Enhancing Waste Management Systems for Industrial Complexes Using Geographic Information Systems

Introduction

Waste management is a critical aspect of development agenda and policy as many cities emerge across the globe with massive transition to manufacturing and the blooming of industrial parks and industrial complexes. Industrial complexes attract a great deal of interest both rom the public and private sector (Kaza et al., 2018, p. 54). Geographic Information Systems with all its varied developments in spatial planning and databases have a great deal of capacity for data capture and data mining that aids varied developments in the space of waste management around Industrial Parks. Designated parks have broadly defined and identifiable characteristic based on regulatory and legal definitions (Li et al., 2017, p. 199). The waste management practices in these developed regions adopt the prototyping in design and the overlaying of the prototypes with GIS technologies promise the optimal outcomes of optimality and efficiency in the long term.

Study Objective/Scope and Study Limitations (if any)

Study Objective

The objective of this proposal as an analytical review of literature is to highlight the essential value of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) in waste management operations at industrial parks. Geographic Information Systems have advanced to encompass databases, sensors, and analytics systems that capture and optimize the value of information resources for the overall process optimization in the documentation and classification of waste related data (Arıkan, Şimşit-Kalender & Vayvay, 2017, p. 5). The advent of artificial intelligence and other functions of data mining and analytics as well as the technologies for surveillance and oversight enable the seamless integration of diverse geospatial data for the optimization and ratification of a circular economy seeking to optimize recycling and sustainability (Esmaeilian et al., 2018, p. 180). The objective shall be attained through suitably targeted activities. These include the assessment of the current waste management practices within industrial complexes, the analysis of existing waste management challenges and inefficiencies and the identification of opportunities for improvement and optimization of waste management systems using GIS technology. The study shall also explore the development of a GIS-based waste management framework tailored to the unique industrial complex needs, the evaluation of the potential environmental and economic benefits of the proposed GIS-based system and the exploration of recommendations for the implementation of the optimized waste management system.

1.2 Scope

This study undertakes an analytical review of literature on the enhancement of waste management systems for industrial complexes using the technology of geographic information systems in waste mapping and the management of logistics in hauling and recycling programs to foster optimal outcomes in waste management within regions of designated industrial parks. Effective site management issues deploying relevant GIS technologies are a prominent aspect of effective waste management (He, Shen & Zhang, 2018, p. 6). Moreover, the study embeds data collection systems including waste inventory, waste characteristics classification, and overall outlook of demographics, impacts, and well-being characteristics of the broader society. The integration of GIS technology enables the execution of environmental impact assessment as a progressive aspect of environmental governance (Ghisellini, Cialani & Ulgiati, 2016, p. 20). This analytical review of literature also underscores the economic viability and validity of the embedded technological approaches in waste management using GIS systems through the capture of economic appraisals.

1.3 Study Limitations

While this study aims to provide valuable insights into optimizing waste management systems using GIS in industrial complexes, it is important to acknowledge potential limitations:

1. a) Generalizability: Findings from the case study may not be directly transferable to all industrial complexes due to variations in waste types, sizes, and infrastructure.
2. b) Data Availability: The accuracy and completeness of data relied upon for the study could impact the precision of the results. Data limitations may also arise from the industrial complex
3. d) Technological Restrictions: Adequate technological infrastructure, including hardware, software, and qualified employees, may be required for the successful implementation of GIS-based waste management systems (Khoshsepehr, Alinejad and Alimohammadlou, 2023).
4. e) Regulatory Considerations: It’s crucial to follow all applicable local, state, and federal legislation when it comes to trash management.
5. f) Resource Constraints: Availability of financial resources, personnel, and technical expertise may affect the extent to which the proposed GIS-based system can be implemented within the industrial complex (Khoshsepehr, Alinejad and Alimohammadlou, 2023).

Study Area

The systematic structural developments in manufacturing and industrial advancement under the oversight of the Bretton Woods institutions have embedded standards and regulations for industrial parks. Within such locations, waste management approaches embrace new technological and innovations (Haupt, Vadenbo & Hellweg, 2017, p. 617). In adaptation and optimization of Waste Management Systems through Geographical Information Systems, industrial parks can implement diverse technologies and innovations that have witnessed a massive reception across the globe as can be seen in literature (Brix, 2020, p. 12). For instance, automation, big data and analytics have greatly impacted the statistical approaches in management science through methods of total quality management (TQM). Waste inventory capture, trucking, hauling and recycling loops through embedded databases can attain astounding levels of efficiency.

