The Effect of Social Proximity on Phonetic Prejudices
Several sociolinguistic studies strongly support the notion that phonetic prejudice tends to intensify the more exposure individuals have to the stigmatizing influences of dominant cultures. Moreover, research across many cultural contexts has found that the same oppressive dialectal features are judged more harshly by local listeners than those further removed geographically. The degree of “foreign accent” in a dialect similarly affects prejudice levels, with stronger accents eliciting more negative reactions, especially in immediate communities (Dacon, J2022). The emergence of international auxiliary languages such as Esperanto may have a sound influence in mediating the prejudices minority groups face amid dominant cultures exploiting the political advantages of prejudice and dominance. Moreover, sociolinguistic proximity arguably promotes prejudice by increasing awareness of subtle phonetic variations from the esteemed norms. Nearby variants become firmly embedded in local identities and thus more readily flagged as shameful defects versus more neutral and natural conversational motifs in the dominant culture. With distance, on the other hand, dialects are processed in broader phonetic categories that encompass many sounds under large stylistic or regional umbrellas, precluding focus on the validity and esteem of specific stigmatized phonemes.
Familiarity has been shown to breed contempt for shameful communal signs, while the perceived strangeness of distant phonetic inventories maintains fascination. Geography allows one to encounter unfamiliar sounds devoid of commentaries, linking them to undesirable sociocultural traits (Dovchin, 2022). Psychologically, distance facilitates impressions of phonetic differences as superficial curiosities rather than core deficiencies of moral character as fed by social dynamics of neighbourhood rivalry. The psychological effect of speaking Esperanto liberates the supposedly domineering and the victim of linguistic prejudice because both assume a critical unanimity occasioned by its universality. Moreover, regular interaction amplifies the recognition of minute variant sounds as shameful deviations. In contrast, such prejudicial associations fade when contact dwindles, and perceivers comprehend dialects in vaguer holistic phonetic categories untethered from close social relationships.
Morphological Prejudice Are Linked To the Familiarity between Actor Cultures
Research indicates that the levels of morphological prejudice correlate strongly with familiarity between linguistic communities. Distant morphological patterns, encountered without preexisting social attitudes attached, tend to provoke intrigue rather than condemnation. Unfamiliar morphology challenges perceivers in a novel yet non-threatening manner when not directly compared to a proximal native variety (Yang et al., 2023). Without familiarity breeding contempt, otherness appears exotic, indicative of cultural creativity rather than defect. With distance, unfamiliar morphologies are initially judged based on their unique intrinsic qualities rather than as shameful deviations from a communal standard. Optimistically, Esperanto conveys a spirit of hope and an invigorated universalism that achieves a unique cultural opacity. When people can supersede the narrow confines of cultural limitations, they are part of a more expansive essence of human experience beyond parochialism. There is no preexisting stigma to confirm or stigma to overcome through such a configured encounter.
In contrast, morphological patterns within one’s speech community or among familiar neighbouring types become firmly tied to complex webs of sociocultural identity. Even minor divergences thus threaten social solidarity, provoking prejudice as attempts to shore up communal norms and boundaries. Variants represent not neutral phenomena but choice political stances toward the prestige ideology (Levy, 2023). Proximity enhances such judgments by embedding variants deeply within labourers of daily social significance. Undesirable morphologies symbolize dangerous uncontrollable deviations infectious to the community if endorsed. Distance disentangles novel patterns from webs of identity politics and perceived sociocultural threats, allowing objective analysis to be uninformed by embedded biases and stereotypes. Unfamiliarity preserves exoticism, preventing another from facing hostility reserved for domestic others.
Case Studies Can Demonstrate Effective Exhibition of the Distance Effect
Numerous case studies provide compelling evidence that distance moderates linguistic prejudice in diverse and complex ways. Within countries, regional accents closer to prestige standards experience fewer stigmas than those farther removed, as proximity enhances familiarity. A significantly influential case of Esperanto intended to achieve international liberation of people from their parochial configurations of cultures in the contest has the chance to neutralize sociolinguistic contests of domination and marginalization. In contrast, immigrant languages spoken in close geographic concentration to natives elicit more substantial prejudice than those of more spatially dispersed immigrants. Moreover, attitudes towards former colonies also illuminate this. Territories proximal to imperial powers faced fiercer attempts to obliterate native languages during colonization (Yang et al., 2023). Conversely, languages of remote territories were sometimes subject to less oppressive policies and warmer public perceptions that valued their well-preserved exoticism. Post-independence, close former colonies still confronted residual dismissive biases towards “less civilized” languages.
