Introduction
Ethical issues frequently emerge within the domain of nursing practice, presenting challenges to the fundamental principles and values underpinning the healthcare field. One notable case study involves Mr. SA, a 78-year-old male who has been diagnosed with severe pancreatic cancer. The complexity of the case is further explained by the request made by the patient’s family to conceal this diagnosis, which presents a challenging dilemma for the nurses as they navigate the conflict between professional ethics and the desires of the patient’s family. The objective of this job is to analyze the intricate ethical dilemmas inherent in this case and to examine the responsibilities and duties of the nurse in effectively managing this complex and delicate scenario.
Patient autonomy, a fundamental aspect of medical ethics, is a crucial focus of the discussion. Patient autonomy emphasizes the need to provide patients with information and involve them in their healthcare decisions (Olejarczyk, 2022). This principle presents a direct conflict with the request made by the family, giving rise to significant inquiries regarding the boundaries of familial jurisdiction over patient data and the ethical responsibilities of healthcare practitioners. The ethical quandary is further heightened by the concepts of beneficence and non-maleficence, which encompass the moral obligations to promote well-being and avoid causing damage (Varkey, 2020). In the scenario with Mr. SA, the nurses are confronted with a dilemma between the potential negative consequences of disclosing the truth versus the adverse effects of deception.
Furthermore, the ethical principle of veracity, which demands truthfulness in the nurse-patient relationship, becomes a focal point of contention (Faubion, 2023). This principle is a matter of professional ethics deeply rooted in trust, forming the foundation of effective healthcare. The nurses’ discomfort and guilt underscore the conflict between their professional duty to uphold the truth and their empathy toward the family’s perspective.
This essay will delve into these ethical principles, examining their application in the given scenario and exploring the broader implications for nursing practice. It will also articulate nurses’ crucial role and obligations in mediating between the patient and his family, striving for a resolution that upholds ethical standards while respecting the emotional and cultural contexts of all parties involved.
Discussion on the Ethical Issues
Principle of Autonomy:
The principle of autonomy, considered a cornerstone in healthcare ethics, places paramount importance on an individual’s right to self-determination concerning their health and well-being (Pugh, 2020). Mr. SA’s case vividly illustrates the ethical complexity of balancing this fundamental principle against familial concerns.
In honoring Mr. SA’s autonomy, the imperative is to furnish him with comprehensive information about his diagnosis and prognosis. This entails transparently discussing the gravity of his condition, treatment options, potential outcomes, and implications for his quality of life. Empowering Mr. SA with this knowledge allows him the agency to actively engage in decisions concerning his care trajectory, including treatment modalities, palliative care preferences, and potential end-of-life choices. Upholding his autonomy aligns with the ethical obligation to treat him as an individual capable of making informed decisions about his health (Entwistle et al., 2010).
However, a poignant conflict emerges when juxtaposing Mr. SA’s autonomy against the family’s plea to withhold this crucial medical information. Their motivations stem from a genuine concern for Mr. SA’s emotional well-being, fearing that disclosure might inflict severe distress or emotional upheaval. This intricately complicates the ethical landscape, raising profound questions about navigating conflicting desires—Mr—SA’s right to know versus the family’s protective instincts.
The crux of this ethical difficulty lies in reconciling the patient’s autonomy with familial wishes, especially when these wishes contradict the patient’s choice if fully informed. It underscores the intricate challenge of respecting an individual’s independence and acknowledging the familial dynamics that contribute significantly to the patient’s support system and well-being.
This ethical dilemma demands a nuanced approach that acknowledges the significance of patient autonomy while recognizing the intricate interplay of familial dynamics and emotional considerations. Striking a balance between respecting Mr. SA’s right to make informed choices and addressing the family’s concerns requires delicacy, empathy, and ethical understanding. It challenges healthcare practitioners to engage in thoughtful, patient-centered decision-making that respects the patient’s autonomy and the familial context without compromising the core principles of ethical healthcare practice.
Beneficence vs. Non-maleficence:
The ethical principles of beneficence (doing good) and non-maleficence (preventing harm), foundational in healthcare ethics, present nurses with a profound moral conundrum—a tightrope walk between doing good and avoiding damage in the context of Mr. SA’s diagnosis (Cheraghi et al., 2023).
