Chapter 1: Introduction
1.1 Over View
For the last two decades, Dual Credit (DC) coursework enrollment has increased. In Texas, DC was approved in 1995 by the Legislature. Texas lawmakers decided to lower state support and deregulate college tuition in the early 2000s, making it more expensive for students and parents to attend college (Miller et al., 2017). The number of people who can afford college is not graduating at a rate sufficient to meet the state’s anticipated labor requirements. The atmosphere for dual credit development in Texas was created by rising costs and low graduation rates (Moreland & Miller, 2017).
Due to this, high school students can now enroll in classes at the college level and get credits that will apply toward both their high school diplomas and upcoming college degrees (Duncheon & Relles, 2020). These programs are becoming increasingly well-liked in Texas, which presents both possibilities and difficulties for institutions of higher learning.
Dual credit programs have gained significant traction in recent years, which allow high school students to enroll in college-level courses and receive credits that count toward their high school diplomas and eventual college degrees (Rigsby, 2019). These programs are becoming increasingly well-liked in Texas, which presents both possibilities and difficulties for institutions of higher learning. An in-depth analysis of the importance of dual credit student performance and its effects on Texas higher education institutions is provided in this essay (Dyer et al., 2022).
Due to their ability to solve important challenges in the Texas educational system, dual credit programs are growing favorably. The programs are intended to encourage easier transitions into college life, improve college preparedness, and give early exposure to higher education. Students gain confidence, experience the difficulty of college education, and learn critical time management and study skills by completing dual credit coursework effectively (Field, 2021). This increased preparedness may impact the state’s objectives and the general operation of higher education institutions.
However, the benefits also bring with them difficulties that institutions of higher learning must resolve. In order to meet the increase in dual credit students, it is crucial to guarantee seamless credit transfer and offer sufficient academic assistance. In order to maintain a level of rigor across all programs, institutions must match dual credit courses with their academic requirements.
Purpose of the Research
This research aims to examine how the success of dual credit students impacts the goals and objectives of higher education institutions in Texas. It aims to investigate the effects of dual credit programs on college enrollment rates, student diversity, institutional reputation, and overall academic performance within the state’s higher education context.
Specific Goals of the Project:
- To explore the Impact on Enrollment
- To examine the Influence on Student Diversity
- To evaluate the Effect on Institutional Reputation
- To Investigate Academic Performance and Retention
- To identify Challenges and Recommendations
Research Questions
- How does the success of dual credit students impact college enrollment rates at higher education institutions in Texas?
- How do dual credit programs influence student diversity within higher education institutions in Texas?
- How does the success of dual credit students affect the reputation and competitiveness of higher education institutions in Texas?
Organization of the paper
The paper will be organized into distinct sections, each serving a specific purpose and contributing to a comprehensive exploration of the impact of dual credit students’ success on higher education institutions in Texas.
The introduction section will set the stage for the research by providing an overview of the topic’s significance and relevance to higher education institutions in Texas. It will introduce the concept of dual credit programs, their increasing popularity, and their potential benefits and challenges. The introduction will also present the purpose of the research and the project’s specific goals, highlighting the research questions that will guide the investigation.
The literature review section will follow, summarizing relevant research studies and scholarly articles related to dual credit programs and their impact on higher education institutions in Texas. This section will synthesize existing knowledge, discussing the effects of successful dual credit students on college enrollment rates, student diversity, institutional reputation, and academic performance. The review will draw from various reputable sources, ensuring a robust foundation of evidence to support the subsequent analysis.
The following section will comprehensively analyze the issue, addressing each research question in detail. For the first research question, the paper will explore data on college enrollment trends, examining whether students who excel in dual credit programs prefer enrolling in the same institution. The analysis will delve into the factors influencing their decisions and the implications for higher education institutions in Texas.
The second research question will be addressed by examining how dual credit programs attract a more diverse student body to higher education institutions. The paper will discuss the benefits of early exposure to college-level coursework for underrepresented communities and marginalized backgrounds. It will explore the positive impact on the learning environment, fostering inclusivity and broadening perspectives.
In addressing the third research question, the paper will delve into the influence of dual credit students’ success on the reputation and competitiveness of higher education institutions in Texas. The analysis will explore the role of word-of-mouth promotion from satisfied dual credit students and their families in shaping institutional image within the community. It will also consider how strong relationships with high schools through dual credit partnerships contribute to institutional reputation.
