Introduction
To have achieved success, a condition deep within the fabric of our common vocabulary is seen as a real-life reference in our society. Previously, it has been notoriously connected to something physical, status, and reaching milestones in our professional career (Gemini et al., 161). Nevertheless, such a narrow definition does not mirror a multi-leveled essence of accomplishment and human satisfaction. In this paper, I will support a statement that the currently widely used definition of success is unsatisfactory and out-of-date. I am going to argue for a redefinition that will take account of personal development, contentment, and social commitment. Through tracing the historical meanings of the term “success” and analyzing how it has evolved in modern life, I aim to show us the urgency of an all-encompassing success approach.
Historical Background
The idea of success is as old as human civilization itself, and it was connected to ideals of surplus and victory, as well as achieving goals. In the realms of Greek philosophy, ‘success,’ also known as επιτυχία (epitukhía), was seen as the achievement of desired results, covering the fields of both politics and sports and the philosophic quest. Despite this setting, accomplishment meant not only achieving the previously formulated objectives but also discovering the talent and mastering the craft (Holcombe, 43). Roman culture also believed in the importance of success as it was rewarded for the person who put effort into reaching the high standards of life. There, prudence and persistence gained popularity as virtues by which success was known, therefore demonstrating the usefulness of resilience and persistence in the pursuit of one’s aspirations. These initial conceptions of success illustrated comprehensive thinking that included individual acquirement and the larger community setting within which such a feat occurred.
From the continuing evolution of societies, the values of materialism and individualism became more interconnected with the meaning of success than before. The beginning of the Industrial Revolution and later the victory of capitalism brought about huge changes in how people measured success, endowing financial prosperity and social status as key measures of success. This transformation soon resulted in a re-directing of the sights as success became more and more closely associated with the external indicators of progress. There was a shift of focus on the growth of resources and personal growth, which is diametrical to other dimensions of fulfillment and completion. Hence, the notion of success has been limited by the wealth and status that has been carried on in modern times (Daumard, 90). Although human conceptual changes and the culture adapting dynamics are changing, the present concept of success is still largely rooted in materialistic ideals, and hence, these stereotypes are narrow and fail to account for the multifaceted nature of the human menu.
Inadequacies of the Conventional Definition
The age-old notion of success, primarily connoting attaining wealth, power, and prestige, ignores the different pathways through which individuals come to feel contentment and happiness in their lives. This one-dimensional perception ignores the diversity of individual personality traits and life ambitions. Thus, it does not broaden the idea of success. Moreover, these standards are actually feeding into society’s norms and existing inequalities. Through a focus on material wealth and social status as the ultimate marks of success, the voices and alternative forms of achievements of marginalized individuals and communities are left out or tabled. Hence, the perpetuation of this type of success limits individual growth and self-actualization as part of a culture of comparison, competition, and uneasiness (Hansen, 4641). At the end of the day, the conventional mindset on success must be replaced with a more open-minded approach to human experiences that would bring a better and fairer social environment.
Material wealth, being the ultimate measurement of success, gets embedded in the culture of consumerism and greed, which directs individuals to collect material possessions and financial resources instead of their well-being in a holistic manner. This unrestrained pursuit of wealth often leads to these distressing feelings of emptiness and desolation that can be seen in our modern society through increasing rates of anxiety, depression, and inner dissatisfaction (Moldes et al., 1396). The incessant quest for materialistic possessions may turn into a domineering sensation of having no non-material values and got purposes, and so on and again. Consequently, the increasing importance of material possessions is not only distorting the views of success but, at the same time, aggravates social issues by promoting a culture of materialism and luxurious spending. By neglecting the role that psychological and emotional fulfillment play in success, the standard definition thus contributes to a collective uneasiness that diminishes the welfare of society and the individuals that compose it.
