Task 1
Purpose of different assessment models
In the fast-paced sphere of adult social care, proper assessment models are crucial as they help understand and respond to varied needs faced by recipients of support and care. Assessment models are systematic processes through which information about an individual’s health, well-being, and support needs can be obtained, analyzed, and interpreted; this report intends to present an insight into the purpose of various assessment models for staff’s understanding and expertise in providing superior quality care at Horizon.
Holistic Assessment Model
Purpose: The holistic assessment models perceive the person as a complete entity, paying attention to physical, psychological, social, and environmental determinants. The objective is to have a holistic view of the person’s immediate needs and desires (World Health Organization, 2020). The care team can create an individualized plan of care to address all facets of a patient’s well-being by assessing multiple dimensions.
Person-Centered Assessment Model
Purpose: The person-centered assessment model focuses on the individual’s preferences, choices, and values. It is a person-centered therapy as it strives to give control back to the individual by including them in decisions about their health and well-being (Salawu et al., 2020, p4980). This approach is also a collaboration, in which the provision of care and its delivery is based on unique identity and individuality so that alignment can be made with their aspiration.
Risk Assessment Model
Purpose: Risk assessment models are created to detect possible risks and threats concerning the health and safety of one’s life. The aim is the implementation of primary preventative measures and interventions to prevent identified risks. The contribution of this model to a safe and supportive care environment is that it strikes the right balance between promoting independence and managing risks once one hires help.
Biopsychosocial Assessment Model
Purpose: The biopsychosocial assessment model is a conceptual idea that considers biological, psychological, and biological effects on an individual’s health and overall status. Understanding the interplay of these variables becomes a complex factor, and therefore, care plans can change according to what is offered with such a perspective.
The purpose of assessment tools available to be used at Horizon.
Assessment tools are an essential part of adult social care at Horizon, helping collate information systematically and ensuring that staff target the specific needs of those needing care and support as recorded within their report. These tools are purposeful and person-centered assessment support strategies. This section aims to observe the assessment tools available within Horizon and provide insights on how such tools can be applied during the care process for both inpatient and outpatient patients.
Functional Assessment Tools: Functional assessment tools assess an individual’s capacity to perform daily activities independently. These tools evaluate mobility, self-care, communication, and cognitive functions. This aims to identify areas where the patient may need support and improvement through appropriate interventions to enhance an individual’s functional independence (Parker, 2020, p. 201).
Social Support and Network Assessment Tools: These tools map an individual’s social relations, featuring family, friends, and civic networks. Understanding an individual’s social support system is essential and plays a holistic role in ensuring care. Through these assessment tools, staff can identify available support networks to the patient and engage key people in a care-planning process, utilizing them to determine familial relationships. This promotes a more patient-centered and participatory approach to care.
Risk Assessment Tools: Risk assessment tools promote awareness of a person’s prospective safety and well-being risks. This entails the risks of health conditions, environmental factors, and personal behaviors. The purpose is to proactively address and manage the identified risks to ensure that the environment prevails while promoting autonomy and an individual’s independence.
Communication and Cognitive Assessment Tools: It is essential to mention that for understanding a person’s ability of verbal communication and cognitive skills, it is necessary to use tools developed especially for assessing such abilities (Bachtler et al., 2023, p. 4). Such tools help identify communication skills or cognitive function challenges, allowing the staff to customize an effective communication strategy and supportive mechanisms.
Analyze how partnership working can support the assessment process.
Partnership working in adult social care means cooperation between various people, organizations, and professionals to ensure comprehensive and efficient assistance to individuals with varied support needs. This report investigates the importance of partnership in supporting assessment at Horizon, highlighting outcomes it generates for delivering and improving high-quality personalized service.
Inclusive Perspectives and Expertise
It also allows for inclusiveness of different worldviews and expertise. The participation of healthcare professionals, social workers, family members, and individuals creates an understanding that covers other aspects beyond physical health (Golightly & Goemans, 2020, p. 8). Each group mentioned above has its opinion and actively participates in formulating a wholly-fledged vision that eliminates any one-sided, biased opinions.
Enhanced Person-Centered Care
A person-centered approach is facilitated by collaboration with individuals and their families in the assessment process. This makes them part of their care plans. It tailors the services to meet their aspirations, preferences, and values through active involvement in goal-setting and decision-making processes (Golightly and Goemans, 2020, p8). This partnership promises that the delivered care matches a patient’s distinctive identity, helping to develop their empowerment and dignity.
