Introduction:
In this paper, I will look at the dynamics generating Triqui migration to the United States and draw insights from the work of an ethnographer, Seth M. Holmes, “Fresh Fruit, Broken Bodies.” By examining the push and pull factors, I strive to make evident the complex forces driving Triquis migration, highlighting many structural inequalities and systemic injustices.
Migration to the United States of the Triquis is a tragic story of hopes, struggles, and unfair treatment. The trip from the frosty canyons of Oaxaca to the vast acres of California is symbolic of native peoples’ quest for a better mouse trap in the face of economic exclusion and environmental damage. Although on the surface, the American Dream is often advertised as the land of opportunities, behind this illusion, there is the hard reality of exploitation along with all kinds of systemic barriers and structural oppression that drive Triqui migrants to their ultimate destiny. Through the process of revealing the complex system of push and pull factors that are driving Triqui migration, we can clarify the root causes of inequality and oppression, which are responsible for the living conditions of migrant farm workers. Through this self-discovery, we not only face the oppressive truths of migration but also the urge to reform the agricultural sector and societal justice.
Holmes’s ethnography visualizes how economic poverty, political instability, and environmental ruin act as push factors that cause Triqui migration. For example, Holmes tells the case of Alberto, whose family in Mexico experienced extreme economic difficulties due to low salaries and a lack of job opportunities (Holmes & Ramirez-Lopez, 2023, p. 52). In addition to that, the agricultural instability in the Trique region is worsened by its vulnerability to natural hazards and climate change. Therefore, agriculturalists have no choice but to find other means of living. The breakdown of the standard agricultural practices and land ownership systems because of neoliberal policy and expansion of agribusiness circles the Triqui communities into a cycle of poverty and dispossession. The more multinationals control the landscape of agriculture, the more small-scale farmers like the Triqui have problems coping and get more and more people unemployed and dealing with food insecurity problems. This fact suggests the economic precarity and environmental deterioration among Triqui; hence, the reason compels many of them to look for a better place beyond their land amidst the risks and complexities of migration.
Also, push factors like the economy’s perceived opportunities and social networks in the United States compel Triqui migration. Triqui migrants are motivated by the prospects of higher pay and better living standards in the U.S. agriculture industry, as nicely described by Holmes. The current social networks and kinship ties contribute to migration by passing essential support and information to Triqui neophytes. “The historical pattern of circular migration of Triqui population from Mexico and the job opportunities in the United States promotes migration as an economic survival tactic (Holmes & Ramírez-López, 2023, p. 105).” In many families, the Triqui children are raised listening to stories of aunts and uncles who migrated north to improve their conditions; such tales have become the dreams of a better future for many generations. Additionally, the already existing Triqui communities in the United States provide a support system for newcomers through support in finding employment, housing, and cultural adaptation. Hence, economic motivators or social support pushes them to take such an arduous journey to the United States.
The attraction of economic prospectors in the U.S. sometimes overshadows all the cruelness and structural inequality that Triqui migrants have to suffer. Holmes explains how the Triqui migrant laborers suffer because of these things since they are marginalized in the agricultural industry. They become vulnerable to exploitation and abuse (Holmes & Ramirez-Lopez, 2023, p. 115). In addition to that, the clinical effects of migrant farm workers’ suffering and disease are not explained in terms of broader socio-economic factors, which, in turn, are reduced to individual behaviors. Apart from that, the prevalent narrative of meritocracy and personal responsibility in the United States strengthens the belief that immigrant agriculturist workers are somehow lazy or do not deserve better treatment. This placement of blame then provides justification for using migrant laborers and for dehumanizing them while deflating the responsibility of employers and policy-makers for systemic injustice. “Clinical discourses also commonly pathologize the bodies of migrants, associating their health problems with their perceived flaws rather than acknowledging the structural violence and occupational dangers inherent in agricultural work” (Holmes & Ramirez-Lopez, 2023, p. 158).
Additionally, the combination of race, class, and citizenship status is a driving force of Triqui migrants’ susceptibility to stigma and marginalization. As indigenous migrants and non-English speakers with minimal legal protections, Triqui pickers are at the very bottom of the ethnic-labor scale, where their exploitation and discrimination are predominantly legitimate with a low chance of appeal. This, in turn, results in misattribution of blame and clinical interpretation of suffering, which not only hide the structural inequalities behind migrant farmworkers’ experiences but also strengthen their marginalization and vulnerability within the agricultural sector.
