Network organizations are the new approach in business ecosystems, a structural element that has become indispensable for green processes. These organizations are in diverse forms and display various dimensions of sustainability and innovation, respectively. This is a descriptive annotation of the different kinds of network organizations and their influence on the environment presented unbiasedly using academic literature and biblical perspectives as a basis.
The dynamics of goals, power, and control in the network organizations must be studied as an integral part of the environmental processes to examine their impacts on the environment. Scott & Davis (2015) state that these factors are the main things that cause organizational behavior and determine its effectiveness. The sustainability processes, resource management, and eco-impact reduction strategies undertaken by network organizations are shaped by the targeting of the processes of the environment framed by the network organizations. The biblical idea of slave leadership and the principle of responsibility affect the ethical activities of companies of the motivational systems. This view teaches us humility, honesty, and morality about environmental stewardship. Indeed, these environmental leadership principles, put in this way, are of primary importance for the leaders guided by them to curb negative impacts on the planet.
Biblical principles can be used to incorporate mainstream leadership in which sustainable development factors are fulfilled. The strategy is to accomplish this goal. This approach builds on resilience, adaptability, and long-term sustainability. With the COVID-19 pandemic, workplaces have had to adapt rapidly to ensure the safety and health of their employees. One of the most significant strategies organizations have adopted is telecommuting. With people working from the comfort of their homes, the line between work and home has become increasingly blurred. Therefore, people electing this incumbent depict them as representatives of environmental responsibility and pioneers in sustainable business. In the end, partnerships and mechanisms of control consensual to ethical and environmentally friendly leaders’ principles are the drivers of environmental protection and guaranteeing a secure future for all generations.
Virtual organizations
Contrary to the traditional understanding, virtual organizations enabled by the new digital technology no longer consider organizational hierarchies and geographical borders. Nowadays, virtual teams are familiar in the corporate world. As a result, there is a need for newly applied leadership strategies to make use of the advantages, such as effectiveness management. The author De Paoli (2023) states that the new leadership paradigms that embrace virtual team dynamics will step up to the challenges they bring. This is proof of the importance of adaptability and leadership in building unity and efficiency in teams that might be distributed. In parallel, the wisdom espoused in Proverbs 16:9 references virtual firms concerning trust. This principle of divine influence on humans enlightens us that the human planning process reflects the chain of guidance, wherein human policies come into effect. Guidance is pivotal within a virtual team of people worldwide who work in a joint effort, crossing the boundaries and borders of different cultures. Leaders will have to make their way through uncertainties and challenges with a sense of meaning, using a mix of their own insights and external advice to get their teams together and, in doing so, to achieve general goals. Moreover, the conditions of the virtual environment come with some rare challenges that call for the creation of adaptability and resilience (Handke et al., 2021). Due to the lack of physical contact, alternative means of resolving conflicts, communication, and collaboration should be developed.
Horizontal hierarchy
According to Isprava (2019), horizontal hierarchy is a management approach different from a traditional top-down bureaucracy by promoting collective decision-making and egalitarianism. When the process is done this way, employees can feel like they have the authority and are motivated to push the envelope of innovation and creativity. Inclusiveness and diversity may only be accomplished by developing proper policies and practices through which the Organization delegates authority to lower levels and distributes decision-making loosely to various teams. These equitable policies and practices, such as non-discriminatory recruitment, diversity training, and anti-harassment measures, contribute positively to organizational culture by creating a safe and supportive environment for all the biblical principle of humility, as elucidated in Philippians 2:3, in particular, harmonizes beautifully with the ethos of all of us being equals. According to this rule, high regard for others is perceived as more essential than one’s self-interest. Within the organizational dynamics, humility is the framework that supports leaders and team members in harmonizing mutual respect, empathy, and collaboration.