Efficient Resource Allocation
The partnership working can allocate resources efficiently. Horizon can access additional support services and expertise by partnering with outside agencies, like hospitals and other community organizations. This guarantees that people get the required care and support, maximizing resource utilization while managing cost-effectiveness in caring.
Coordinated Care Planning
Collaboration promotes coordinated care planning, pooling professionals from different disciplines (Faustino et al., 2022, p. 118). Together, social workers, healthcare staff, and support staff can create a comprehensive care plan to address all areas of an individual’s needs.
Promotion of Continuity of Care
First, continuity of care is ensured by working in partnership because it lays down clear lines of communication to be followed between the various providers. This becomes particularly crucial during transitions, especially hospital discharges or moving to care settings.
Using person-centered ways of working to support individuals to participate in the assessment process
In adult social care settings, it is essential to use person-centered ways of working to create a collaborative and empowering environment for individuals requiring an assessment process. This approach acknowledges the autonomy and individuality of a person, making him not an object or patient but rather an active informant who prefers his angle. Here is a guide on how to use person-centered ways of working to support individuals in participating effectively in the assessment process at Horizon:
Establishing Trust and Rapport: Create a trustworthy and respectful report with the person. She would take time to introduce herself and explain her role, but more importantly, she would listen actively to each patient’s concerns (Lenzen et al., 2020, p. 274). Person-centered care builds a solid foundation by practicing good relationship or people skills and interviewing techniques for establishing positive rapport, which allows individuals to engage actively in the assessment process.
Inclusive Communication: Customize your communication according to the person’s choice and want. Present information clearly and understandably, considering sensory or cognitive factors (Chien et al., 2020, p103759). Use open-ended questions to elicit the individual’s ideas, emotions, and worries, promoting a collaborative discourse in all stages of the assessment.
Involve the Individual in Goal Setting: For the plan of care, this approach should entail that people actively contribute to goal setting. In the assessment process, we shall talk about what an individual hopes to become, his preferences, and the goals he would like to achieve. Identify realistic and achievable goals in collaboration with the individual that are consistent with their values and priorities, ensuring a direct link between the assessment process or would be contributing directly towards well-being.
Respect Autonomy and Choices: Working person-centered emphasizes respecting an individual’s autonomy and choices. Brief the person about the assessment mechanism, explain why they will be assessed, and how this process will occur as a repeated or singular test condition.
Undertaking an assessment
An adult social care assessment at Horizon is a systematic and holistic process. First, Moreno, there is a tot between you and your friend, so they trust you enough to open up. The assessment’s purpose and process must be clearly explained to an individual such that it tests their understanding to obtain informed consent. Use inclusive communication techniques specific to individual choices and requirements (Double et al., 2020, p. 499). Use assessment tools to consider the physical, psychological, social, and environmental aspects to gather comprehensive information. Engage individuals in setting goals actively, allowing them to exercise decision-making autonomy. If relevant, draw a close connection with either family or form supportive networks and understand the distinctive individual’s context. Seek feedback regularly, thus providing for constant communication and adapting the care plan to changing needs. Maintain accurate and up-to-date documentation by legal and ethical standards. This person-centered, holistic approach guarantees a respectful and empowering assessment process that enables the development of personalized and effective care plans at Horizon.
The referral process for individuals
The referral process for individuals within adult social care established in Horizon should be used once there is a necessity for more expertise, services, or specialized coaching beyond the present provision. Referrals are also needed sometimes when the person has some particular features according to their medical conditions and requires the attention of other health care professionals, like therapists’ help. Referrals may also be started if the person says things that identify particular needs or wishes where external agencies or nearby resources, such as vernacular interpreters, multicultural liaise, and employment aid services, are called to help. A tightrope is a balance between the determination of the client and uncertainty as, at times, some symptoms call for such establishment that may be related to behavior concerns about mental health problems where referral will be made to some professional in the area of mental health.
