Introduction
Despite stiff competition from industry heavyweights like Walmart, Blockbuster, and Amazon, the once-small Silicon Valley corporation Netflix has become a spectacular success story in terms of growth, market share, and profitability. Netflix quickly reacted to market shifts and deployed new techniques from its early days when it mostly rented DVDs. In response to Walmart’s foray into the online movie subscription service market, the firm has signed license deals with studios to provide online movie downloads and has partnered with device makers to make content more easily accessible.
Netflix’s success may be largely attributed to the company’s ability to change with the times. The corporation encouraged a culture of “freedom and responsibility” and sought out high-achievers who could juggle several responsibilities. In addition, the company used a unique performance-based compensation system, with pay levels above market average to serve as significant incentives for employee achievement (Steel, 2006).
The Netflix stock option plan stood out because it allowed workers to buy firm shares at a discount over time. However, it is still being determined whether or not stock options are an effective motivational tool, with some suggesting that other forms of compensation, such as cash rewards, may be more effective. In addition, several economic and psychological variables may affect how much stock options are worth to workers, and the options themselves could be more flexible since they must be exercised before they can be used.
Since its first public offering, Netflix has constantly improved its pay structure. CEO Reed Hastings, who initially placed a high value on huge monetary remuneration, later established a novel compensation model in which workers may choose their own pay mix at the end of each year. Stock option awards were distributed monthly, with the number of shares given to each employee determined by a predetermined formula. Importantly, employees were not obligated to use their vested options before leaving the company, and there were no vesting restrictions on the stock option grants. Contrary to popular belief, Netflix did not offer its employees monetary bonuses in 2007 (Cropanzano).
Results from Netflix’s 2007–2009 stock option program were mixed. Voluntary turnover was lower and obligatory turnover was greater than at comparable technological organizations. The company’s overall turnover rate was much higher than the market norm. About a third of workers preferred stock options during this period, while the other two-thirds opted for cash. Attracting and keeping top employees has been aided by Netflix’s innovative remuneration systems and performance-driven culture. However, the effectiveness of these practices, like any organization, requires constant evaluation and adjustments to ensure steady development and success.
Case Summary
There are several moving parts to Netflix’s business plan. The firm needed to build a critical mass of clients to cover its fixed expenses. Customer behavior was also crucial since regular renters were more costly to service. Netflix provided various movies that were always accessible to its subscribers. Netflix realized the need for timely shipment and created a system of distribution hubs to meet demand. The firm went one step further and created a recommendation system that used user ratings to provide movie suggestions. Netflix has to contend with rivals like Wal-Mart, Blockbuster, and even Amazon. They tried competing with Netflix in the online movie subscription industry but were ultimately unsuccessful. Quick delivery, a better selection of movies, and agreements with hardware makers to download movies to Internet-connected devices were all parts of Netflix’s plan to beat the competition.
Netflix encouraged its employees to excel via an environment of trust and independence. Workers were expected to work long hours, take responsibility, demonstrate initiative, and behave like owners. In exchange, Netflix offered its staff a great deal of autonomy in their day-to-day operations, reducing the red tape they had to deal with. The corporation offered above-market salaries to its best performers to keep their skills. The performance bar at Netflix was set high, and only the most dedicated workers were allowed to stay on. There was a lot of involuntary turnover in the organization, so there would always be openings for better successors.
Netflix took a novel tack in the area of pay for its employees. Employees were allowed to establish their pay mix between cash and equity-based incentives rather than receiving a set amount of each. All non-hourly exempt workers could participate, not just C-suite executives. While the company guaranteed above-average pay, employees were given some leeway in deciding how much that pay should be in cash versus stock options. Netflix found this method to be more cost-effective and motivating for employees. Now a major Silicon Valley player, Netflix was first met with intense rivalry and distrust. Investors were skeptical of its business concept and growth prospects, so it had to start from scratch to create a subscriber base. Netflix’s founder Reed Hastings is widely credited for the company’s success since his emphasis on employee autonomy and ownership helped it withstand the onslaught of Walmart, Blockbuster, Amazon, and other upstarts. Netflix’s pay scheme, in which workers may choose their proportion of cash and equity-based bonuses, is just one of the novel measures the company has taken to recruit, retain, and inspire its workforce. The higher-ups were curious whether this method supported the organization’s goals of boosting productivity, boosting morale, and reaffirming its culture.