Horizontal hierarchy differs from traditional hierarchical structures that often favor power and control of employees by an authority. A flat hierarchy puts cooperation and shared leadership among employees first. This also enriches employee engagement and morale, and the employees can utilize this diversity of ideas and perspectives to achieve common goals. Individuals feel highly empowered in such a setting and can exercise their right to express opinions, take ownership of their work, and contribute to realizing the Organization’s goals. Besides this, horizontally organized hierarchies push for flexibility and agility, which allows organizations to respond quickly to changes in the external environment. One way to realize the potential of collective intelligence in organizations is by decentralizing the decision-making authority. This way, an organization can leverage the teams’ collective intelligence to identify opportunities and overcome challenges in real time.
Decentralized organizations
Decentralized organizations are the new paradigm of constructing decision-making processes, where the control is distributed across several levels. This model, based on that of Alexy (2022), creates agility and originality by building on the teams’ skills to be self-motivated and capable of adjusting to changing circumstances. The power of decentralized organizations is because they distribute decision-making authority across multiple levels and categories, so these organizations achieve the full potential of the diversity of knowledge and expertise at lower levels, which leads to innovation and adaptability.
The biblical principle referenced in Ecclesiastes 4:9-10 stresses the need for solidarity and the sense of belonging that family share; besides, humans have a unique power to learn from each other and to help our neighbors; this is interesting and worth discussing. This principle, having resonance with the cooperative essence of the decentralized structures, in which people work as a team to accomplish goals, does it by being motivated by the efforts of all participants within a network. Put, teams in a community are more potent in collaborating, and distributed companies benefit from leveraging team members’ collective intelligence and capabilities. Within decentralized organizations, teams can experiment, dare, and think of new ideas without being limited by strict and unnecessary hierarchies or bureaucratic red tape. This liberty encourages a culture of innovation and entrepreneurship that strives to mold individuals with the freedom of thinking and defiant spirits. In addition, decentralization elevates accountability and ownership since teams are directly responsible for the results of their choices, creating a stronger feeling of responsibility and possession.
Boundaryless enterprises
Boundaryless organizations represent a new paradigm in organizational structure, going beyond the boundaries that limit them to external stakeholders and partners through collaboration instead. Indeed, as Picot et al. (2023) point out, these entities concentrate on openness and interoperability, fully aware of the incomparable benefits that are unlocked by merging outside views and competencies. This strategy supports knowledge sharing and is a springboard for innovations since disparate perspectives and recommendations fuel new thinking and problem-solving. What lies at the heart of boundaryless enterprises is that no entities possess all the knowledge and resources required to thrive in the increasingly complex and ever-changing business ecosystem. The partners can be organizations, experts, or even customers, and therefore, boundaryless enterprises can leverage a pool of expertise and experiences.
In other cultural and philosophical systems, these boundaryless organization principles are reiterated. Proverbs 27, 17, For example, gives out the cue of mutual support and collective growth, which users can sharpen each other through communication and collaboration. The biblical ethos of the boundaryless Organization echoes this philosophy as individual wisdom of diverse groups supports organizational learning and growth. Different approaches are created to promote cooperation and remove obstacles whenever boundaryless enterprises are used. This can range from creating strategic partnerships to participating in industry networks and consortia or even asking for public input through crowdsourcing.
Virtual team’s challenges and solutions
Despite its numerous merits, the virtual team has distinctive problems that can limit its efficiency. Communication barriers and cooperation track records are among the significant issues that virtual teams face, as indicated by Smith & Ruiz (2020). However, the findings by Handke et al. (2021) suggest that proactive team members need to have feedback mechanisms to address these problems, which in turn improve overall performance. This can be associated with the biblical teachings of fruitful criticism and accountability between ourselves, enhancing a culture of growth and improvement in virtual teams. Besides, the adoption of virtual teams will propel the management capabilities among enterprises through knowledge transfer, according to Zhang (2022). This approach relies on the biblical concept of stewardship, which underscores the importance of prudent and productive use of resources for the Organization’s greater good.