Task 2
Developing a care plan
To ensure effective and person-centered care, the adequate development of a comprehensive care plan is one of the most important things. This systematic approach considers the assessment data, collaborative decision-making, continuous monitoring, and readjustment (Moudatsou et al., 2020, p. 26). A well-designed care plan is a roadmap for high-quality provision, addressing an individual’s unique needs, preferences, and goals. The following steps outline how to develop a care plan:
Initial Assessment: It begins with a well-rounded initial assessment as the basis of the care plan. This entails collecting information about the individual’s health status, medical history, lifestyle, and psychosocial factors (de Ruijter et al., 2020, p. 11701). Hence, evaluations should be comprehensive – considering physical fitness and health of the mind and heart. Use standardized tools and communicate openly with the individual and their support network to obtain sound information. The evaluation should pinpoint the individual’s needs, goals, and dreams to achieve a person-centered approach.
Analysis and Interpretation: After collecting the assessment data, you must analyze and interpret your findings. Determine patterns, trends, and potential risk factors that may affect an individual’s well-being with objective data like medical records, test results, and subjective information from the individual and their caregivers.
Collaborative Decision-Making: When creating a care plan, it is vital to consider the influence of the individual, their family members, and other parties involved in decision-making. This, in turn, will make the care plan reflective of an individual’s preferences, values, and priorities. Details on interdisciplinary team members such as healthcare professionals, social workers, and therapists should be sought to gather different perspectives.
Goal Identification: Establish short- and long-term goals based on the assessment process findings and a collaborated discussion. Goals must be specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound SMART. Set the priorities according to their relevance for one’s overall health, comfort level, and well-being. Make goals that align with the individual’s values and hopes, encouraging ownership and engagement in what will be done actively. This may also include medical treatments, therapeutic measures, lifestyle interventions, and support (Bandelow et al., 2021). Adapt the care plan to reflect personal choices, cultural beliefs, and backgrounds for a culturally responsive approach.
Monitoring and Adjustment: Determine a systematic schedule for monitoring the process of accomplishing set goals. Use periodic assessments to identify changes in the person’s health status or circumstances that require adjustments to a care plan (Horner, 2018). This plan should be dynamic in reviewing needs to remain applicable and effective even long after implementation.
Documentation: Accurate and detailed documentation also results in the development of a care plan. It should be documented the procedure for measuring, analysis of results found; what goals were achieved, and which interventions have been selected with rationale for each choice.
Evaluating the effectiveness of the assessment process and outcomes
The evaluation of evaluative efficacy and outcomes should be done to enhance course-of-care provision for a person. This analyzing stage involves an in-depth examination of the evaluation process and also its impact on the care intervention that was undertaken. The outlined steps show how health practitioners can conduct a systematic assessment of the quality and efficiency of both processes and outcomes:
Establish Clear Evaluation Criteria: This is by beginning the evaluation process with criteria that are clear and measurable, on which such an assessment can be based. These should correspond with the purposes and objectives identified in the terminal evaluation.
Assess the Adequacy of the Assessment Process: Assess how adequate and effective the assessment process is. Think about aspects such as the depth of the dataset, suitability assessment tools adopted, and participation by an individual along with their support network (Hoernke et al., 2021). Know whether the evaluation examined physical, psychological, and emotional aspects.
Examine the Relevance of Identified Goals: Evaluate the applicability and suitability of goals that were found during the assessment. Figure out whether these goals correspond to an individual’s requirements, interests, and dreams. If inconsistencies occur, look for the reasons behind them and redefine objectives in case it is necessary.
Monitor Progress Toward Goals: Regularly monitor and track the progress made towards achieving the set objectives. Using objective measures and indicators to assess whether the level of performance towards desired outcomes has been achieved. Regarding quantitative data, we focus on the changes in vital signs or test results; as for qualitative features concerned with subjective feelings experienced by an individual and reviews documented.
Evaluate the Effectiveness of Interventions: Review if the selected interventions were evidence-based, culturally competent, and compatible with the individual’s choices. Determine the outcomes of interventions on the individual’s overall well-being regarding physical, psychological, and social dimensions of care. If interventions prove ineffective or need to be modified, reconsider the rationale and search for different strategies that might suit an individual better.
Engage in Stakeholder Feedback: Ask for comments from essential parties, such as the person themself, their relatives, and other members of interdisciplinary teams. Their perceptions provide a valuable understanding of the success of evaluation and results. Assess the person’s satisfaction with the care received perceptions of goal achievement, and any issues encountered during implementation, including feedback in the appraisal, promoting a team-based and patient-centered care practice.
