JSTOR and EBSCO are popular online database systems that offer access to academic journals, articles, and research papers. Libraries and educational institutions worldwide widely use these platforms to provide users access to high-quality scholarly content. JSTOR is a digital library that offers access to thousands of academic journals, books, and primary sources in the arts, humanities, and social sciences. The platform provides an archive of scholarly content, with many articles dating back to the 19th century. JSTOR is widely used by academic researchers, students, and professionals. EBSCO is a comprehensive research database that offers access to various scholarly journals, magazines, and books in multiple disciplines, including business, health, education, and social sciences. The platform provides access to full-text articles and abstracts from thousands of sources, making it a popular choice for academic libraries and researchers. This comparative evaluation will examine the key features and functionality of JSTOR and EBSCO online database systems, assessing their usability, content, technical aspects, and cost. This evaluation aims to assist librarians and patrons in making informed decisions about which platform best meets their needs.
Background and Context
Academic libraries and educational institutions widely use JSTOR and EBSCO to provide their users with scholarly content. The availability of online databases like JSTOR and EBSCO has revolutionized how research is conducted. Instead of relying on print journals and books, researchers can access vast repositories of scholarly content online from anywhere in the world. Libraries and educational institutions face the challenge of providing their users access to high-quality academic content while managing costs. Online databases like JSTOR and EBSCO offer a cost-effective solution by providing access to various scholarly content without needing physical storage space. JSTOR and EBSCO are well-established platforms, with JSTOR being launched in 1995 and EBSCO in 1944. They have built up a strong reputation in the academic community for providing high-quality content and reliable access. It is important to note that both platforms have different focuses, with JSTOR emphasizing archival content and EBSCO offering a broader range of current research articles. Additionally, each forum has its own set of strengths and weaknesses, which will be evaluated in the following sections of this comparative evaluation.
Platform Features and Functionality
JSTOR and EBSCO offer a range of features and functionality to their users.
Content: Both platforms provide access to scholarly content, but JSTOR primarily focuses on archival material, including full-text articles, books, and primary sources. In contrast, EBSCO provides access to a broader range of current research articles, books, and other resources.
Search Capabilities: Both platforms offer robust search capabilities that allow users to search across multiple disciplines and fields. JSTOR provides an advanced search feature that allows users to refine their search using various criteria, including date range, content type, and language. EBSCO also offers advanced search features and will enable users to customize their search preferences.
User Interface: JSTOR has a clean and intuitive user interface that is easy to navigate. It provides users clear options for browsing content by subject, title, or author. EBSCO’s more complex user interface offers more options for customizing searches and results.
Access: JSTOR offers a single, all-inclusive subscription that provides access to its content. In contrast, EBSCO offers a range of subscription options, including access to individual journals and databases. This allows libraries to tailor their subscriptions to their specific needs and budgets.
Ease of Use: Both platforms are easy to use, but JSTOR is generally more user-friendly. It provides users with clear options for browsing and searching, and its interface is straightforward to navigate.
Mobile Access: Both platforms offer mobile access, with JSTOR offering a dedicated app for iOS and Android devices and EBSCO offering a mobile-optimized website.
JSTOR’s focus on archival material and user-friendly interface makes it an excellent choice for researchers looking for older, scholarly content. In contrast, EBSCO’s comprehensive coverage of current research articles and customizable subscription options make it a good choice for libraries with diverse research needs.
The technical aspects of online databases are essential to their usability and reliability.
Accessibility: Both platforms are accessible through standard web browsers and are compatible with most operating systems. JSTOR also offers a dedicated app for iOS and Android devices.
Speed and Performance: Both platforms are renowned for fast and reliable performance. However, JSTOR’s focus on archival material may be slower to load older content than EBSCO’s current research articles.
Authentication and Security: Both platforms offer robust authentication and security features to protect user data and content. JSTOR uses a secure login system that requires users to create an account, while EBSCO offers multiple authentication options, including IP address authentication and single sign-on.
Technical Support: Both platforms offer technical support to their users, with JSTOR providing email and phone support and EBSCO offering email, phone, and chat support.
Integration with Library Systems: Both platforms offer integration with library systems, including cataloging and interlibrary loan systems. However, EBSCO offers more extensive integration options, including discovery services and citation management software integration.
Data Export and Integration: Both platforms allow users to export data, such as citations and articles, to other software applications. JSTOR will enable users to export data to citation management software and Google Drive, while EBSCO offers integration with a broader range of citation management software, including EndNote and RefWorks.
Overall, both platforms offer robust technical features and are well-suited to the needs of libraries and researchers. JSTOR’s focus on archival material may be slower to load older content, but its dedicated app and user-friendly interface make it an attractive option for users. In contrast, EBSCO’s comprehensive integration and customizable authentication options make it a good choice for libraries with diverse research needs.