The principle of beneficence, encapsulating the obligation to act in the patient’s best interest and promote their well-being, compels nurses to consider the potential positive outcomes of disclosing Mr. SA’s diagnosis (Bester, 2020). Openly discussing his medical condition could enable him to make informed decisions, engage in treatment discussions, and actively participate in planning his care trajectory. It aligns with the aspiration to foster Mr. SA’s well-being by empowering him with information essential for informed decision-making.
Conversely, the principle of non-maleficence emphasizes the imperative to avoid causing harm or distress to the patient (Varkey, 2020). The prospect of disclosing a diagnosis as severe as Mr. SA’s pancreatic cancer raises concerns about the potential emotional upheaval and distress it might inflict. Nurses grapple with the ethical dilemma of whether disclosing this critical information might disrupt Mr. SA’s dynamic equilibrium or lead to significant psychological distress.
The ethical tightrope becomes even more precarious when contemplating the ramifications of withholding information (American Medical Association, 2022). A decision to keep Mr. SA uninformed about his diagnosis might stem from a well-intentioned desire to shield him from distress. However, it potentially denies him the opportunity to participate in decisions regarding his care, align interventions with his values, and make end-of-life preferences known. This withholding of information could inadvertently impede Mr. SA’s autonomy, depriving him of the chance to plan and prepare for what lies ahead.
As ethical stewards, nurses navigate this delicate balance by conscientiously weighing the potential harm caused by truth-telling against the damage incurred by withholding vital information (Ethics, 2018). Their ethical compass aligns with prioritizing Mr. SA’s well-being while considering the emotional, psychological, and existential impact of both disclosing and withholding the diagnosis. It underscores the complexity of ethical decision-making, compelling nurses to adopt a patient-centered approach that strives to mitigate harm while respecting patients’ autonomy and values. Ultimately, the moral imperative remains rooted in fostering Mr. SA’s holistic well-being, ensuring that whichever path is chosen is driven by a commitment to his best interests and dignity as an individual.
Veracity:
Veracity, often described as the ethical obligation to be truthful, is a cornerstone in the intricate web of trust that underpins the relationship between healthcare providers and their patients (Pugh, 2020). Upholding this principle is not merely an ethical mandate but a fundamental pillar that fosters a therapeutic alliance conducive to comprehensive patient care.
In Mr. SA’s case, the conflict arises between truthfulness and familial desires. The family’s plea for secrecy regarding Mr. SA’s diagnosis clashes directly with the nurses’ professional duty to convey honest information to the patient. This ethical quandary places nurses in a challenging position, torn between honoring the family’s wishes and maintaining the integrity of the nurse-patient relationship through transparency.
Compliance with the family’s request for secrecy poses inherent risks. While it may temporarily alleviate the potential distress Mr. SA might experience upon hearing his diagnosis, it also jeopardizes the essential trust between Mr. SA and his healthcare providers. Keeping vital information from Mr. SA could lead to a rupture in the belief that forms the foundation of effective healthcare relationships. This breach of trust might hinder the establishment of an open, honest, and communicative rapport, potentially impeding Mr. SA’s participation in his care decisions and obstructing effective treatment planning.
Conversely, choosing to disclose the diagnosis, albeit potentially distressing initially, could pave the path for a transparent and candid therapeutic relationship in the long term (Pugh, 2020). While this disclosure might introduce temporary emotional upheaval, it opens avenues for authentic communication, fostering a climate of trust and respect between Mr. SA and his healthcare team. This honesty may contribute to a deeper level of patient engagement, enabling informed decision-making and promoting a more collaborative approach to Mr. SA’s care.
The ethical imperative for nurses lies in navigating this intricate terrain with ethical understanding, empathy, and a commitment to the patient’s well-being. It necessitates a delicate balance between respecting the family’s concerns and upholding the principle of veracity to nurture a relationship founded on trust and honesty (Adams, 2018). Ultimately, the decision hinges on a profound understanding of the long-term benefits of truthfulness in fostering a robust and enduring therapeutic alliance that supports Mr. SA’s holistic care and respects his autonomy as an informed participant in his healthcare journey.
Cultural and Psychological Considerations:
Cultural beliefs and psychological factors significantly influence healthcare decisions (Jimenez et al., 2012). Mr. SA’s family’s request to withhold information may be rooted in cultural norms prioritizing familial protection and shielding individuals from distressing news. Understanding these cultural perspectives is crucial for nurses in navigating discussions around truth-telling. Moreover, acknowledging the psychological impact of such information on Mr. SA and his family is imperative. This includes recognizing potential anxiety, fear, or sadness upon learning the diagnosis and tailoring communication strategies to provide support and understanding.