Netflix is a pioneer in the industry, and the company’s culture and policies are among the best in the business. Reed Hastings, Netflix’s creator, is widely credited for the company’s success by encouraging a work ethic characterized by initiative, innovation, and dedication. Working conditions at Netflix were designed to entice and keep high-performing workers who could accomplish the jobs of two or three persons. The firm paid above-average compensation to keep its best and brightest from leaving for rivals. The idea was to compensate workers as least as much as it would cost to replace them.
Netflix has rigorous standards for work performance, and only the most dedicated workers are kept on. In order to create a way for more productive replacements, the corporation often fired below-average employees. At Netflix, the involuntary turnover rate was almost twice as high as the voluntary. The firm had a novel approach to remuneration in that workers could choose their proportion of cash and stock options. The percentage of stock options sought was up to the employee’s discretion, who might get as much as 60%. Netflix found this method to be more financially prudent and motivating to employees. Stock options may be studied economically within the framework of employee pay. Stock options allow workers to buy a firm’s shares at a certain price (the exercise price) within a specified time frame. Compensation packages that include stock options give workers a stake in the company’s future performance and bring worker interests in line with those of stockholders.
There are several benefits for Netflix for workers to have the opportunity to combine cash and stock options. In the first place, it improves productivity in the workplace by making pay more in line with workers’ desires. Employees with faith in the company’s future success may choose a larger share of stock options, while others who would rather have their money now may opt for a larger cash component. With this wiggle room, workers may tailor their pay to their needs and comfort levels with financial risk. Second, stock options may be used to increase motivation to succeed. Employees are more committed to the firm’s development and success when they have a financial interest in the company via stock options. Netflix may foster a performance-driven culture and recruit high-performing individuals prepared to take on greater risk in exchange for possible benefits by tying their remuneration to the company’s stock performance. Stock option plans have been shown to boost both business values and morale. Netflix rewards workers who seize the reins, demonstrate initiative and behave like owners. Employees are shown that the corporation has faith in their abilities and potential by being given stock options. This may instill a feeling of accountability and motivate workers to make decisions that are in the business’s best interest.
Several distinctive characteristics distinguish Netflix’s compensation plan. The innovative way the organization handles equity-based remuneration stands out. Netflix is unusual in that all workers, not only exempt ones, may choose their combination of cash and stock options for their compensation packages. The value the organization places on personal autonomy is reflected in this policy. The goal of Netflix’s employee-choice pay model is to improve the effectiveness of the company’s compensation structure, provide more tangible rewards for success, and solidify the company’s culture.
Netflix’s business strategy and its history have had an impact on the company’s remuneration structure. When Reed Hastings founded it, Netflix began as a subscription-based online movie-renting business in 1997. For a flat monthly charge, subscribers may make unlimited online movie requests. The company’s success hinged on attracting a large enough consumer base, establishing a reliable system of distribution facilities, and launching a user-friendly, movie-recommendation-equipped website. Netflix has prospered in the face of formidable rivals like Wal-Mart and Blockbuster by riding the crest of industry waves, such as the one from DVDs to online streaming.
Netflix’s pay structure reflects the company’s values and policies towards employees. The corporation promoted a high-performance culture that valued initiative, personal responsibility, and teamwork. Netflix actively sought out high-performers and was prepared to pay above-average rates to keep them. The company’s performance standards were rigorous, and only the best performers were kept on. To ensure that its workers were fairly rewarded relative to the market for comparable professions, Netflix instituted an annual review process that considered market data and variations in function and responsibilities. The company’s philosophy of independence and responsibility was reflected in its unique perks, such as available vacation time.