The perpetuation of a mindset fixated on achieving validation from the outside world continues to keep competitiveness as the driving force behind the decline in the degree of well-being and cooperation in society. Where the criteria for success typically are the superiority of one over the others, empathy and communal solidarity can easily become the hostages of a single individual’s desperate desire to win. Such perpetuates social division, leading to a culture where individuals give preference to personal advancement at the cost of community harmony. As a result, a poisoned culture of comparison and unsuitability will be produced, enabling an environment where the subjects of the comparison will be measured by the other’s success, not their inner happiness. The culture of competition engenders an atmosphere with no shortages of insecurity and omnipresence of inadequacy that has the notable effect of undermining mutual cooperation, thus preventing genuine collaboration and effective support. In fact, according to Lauer (20), the conventional concept of success continues to feed this competitive pattern; it is called social isolation, and it makes society fragmented, and it is hard to build a cohesive and empathetic society.
In addition to that, the constricted definition of success tends to exclude marginalized communities, and therefore, systemized inequalities are reinforced. This idea of success reflects one form of that kind of achievement, and it neglects other forms. This narrow definition of success serves only to reinforce the power structure and get in the way of an egalitarian society (Duncarme & Frederic, 8). In addition to this, particular groups are systematically left out or locked in, thus making it more and more challenging for these groups to close the gap because of ethnicity, gender, social status, and other social challenges. The deification of usual emblems of achievement not only stabilizes hierarchies but also nullifies different means of success, thus stopping the latter from being used by the historically deprived groups. Thus, the sustainability of the current limited notion of success keeps the playing field uneven and stunts any potential progress toward a fairer and just tomorrow. It is only through engaging in the deconstruction and rebuilding of our concept of success that we can then start bringing down the systematic injustices that ignore and denigrate the rich tapestry of human contributions to life.
Redefining Success
Given the limitations that wealth and social status have, success needs to be redefined holistically, which expands the notion of success beyond those traditional metrics that we have (Gesun et al., 2). In my plan, success is not only considered what external achievements can achieve but also what personal fulfillment, self-satisfaction, and contribution to society should be considered as well. Unlike the view that success is exclusively measured through material gains, success should be able to be measured based on the self-realization and positive impact that society has on itself and its environment. This reframed idea of success verticalizes the scattered importance of superficial measurements for people’s progress and the capacity for change-making. By adopting a more comprehensive notion of success that focuses mostly on individual health, personal achievement, and community development, we can enable people to live fully by producing better lives and contributing to a better society at large.
The first option that would meet the requirement is to privilege the whole being, which consists of physical, mental, emotional, and spiritual parts. Being truly successful is not limited to collecting shiny external accomplishments anymore; instead, it derives from the desire to have a holistic and balanced existence in all areas of life. Such a holistic perspective implies that a person should be comfortable with themselves, manifest their talents, and be strong enough to resist various problems. It states that true success isn’t only anchored on how you gather material wealth or social recognition, but it’s the meaning of life itself that brings a person to a state of overall satisfaction. To promote individual health and wholeness, people are motivated to do more self-care, mindfulness, and even personal growth. The redefinition of success, which is not only by individual well-being but also through society’s development of empathy and close-knit, is, therefore, able to improve the quality of life of society’s members.
Another point is revising the definition of success in a way that emphasizes personal prosperity and self-actualization, not surpassing other people but a feeling of satisfaction. Each pathway is different, and each person encounters untold mountains – the real achievement happens during the period of overcoming the obstacles, the learning process from mistakes, and the development of your own self. Instead of just assessing the level of success by way of matching it with the absolute standards or the outside world’s accomplishments, attention is shifted to personal growth and happiness. This paradigm shift, therefore, challenges people to be more of who they really are rather than what custom expects from them, to emphasize their unique strengths, and to pursue objectives that align with their dreams and goals. Here, success is less about the level but rather a personal and life-long journey of self-exploration and self-development. People ought to be urged to find personal development rather than place too much pressure on themselves to win in the competition, during which they look for success as being synonymous with their prosperity, wealth, and fame. In the end, this shift in mental attitude brings around a culture of personal compassion, resilience, and self-awareness, which is the premise of significant and long-lasting personality growth.
