Introduction:
Language acquisition and literacy during the first years of life are crucial to ensuring successful learning in later childhood—a case study of a four-year-old boy in a UTK preschool classroom during center time. Language and literacy development occur in multiple ways, with observations guided by the Desired Results Developmental Profile – Kindergarten (2015), a comprehensive observation instrument. The child under study is intellectually mature and participates in many center activities such as blocks, magnatiles, legos, puzzles, kitchens, and art. This analysis is conducted in ten observations, integrating the theories and studies and bringing a sophisticated view of what the child should read or learn regarding their language and literacy.
Observation 1 (Understanding language – receptive):
The child uses the magnates in the middle of the day and makes complex designs. The teacher presents another group of shapes with names and characteristics and requests the child’s reproduction of a particular form (California Department of Education, 2014). Even though it is his first time using some of the shapes employed by an adult, the child listens carefully, understands the directions provided, and starts to replicate the structure correctly.
Interpretation:
The fact that the child can comprehend such complicated directions and unknown words concerning forms reveals his receiving language competencies. According to Piaget’s theory of cognitive development, children within this age range start comprehending abstract concepts and can demonstrate logical reasoning (California Department of Education, 2014). This corresponds with Piaget’s notion of the concrete operational phase, during which children can control their mental manifestations.
Observation 2 (Responsiveness to language):
The child receives a picture book of animals in the art center. The teacher refers to every animal calling its name and asks the child to choose out of all (California Department of Education, 2014). In addition, it is not just that it quickly calls these animals but also provides additional helpful information about them, including where they live and what they sound like.
Interpretation:
This observation suggests that a child is also responding to the language, which indicates that the child can be engaged in meaningful conversation. Sociocultural theory by Vygotsky emphasizes the roles of language and social interactions as they contribute to the growth of the mind. Responding shows that the child is no longer a mere receiver but can also give more information (Wilcox et al., 2020). Moreover, it demonstrates an advanced level of thought and language development due to social interactions.
Observation 3 (Communication and Use of Language – expressive):
The child plays a chef in the kitchen center, telling a complete and imaginative story about making a meal (McLeod et al., 2019). The different types of jargon applied include adjectives and verbs, which describe various ingredients and depict the order of preparation.
Interpretation:
This observation indicates expressive language in a child already using language for communication and pretend play or playful activity. Play is crucial for initiating and developing ideas in the child’s psychosocial theory, as proposed by Erikson during the preschool years (McLeod et al., 2019). Storytelling by the child in the kitchen center demonstrates that they can have purpose, plan, and execute their activity according to the psychological theories of Erikson’s initiative versus guilt stage.
Observation 4 (Reciprocal Communication and Conversation):
The child forms another group with one of his peers and constructs a structure at the block center. Through discussion, they compare their notions, allocate roles, and plan where every building element will be. It is an exchange, and the dialogical process is mutual, whereby the children communicate.
Interpretation:
This point reinforces the fact that the infant is capable of two-way communication and cooperating with other kids on a playground. Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory emphasizes the significance of peer conversation on cognition, whereby children learn from each other and support their mutual comprehension (Goodrich et al., 2017). In line with Vygotski’s focus on the social setting, the child’s communication ability supports their collaboration.
Observation 5 (Interest in Literacy):
In the puzzle center, the child demonstrates curiosity about letter puzzles. Such children enjoy identifying and naming every letter, showing a remarkable attachment to the alphabet and its phonics. At this point, the child tries to group the letters to create words he or she might already know.
Interpretation:
The above observation shows that at this age, a child starts developing an attraction toward reading and the desire to learn letters and their phonemic components. Literary interest is essential in the DRDP-K, an early indication of later reading and writing ability (Petersen et al., 2022). As per the stages of emergent literacy stated by Marie Clay, this is important since children develop interests in letters and sound play that are precursors to literacy later in life.
Observation 6 (Comprehension of Age-Appropriate Text):
The teacher reads a story in the book center, and the child listens, asks questions, and makes links with their experiences. The child can respond correctly to questions concerning the plot and characters of the story.
Interpretation:
At this point, the child can comprehend the appropriate text by appreciating narrative elements. The story must relate to a personal experience of the child. One prominent example is the transactional theory of reading, proposed by Louise Rosenblatt (Phillips et al., 2021). Reading as a transaction involves a process that enables children to relate what happens in a story.
Observation 7 (Concepts about Print):
During the tour around the book center, the child shows that he understands concepts related to the print. This is so because children correctly point out a textbook’s front and back cover; they indicate the title and author on this sheet and copy the teacher’s text reading pattern by making movements from left to right on this sheet starting from the upper corner.
Interpretation:
This indicates that the child is learning how written words look and the rules and regulations governing their usage. Literacy stage theory developed by authors like Marie Clay highlights the transition from emergent literacy to conventional reading (Norambuena et al., 2022). This is because recognition of print features is typical for the beginnings of growing literacy awareness in the child.
Observation 8 (Phonological Awareness):
The child participates in a rhyming game with the teacher in the leg center. The teacher says a word, and the child finds out which Lego pieces match with which rhyming pictures. The child is very good at rhyming and appreciates quality lyrics.