Theoretical framework
Competition and merit-based compensation are central to tournament theory, which finds resonance in the Netflix case study. Netflix’s online movie renting industry was crowded with heavy hitters like Wal-Mart, Blockbuster, and Amazon. Netflix’s success may be attributed to its culture, which encourages and rewards individuals’ independence, initiative, and innovation in the workplace. Netflix took a novel tack with employee pay by enabling them to tailor their package to reflect their success and contribution to the firm by choosing from various cash and equity-based prizes.
This method aimed to improve the economic efficiency of remuneration while also providing better incentives for success. Netflix’s strategy for staying ahead in the market and accomplishing its goals was to encourage healthy competition, reward employees based on their performance, and foster a spirit of teamwork and motivation. With the likes of Wal-Mart, Blockbuster, and Amazon joining the online movie rental business, competition for Netflix was stiff. Despite these obstacles, Netflix has adopted tournament theory for employee motivation and performance improvement.
The organization fostered a culture of trust and independence, encouraging employees to take charge of their work and hold one another to high standards. Netflix has its unique pay scheme in place to further motivate success. Netflix workers of all levels could create their pay mix rather than accepting the company’s standard cash and equity-based bonuses. By taking this tack, workers could better tie their compensation to the value they brought to the company. Netflix’s goal in allowing workers to choose their salaries was to increase their sense of ownership over the firm and their dedication to its mission. The company’s pay plan reflected the same dedication to cost-effectiveness as the rest of the business. Netflix aimed to maximize efficiency in resource deployment by linking pay to output. Netflix wanted to design a system that successfully rewarded great performers while keeping expenses low, so they let workers choose their pay mix. Netflix overcame difficulties brought on by rival companies and market shifts by encouraging healthy competition, rewarding employees based on their performance, and fostering a culture of empowerment. The corporation saw the DVD market decline as consumers shifted their attention to online streaming services. To maintain its competitive edge
Netflix aggressively sought collaborations with hardware makers and license arrangements with studios to expand the number of devices that could stream its content. Netflix’s success and rapid expansion may be largely attributed to the company’s adoption of tournament theory ideas. Netflix has established itself as a frontrunner in its industry by encouraging a spirit of excellence among its employees and rewarding them in ways that are directly related to their level of performance. To accomplish its lofty objectives and keep its competitive advantage in the online entertainment business, the firm relied on its ability to recruit and retain brilliant individuals and its flexibility in changing market conditions.
Analysis
In this case, Netflix’s compensation program is featured, with a few key highlights steady with the organization’s way of life, procedure, and paying norms. The principal element of the program is that it permits workers to demand their compensation mix. This implies that workers can pick the distribution of their remuneration between a base compensation and investment opportunities that fit them best. They can change their distribution toward the year’s end, not during the year. Representatives can assign up to 60% of their remuneration to investment opportunities. This program is predictable with Netflix’s way of life of opportunity and obligation. It aligns with the organization’s allowing representatives to pick their pay blend, designers, to their necessities. Furthermore, representatives must be top entertainers to get high-level pay. This element advances Netflix’s vision of long-haul development by zeroing in on holding high-performing employees(Buckingham & Goodall, 2015, p.40-50).
The program’s second feature is that Netflix only sometimes raises wages every day, which is different for different organizations that deal with merit-based increments or costs for most everyday items changes. Netflix changes the worker’s compensation after considering late market information on compensation and employee execution. This component is steady with the organization’s paying principles over the wages that different organizations pay their representatives (Jonaseen, 1997). It lines up with Netflix’s plan of action of advancement and obligation because the remuneration style grants employees in light of their exhibition as opposed to how much time and exertion they put into their positions.