The ethnic-labor hierarchy at the farm reproduces the social suffering and violence continuums, which further worsens the physical and mental health issues suffered by indigenous Triqui pickers. Holmes expresses the triangular social strata in the agricultural environment, where indigenous Triqui pickers are at the lowest tier of the social hierarchy because of their marginalized status and legal inability to protect them. Many Triqui migrants experience discrimination as well as exploitation by employers and other workers who view them as throwaway and unworthy because of their ethnicity and status as undocumented residents. “Justifying the normality of violence and failure toward the Triqui pickers causes them to be at a low level in the labor hierarchy. It strengthens the patterns of social suffering and marginalization” (Holmes & Ramirez-Lopez, 2023, p. 210). The ethnic-labor hierarchy intersects with gender issues as indigenous women have also been exposed to more hardships and forms of exploitation in the agricultural industry. Triqui women commonly experience sexual harassment and assault in the fields, but they are afraid of consequences such as denunciation or deportation if they report their abusers. The complexities of that intersectional oppression further widen health disparities already faced by indigenous Triqui pickers, who consistently struggle with the consequences of racism, sexism, and economic suppression. Therefore, the ethnic-labor hierarchy sustains a cycle of social pains and violence, amplifying the vulnerabilities and health gaps of indigenous Triqui migrants in the United States.
Symbolic violence becomes a relevant tool for analyzing the normalization and relegation of migrant laborers’ plight to the status of “acceptable” conditions within the agricultural industry. Holmes builds on Bourdieu’s field of symbolic violence concept to reveal that the systematic undervaluation of bodies and identities of Triqui migrant workers is an element that causes their marginalization and suffering. The act is a vicious cycle in which the low wages and the precarious employment contracts decrease the status of migrant farmworkers in the social hierarchy and, at the same time, socially accept their exploitation by employers and politicians. Additionally, the proliferation of the narrative of individual responsibility and meritocracy hides the structural injustices and the systemic injustices that the migrant farmworkers experience, which further compromise their vulnerability to exploitation and abuse (Holmes & Ramirez-Lopez, 2023, p. 290). “Normalization of symbolic violence is not only apparent in the agricultural industry, but also reflects in the community’s attitudes towards migrant workers. Here their suffering and exploitation could be rather dismissed or ignored” (Holmes & Ramirez-Lopez, 2023, p. 305). By portraying migrant farmworkers as “others” whose labor is needed yet throwaway, we sanction the permanent continuity of these injustices and disparities within the agricultural sector. Thus, symbolic violence is like the filter we need to look deeper into the casually accepted ideas and practices that boost oppression and discomfort among migrant workers.
Conclusion
In conclusion, Holmes’s ethnography illuminates the complex factors that drive Triqui migration to the U.S. Push and pull variables and clinical understandings of pain help us comprehend migrant farmworkers’ structural inequities and systemic injustices. Exploring the ethnic-labor hierarchy and symbolic violence reveals the interlocking oppressions and exploitation of indigenous Triqui pickers in the agriculture business. To improve circumstances for migrant farmworkers, Triqui migration must be addressed at its source: economic inequality, environmental degradation, and systematic prejudice. We can make the agricultural business more inclusive and compassionate by campaigning for legislative changes and social justice programs that respect the rights and dignity of all workers, regardless of origin or ethnicity. Raising awareness and questioning the normalization of symbolic violence against migrant workers are essential to reducing structural obstacles to their marginalization and suffering. Recognizing the humanity and intrinsic value of migrant farmworkers will help us achieve a future where all people are treated with dignity, respect, and justice in their livelihoods.
References
Holmes, S. M., & Ramirez-Lopez, J. (2023). Fresh Fruit, Broken Bodies: Migrant Farmworkers in the United States, Updated with a New Preface and Epilogue (Vol. 27). Univ of California Press. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=BrbNEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR9&dq=Fresh+Fruit,+Broken+Bodies+MIGRANT+FARMWORKERS+IN+THE+UNITED+STATES+SETH+M.+HOLMES,+PHD,+MD+With+a+Foreword+by+Philippe+Bourgois&ots=uLZu2AfX5u&sig=T5y2y8_N9GLmg7mH3XW3bwSdag8
write