Roles and Obligations in Assisting Mr. SA and the Family
Nurses assume diverse duties that transcend conventional nursing as they navigate intricate ethical dilemmas. According to Nsiah et al. (2019), individuals in this role fulfill various functions, including communication, advocacy, education, and mediation. To examine the ethical considerations about the diagnosis of Mr. SA, it is imperative to go into the ethical implications associated with his case:
Communicator and Communication Facilitation:
The establishment of open communication serves as the fundamental basis for ethical decision-making (Kourkouta & Papathanasiou, 2014). It is imperative for the nurse to actively participate in open and honest communication with both Mr. SA and his family. This entails transmitting medical knowledge and cultivating an atmosphere characterized by trust and comprehension. A family conference can serve as a strategic method, facilitating an avenue for the family members to articulate their issues freely. Concurrently, the nurse facilitates Mr. SA’s active engagement, recognizing his independence and establishing him as a crucial contributor in making decisions.
Nurses have a crucial role in facilitating efficient communication among all stakeholders. Creating an environment that is secure and free from criticism is paramount (Kourkouta & Papathanasiou, 2014). This necessitates actively listening to Mr. SA’s worries and carefully considering the rationale provided by his family for their request. Nurses can validate their apprehensions by addressing the family’s concerns over Mr. SA’s emotional well-being while underlining the significance of open and honest communication within the healthcare setting.
According to Babaii et al. (2021), nurses have the potential to foster sympathetic dialogues with Mr. SA’s family, thereby promoting their understanding of the importance of involving him in topics about his health. In addition, it is possible to educate the family gently about the potential adverse outcomes associated with withholding essential medical information. These outcomes may include inhibiting Mr. SA’s capacity to make well-informed decisions regarding his healthcare and undermining faith in the healthcare team.
Advocate:
It is essential to advocate for Mr. SA’s autonomy. The nurse supports the patient’s entitlement to comprehensive health knowledge while simultaneously recognizing and honoring the family’s apprehensions. Achieving a harmonious equilibrium among these conflicting goals necessitates adopting a sophisticated and nuanced strategy (Davoodvand, 2016). In the role of an advocate, the nurse is tasked with effectively managing the delicate balance between acknowledging and honoring familial connections while also promoting the autonomy of Mr. SA. This advocacy entails the facilitation of talks that underscore the significance of truth disclosure in upholding trust and fostering collaborative decision-making (Molina-Mula & Gallo-Estrada, 2020).
Collaborative Decision-Making:
Nurses assume a crucial role in enabling a collaborative decision-making process that effectively incorporates the viewpoints of Mr. SA, his family, and the healthcare staff. The topic at hand pertains to examining the consequences associated with truth-telling as opposed to non-disclosure, as well as the study of viable solutions that both respect Mr. SA’s autonomy and satisfy the concerns expressed by his family (Cheng et al., 2021).
Nurses expand their range of expertise and viewpoints by engaging the healthcare team in these talks. Collaborating with medical professionals, social workers, and ethics committees facilitates a thorough assessment of the circumstances and promotes a collective approach to decision-making (Rosen et al., 2018). The process fosters the generation of alternative solutions based on ethical principles, considering the emotional consequences for Mr. SA and his family.
Education and Support:
The provision of customized instruction and comprehensive emotional assistance is of utmost importance. Nurses have the capacity to provide valuable insights into the advantages of honesty within healthcare partnerships, thereby equipping Mr. SA and his family with the necessary resources to manage the potential emotional turmoil associated with engaging in conversations about his diagnosis (Molina-Mula & Gallo-Estrada, 2020).
Cultivating empathy and understanding is crucial in guiding Mr. SA and his family as they navigate the complex emotional terrain that these discussions may trigger. According to Moudatsou et al. (2020), nurses can help individuals normalize their emotions of fear or uncertainty and provide them with coping mechanisms to navigate these difficult circumstances effectively.
Ethical Guidance:
Nurses fulfill the role of ethical guides, assisting in the navigation of intricate interactions between values and ethical standards. Incorporating the input of various healthcare specialists, such as ethicists or spiritual advisers, contributes to a range of viewpoints that enhance the decision-making process (Papathanasiou et al., 2014). Collectively, these professionals have the ability to collectively examine innovative resolutions that uphold Mr. SA’s independence while simultaneously addressing the family’s apprehensions about his welfare.