The third element of the program is that if a worker has any desire to exit or is terminated from the organization, the employee can hold their unexercised choices until the end of the 10-year time frame. This implies that Netflix doesn’t punish its workers for deciding to get investment opportunities as a component of their remuneration, regardless of whether they deliberately pick or are driven away from the company. This feature is lined up with the organization’s way of advancing worker opportunities by allowing them to stop without adding the pressure of enduring a monetary shot. Netflix’s compensation program is reliable with the company’s way of life, system, and paying norms. The program allows workers to pick their remuneration blend, rewards employees because of their exhibition, and advances long-haul development. The organization’s payment guidelines are higher than different organizations, and the program does not punish workers for deciding to get investment opportunities. These features make Netflix’s pay program remarkable and appealing to top-performing employees. Netflix’s pay program is intended to align with the organization’s way of life, procedure, and paying norms. It advances representative opportunity and obligation while compensating high-performing workers. The program is extraordinary and alluring to top-performing workers, which assists the organization in withholding its ability and advancing long-haul development.
Netflix has fostered a special pay program that aligns with the organization’s procedure and action plan. The program plans to hold persuaded representatives keen on working at Netflix instead of those who stay since they dread losing their unexercised investment opportunities. By eliminating vesting limitations and permitting workers to practice their investment opportunities right away, the program furnishes representatives with the opportunity to leave or stay with the organization unafraid of losing their pay. This guarantees that individuals who stay at Netflix are the people who need to be there, and the organization can forestall the chance of having unmotivated workers. The program likewise aligns with Netflix’s way of life, which values high-level entertainers and their commitment to the organization’s prosperity. By eliminating vesting limitations, Netflix can undoubtedly eliminate failure to meet workers’ expectations and spotlight on holding its high-level entertainers, consequently safeguarding its strategic advantage (Gale, 1989).
Netflix’s compensation program is a vital component of the organization’s methodology and plan of action, permitting the organization to hold cutthroat representatives and save its way of life through superior execution and development. Netflix has fostered an interesting remuneration program that aligns with the organization’s technique and action plan. The program plans to hold roused representatives who are truly keen on working at Netflix, as opposed to those who stay since they dread losing their unexercised investment opportunities. By eliminating vesting limitations and permitting workers to practice their investment opportunities immediately, the program allows representatives to leave or stay with the organization unafraid of losing remuneration. This guarantees that individuals who stay at Netflix are the people who need to be there, and the company can forestall the chance of having unmotivated workers.
The program also aligns with Netflix’s way of life, which values high-level entertainers and their commitment to the organization’s prosperity. By eliminating vesting limitations, Netflix can undoubtedly eliminate failure to meet workers’ expectations and spotlight on holding its high-level entertainers, safeguarding its upper hand. Netflix’s pay program is a significant component of the organization’s procedure and plan of action, permitting the organization to hold cutthroat workers and safeguard its way of life of elite execution and development.
“Reward management: alternatives, consequences, and contexts” by Sarah E. Jones and Stephen J. Perkins is a book chapter that explores the concept of reward management and its various alternatives, consequences, and contexts. The chapter provides a theoretical framework for understanding the role of rewards in organizational behavior, particularly how different types of rewards can influence employee motivation and behavior.
“The Economics of Organizations and Strategy” by Seán Rickard is a book that discusses how economic principles can be applied to the study of organizations and their strategies. Chapter “Wages, incentives, and human resources” specifically focuses on the role of wages and incentives in human resource management. The chapter examines various compensation systems and their effectiveness in motivating employees to perform at higher levels.
Agency theory
Agency theory proposes that managers and employees have various interests, and directors might keep their best interests in mind instead of in light of a legitimate concern for the organization. On account of Netflix, the company’s compensation conspire is intended to adjust the representatives’ interests to the organization’s interests by connecting worker pay to the organization’s exhibition. The company has a “pay for execution” reasoning, implying that workers are compensated because of their presentation and commitment to the organization’s prosperity. This approach assists with lessening the organization’s issue by guaranteeing that employees are roused to try sincerely and add to the organization’s prosperity.