Interpretation:
It shows that this child has good phonological awareness, emphasizing her awareness of the aspects of language as sound. The contribution of research by phonological awareness theorists such as Marilyn Jager Adams supports the role of this skill in developing early literacy (Zussino et al., 2022). The child’s performance in rhyming games matches Adam’s claim that phonological awareness predicts reading success.
Observation 9 (Letter and Word Knowledge):
The child is excited during a letter recognition game at the art center. Letter knowledge is well established among them, as they can identify and state many letters. A child also tries to put together simple words by using a set of letters.
Interpretation:
This shows that the child has gained a good understanding of letters and letter sounds, as evident in his developed letter and word knowledge. Researchers such as Emergent Literacy theorists emphasize certain stages in the growth of early literacy skills, which include developing letter and word knowledge. This is emphasized throughout the developmental continuum (DRDP-K), increasing children’s understanding of letters and words (Verhoeven et al., 2020). Letter knowledge is manifested by the ability of the child to appreciate and employ letters in a creative task.
Observation 10 (Emergent Writing):
During free play in the magnatiles center, the child spontaneously integrates writing. In order to label their structures, they use invented spelling to capture the sound of the word (Schmitt et al., 2017). This shows that a child knows the purpose of writing: to convey meanings.
Interpretation:
Observing this phenomenon clearly shows that the child is already using writing to communicate effectively. Developmental stages in DRDP-K include emergent writing and the sequential development of regular writing. The idea that functional writing occurs within meaningful or social situations is what Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory emphasizes (Thomas et al., 2020). In the process of the child, one begins to invent spellings, or the spelling as the case may be, hence representing a natural way to emerge into writing.
Conclusion:
Finally, the perceptions of the preschool-aged kid in the UTK class illustrate the numerous facets of language and literacy advancement. All these observations concur with DRDP K (Desired Results Developmental Profile for Kindergarten), as well as related theories and research on Early Childhood Education. All these features, including speech, pre-reading, and pre-writing, are considered aspects of one whole concerning the child’s cognitive growth at the kindergarten stage. It is imperative that at this stage, recognize and develop these early language and literacy skills because they are the foundation upon which future academic achievement and success can be placed.
References
California Department of Education. (2014). DRDP-K (2015): A developmental continuum for kindergarten calibration version for transitional and kindergarten-aged children. Sacramentohttps://oercommons.s3.amazonaws.com/media/editor/None/srv/django/oercommons/project/media/upload/authoring/14363/documents/DRDP2015%20PS%20English.pdf
Wilcox, M. J., Gray, S., & Reiser, M. (2020). Preschoolers with developmental speech and language impairment: Efficacy of the Teaching Early Literacy and Language (TELL) curriculum. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, pp. 51, 124–143. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885200619301292
McLeod, S., Harrison, L. J., & Wang, C. (2019). A longitudinal population study of literacy and numeracy outcomes for children with speech, language, and communication needs in early childhood. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, pp. 47, 507–517. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885200618300784
Goodrich, J. M., Lonigan, C. J., & Farver, J. A. M. (2017). Impacts of a literacy-focused preschool curriculum on the early literacy skills of language-minority children. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, pp. 40, 13–24. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885200617300509
Petersen, D. B., Staskowski, M., Spencer, T. D., Foster, M. E., & Brough, M. P. (2022). The effects of a multitiered system of language support on kindergarten oral and written language: A large-scale randomized controlled trial. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 53(1), 44–68. https://pubs.asha.org/doi/abs/10.1044/2021_LSHSS-20-00162
Phillips, B. M., Kim, Y. S. G., Lonigan, C. J., Connor, C. M., Clancy, J., & Al Otaiba, S. (2021). Supporting language and literacy development with intensive small-group interventions: An early childhood efficacy study. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, pp. 57, 75–88. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885200621000594
Norambuena, Y. S., Saez, K. L., Fuentes, D., Ponce, F. P., & Salas, G. (2022). Language, analogical reasoning, and working memory skills in emergent literacy period: Typical and DLD trajectories via Cluster Analyses. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 60, 173-186. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885200622000114
Zussino, J., Zupan, B., & Preston, R. (2022). Speech, language, and literacy outcomes for children with mild to moderate hearing loss: A systematic review. Journal of Communication Disorders, 106248. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021992422000673
Verhoeven, L., Voeten, M., van Setten, E., & Segers, E. (2020). Computer-supported early literacy intervention effects in preschool and kindergarten: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 30, 100325. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1747938X1930394X
Thomas, L. J., Gerde, H. K., Piasta, S. B., Logan, J. A., Bailey, L. L., & Zettler-Greeley, C. M. (2020). The early writing skills of children identified as at-risk for literacy difficulties. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, pp. 51, 392–402. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S088520062030003X
Schmitt, M. B., Logan, J. A., Tambyraja, S. R., Farquharson, K., & Justice, L. M. (2017). Establishing language benchmarks for children with typically developing language and children with language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60(2), 364-378. https://pubs.asha.org/doi/abs/10.1044/2016_JSLHR-L-15-0273
write