Nurses can cultivate a more comprehensive comprehension of the issue by providing counsel rooted in ethical principles and informed by many perspectives. This, in turn, can facilitate decision-making processes that are in accordance with ethical norms and uphold the desires of all relevant stakeholders (Haddad, 2023).
In brief, nurses fulfill a diverse range of responsibilities in addressing ethical quandaries by facilitating effective communication, promoting collaborative efforts, providing educational resources and assistance, and guiding ethical decision-making processes. The primary objective of this all-encompassing strategy is to maintain ethical standards while simultaneously navigating the intricate emotional and cultural factors that are present in the process of making healthcare decisions.
Mediator:
Mediation is crucial in resolving the dispute arising from the juxtaposition between Mr. SA’s right to access information and the family’s need for confidentiality. According to Babaii et al. (2021), the nurse assumes the role of a mediator, facilitating a dialogue that is both constructive and compassionate, with the aim of discussing the potential advantages and disadvantages associated with the disclosure of truth. During this procedure, the nurse facilitates the family in making a well-informed decision, promoting comprehension of the consequences associated with their specific request. Furthermore, the nurse actively engages with the broader healthcare team, which comprises physicians, social workers, and ethicists, to incorporate various perspectives and foster a comprehensive discourse.
Psychological and Emotional Well-being:
The responsibilities of nurses cover not just the physical health of individuals but also the psychological and emotional well-being of patients. Acknowledging that Mr. SA is not solely a medical case but rather an individual with comprehensive needs, the nurse facilitates an open communication environment that encompasses medical considerations and emotional and psychological dimensions (Flaubert, 2021). This entails sustaining empathy, comprehending the emotional standpoint of the family, and delicately underscoring the importance of Mr. SA’s autonomy in influencing his overall well-being.
Conclusion
The ethical quandary presented in the case of Mr. SA, a 78-year-old man diagnosed with advanced pancreatic cancer, encapsulates the intricate interplay between patient autonomy, truthfulness, familial concerns, and healthcare providers’ ethical obligations. This essay has meticulously dissected the multifaceted ethical issues intrinsic to this scenario and scrutinized the pivotal role of nurses in navigating this complex and sensitive situation.
At the crux of this discussion lies the foundational principle of patient autonomy, advocating for a patient’s right to informed decision-making in healthcare. However, this principle intertwines with familial wishes, sparking a profound debate about the boundary of family authority in patient information and the moral responsibilities of healthcare practitioners. The ethical tug-of-war between beneficence and non-maleficence further complicates the nurses’ predicament as they navigate the potential harm of truth-telling against the consequences of withholding vital information.
Moreover, the ethical principle of veracity, fundamental in nurturing trust in healthcare relationships, becomes a focal point of contention. The nurses find themselves torn between professional obligations to uphold truthfulness and their empathetic understanding of the family’s perspective, leading to discomfort and a sense of ethical dilemma.
Cultural norms and psychological considerations add layers to this ethical quandary. Understanding the cultural context of the family’s request to shield Mr. SA from distressing news becomes imperative. Simultaneously, acknowledging the potential psychological impact on both Mr. SA and his family emphasizes the need for tailored communication strategies that provide support and understanding.
In addressing these ethical dilemmas, nurses assume a multifaceted role transcending traditional caregiving. They act as communicators, advocates, educators, and mediators, aiming to navigate this complex terrain with empathy, sensitivity, and ethical understanding. Engaging in open communication, advocating for patient autonomy, facilitating collaborative decision-making, providing education and emotional support, and offering moral guidance are crucial facets of the nurse’s involvement.
The nurse’s role as a mediator becomes paramount in harmonizing Mr. SA’s right to information and the family’s desire for non-disclosure. By orchestrating constructive and empathetic conversations involving a spectrum of healthcare professionals and emphasizing holistic well-being, nurses endeavor to strike a delicate balance that upholds ethical standards while respecting all parties’ emotional and cultural intricacies.
In essence, this scenario illuminates the complex ethical landscape inherent in nursing practice. Nurses navigate these intricate ethical dilemmas with finesse, drawing upon critical thinking skills, ethical frameworks, and compassionate care to uphold the values of autonomy, truthfulness, and beneficence. The ultimate goal is to foster a healthcare environment that honors the patient’s dignity, autonomy, and well-being while acknowledging the familial context in decision-making. This nuanced approach exemplifies nurses’ dynamic and indispensable role in shaping ethical healthcare practices that prioritize patient-centered care and uphold the integrity of the healthcare profession.