2.1 Selection Criteria

1. a) Size and Diversity: According to the EPA (n.d.), the industrial complex that is chosen must be large enough and complex enough to replicate typical industrial settings. To provide a thorough grasp of waste management difficulties, a variety of industries and waste streams should be present.
2. b) Geographical Location: Due to environmental regulations, high population density, or a lack of available landfill space, the study location should be located in a region where waste management is a major concern.
3. c) Waste Generation Rate: According to the EPA (n.d.), the industrial complex should produce a significant volume of waste so that there are enough data points for insightful analysis and optimization.
4. d) Data Availability: It is essential to have access to pertinent data, such as trash creation rates, waste composition, current waste management facilities, and spatial data. There should be enough data available in the chosen area.

2.2 Samples of Potential Study Areas

Depending on the geographic focus and research objectives, a number of industrial complexes in various regions can provide ideal study locations. They consist of:

1. a) City industrial park: An industrial park with a high concentration of industrial activity and limited landfill. This study area can be a specific urban trash management problem.
2. b) Regional Manufacturing Hub: A manufacturing hub situated in an area where there are numerous waste streams and significant manufacturing activity. This area might be used as an illustration for a study with a regional focus.
3. c) Eco-Industrial Park: An eco-industrial park renowned for its unique waste management techniques and sustainability initiatives. This could serve as a case study to show top tricks and areas for development.

Needed Data

The required information will lay the groundwork for examining current waste management procedures, creating GIS-based optimizations, and evaluating the potential environmental and financial advantages.

Data on Waste

Detailed statistics on the amount of waste produced by each industry inside an industrial park complex is vital for an effective study. To account for variations, this data should be gathered over a long period of time (De Souza Melaré et al., 2017, p. 523). Information on the kinds and ratios of various waste streams produced, including hazardous and non-hazardous items, is provided by waste composition (Zhang et al., 2019, p. 22). The information on current waste collection routes, frequencies, and schedules should be documented and set into relevant databases that aid in gradual optimization. Moreover, the records of waste disposal as evidence of the techniques now used to dispose of trash, including recycling and landfills presents the existing state of operations, which aids with the information on any sorting or segregation of waste streams at the source is included in waste segregation practices.

Infrastructure Information

Waste management programs depend on the existing infrastructure for hauling and recycling. The information on the current waste management infrastructure, including information on disposal sites, recycling centers, and collecting stations helps build the relevant databases and GIS installations (Esmaeilian et al., 2018, p. 190). The information about the location of the industrial complex’s businesses, garbage collection facilities, access routes, and prospective disposal sites yields to the efficiency through integration of different technologies.

Economic Information

The econometric component of data functions embedded in the infrastructure and varied initiatives helps foster efficiency in waste management (Anthopoulos, 2017, p. 239). The financial information about the costs of garbage management, including collection, personnel, transportation, disposal fees, and infrastructure upkeep all aid in the optimization schedules for the development of the complex (Fatimah et al., 2020, p. 12). The exhaustive details on the industrial complex’s available budget for trash management can them be associated to company budgets and controls through a balanced scorecard mechanism.

3.4 Environmental Information

Data on carbon emissions related to waste disposal, transportation, and the environmental effects of current waste management techniques can be appraised based on the existing regulatory systems integrated through the global benchmarks (Malinauskaite et al., 201, p. 2032). Through oversight of the environmental laws; current legislation and regulations for licenses that have an effect on how trash is managed in the studied region.

3.5 Data on Stakeholders

Stakeholder Information: Contact information and functions of important stakeholders, including management of industrial complexes, waste management service providers, governing bodies, and municipal governments.

3.6 GIS Data

Geospatial Data: GIS datasets that facilitate the use of GIS-based optimization approaches, such as maps, satellite imagery, and spatial layers.

3.7 Social Data

Data on the number of workers and employees at the industrial complex, as well as (if applicable) information on where they live.

3.8 Historical Information

Historical Information: Any information from the past on alterations to the industrial complex’s waste management procedures.

3.9 Interviews and Surveys

Results from stakeholder interviews and surveys to learn more about difficulties, opinions, and expectations in waste management.