Even in decolonized states, dominant groups harboured more prejudice towards autochthonous languages occupying proximate territories than those from far-flung borderlands. Global economic hierarchies spawn parallel biases, with languages of geographically nearer yet financially poorer nations facing more derision than remote languages. Contempt nuances based on physical, cultural and economic distance factors reveal the varied cultural stances of pride and prejudice segments of society take against the minor others (Furlong, 2020). While geography cannot single-handedly erase entrenched prejudices, these cases demonstrate its potential to alleviate stigma. Reactions among diverse segments within a population still vary based on ideological convictions, economic factors, and perceived cultural-racial threats to the survival of families or small neighbourhoods and community settlements. The notion and construct of a “less civilized” language does not emerge when a substantial population can speak a language like Esperanto.
Moreover, globalization in today’s society tends to mitigate distance through connectivity and mobility occasioned by the digital media influences in society. Distance fosters initial neutral perceptions, allowing objective analysis unhindered by prejudice, though proximity strengthens stigmatization by intensifying familiarity with variants and their social meanings. Together, they reveal geography as one moderating factor of complex intersectional linguistic discrimination.
Dominant Psychological Factors and Correlation to the Distance Effect
Several fundamental psychological principles help explain how distance moderates prejudice. As the idiom goes, familiarity breeds contempt, whereas the unfamiliar tends to provoke curiosity rather than hostility. Proximity strengthens attachment to in-group norms, casting any deviation as a threatening trespass (Bonotti & Willoughby, 2023). At a distance, variants encounter perceivers with blank cognitive slates, judged objectively rather than through the lens of embedded biases. Distance preserves the mystique of otherness as an enticing enigma rather than an affront. With proximity, linguistic variants become symbolically overloaded as proud displays of distinct identities or shameful character defects (Strelluf, 2023). Research also shows that close contact enhances awareness of even subtle distinctions as meaningful social markers. Variants represent not neutral phenomena but purposeful signs of allegiance toward a prestigious or stigmatized group. Such experiences often tend to prime negative judgments versus more neutral distant appraisals.
Proximity encourages beliefs that stigmatized variants deliberately flout respectable conventions or reflect the deep-rooted moral failings of their users. Distance decouples variants from such prejudgments of user character by preventing variants from becoming embedded indexes of rivalry-based identities. Without familiarity, specific linguistic variants retain ambiguity and humanity as natural if exhibited as unfamiliar phenomena (Cao, 2023). From extensive literature across sociolinguistics, psychology of language, cultural attitudes, and historical analyses of colonial linguistic policies, it can be demonstrated that prejudices are politically induced and nurtured. The essay explores and examines the psychological mechanisms and real-world case studies supporting geography as a moderating factor (Furlong, 2020). Psychologically, familiarity readily qualifies to breed contempt for home varieties that become firmly associated with social identities. At the same time, the perceived exoticness of distant linguistic variants may trigger curiosity instead of hostility. These psychological distances help relieve variants of prejudiced symbolic baggage commonly incurred through proximity and intergroup familiarity. Distance preserves initial neutrality before biases emerge to dominate perceptions.
Boundaries and Existing Limitations of Distance in Reducing Prejudice
While distance can alleviate prejudice by reducing familiarity, some delimitations must be acknowledged. Geography alone does not eliminate all prejudice, as biases are deeply ingrained social phenomena embedded within complex political and historical contexts. At best, distance may temper but not fully erase prejudiced viewpoints. Reactions to linguistic variants also depend strongly on ideological convictions and socio-political group affiliations that can exacerbate or counteract distance effects (Craft et al., 2020). Comparative analyses of colonial-era attitudes parallel this observation, with the kin languages of more proximal colonies often facing severe contempt than those at greater distance. The eminent morphological patterns equally elicit less hostility with the experience of distance. In this regard, the unfamiliar morphological systems provoke intrigue and curiosity rather than contempt when encountered from cultures remotely placed versus amongst neighbours (Buskell et al., 2019). The critical factor of distant and resultant linguistic patterns has more potential to seem foreign and displaced instead of defective when encountered outside familiar social dynamics within close cultural proximity. Prejudices may persist at a distance if ideologies vilify the dehumanized other. Conversely, anti-bias education and intercultural exposure can mitigate prejudices even amidst proximity by bolstering empathy and social solidarity.