Cost and Licensing
The cost and licensing of online databases like JSTOR and EBSCO are essential considerations for libraries and educational institutions.
Cost: JSTOR offers a single, all-inclusive subscription model, with pricing based on the size and type of institution. In contrast, EBSCO provides a range of pricing options, including subscriptions to individual journals and databases and customizable packages.
Licensing: Both platforms offer licensing options that vary depending on the type and size of the institution. JSTOR’s license agreement includes unlimited simultaneous users and allows interlibrary loan and document delivery. EBSCO’s licensing agreements also allow total concurrent users and interlibrary loans but may consist of document delivery restrictions.
Access: JSTOR’s all-inclusive subscription model provides access to all its content, while EBSCO’s pricing options allow for more customized access to specific journals and databases.
Renewals: JSTOR’s subscription model is based on annual renewals, while EBSCO’s pricing options may include multi-year or perpetual licenses.
Discounts: Both platforms offer discounts for consortia and multi-site subscriptions. JSTOR also offers discounts for early renewal and multi-year agreements.
Overall, JSTOR’s single, all-inclusive subscription model provides a straightforward and cost-effective option for libraries and educational institutions seeking access to a broad range of scholarly content. In contrast, EBSCO’s customizable pricing options may suit libraries with more specific research needs and budget constraints. It is essential to carefully consider each platform’s licensing options and renewal terms when deciding.
The user experience of online databases like JSTOR and EBSCO is critical to their usability and adoption by researchers and students.
Searchability: Both platforms offer powerful search capabilities, allowing users to search for articles, journals, books, and other materials by keyword, author, title, and subject. JSTOR’s search interface is more straightforward and user-friendly, while EBSCO’s interface provides more advanced search options, such as field-specific searching and Boolean operators.
Navigation: JSTOR’s interface is designed to provide easy navigation of its vast archive of scholarly content, with intuitive menus and links to related content. EBSCO’s interface is more customizable, allowing users to save searches and create alerts for new content.
Display: Both platforms offer various display options for search results and content, including full-text HTML and PDF formats. JSTOR’s collection is more streamlined and minimalist, while EBSCO’s display offers customization options like highlighting and annotating.
Accessibility: Both platforms offer accessibility features, including adjustable font sizes, contrast settings, and screen reader compatibility. JSTOR also offers a mobile app for iOS and Android devices, while EBSCO’s interface is mobile-responsive.
Help and Support: Both platforms offer extensive assistance and support resources, including user guides, tutorials, and online help centers. JSTOR’s support is more personalized, with email and phone support available, while EBSCO’s support includes live chat and a community forum.
Both platforms offer powerful search capabilities and user-friendly interfaces, with JSTOR’s more straightforward interface and EBSCO’s more customizable interface. JSTOR’s mobile app and personalized support may be beautiful to users, while EBSCO’s advanced search options and community forum may be helpful for more advanced researchers. Ultimately, the choice of platform will depend on the specific needs and preferences of individual users and institutions.
In conclusion, JSTOR and EBSCO are two leading online database platforms that provide valuable resources for libraries, researchers, and students. Each venue offers unique features, functionality, and user experience, making them suitable for further research and institutions. JSTOR’s all-inclusive subscription model provides access to a vast archive of scholarly content in a user-friendly interface, personalized support, and a mobile app for convenient access. In contrast, EBSCO’s customizable pricing options and advanced search capabilities provide a more tailored research experience, with customizable alerts and a community forum for sharing information. Ultimately, the choice between JSTOR and EBSCO will depend on individual institutions’ and researchers’ specific needs and budget constraints. However, evaluating the platform’s features, functionality, technical aspects, cost and licensing, and user experience makes it possible to make an informed decision and choose the platform that best meets one’s needs.
Ballock, T., Ostergaard, K., & Heinlen, A. L. (2019). Creatively collecting: Transforming Acquisitions and Collection Services, 309-324. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv2x00vjh.30
Lavender, J., & McAllister, C. (2020). Comparison and review of 17 E-book platforms. “The Time Has Come . . . to Talk of Many Things”. https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284317162
Macharia, J. M. (2022). Systematic literature review of interventions supported by the integration of ICT in education to improve learners’ academic performance in stem subjects in Kenya. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(3), 52-75. https://doi.org/10.47941/jep.979
Robins, S. (2022). Full-text retrievals and EBSCO discovery service: Assessing usage of E-journals across multiple platforms. Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship, 34(2), 89-107. https://doi.org/10.1080/1941126x.2022.2064105
Vickery, J. (2016). Summon, EBSCO discovery service, and Google scholar: Comparing search performance using user queries. Where Do We Go From Here? Charleston Conference Proceedings 2015. https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284316238