Following the analysis, the paper will present clear conclusions and evidence-based recommendations. The conclusions will summarize the key findings from the research and highlight the implications of dual credit students’ success in higher education institutions in Texas. The recommendations will offer practical and actionable suggestions for policymakers, educators, and administrators to optimize the positive impact of dual credit programs and address any challenges identified during the research.
The paper will conclude with a summary of the main points discussed and emphasize the significance of understanding the impact of dual credit students’ success on higher education institutions in Texas. It will highlight the potential benefits of leveraging dual credit programs to enhance the state’s college enrollment, diversity, reputation, and overall academic excellence. Finally, the conclusion will underscore the importance of continuous research and collaboration to maximize the positive outcomes of dual credit initiatives in the Texas higher education landscape.
Chapter 2: Literature Review
2. 1 Historical Background of Dual Credit Programs in Texas.
The historical background of dual credit programs in Texas traces back several decades, with the development of these programs influenced by changing educational policies and the state’s commitment to expanding college opportunities for high school students. The roots of dual credit initiatives can be traced to the early 20th century, but their formal establishment and growth gained momentum in the late 20th and early 21st centuries (Giani et al., 2014; Rigsby, 2019).
The concept of dual credit, where high school students could earn college credits for coursework completed during their secondary education, originates in early educational experimentation. Some colleges and universities in Texas started offering college-level courses to high school students in the 1920s, mainly as part of advanced placement programs (Cowan & Goldhaber, 2015). These early endeavors were limited in scope and accessibility.
The formal establishment of dual credit programs in Texas can be attributed to the 1970s and 1980s (Bozkurt, 2019). During this period, state policymakers recognized the need to bridge the gap between high school and college education. They aimed to increase college readiness and provide opportunities for high school students to earn college credits, making higher education more accessible and affordable. In the 1980s, the Texas Legislature began actively supporting the development of dual credit programs through legislative acts and funding initiatives. The Texas Education Agency (TEA) was key in coordinating and expanding dual credit opportunities across the state (Reich et al., 2020).
In the 1990s, partnerships between high schools and colleges were formalized, facilitating the establishment of dual credit programs in high schools and college campuses. These collaborations allowed high school students to take college-level courses taught by high school instructors or faculty(Hagen Alvarado, 2020). Dual credit policies were first authorized in Texas in 1995. Texas enacted House Bill 1336, which acknowledged dual credit education as an intervention strategy that institutions of higher learning might utilize to assist students in transitioning from high school to post-secondary education.
As Texas continues to stress the value of college preparedness and accessibility for high school students in the twenty-first century, the backdrop of dual credit programs in Texas continues to change (Giani et al., 2014). Dual credit schemes saw tremendous development and extension in the early 2000s as state authorities and educational institutions came to understand the potential advantages of such projects. Texas saw a rise in the number of high schools and universities working together to provide dual credit courses in the early 2000s. This development was motivated by the rising demand from parents and students looking for ways to shorten the time and expense of obtaining a college degree. The Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB), which provides rules and assistance to assure uniformity and quality in dual credit offers throughout the state, played a critical role in ensuring those two factors (Cowan & Goldhaber, 2015; Bozkurt, 2019).
The breadth of dual credit programs in Texas has expanded beyond conventional academic courses by the middle of the 2000s. The Texas Legislature approved House Bill 3468 in 2011, extending the availability of dual credit to include technical courses and workforce education initiatives. With an eye on students interested in technical and vocational courses, this action attempted to match dual credit possibilities with the broad career and employment demands of Texas (Bozkurt, 2019)
The “Graduate by Numbers” campaign was introduced by the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board in 2015. To raise college completion rates in Texas, this effort attempted to improve student preparedness for higher education, including dual credit options (Klimitchek, 2017). To lower college dropout rates and provide students with the information and skills they need to thrive in post-secondary education, dual credit was stressed. In 2020, Dual credit programs are still thriving in Texas, and more high school students are using them to get college credits before completing their high school education (Simieou III et al., 2021).
The acceptance and influence of dual credit programs in Texas have risen steadily throughout the twenty-first century (Simieou III et al., 2021). More high school students than ever before are taking advantage of these chances to earn college credits while still in high school, providing them an advantage in the college application process and preparing them for the intellectual demands of higher education.