Globalization also complicates distance, with mass media, travel and telecommunications eroding physical barriers between groups. These enable familiarity to bloom without geographic proximity as prejudices spread virally. Distant communities may now share intimate familiarity through online contact (Rosa & Flores, 2020). Certain post-colonial prejudices also endure precisely due to neo-imperial ideologies that project influence globally to justify continued domination. Distance fails to remedy prejudice when systemic inequalities transect the global sociolinguistic landscape. In countries like Hungary and China, where Esperanto has entered the mainstream through the public education system, there is hope that the inspiration can inspire widespread use of the neutral linguistic variant as a positive reinforcement of multiculturalism. Moreover, while distance offers prejudice mitigation through unfamiliarity, its impact depends on concurring social and ideological conditions. Prejudice ultimately stems from complex power disparities not ideally amended by geography alone amid shifting political economies and technological influences that have shrunk our world while widening emergent social disparities.
Conclusion
While geography alone does not eliminate linguistic prejudice, physical and cultural distance from a disfavored variety can help decouple it from perceptions of social identity and lessen prejudicial associations based on phonetics and morphology. The international auxiliary languages offer one way to embed this distance effect and mitigate prejudices. This research underscores the potentially viable use of Esperanto in the era of globalization and multiculturalism to inspire a new wave of cultural and sociolinguistic neutrality that ameliorates the hostile incidences of sociolinguistic prejudices. Moreover, while distance alone does not eliminate linguistic chauvinism, it is prominently observable that physical and cultural extraction from a stigmatized variety can significantly moderate phonetically- and morphologically-based prejudice by decoupling existing variants from perceptions of social inferiority characteristics. International auxiliary languages aim to embed this geographic distance effect to counter various prejudices, and the project deserves more significant effort and public participation.
References
Bonotti, M., & Willoughby, L. (2023). Linguistic prejudice and electoral discrimination: What can political theory learn from sociolinguistics?. Metaphilosophy.
Buskell, A., Enquist, M., & Jansson, F. (2019). A systems approach to cultural evolution. Palgrave Communications, 5(1).
Cao, L. (2023). Racialized queer immigrants’ English learning in Canada: A sociolinguistic ethnography.
Craft, J. T., Wright, K. E., Weissler, R. E., & Queen, R. M. (2020). Language and discrimination: Generating meaning, perceiving identities, and discriminating outcomes. Annual Review of Linguistics, 6, 389-407.
Dacon, J. (2022). Towards a deep multi-layered dialectal language analysis: A case study of African-American English. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.08978.
Dovchin, S. (2022). Translingual discrimination. Elements in Intercultural Communication.
Furlong, A. (2020). Adapting Pride and Prejudice: Stylistic choices as communicative acts (pp. 45-60). London: Bloomsbury.
Levy, T. I. (2023). The Phonetics of Prejudice: Exploring Emotional and Racial Perceptions of African American Language and the’Angry Black Woman’Stereotype (Doctoral dissertation, Northeastern Illinois University).
Rosa, J., & Flores, N. (2020). Reimagining race and language. The Oxford handbook of language and race, 90.
Strelluf, C. (2023). Sociophonetics and the sociolinguistic-phonetic interface: A radical introduction. In The Routledge Handbook of Sociophonetics (pp. 1-20). Routledge.
Yang, M., McAllister, G., & Huang, B. (2023). Trilingual and Multicultural Experiences Mitigating Students’ Linguistic Stereotypes: Investigating the Perceptions of Undergraduates of Chinese Heritage Regarding Native/Non-Native English Teachers. Behavioral Sciences, 13(7), 588.
write