Temporal motivation theory (TMT)
The temporal motivation theory (TMT) is based on the idea that people are motivated by the value of a particular reward and the time it will take to get that reward. Individuals are less likely to be motivated by incentives that are farther in the future and more likely to be motivated by rewards that are accessible right now, according to the idea of anticipated utility. In the case of Netflix, the company’s compensation plan is designed to provide employees with immediate incentives through attractive salaries, bonuses, and stock options. This is because the firm was created to offer online streaming entertainment. This method effectively increases employee morale by giving employees a clear incentive to work long hours at the office and contribute to the firm’s success.
Equity theory and Expectancy theory
As per the equity theory, an individual’s motivation level is primarily influenced by their perception of fairness in their compensation relative to others in similar circumstances. The payment system implemented by Netflix is designed to ensure equity and clarity. The compensation of Netflix employees is contingent upon their job performance and the extent of their contribution to the company’s overall achievements. Furthermore, the corporation implements strategies to guarantee equitable compensation throughout all its teams and departments, intending to eradicate any inequity.
The expectation theory posits that individuals are motivated by the anticipation that their endeavors will yield favorable outcomes. The compensation plan of Netflix is designed to provide significant remuneration, bonuses, and stock options to employees who contribute significantly to the company’s success. The circumstance above is attributable to the fact that the plan was formulated to incentivize individuals who made valuable contributions to the company’s achievements. Implementing this particular approach facilitates motivating employees by establishing a clear and unambiguous standard that their exertions will be duly recognized and compensated.
Findings
As indicated by Exhibit 6, workers at Netflix did not regularly hold every one of their stock options for the full 10-year term. Roughly 50% of stock options were practiced within only four years of the award date. Also, the information showed that female employees, workers with more significant compensations, and workers at the VP level were bound to partake in the stock option program. One potential clarification for this finding is that representatives at the VP level or with more significant compensations have more insight and a superior comprehension of what they are searching for in a business. Subsequently, they could focus on Netflix for a more extended timeframe and see the worth in financial planning with the organization. Also, employees who got bigger raises would participate more in the investment opportunities program, possibly since they were superior workers and persuaded by seeing the immediate effect of their work on the organization’s worth.
The information likewise showed that employees who were automatically ended were more averse to partaking in the stock program in the earlier year. While employees are not generally compelled to practice their stock option upon end, a worker performing poorly is less inclined to see the worth in putting resources into the organization and may pass on the program subsequently. This data has suggestions for Netflix’s compensation and maintenance procedures. By focusing on more elevated-level workers and boosting solid execution with raises and investment opportunities, Netflix can hold its top ability and make a culture of superior execution. Notwithstanding, it is likewise critical to address the underlying drivers of the compulsory end, for example, unfortunate work fit or absence of help, to limit turnover and keep a roused and connected labor force. Exhibit 6 gives significant knowledge into the variables that impact worker support in investment opportunities programs and can illuminate Netflix’s endeavors to draw in and hold top ability. By understanding its representatives’ inspirations and ways of behaving, Netflix can plan remuneration and maintenance methodologies that align with its way of life and objectives.
Whether to put resources into organization stocks can rely upon different elements, for example, a representative’s work residency, risk resistance, and individual monetary necessities. For example, a representative who will leave the organization might like to accept their compensation as money instead of putting it in stocks, which are less fluid resources. In the meantime, workers with longer work residencies might be less keen on investment opportunities, as their situation in the firm is now ensured, and they might be searching for lower-risk compensation bundles.