2.2. The Structure and Administration of Dual Credit Programs in the State.
In Texas, the organization and management of dual credit programs are well-coordinated and entail cooperation between high schools and institutes of higher learning. The Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB), which establishes policies and rules to guarantee uniformity and high standards across the state, oversees these programs (Ferguson et al., 2015; Page & Scott-Clayton, 2016).
Page & Scott-Clayton (2016) claimed that the relationship between high schools and colleges or universities is the foundation of the dual credit program framework. High schools find qualifying pupils who satisfy certain eligibility requirements, such as academic achievement and results on standardized tests. These students are then allowed to register for college-level courses provided by affiliated colleges or universities, either on the institution’s campus, online, or at the high school itself.
Bailey et al. (2015) explained that many parties manage dual credit programs, including advisers, college instructors, and high school officials. In order to find qualified students, aid them with the application process, and guide them toward the right courses that complement their academic and professional aspirations, high school counselors and administrators are essential. Bleiklie et al. (2016) added that college faculty members are in charge of instructing the dual credit courses and ensuring that their content and difficulty level are comparable to those provided to regular college students. To guarantee students a worthwhile educational experience, the courses must adhere to the same criteria and learning objectives as normal college courses (Bleiklie et al., 2016).
Colleges often employ dual credit coordinators or administrators to work with high schools, manage the program’s administrative details, and resolve problems (Haxton et al., 2016). These coordinators collaborate closely with high school partners to provide seamless communication and a smooth transition for dual credit students between their high school and college experiences. The Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board is crucial in developing program criteria, formulating policy, and assessing the efficacy of dual credit programs throughout the state (Venezia & Jaeger, 2013). The engagement of THECB helps to handle any possible credit transfer concerns that may emerge for students who seek to continue their studies at other schools or universities, as well as ensuring that dual credit courses adhere to academic standards (Weissman, 2022).
To keep up with shifting goals and requirements in education, the Texas Legislature evaluates and modifies laws about dual credit programs regularly. These modifications often increase credit transferability, dual credit alignment with workforce demands, and program accessibility.
2.3 Policies or Initiatives Related to Dual Credit in Texas.
Texas has developed several dual credit regulations and measures to guarantee their efficacy, equal access, and conformity with the state’s educational objectives. Increased college enrolment, improved college preparedness, and effective high school-to-college transitions are the goals of these programs and initiatives.
Paulson et al. (2021) claimed that a state-mandated program called the Texas Success Initiative (TSI) evaluates high school students’ college preparedness and decides whether they are prepared to enroll in a college-level curriculum. Students must complete the TSI assessment requirements to take part in dual credit programs. The TSI promotes college preparedness by ensuring pupils have the intellectual abilities to excel in college-level courses.
The 2015 law HB 505 intends to raise the standard and accountability of dual credit programs. To guarantee that they can efficiently teach college-level material, the law stipulates that dual credit teachers must fulfill certain requirements and undergo training. Additionally, it defines guidelines for choosing dual credit courses and guarantees adherence to college academic requirements.
The Texas Education Agency (TEA) and the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) are partners in the Early College High School (ECHS) Initiative. By allowing historically underprivileged students to concurrently receive a high school diploma and an associate’s degree or college credits, this effort aims to boost college preparedness and enrolment among these students. In order to assist students in excelling in college-level curricula, ECHS programs strongly emphasize college preparedness and provide academic support.
Memorandums of Understanding (MOUs) are often created by colleges and high schools engaged in dual credit agreements to spell out the rules and regulations of the program. MOUs specify each party’s obligations, the available courses, how credits are transferred, and other program-specific information. These agreements aid in fostering open dialogue and collaboration between the institutions.
Texas has put in place financial assistance efforts to increase students’ access to and affordability of dual credit. The cost of dual credit programs is mostly covered by state support, which eases the financial load on students and their families. Additionally, some programs provide students with free access to dual credit courses.
The state’s dual credit requirements are outlined in the Texas Administrative Code (TAC), which establishes criteria for dual credit courses, teacher credentials, student eligibility, credit transfer, and other program elements. These requirements guarantee uniformity and high standards for all Texas dual credit programs.
