My main idea is about human rights here; this is the foundation of my position on peaceful activities that should be undertaken by international communities in violent countries that can be considered sovereign states. I firmly take the position that, in such cases as mass human rights violations, the international society has no time to wait; neither does it have the luxury to mull, but it should react to the violation characterized by a heroic decision and urgent actions. When a sovereign state is in the act of planning and carrying out horrific atrocities like mass killings or crimes against humans against contemporary natives, the language of intervention becomes appropriate, if not obligatory, to protect the most basic rights of individuals. Keeping human dignity as the most important principle in this context, we build our ethical base for eliminating pain and injustice during serious human rights violations.
Such a commitment improves my stand on the effectiveness and necessity of international intervention in war situations. It is the most crucial element needed for bringing the wrong done to justice and lays a foundation for peace and forgiveness. An individual government that ignores to prosecute people who are villains behind violent and severe human rights violations deprives such a government of justice, and the cycle of impunity continues. In cases where the international community cannot show aggression and other human rights violations with reasonable means, they should feel compelled to use all the proper means of intervention to ensure that justice is served. By taking perpetrators accountable and giving people the victims some sort of reparation, interventions can promote the establishment of a posterior society, which is generally more fair and balanced after the conflict. Therefore, the adverse effects on the local communities are ameliorated since the restoration agreements they receive will be their tool for future-forward peace and stability.
“Compassion,” a value about which I am deeply convinced, largely influences my understanding of which actions are to be taken. I firmly maintain that the pain and glory lose their meaning if those who are innocent and caught amid the war do not receive the necessary attention from the international society. Thus, the moral imperative overrules the duty to stay out and protect the needy while fulfilling their essential humanitarian need. Compassion, thus, leads us to recognize others as human beings when affected by conflict, and, as a consequence, we react to their suffering in a manner that is as humane as possible. These factors are vital in establishing the foundation stones of the socio-political structures that society is built upon. The international community’s support, which strives to arrest human suffering and meet the immediate needs of the communities affected, serves as a testament that humanity is not one step short of fulfilling the fundamental values and rights of existence of all individuals, no matter what the circumstances. In addition, a compassionate nature is vital in such work because it helps local populations realize the meaning of trust and rapport, which translates to effective engagement. Therefore, incorporating compassion into conflict resolution, which protects human life and creates an empathic and pro-solidarity culture at the international level, emphasizes promoting the values of compassion and humanity.
Conclusively, the most powerful influences that verse my stance on where and when the international community is supposed to go with respect to each sovereign state during times of conflict are my values, such as human rights, justice, and compassion. These principles make it impossible to ignore the occurrence of horrific human rights violations as well as other scenarios in the world where justice is not seen. Furthermore, they also become compelled to advocate for rights and end the suffering of innocent civilians. Sovereignty is an equally crucial as well as noble issue, but it should not be a shield for those who commit atrocities and crimes against humanity. It is the duty of international community to maintain principle-based practices of international law and fulfill their responsibility for the protection and betterment of all beings challenged with complex geo-political problems.
References
Crocker, C. A., Hampson, F. O., & Aall, P. (2015). Managing Conflict in a World Adrift. In Amazon. United States Institute of Peace Press and Centre for International Governance and Innovation. https://www.amazon.com/Managing-Conflict-Adrift-Chester-Crocker/dp/1601272227
Ramos Jaraba, S. M., Quiceno Toro, N., Ochoa Sierra, M., Ruiz Sánchez, L., García Jiménez, M. A., Salazar-Barrientos, M. Y., Bedoya Bedoya, E., Vélez Álvarez, G. A., Langer, A., Gausman, J., & Garcés-Palacio, I. C. (2020). Health in conflict and post-conflict settings: reproductive, maternal and child health in Colombia. Conflict and Health, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13031-020-00273-1
Spangaro, J., Toole-Anstey, C., MacPhail, C. L., Rambaldini-Gooding, D. C., Keevers, L., & Garcia-Moreno, C. (2021). The impact of interventions to reduce risk and incidence of intimate partner violence and sexual violence in conflict and post-conflict states and other humanitarian crises in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Conflict and Health, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13031-021-00417-x
write