References
Adams, S. B. (2018). Empathy as an ethical imperative. Creative Nursing, 24(3), 166–172. https://doi.org/10.1891/1946-6560.24.3.166
American Medical Association. (2022). Withholding Information from Patients | AMA-Code. code-medical-ethics.ama-assn.org. https://code-medical-ethics.ama-assn.org/ethics-opinions/withholding-information-patients
Babaii, A., Mohammadi, E., & Sadooghiasl, A. (2021). The Meaning of the Empathetic Nurse–Patient Communication: A Qualitative study. Journal of Patient Experience, 8, 237437352110564. https://doi.org/10.1177/23743735211056432
Bester, J. C. (2020). Beneficence, interests, and well-being in medicine: What it means to provide benefit to patients. American Journal of Bioethics, 20(3), 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2020.1714793
Cheng, Q., Duan, Y., Wang, Y., Zhang, Q., & Chen, Y. (2021). The physician-nurse collaboration in truth disclosure: from nurses’ perspective. BMC Nursing, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-021-00557-8
Cheraghi, R., Valizadeh, L., Zamanzadeh, V., Hassankhani, H., & Jafarzadeh, A. (2023). Clarification of ethical principle of the beneficence in nursing care: an integrative review. BMC Nursing, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01246-4
Davoodvand, S. (2016). Patient advocacy from the clinical nurses’ viewpoint: a qualitative study. PubMed Central (PMC). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4958925/
Entwistle, V., Carter, S. M., Cribb, A., & McCaffery, K. (2010). Supporting patient autonomy: The importance of clinician-patient relationships. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 25(7), 741–745. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-010-1292-2
Ethics. (2018, July 20). ANA. https://www.nursingworld.org/practice-policy/nursing-excellence/ethics/
Faubion, D. (2023). Veracity in Nursing – Why is it Important & Examples. https://www.nursingprocess.org/veracity-in-nursing.html
Flaubert, J. (2021, May 11). Supporting the Health and Professional Well-Being of Nurses. The Future of Nursing 2020-2030 – NCBI Bookshelf. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK573902/
Haddad, L. M. (2023, August 14). Nursing ethical considerations. StatPearls – NCBI Bookshelf. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK526054/
Jimenez, D. E., Bartels, S. J., Cárdenas, V., Dhaliwal, S. S., & Alegrı́A, M. (2012). Cultural beliefs and mental health treatment preferences of ethnically diverse older adult consumers in primary care. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 20(6), 533–542. https://doi.org/10.1097/jgp.0b013e318227f876
Kourkouta, L., & Papathanasiou, I. V. (2014). Communication in nursing practice. Materia Socio-medica, 26(1), 65. https://doi.org/10.5455/msm.2014.26.65-67
Molina-Mula, J., & Gallo-Estrada, J. (2020). Impact of Nurse-Patient relationship on quality of care and patient autonomy in Decision-Making. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(3), 835. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17030835
Moudatsou, M., Stavropoulou, A., Philalithis, Α., & Koukouli, S. (2020). The role of empathy in health and social care professionals. Healthcare, 8(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare8010026
Nsiah, C., Siakwa, M., & Ninnoni, J. P. K. (2019). Registered Nurses’ description of patient advocacy in the clinical setting. Nursing Open, 6(3), 1124–1132. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.307
Olejarczyk, J. P. (2022, November 28). Patient rights and ethics. StatPearls – NCBI Bookshelf. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK538279/
Papathanasiou, I. V., Kleisiaris, C., Fradelos, Ε. C., Kakou, K., & Kourkouta, L. (2014). Critical Thinking: the development of an essential skill for nursing students. Acta Informatica Medica : AIM : Journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : ČAsopis DrušTva Za Medicinsku Informatiku BiH, 22(4), 283. https://doi.org/10.5455/aim.2014.22.283-286
Pugh, J. (2020). Informed consent, autonomy, and beliefs. Autonomy, Rationality, and Contemporary Bioethics – NCBI Bookshelf. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK556864/
Rosen, M. A., DiazGranados, D., Dietz, A., Benishek, L. E., Thompson, D. A., Pronovost, P. J., & Weaver, S. J. (2018). Teamwork in healthcare: Key discoveries enabling safer, high-quality care. American Psychologist, 73(4), 433–450. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000298
Varkey, B. (2020). Principles of clinical ethics and their application to practice. Medical Principles and Practice, 30(1), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1159/000509119
write