Initiatives for College Credit Transfer: Texas colleges and universities have taken action to enhance the transferability of dual credit courses to institutions of higher learning. Credits gained in dual credit programs must be recognized and utilized toward degree requirements at public colleges and universities. This is ensured through articulation agreements and course equivalency matrices.
Chapter 3: Impact of Dual Credit (DC) Programmes
Dual Credit Programs and Their Impact on Higher Education Institutions in Texas.
Dual Credit (DC) program enrollment has increased in the United States, including Texas. Through dual credit programs, high school students can enroll in college-level courses and get credit for both their high school and college studies simultaneously. These programs offer students several advantages, including advanced courses, shorter degree completion times, lower costs, and assistance transitioning from high school to college.
An increase in enrollment is one of the dual credit systems’ most important effects on Texas’ higher education institutions. By taking advantage of these initiatives, high school students are also enrolling in college courses, which increases the number of students on college campuses. The campus atmosphere may become more varied and lively due to the inflow of younger students, enhancing the college experience for all students.
This study examined the long-term effects of dual credit enrolment on obtaining a college degree. It was discovered that dual credit program participants were more likely to finish their college degrees than their non-participating counterparts. Higher levels of college preparation and improved ability to handle the rigors of higher education were shown by dual credit students, which enhanced college graduation rates.
This study examined the post-secondary outcomes of Texas students participating in dual credit programs. It turned out that dual credit course completion was favorably connected with greater college enrollment rates, especially at the school where the credits were acquired. In addition, compared to regular college applicants, dual credit students tended to stick with their studies and had greater retention rates.
This investigation examined the impact of dual enrollment on obtaining a college degree in Texas using statewide randomized trials. The findings showed that dual credit program participants were more likely to complete a college degree within six years after high school graduation. The results showed that low-income students were disproportionately affected, indicating that dual credit programs can help foster college success and close achievement inequalities.
This case study focused on rural Texas schools and investigated the effects of dual credit programs on college enrollment and completion rates. It was shown that dual credit program participants from rural regions were likelier to enroll in colleges and universities, stay enrolled, and finish their degrees. The study emphasized how dual credit courses help students in isolated areas gain access to higher education.
The viewpoints of Texas dual enrollment program administrators were investigated in this qualitative research. It listed several advantages of dual credit programs, such as better college preparedness, easier college transitions, and higher levels of student participation. Administrators also emphasized issues with curriculum consistency, credit transfer rules, and providing sufficient academic assistance for dual credit students.
Effects of Dual Credit Programmes on the College Enrollment and Success Rates.
Over the years, Texas’ dual credit systems have experienced substantial change due to shifting legislative priorities and educational demands. The development of these programs has had a significant influence on the state’s students’ college enrollment and achievement rates.
Texas dual credit programs have expanded from providing a small selection of courses to a wider array of choices. These programs were initially primarily concerned with basic academic topics, but they have now grown to include professional and technical education courses, enabling students to explore a variety of subject areas and acquire useful skills prior to enrolling in college.
Texas has worked to make dual credit programs more accessible to a wider group of students throughout time. These programs are now available to students from many socioeconomic backgrounds, including those attending public, private, and charter schools, at more institutions because of collaborations between high schools and universities.
On-campus dual credit options have been established inside high schools due to the growth of dual credit programs. Now that high school teacher who satisfy certain requirements are permitted to offer dual credit courses, more students have access to college-level curriculum without having to go to college campuses.
Texas has sought to build articulation agreements between high schools and universities to facilitate a more seamless credit transfer procedure. The agreements reduce possible hurdles to credit transfer and guarantee students’ smooth transition to higher education by outlining exactly how dual credit courses fit college requirements.
Research Gaps
The benefits of dual credit programs on college enrollment and completion rates are regularly highlighted in the research. Dual credit course success encourages students to continue their studies at the school where they acquired the credits, increasing enrolment numbers. In addition, compared to non-participants, dual credit students often have stronger perseverance rates and a higher chance of finishing their college degrees. This shows that early exposure to college-level material improves academic performance in higher education and increases college preparation.
Numerous studies show that dual credit systems in Texas are especially advantageous for minority and low-income students. These programs provide individuals who may have encountered college access and achievement obstacles a route to higher education. According to studies, taking dual credit courses gives historically underprivileged children a chance to succeed academically and post-secondarily while also closing achievement disparities.