Employees will generally practice their stock options before the 10-year term wraps up, with around half of the stock options practiced in four years or less. This conduct might be driven by the worry that the characteristic worth of stocks might dial back or diminish from now on, which would expand the gamble of clutching them. Moreover, workers might require prompt fluid capital or find it trying to propose their choices as security for the credit. Individual convictions about stock returns might impact workers’ choice to practice investment opportunities. Nonetheless, it is fundamental to recollect that previous stock presentation is certainly not a solid indicator of future returns. In this manner, while individual convictions might assume a part in the dynamic cycle, it is vital to consider choices concerning sound financial examination instead of feelings. Employees often practice their investment opportunities when they have a 40-60% increase over the strike cost. This rate might signal workers to fence their gamble and sell their stocks before any possible decrease in their worth. Putting resources into organization stocks is a mind-boggling choice that requires considering different factors, such as work residency, risk resistance, and individual financial needs. Understanding the basic motivations of employees for practicing their stock options can give important experiences in their financial decision-making (Roberts, 2010, p.125-132).
Recommendations
Netflix allows employees to plan their compensation mix, permitting them to disperse their compensation among money and stocks up to 60%. Nonetheless, to guarantee that workers have a superior comprehension of the stock program, Netflix should consider recruiting a financial advisor. This would empower workers to settle on informed conclusions about their monetary pay, prompting expanded monetary soundness and diminished feelings of anxiety. At last, this would help representatives in their work execution.
Netflix should consider overhauling its excursion strategy, which offers limitless downtime for all employees. The company could boost employees who limit their time off. For instance, employees who go home for the days out of every year could get a reward and an extra sum added to their compensation toward the year’s end. This approach would urge employees to adopt a capable downtime strategy while helping the company’s general efficiency. Netflix’s remuneration blend and travel strategy give workers much adaptability. Nonetheless, the company should consider recruiting a financial advisor to assist employees with settling on informed conclusions about their financial compensation. Also, modifying the excursion strategy to boost mindful time off could help the two representatives and the company in the long run.
Reference
Connelly, B.L., Tihanyi, L., Crook, T.R. and Gangloff, K.A., 2014. Tournament theory: Thirty years of contests and competitions. Journal of Management, 40(1), pp.16-47.
Buckingham, M. and Goodall, A., 2015. Reinventing performance management. Harvard Business Review, 93(4), pp.40-50.
Cassar, L. and Meier, S., 2018. Nonmonetary incentives and the implications of work as a source of meaning. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 32(3), pp.215-38.
Connelly, B.L., Tihanyi, L., Crook, T.R. and Gangloff, K.A., 2014. Tournament theory: Thirty years of contests and competitions. Journal of Management, 40(1), pp.16-47.
Cropanzano, R., Bowen, D.E. and Gilliland, S.W., 2007. The management of organizational justice. Academy of management perspectives, 21(4), pp.34-48.
Gale, D., 1989. The theory of linear economic models. University of Chicago Press.
Larcker, D.F., Tayan, B. and McCall, A.L., 2010. Equity on Demand: The Netflix Approach to Compensation. Rock Center for Corporate Governance at Stanford University Teaching Case No. CG-19.
Lazear, E.P., 2000. Performance pay and productivity. American Economic Review, 90(5), pp.1346-1361.
Park, S. and Sturman, M.C., 2016. Evaluating form and functionality of pay‐for‐performance plans: The relative incentive and sorting effects of merit pay, bonuses, and long‐term incentives. Human Resource Management, 55(4), pp.697-719.
Pepper, A. and Gore, J., 2014. The economic psychology of incentives: An international study of top managers. Journal of World Business, 49(3), pp.350-361.
Perkins, S.J. and Jones, S., 2020. Reward management: Alternatives, consequences, and contexts. Kogan Page Publishers.
Roberts, J., 2010. Designing incentives in organizations. Journal of institutional economics, 6(1), pp.125-132.
Steel, P. and König, C.J., 2006. Integrating theories of motivation. Academy of management review, 31(4), pp.889-913.
Trevor, C.O., Reilly, G. and Gerhart, B., 2012. Reconsidering pay dispersion’s effect on the performance of interdependent work: Reconciling sorting and pay inequality. Academy of Management Journal, 55(3), pp.585-610
write