Tools of Study

1. Geographic Information Systems (GIS): The study’s main tool will be GIS software like ArcGIS or QGIS, which enables spatial analysis, mapping, and visualization of waste management data (Jouhara et al., 2017, p. 200). It will help in identifying the best trash disposal locations, streamlining waste collection routes, and evaluating the effects of the suggested modifications.
2. Data Collection Tools: Real-time trash generation and spatial data will be gathered using tools for data collection, such as mobile devices and software for field surveys (Dey et al., 2022, p. 22). GPS-enabled tools for monitoring rubbish collection routes may fall under this category.
3. Statistical Software: To find correlations between variables, test hypotheses, and do regression analysis, statistical tools like R or Python will be used. This will allow us to evaluate the efficacy of the suggested waste management changes.
4. Environmental Modeling Software: To simulate the potential environmental effects of the enhanced waste management system, including decreases in carbon emissions and landfill utilization, specialized environmental modeling software may be utilized.
5. Communication and Visualization Tools: To present findings, build reports, and create visual aids for presentations to stakeholders and decision-makers, tools including Microsoft Excel, PowerPoint, and data visualization libraries will be used.
6. Methodology of Study

The method of study for this proposal embraces the analytical review of literature that captured relevant facets of the development in waste management at industrial parks with GIS technologies convergence. Waste audit programs, surveys and interviews on waste management best practices are documented (Grigorova, Ranchev & Yankova, 2017, p. 6). Diverse studies indicate the use of mobile data Apps and integrated GPS platforms for data capture in waste management (Mukherjee et al., 2021, p. 8). Real-time data tracking of operations through integrated databases and gadgets ensure effective oversight (Bing et al., 2016, p. 282). Remote sensing tools and diverse environmental sensors embedded in the industries give an effective grasp of quantities and characteristics of waste for suitable oversight (Abuhasel, 2023, p. 333). Embedded balanced scorecard approaches aid the industries to capture the relevant econometric attributes of waste and hence improve the value of data and budgetary simulations into the waste management process (Kumar et al., 2017, p. 6). Enhanced availability and distribution of data with suitable geospatial attributes built on the GIS layers, weather data and public records enable optimal outcomes.

6.0 Brief Review of Literature

Several important conclusions and trends may be drawn from an examination of the literature on waste management systems in industrial complexes and the integration of Geographic Information Systems (GIS). The development of various waste streams, ineffective collection and disposal methods, and environmental issues are just a few of the important waste management challenges that industrial complexes frequently encounter (Kumar et al., 2017). These difficulties affect operational expenses while also raising carbon emissions (Salvia et al., 2021). As a solution to these problems, GIS has become an essential tool for decision support. The efficiency and sustainability of waste management procedures within industrial complexes are improved by GIS, which enables geographical analysis, route optimization, and real-time monitoring of garbage collection (Asefa, Barasa, and Mengistu, 2022).

The academic literature emphasizes how crucial spatial data and mapping are to GIS-based waste management (Das et al., 2019, p. 660). Garbage management experts can assess garbage generation patterns, pinpoint the best routes for collection, and choose the best disposal locations by utilizing spatial data (Lumen, 2022). This spatial analysis plays a crucial role in shortening travel lengths, lowering fuel consumption, and ultimately lowering associated expenses (Ferronato & Torretta, 2019, p. 1060). Additionally, GIS-based systems have clear environmental advantages because they may significantly reduce carbon emissions, which make them a desirable option for industrial complexes looking to reduce their environmental effect and increase sustainability.

Case Studies

Through the use of Geographic Information Systems (GIS), several case studies offer useful insights into the adaptation and optimization of waste management systems in industrial complexes (Anagnostopoulos et al., 2017, p. 282). Within its industrial complexes, Singapore has established a cutting-edge waste management system that mainly utilizes GIS technology. RFID (Radio-Frequency Identification) tags and sensors are used in the city-state’s industrial zones to track garbage cans (Kabirifar et al., 2019, p. 8). GIS is used to improve operating efficiency overall, minimize vehicle emissions, and optimize garbage collection routes (Zhou et al., 2022). The case study demonstrates how GIS was successfully used for real-time monitoring, leading to lower expenses and a noticeably smaller environmental footprint for trash management.

Isolated cases elaborate the challenges and intrigues of the deployment of GIS technologies in waste management like the Kalundborg Eco-Industrial Park in Denmark that is well known for its environmentally friendly operations, which include trash treatment. To map trash flows and find chances for garbage exchange and recycling among the various enterprises within the complex, the park makes use of GIS (Shi, 2019). The park has significantly reduced garbage creation, reduced disposal costs, and decreased environmental consequences by using GIS to evaluate geographical data (Nascimento et al., 2019, p. 610). This case study explains how GIS makes it easier for industrial complexes to develop circular economies, which has positive effects on the economy and the environment.