Promoting student diversity within Texas’ higher education institutions is aided via dual credit programs. These programs draw a more diversified pool of students by giving high school students early experience with college material. These students come from various cultural, socioeconomic, and intellectual backgrounds. This improves the overall learning environment and encourages all students to have more inclusive and fulfilling educational experiences.
Chapter 4: College Enrollment Trends among Successful Dual Credit Students in Texas
Factors Influencing College Enrollment Decisions.
Understanding the campus and its resources is an important component. Dual credit students who visited the college campus before while still in high school grow used to the campus’ structure, amenities, and academic departments. Due to this familiarity, they may feel at home and more willing to continue their studies at the same school.
Enrollment choices are significantly influenced by participants’ positive experiences when enrolled in the dual credit program. Successful dual credit students may have formed deep bonds with college professors, staff members, and others while enrolled in college-level courses. Strong bonds with the school and its community may develop due to these beneficial contacts and experiences, making it a more alluring option for continuing their study.
A key element in enrollment choices is the opinion of the institution’s academic support and excellence. Successful dual credit students may have succeeded in their dual credit coursework and have a positive opinion of the institution’s level of instruction. Their perception of the institution as a place that fosters their academic development and success may play a role in their choice to attend, which may have additional implications.
Successful dual credit students could appreciate the consistency of their academic path. By deciding to attend the same college in college, they may build on the credits they had acquired there, perhaps cutting down on the time it takes to get their degree. This consistency may facilitate a smooth adjustment to college life and lessen any worries about beginning at a new school.
Consequences for Texas’ Higher Education Institutions: Successful dual credit students’ propensity for enrolling in the same school has various consequences for Texas’ higher education institutions. First, it favors enrollment numbers since some dual credit students who do well in the program decide to enroll full-time in college at the same school. This may enhance the institution’s capacity to remain financially viable by stabilizing or growing its student body.
Student diversity is increased when successful dual credit students are enrolled at the same institution. Because dual credit programs draw students from various areas and backgrounds, the student population is becoming more diverse. This variety enhances the educational setting by promoting intercultural awareness and fruitful student relationships.
Successful dual credit students influence the reputation and competitiveness of higher education institutions.
The reputation and competitiveness of higher education institutions may be significantly impacted by successful dual credit students in various ways. Their successes and satisfying experiences in dual credit courses add to the institution’s general reputation and status in the community and the field of higher education.
Dual credit students who do well in their classes and like their time at the college or university are more inclined to discuss it with their loved ones, friends, and classmates. Since suggestions from trusted sources substantially impact how the public perceives a product or service, word-of-mouth advertising from happy customers and their families may be an effective marketing tactic. Successful dual credit students’ glowing recommendations may improve the institution’s image and draw in prospective students.
Successful dual credit students set the bar high for academic achievement and demonstrate the institution’s capacity to provide top-notch instruction. The institution’s dedication to academic rigor and readiness for higher education is shown by its successes in the college-level curriculum while still in high school. Due to the successes of these dual credit students, prospective students and stakeholders are more likely to regard the school as intellectually strong and competitive.
Students from underrepresented populations and people of different backgrounds are often drawn to dual credit programs. The institution’s dedication to diversity and inclusiveness is reinforced when successful dual credit students from diverse backgrounds succeed there. Prospective students looking for a supportive learning environment may find this institution’s open and inviting reputation intriguing.
Chapter 5: Challenges and Concerns
Challenges Related to Dual Credit Programs and Their Impact on Higher Education Institutions in Texas.
While dual credit systems have many advantages, they also bring several problems and issues that influence Texas’ higher education institutions. For dual credit projects to be effective and successful, these problems must be resolved.
Dual credit students may struggle due to inconsistent credit transfer procedures across higher education institutions. Due to possible credit loss and the need for students to repeat coursework, not all colleges and universities may accept dual credit courses as equal to their own. This issue may be addressed by establishing uniform credit transfer regulations and articulation agreements.
Despite their experience in dual credit programs, some students could have trouble adjusting to the rigorousness of college-level education. Their performance in higher education may be increased by addressing areas of academic under-preparedness and by offering more academic assistance.