Furthermore, the organization structure is of significant importance in driving how the development strategies that focus on equality-based incentives are generated, as stated in the argument of Li et al. (2020). Extreme dependence of organizational structure on planning strategy indicates that the structure should be consistent with strategic implementation, which is the idea that leadership should be purposeful and exercise power with wisdom while decision-making is in line with biblical teachings. Hierarchical organizational structure, on the one hand, does have its benefits, like better communication and collaboration, but on the other hand, it also presents coordination and responsibility issues, as mentioned by Nasrudin (2022). The reflections from these critical ethnographic analyses agree with the essential teachings in the Bible on how unity and stewardship are crucial in all communities within the requirement for constant checking and control. The horizontal organizational structure is analyzed here. It has been found that the Organization can adapt and innovate through its use, as Miller (2022) argues. This coincides with the Bible’s provisions of stewardship and creativity, emphasizing the ethical and sustainable governance of the assets for the benefit of the community.
Conclusion
Network organizations play a critical role in environmental processes and are influential in forming sustainability and innovations. Combining learning and knowledge from scholarly research and scriptural principles enables organizations to navigate complexities and create ethics and sustainability as they use diverse organizational forms, whether virtual teams or boundaryless enterprises; they are in an excellent position to reap the best of each structure, with positive environmental outcomes and sustainable growth.
References
Alexy, O. (2022). How flat can it get? From better at flatter to the promise of the decentralized, boundaryless Organization. Journal of Organization Design. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41469-022-00110-0
American Bible Society. (2002). The Holy Bible. American Bible Society.
Deeb, G. (2020, May 4). The Pluses And Minuses Of Virtual Teams. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/georgedeeb/2020/05/04/the-pluses–minuses-of-virtual-teams/
Donatella De Paoli. (2023). Virtual organizations: a call for new leadership. Edward Elgar Publishing EBooks. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781783477920.00014
Handke, L., Klonek, F., O’Neill, T. A., & Kerschreiter, R. (2021). Unpacking the Role of Feedback in Virtual Team Effectiveness. Small Group Research, 53(1), 104649642110571. https://doi.org/10.1177/10464964211057116
Isprava, T. (2019, September 9). Benefits of applying horizontal hierarchy in workplace. Isprava. https://www.isprava.com/2019/09/09/benefits-of-applying-horizontal-hierarchy-in-workplace/
Li, Z., Lu, S., Ryan, J. K., & Sun, D. (2020). Impact of Organizational Structure on Development Strategy under Equity‐Based Incentives. Production and Operations Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13288
Merida, T., Platt, D., & Akin, D. L. (2015). Exalting Jesus in 1 and 2 Kings. Nashville B & H Publishing Group. https://www.christianbook.com/exalting-jesus-in-2-kings-ebook/tony-merida/9780805496710/pd/80423EB
Miller, K. (2022, April 12). In-depth elaboration of horizontal organizational structure. Crowjack. https://crowjack.com/blog/strategy/organizational-structures/horizontal
Nasrudin, A. (2022, April 16). Horizontal Organizational Structure: Characteristics, Advantages, Disadvantages. Penpoin. https://penpoin.com/horizontal-organizational-structure/
Olav Kjellevold Olsen, Kari Wik Ågotnes, Hetland, J., Roar Espevik, & Ravnanger, C. (2023). Virtual team-cooperation from home-office: a quantitative diary study of the impact of daily transformational- and passive-avoidant leadership – and the moderating role of task interdependence. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1188753
Picot, A., Reichwald, R., Wigand, R. T., Möslein, K. M., Neuburger, R., & Neyer, A.-K. (2023). The Boundaryless Enterprise. In Springer eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-40054-5
Smith, S. M., & Ruiz, J. (2020). Challenges and Barriers in Virtual teams: a Literature Review. SN Applied Sciences, 2(6), 1–33. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-2801-5
W Richard Scott, & Davis, G. F. (2015). CHAPTER 8 Goals, Power, and Control: Organizations and Organizing. Routledge. https://ereader.perlego.com/1/book/2192623/13?element_originalid=sec8_1.
Zhang, A. (2022). The application of virtual teams in the improvement of enterprise management capability from the perspective of knowledge transfer. PLOS ONE, 17(3), e0264367. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264367
write