Expected Findings/Outcome

The study will reveal specific inefficiencies in the current waste management system of the conventional industrial complex models. It shall endorse a customized GIS-based waste management framework that is optimized to meet the complex’s unique needs (Jin, Yuan & Chen, 2019, p. 182). Moreover, the project makes suggestions for environmental benefits that include reduced carbon emissions and decreased landfill usage resulting from optimized waste collection (Prata et al., 2019, p. 6). Insights into more efficient resource allocation, including waste collection point placement and personnel allocation, will be provided. The adoption of GIS-based waste management practices will promote enhanced sustainability within the industrial complex.

References

Abuhasel, K., 2023. Geographical Information System Based Spatial and Statistical Analysis of the Green Areas in the Cities of Abha and Bisha for Environmental Sustainability. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 12(8), p.333.

Anagnostopoulos, T., Zaslavsky, A., Kolomvatsos, K., Medvedev, A., Amirian, P., Morley, J. and Hadjieftymiades, S., 2017. Challenges and opportunities of waste management in IoT-enabled smart cities: a survey. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Computing, 2(3), pp.275-289.

Anthopoulos, L.G., 2017. Understanding smart cities: a tool for smart government or an industrial trick? (Vol. 22, p. 293). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.

Arıkan, E., Şimşit-Kalender, Z.T. and Vayvay, Ö., 2017. Solid waste disposal methodology selection using multi-criteria decision making methods and an application in Turkey. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, pp.403-412.

Asefa, E.M., Barasa, K.B. and Mengistu, D.A., 2022. Application of Geographic Information System in Solid Waste Management. [online] www.intechopen.com. IntechOpen. Available at: https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/81402.

Bing, X., Bloemhof, J.M., Ramos, T.R.P., Barbosa-Povoa, A.P., Wong, C.Y. and van der Vorst, J.G., 2016. Research challenges in municipal solid waste logistics management. Waste management, 48, pp.584-592.

Brix, H., 2020. Wastewater treatment in constructed wetlands: system design, removal processes, and treatment performance. In Constructed wetlands for water quality improvement (pp. 9-22). CRC Press.

Das, S., Lee, S.H., Kumar, P., Kim, K.H., Lee, S.S. and Bhattacharya, S.S., 2019. Solid waste management: Scope and the challenge of sustainability. Journal of cleaner production, 228, pp.658-678.

De Souza Melaré, A.V., González, S.M., Faceli, K. and Casadei, V., 2017. Technologies and decision support systems to aid solid-waste management: a systematic review. Waste management, 59, pp.567-584.

Dey, P.K., Malesios, C., De, D., Budhwar, P., Chowdhury, S. and Cheffi, W., 2022. Circular economy to enhance sustainability of small and medium sized enterprises. In Supply Chain Sustainability in Small and Medium Sized Enterprises (pp. 10-45). Routledge.

EPA (n.d.). Guide for Industrial Waste Management Protecting Land Ground Water Surface Water Air Building Partnerships vii. [online] Available at: https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2016-03/documents/industrial-waste-guide.pdf.

Esmaeilian, B., Sarkis, J., Lewis, K. and Behdad, S., 2020. Blockchain for the future of sustainable supply chain management in Industry 4.0. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 163, p.105064.

Esmaeilian, B., Wang, B., Lewis, K., Duarte, F., Ratti, C. and Behdad, S., 2018. The future of waste management in smart and sustainable cities: A review and concept paper. Waste management, 81, pp.177-195.

Fatimah, Y.A., Govindan, K., Murniningsih, R. and Setiawan, A., 2020. Industry 4.0 based sustainable circular economy approach for smart waste management system to achieve sustainable development goals: A case study of Indonesia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 269, p.122263.

Ferronato, N. and Torretta, V., 2019. Waste mismanagement in developing countries: A review of global issues. International journal of environmental research and public health, 16(6), p.1060.

Ghisellini, P., Cialani, C. and Ulgiati, S., 2016. A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems. Journal of Cleaner production, 114, pp.11-32.

Grigorova, I., Ranchev, M. and Yankova, T., 2017. Waste management-current trends. In Proceedings from the 60th International Scientific Conference of the UMG “St. Ivan Rilski”, Sofia, Bulgaria, Mining and Mineral processing (Vol. 60, No. 2).

Haupt, M., Vadenbo, C. and Hellweg, S., 2017. Do we have the right performance indicators for the circular economy?: insight into the Swiss waste management system. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21(3), pp.615-627.

He, L., Shen, J. and Zhang, Y., 2018. Ecological vulnerability assessment for ecological conservation and environmental management. Journal of environmental management, 206, pp.1115-1125.