All students must have fair access to dual credit programs, which is crucial. Due to a lack of funding or skilled teachers, certain high schools, especially those in rural or low-income regions, may struggle to provide dual credit courses. Promoting educational equality requires addressing these inequalities and increasing all students access to dual credit programs.
Maintaining academic rigor and quality depends on ensuring that dual credit teachers satisfy the relevant requirements and criteria. For high school teachers to successfully teach college-level material, colleges, and institutions must offer proper training and support.
Chapter 5: Analysis and Discussion
Analysis of Dual Credit Students’ Success Impact on Higher Education Institutions
Dual credit programs in Texas have emerged as a valuable educational opportunity, providing high school students with early exposure to college-level coursework and the chance to earn college credits. This paper has explored how successful dual credit students impact the goals of higher education institutions in Texas, examining their contributions to increased enrollment, diversity, and improved retention rates. It has addressed various challenges and concerns related to credit transfer, academic preparedness, and potential academic gaps.
The impact of successful dual credit students on higher education institutions is multi-faceted and significant. These students positively influence enrollment figures by continuing their education at the same institution where they completed their dual credit courses. This preference is rooted in the sense of familiarity, academic success, and confidence they have gained through early exposure to college academics. As a result, higher education institutions witness increased enrollment, contributing to a larger and more diverse student body.
Successful dual-credit students are vital in promoting diversity and inclusivity on college campuses. Dual credit programs often attract students from diverse backgrounds and communities, including those traditionally underrepresented in higher education. The achievements of these students not only enhance campus diversity but also demonstrate the institution’s commitment to creating an inclusive learning environment.
Another significant impact of successful dual credit students is the improvement in retention rates. These students enter college with a head start in coursework, better prepared to navigate higher education’s academic challenges and demands. As a result, they are more likely to persist and complete their degrees on time, contributing to improved retention rates for the institution.
However, several challenges and concerns accompany dual credit programs that must be addressed to ensure their effectiveness. Credit transfer policies between high schools and colleges can be inconsistent, leading to credit loss or the need to repeat coursework. Establishing standardized credit transfer policies and articulation agreements can mitigate this concern and ensure a seamless transition for dual credit students.
Academic preparedness is another area of concern. While dual credit programs offer valuable academic exposure, not all students may be adequately prepared for college-level rigor. Providing academic support services and readiness programs tailored to dual credit students can help address this issue and enhance their academic success in college.
Potential academic gaps between dual credit and subsequent college courses require careful attention. Collaboration between high school and college faculty can ensure that dual credit courses align with college-level standards, minimizing gaps in students’ academic preparation. Equity and access are also critical considerations. Ensuring equitable access to dual credit programs for all students, regardless of their socioeconomic background or geographic location, is essential for promoting educational equity and providing equal opportunities for academic advancement.
Strengths and Weaknesses of Dual Credit Programs and Their Impact on Higher Education Institutions.
Dual credit programs offer various strengths and weaknesses that impact higher education institutions. Understanding these aspects is crucial for optimizing the benefits of these programs while addressing potential challenges.
Strengths
Due to dual credit schemes, more high school students are registering for college courses, which boosts the number of students attending higher education institutions. These initiatives are a powerful recruiting tool, enticing prospective students to consider attending college full-time.
Through early exposure to college-level material, dual credit programs provide kids with the necessary academic preparation and abilities. Students increase their chances of succeeding in higher education by getting a head start on adjusting to the rigors of college.
Through dual credit programs, high school students may get free or inexpensive college credits while still in high school. This monetary advantage could entice students and their families to the school, enhancing accessibility and affordability.
Due to the broad student body that dual credit programs attract, college campuses now have more inclusive and richer learning environments.
Successful dual credit students often adapt to college life more smoothly, improving retention rates because they are better equipped to handle the difficulties of both academic and social life.
Programs for earning dual credit encourage productive partnerships between colleges and secondary schools. These collaborations improve relationships with the neighborhood and highlight the institution’s dedication to ensuring equal access to education.
Weakness
When dual credit students move to colleges, inconsistent credit transfer procedures across schools may cause problems. Certain credits will not transfer, which might result in repeated courses and a delay in getting a degree.
Some dual credit students may not be sufficiently prepared for the demands of a college degree, making it difficult to keep up with course requirements and expectations for higher education. In particular, students in remote or impoverished locations with few resources or trained teachers may not have equitable access to dual credit programs. Disparities in education may come from this.