Moreover, we need to refashion the meaning of success such that recognizing the actualized diversity of gifts and generosity to others as well as the entire community is prioritized. To that end, instead of pursuing only personal achievements or wealth, ideally, the degree of success should be concentrated on the general effect we have in the world. Regardless of whether it is specifically via doing good deeds, inventing new ways to deal with social problems, or advocating for social justice, success is not only measured by achieving material goals but also by how much people contribute to society to alleviate the hardships of others and bring about societal betterment. Such a mindset shift aims to drive people to put the interest of others and the good of the community at the focal point rather than belittling it with self-interested considerations. Not in vain, concentrating on service and altruism as virtues helps the community to employ their talents and resources for the purpose of fixing urgent social problems and donating to a better world. Ultimately, periodic achievements are not the factors of one’s success but the influence and imprint they leave on the lives of the communities and the individuals whom the person has influenced through action.
Examples of Alternative Definitions
The definition of success, as propounded by Paul Farmer, breaks away from the traditional parameters of success. Not only as a celebrated doctor of his time but also a humanitarian, Farmer spent his whole life helping patients worldwide. Not accumulated by abundant material wealth or widespread prominence, farmers’ audible work helped to rescue numerous lives and lead future activists (Nasser, 23). The significance of his success is not that he is following conventional standards but that he remains unbending in pursuing justice and compassion all the way. Farmer is beyond individual merit, as his unwavering hard work has managed to provide lifesaving medical assistance to those who most deserve it, with no limitations to socioeconomic status or geographical location. This account points out how powerful some people can become as they are guided by a purpose and a conviction to serve others. The life of a farmer stands up to the low cultural idea of achievement by indicating the value of dedication, empathy, and the urge to serve others in accomplishing a good life.
The premise of “Bhutanese Gross National Happiness” as an alternative to the traditional evaluation of success recalibrates the entire concept of achievement. In this particular case, prosperity in Bhutan does not coincide with the popular measure of GDP and instead consists of people’s welfare and satisfaction (Clinton, 2022). The Bhutanese government demonstrates that through strategic policies that take into consideration environment protection, cultural promotion, and equitable development, economic growth is not the same as progress, which has been consistently held. Such a progressive approach will look beyond the confines of merely financial wealth, and the cost of socioeconomic welfare can be accounted for. By giving precedence to the unfolding of the happiness and complete satisfaction of its citizens rather than to material growth, Bhutan has become the prototype of development that strongly advocates for a good quality of life, environmental protection, and a diversified culture. In this manner, Bhutan offers an exemplary case of how reforming success can be very much related to the recipe of more sustainable and flourishing societies in which the quest for betterment is accompanied by an eye for social well-being and environmental care.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the common outlook on success fails to encapsulate the complexity and the richness of human existence. By redefining success to first value self-satisfaction, personal development, and social progress, we will be able to develop a more inclusive and sustainable image of prosperity. The time has come to discard the limited definitions of success and embrace the decent perception that celebrates the inherent dignity and value of every human being.
Works Cited
Clifton, Jon. Blind spot: The global rise of unhappiness and how leaders missed it. Simon and Schuster, 2022.
Daumard, Adeline. “Wealth and affluence in France since the beginning of the nineteenth century.” Wealth and the Wealthy in the Modern World. Routledge, 2024. 90–121.
Ducarme, Frédéric, and Denis Couvet. “What does ‘nature’mean?.” Palgrave Communications 6.1 (2020): 1-8.
Gemino, Andrew, Blaize Horner Reich, and Pedro M. Serrador. “Agile, traditional, and hybrid approaches to project success: is hybrid a poor second choice?.” Project Management Journal 52.2 (2021): 161-175.
Gesun, Julianna S., et al. “A scoping literature review of engineering thriving to redefine student success.” Studies in Engineering Education 2.2 (2021).
Hansen, Ian G. “Self-Actualization.” Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences (2020): 4641–4644.
Holcombe, Randall G. “Engineering is not entrepreneurship.” Moonshots and the New Industrial Policy: Questioning the Mission Economy (2024): 43–60.
Lauer, Thomas. Change management: fundamentals and success factors. Springer Nature, 2020.
Moldes, Olaya, and Lisbeth Ku. “Materialistic cues make us miserable: A meta‐analysis of the experimental evidence for the effects of materialism on individual and societal well-being.” Psychology & Marketing 37.10 (2020): 1396-1419.
Nasser, Elias. Physicians as Patient Advocates: A Tribute to Dr. Paul Farmer. Diss. 2023.
write