Need a perfect paper? Place your first order and save 5% with this code:   SAVE5NOW

Balancing Transparency and Investigative Integrity: Navigating the Use of Force and Public Scrutiny in Law Enforcement

The given situation depicts many profound dilemmas brought forth by the police usage of force, the role of media and public monitoring, and the decision-making system associated with the investigation and unveiling of the subsequent findings. The police chief’s decisions in this circumstance may result either in the strengthening of community relations and public trust or in a further fracturing of the community. The fact that the video is aired out in the limelight before the investigation is over is a positive move toward being transparent and remedying the community’s trust issue. This approach can also save public embarrassment, complaints, and problems created due to underlying issues. Also, it will show initiative from the government side to address the problems of the public. While on the one hand, it can be problematic due to the risk of losing the essence of the investigation by releasing evidence prematurely and also can impact the testimonies or public opinion before collecting all the facts, on the other hand, it offers benefits and freedom to access to news and information across borders in the world of internet.

Despite this, the decision to not show the video right away and wait for the results of the investigation is likely to be seen by the public as a lack of transparency and accountability and as a reason for the rising public outrage, which will again reduce the level of trust in the department. It can be a basis for keeping the media’s attention focused and dividing the community more. On the other hand, it could also be classified as a neutral investigation, which would deal with the legal interests of the department with an impartial justice system. As for the police officers’ use of excessive force, strict guidelines set in place are essential to deter the unjustified use of violence. “Law Enforcement Ethics” by (Dempsey, Forst, & Carter, 2017, p. 232) provides valuable insights into this matter.

“American law guarantees all person’s equal opportunity in employment. However, employment discrimination has existed in police departments for a long time. The main areas of discrimination are race/ethnic background and gender.” (Dempsey, Forst, & Carter, 2017, p. 194). This quote pinpoints the history of discrimination by authorities due to race, color, and gender. The quote establishes the concepts of extensive training, clear policies, and effective supervision that would let law enforcement officers use force only if necessary. This principle highlights that the force should be the last option and, thus, commensurate with the level of resistance or force encountered. Furthermore, the textbook on page 162 affirms that for officers to use force appropriately and only when necessary, they should have proper training, clear policies, and adequate supervision. Thus, comprehensive training programs, well-defined departmental policies, and solid supervisory oversight are all essential to help reduce the number of occasions when officers use force unjustifiably.

Based on the textbook and best practices, three methods that officers can employ to reduce unwarranted cases of the use of deadly force are:

 De-escalation techniques: Cops have to be equipped with enough communication abilities and have developed conflict resolution skills so that they could be able to calm down any situation that non-force methods can resolve. These skills are a few of the abilities employed, often confidentially oriented, problem-solving, and intervention.

Proper use of less-lethal options: Officers must be given and trained with the use of the appropriate less-lethal instruments, like stun guns, pepper sprays, or bean bags, which can be used as substitutes for lethal force when required.

Continuous training and scenario-based exercises: On the other hand, realistic training simulations that re-create real, highly stressful situations can help police officers enhance their reaction time to such incidents and end up applying the proper use of force practices. This may include imitation, re-enactment, and discussion sessions aiming to refocus and learn from the instances that happened.

In conclusion, carefully considering the possible benefits and drawbacks is necessary when deciding whether to disclose or keep information secret. Maintaining public trust requires accountability and transparency, yet premature information release may jeopardize the investigation’s integrity. The best action is balanced, prioritizing an exhaustive and objective investigation while actively engaging the community and resolving issues.

References

Dempsey, J. S., Forst, L. S., & Carter, S. B. (2017). An Introduction to Policing (9th ed.). Publisher.

 

Don't have time to write this essay on your own?
Use our essay writing service and save your time. We guarantee high quality, on-time delivery and 100% confidentiality. All our papers are written from scratch according to your instructions and are plagiarism free.
Place an order

Cite This Work

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing style below:

APA
MLA
Harvard
Vancouver
Chicago
ASA
IEEE
AMA
Copy to clipboard
Copy to clipboard
Copy to clipboard
Copy to clipboard
Copy to clipboard
Copy to clipboard
Copy to clipboard
Copy to clipboard
Need a plagiarism free essay written by an educator?
Order it today

Popular Essay Topics