Chapter 6: Conclusions and Recommendations
Key Findings
Dual credit programs positively impact higher education institutions in Texas by increasing college enrollment. Successful dual credit students often choose to continue their education at the same institution where they earned their credits, contributing to increased enrollment figures.
Dual credit programs promote diversity and inclusivity on college campuses. These programs attract students from diverse backgrounds and communities, enhancing the overall student body’s diversity and enriching the learning environment.
Successful dual credit students demonstrate higher retention rates in college. Their early exposure to college academics and campus life equips them with the necessary skills to navigate the challenges of higher education, leading to improved persistence and timely graduation.
Dual credit programs contribute to college readiness by exposing students early to college-level coursework. Dual credit students often enter higher education better prepared for academic rigor and demands.
Challenges related to credit transfer policies and academic preparedness exist for dual credit students. Inconsistent credit transfer policies between high schools and colleges can lead to credit loss or the need to repeat coursework. Some dual credit students may also face difficulties adapting to the academic rigor of higher education.
Equity and access disparities can impact the availability of dual credit programs for all students, particularly those in underserved areas with limited resources or qualified instructors.
Collaborative efforts between high schools and higher education institutions are essential for addressing potential academic gaps and ensuring course alignment and rigor in dual credit programs.
Dual credit programs have the potential to positively influence the reputation and competitiveness of higher education institutions. Successful dual credit students contribute to positive word-of-mouth promotion and showcase the institution’s commitment to academic excellence.
Conclusion
The overall impact of dual credit students’ success on higher education institutions in Texas is undeniably positive, with a range of benefits and opportunities that enrich the institutions and their students. Dual credit programs have emerged as a valuable pathway to college readiness, diversity, and increased college enrollment, positively influencing the goals and reputation of higher education institutions. However, several challenges and concerns necessitate careful consideration and proactive measures to ensure these programs’ continued effectiveness and success.
Firstly, successful dual credit students significantly contribute to higher education institutions’ enrollment figures. Continuing their education at the same institution where they earned their credits bolsters student numbers and contributes to a diverse and vibrant campus community. Coming from diverse backgrounds, these students contribute to a more inclusive learning environment that fosters cross-cultural understanding and meaningful interactions among students.
Secondly, dual credit students’ academic success demonstrates these programs’ effectiveness in promoting college readiness. Early exposure to college-level coursework equips students with essential academic skills, preparing them to confidently navigate the rigor of higher education. As a result, dual credit students show higher retention rates, persisting and completing their degrees on time.
Recommendations
To enhance the positive impact of dual credit programs, policymakers, educators, and administrators can implement evidence-based recommendations that address the challenges and capitalize on the strengths of these initiatives.
Policymakers should collaborate with higher education institutions to establish standardized credit transfer policies and articulation agreements. These policies clearly outline which dual credit courses are eligible for transfer and how they align with specific degree requirements, minimizing credit loss and ensuring a smooth transition for dual credit students.
Educators and administrators should develop academic preparedness support programs tailored to dual credit students. These programs may include targeted academic advising, tutoring, and study skill workshops to help students develop the necessary academic tools for success in college-level coursework.
Policymakers and educators should work together to ensure equitable access to dual credit programs for all students, particularly those in underserved areas. Strategies include expanding program availability in rural communities, providing financial assistance for low-income students, and offering virtual learning options to reach students in remote areas.
References
Haxton, C., Song, M., Zeiser, K., Berger, A., Turk-Bicakci, L., Garet, M. S., . Hoshen, G. (2016). Longitudinal Findings From the Early College High School Initiative Impact Study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 38(2), 410-430. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44984545.
Venezia, A., & Jaeger, L. (2013). Transitions from High School to Colle. The Future of Children, 23(1), 117-136.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/23409491.
Weissman, S. (2022, November 21). A Step Toward Outcomes-Based Funding for Texas 2-Year Colleges. Inside Higher Ed.