Jin, R., Yuan, H. and Chen, Q., 2019. Science mapping approach to assisting the review of construction and demolition waste management research published between 2009 and 2018. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 140, pp.175-188.

Jouhara, H., Czajczyńska, D., Ghazal, H., Krzyżyńska, R., Anguilano, L., Reynolds, A.J. and Spencer, N., 2017. Municipal waste management systems for domestic use. Energy, 139, pp.485-506.

Kabirifar, K., Mojtahedi, M., Wang, C. and Tam, V.W., 2020. Construction and demolition waste management contributing factors coupled with reduce, reuse, and recycle strategies for effective waste management: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 263, p.121265.

Kaza, S., Yao, L., Bhada-Tata, P. and Van Woerden, F., 2018. What a waste 2.0: a global snapshot of solid waste management to 2050. World Bank Publications.

Khoshsepehr, Z., Alinejad, S. and Alimohammadlou, M., 2023. Exploring industrial waste management challenges and smart solutions: An integrated hesitant fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, [online] 420, p.138327. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138327.

Kumar, S., Smith, S.R., Fowler, G., Velis, C., Kumar, S.J., Arya, S., Kumar, R. and Cheeseman, C., 2017. Challenges and opportunities associated with waste management in India. Royal Society Open Science, [online] 4(3), p.160764. doi:https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160764.

Kumar, S., Smith, S.R., Fowler, G., Velis, C., Kumar, S.J., Arya, S., Rena, Kumar, R. and Cheeseman, C., 2017. Challenges and opportunities associated with waste management in India. Royal Society open science, 4(3), p.160764.

Li, X., Wu, P., Shen, G.Q., Wang, X. and Teng, Y., 2017. Mapping the knowledge domains of Building Information Modeling (BIM): A bibliometric approach. Automation in Construction, 84, pp.195-206.

Lumen, K., 2022. 13.2 Waste Management Strategies | Environmental Biology. [online] courses.lumenlearning.com. Available at: https://courses.lumenlearning.com/suny- monroe-environmentalbiology/chapter/15-2-waste-management-strategies/.

Malinauskaite, J., Jouhara, H., Czajczyńska, D., Stanchev, P., Katsou, E., Rostkowski, P., Thorne, R.J., Colon, J., Ponsá, S., Al-Mansour, F. and Anguilano, L., 2017. Municipal solid waste management and waste-to-energy in the context of a circular economy and energy recycling in Europe. Energy, 141, pp.2013-2044.

Mukherjee, A.G., Wanjari, U.R., Chakraborty, R., Renu, K., Vellingiri, B., George, A., CR, S.R. and Gopalakrishnan, A.V., 2021. A review on modern and smart technologies for efficient waste disposal and management. Journal of Environmental Management, 297, p.113347.

Nascimento, D.L.M., Alencastro, V., Quelhas, O.L.G., Caiado, R.G.G., Garza-Reyes, J.A., Rocha-Lona, L. and Tortorella, G., 2019. Exploring Industry 4.0 technologies to enable circular economy practices in a manufacturing context: A business model proposal. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 30(3), pp.607-627.

Prata, J.C., Silva, A.L.P., Da Costa, J.P., Mouneyrac, C., Walker, T.R., Duarte, A.C. and Rocha- Santos, T., 2019. Solutions and integrated strategies for the control and mitigation of plastic and microplastic pollution. International journal of environmental research and public health, 16(13), p.2411.

Salvia, G., Zimmermann, N., Willan, C., Hale, J., Gitau, H., Muindi, K., Gichana, E. and Davies, M., 2021. The wicked problem of waste management: An attention-based analysis of stakeholder behaviours. Journal of Cleaner Production, [online] 326(2), p.129200. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129200.

Shi, L., 2019. Industrial Symbiosis: Context and Relevance to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Encyclopedia of the UN sustainable development goals, 1, pp.1–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71062-4_19-2.

Zhang, A., Venkatesh, V.G., Liu, Y., Wan, M., Qu, T. and Huisingh, D., 2019. Barriers to smart waste management for a circular economy in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 240, p.118198.

Zhou, J., Li, L., Wang, Q., Fan, Y.V., Liu, X., Klemeš, J.J., Wang, X., Tong, Y.W. and Jiang, P., 2022. Household waste management in Singapore and Shanghai: Experiences, challenges and opportunities from the perspective of emerging megacities. Waste Management, 144(3), pp.221–232. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2022.03.029.