Tinberg, H., & Nadeau, J.-P. (2011). Contesting the Space between High School and College in the Era of Dual-Enrollment. College Composition and Communication, 62(4), 704–725. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23006913
Evans, B. J. (2019). How College Students Use Advanced Placement Credit. American Educational Research Journal, 56(3), 925–954. http://www.jstor.org/stable/45237712
Watt-Malacolm, B. (2011). Dual Credit: Creating Career and Work Possibilities for Canadian Youth. Canadian Journal of Education / Revue Canadienne de l’éducation, 34(2), 256–276. http://www.jstor.org/stable/canajeducrevucan.34.2.256
An, B. P. (2013). The Impact of Dual Enrollment on College Degree Attainment: Do Low-SES Students Benefit? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 35(1), 57–75. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23356970
Blankenberger, B., Lichtenberger, E., & Witt, M. A. (2017). Dual Credit, College Type, and Enhanced Degree Attainment. Educational Researcher, 46(5), 259–263. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44971768
Berger, A., Adelman, N., & Cole, S. (2010). The Early College High School Initiative: An Overview of Five Evaluation Years. Peabody Journal of Education, 85(3), 333–347. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25759032
Miller, T., Kosiewicz, H., Wang, E. L., Marwah, E. V., Delhommer, S., & Daugherty, L. (2017). Dual credit education in Texas. Interim Report. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
Moreland, C., & Miller, K. D. (2017). The triumph of whiteness: Dual credit courses and hierarchical racism in Texas. Rhetorics of whiteness: Postracial hauntings in popular culture, social media, and education, 182-194.
Luncheon, J. C., & Relles, S. R. (2020). ” We’re Caught In Between Two Systems”: Exploring the Complexity of Dual Credit Implementation. The Review of Higher Education, 43(4), 989-1016.
Rigsby, T. (2019). A comparative study of student success outcomes of early college high school and dual credit at a central Texas community college (Doctoral dissertation, National American University).
Dyer, K., Childers, G., & Odell, M. R. (2022). Predictors of Academic Achievement in Dual Credit Students. Journal of Advanced Academics, 33(2), 217-236.
Field, K. (2021). The rise of dual credit: More and more students take college classes while still in high school. That is boosting degree attainment but also raising doubts about rigor. Education Next, 21(1), 57-64.
Giani, M., Alexander, C., & Reyes, P. (2014). Exploring variation in the impact of dual-credit coursework on post-secondary outcomes: A quasi-experimental analysis of Texas students. The High School Journal, 200-218.
Cowan, J., & Goldhaber, D. (2015). How much of a” running start” do dual enrollment programs provide students? The Review of Higher Education, 38(3), 425-460.
Bozkurt, A. (2019). From distance education to open and distance learning: A holistic evaluation of history, definitions, and theories. In Handbook of Research on Learning in the Age of Transhumanism (pp. 252-273). IGI Global.
Reich, J., Buttimer, C. J., Fang, A., Hillaire, G., Hirsch, K., Larke, L. R., … & Slama, R. (2020). Remote learning guidance from state education agencies during the COVID-19 pandemic: A first look.
Hagen Alvarado, C. (2020). Multilingual Mindset: Using Cross-Functional Strategies Within the Texas Education Agency to Prioritize English Learners (Doctoral dissertation).
Klimitchek, M. L. (2017). A quantitative assessment of Texas house bill 505: college dual credit courses and academic success among high school students (Doctoral dissertation, Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi).
Simieou III, F., Grace, J., Decman, J., & Cathern, T. (2021). ” Let’s Stay Together”: Examining a Grow Your Own Program in an Urban District. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 16(1), 137-151.
Ferguson, C., Baker, P., & Burnett, D. (2015). Faculty members’ perceptions of rigor in dual enrollment, accelerated programs, and standard community college courses. New Directions for Community Colleges, 2015(169), 83-91.
Page, L. C., & Scott-Clayton, J. (2016). Improving college access in the United States: Barriers and policy responses. Economics of Education Review, 51, 4-22.
Bailey, T. R., Jaggars, S. S., & Jenkins, D. (2015). Redesigning America’s community colleges: A clearer path to student success. Harvard University Press.
Bleiklie, I., Enders, J., Lepori, B., & Musselin, C. (2016). NPM, network governance, and the university as a changing professional organization. In The Ashgate research companion to new public management (pp. 161-176). Routledge.
Paulson, E. J., Sarker, A. L., Reynolds, J. S., & Cotman, A. M. (2021). Instructors’ voices: Experiences with state-mandated accelerated integrated developmental reading and writing coursework in Texas community colleges. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 51(2), 110-130.
write