Consider Adherence and Compliance: Assess the patient’s compliance and adherence to the care plan. The individual’s involvement in imposed interventions and compliance with suggested treatments should be evaluated. Non-adherence may reflect barriers, challenges, or dissatisfaction with the planned care. Understanding these factors helps healthcare professionals to address underlying issues and make changes to improve adherence and outcomes.
Conduct Comparative Analysis: Perform comparative analysis by comparing the results of current outcomes with baseline data collected during the initial assessment. This analysis enables healthcare professionals to identify trends, improvements, or any deviation from the anticipated trend. Understanding the course of change is helpful since knowing how a particular assessment process or intervention works will inform and guide future decision-making regarding that care plan.
Iterative and Continuous Improvement: Do not consider the evaluation process linear and finite. Apply the results in guiding ongoing improvement initiatives regarding both the assessment process and care delivery. Ensure that the care plan is regularly updated based on evaluation results to keep it relevant and effective at addressing the shifting needs of individuals.
An action plan to address any changes following an assessment review
To ensure that care remains responsive and person-centered as a person’s condition changes, devising an action plan to deal with the changes following the assessment review is critical. Here is a comprehensive guide to creating an effective action plan:
Review Assessment Findings: Begin by looking back at the assessment results. Determine any new information or changes in the individual’s health status, preferences, and goals. It is crucial to fully understand the assessment review to utilize the necessary adjustments in an action plan.
Identify Key Changes and Prioritize: Note the main changes detected during the assessment review. Make these changes a priority based on how they affect the individual’s well-being and create an overall care plan (Moudatsou et al., 2020, p. 26). Differentiate between the immediate issues that must be tackled quickly and those that can wait until later, thereby maintaining a clear and goal-oriented action plan.
Engage Stakeholders: Work together with the individual, family members, and involved healthcare professionals to review findings from assessment reviews. Request feedback regarding possible care plan modifications and learn what this person wants.
Set Clear and Achievable Goals: Set measurable and attainable objectives stemming from the changes observed in the assessment review. Goals should be measurable, realizable, realistic, timely, and time-bound (SMART). Make it clear what you want to get out of the action plan so that its implementation will be effective.
Select Appropriate Interventions: Select interventions that address the identified changes and goals. Ensure that interventions are evidence-based, culturally competent, and tailored to meet individual needs. Consider short-term solutions to immediate issues and long-term plans that foster ongoing well-being. Customize the interventions to suit their person and get input from multidisciplinary team members.
Develop a Timetable for Implementation: Develop an implementation schedule of the action plan. Clearly outline each intervention’s commencement date and duration and how progress will be tracked. A suitably formatted timetable helps in a systematic and organized approach to tackling changes so that they can be tracked and evaluated effectively.
Establish Monitoring and Evaluation Mechanisms: Develop a robust framework of monitoring and evaluation to monitor the progress made towards the implementation action plan. Define particular indicators and metrics that correlate with identified objectives. Monitor the effectiveness of interventions and make changes where necessary regularly.
Summary of an assessment process for staff to show they understand the impact of assessments on individuals and their families.
The appraisal procedure is paramount in influencing the treatment and health of people’s lives with their loved ones, leading to a profound knowledge for employees. Following the fact that it is initiated with an initial assessment, staff should use a holistic approach to assess people, considering such aspects as their physical, mental, and emotional conditions. Involving individuals and their families actively in the process promotes collaboration and empowerment, which helps to align care plans with unique needs and long-term goals. Staff should also focus on cultural competence in their assessments, being aware of different backgrounds, and treating everyone respectfully. Periodic reassessments recognize that people’s needs change, so care plans should also be plastic. Transparent communication of assessment findings and care plans fosters trust and allows shared decision-making.
Bibliography
Bachtler, J., Polverari, L., Domorenok, E., & Graziano, P. (2023). Administrative capacity and EU Cohesion Policy: Implementation performance and effectiveness. Regional Studies, 1-5.
Bandelow, N.C., Hornung, J., Sager, F. and Schröder, I., 2022. Complexities of policy design, institutional change, and multilevel governance. European policy analysis, 8(4), pp.366-369.
Chien, S.Y., Hwang, G.J. and Jong, M.S.Y., 2020. Effects of peer assessment within the context of spherical video-based virtual reality on EFL students’ English-speaking performance and learning perceptions. Computers & Education, 146, p.103751.
de Ruijter, V.N., Redondo-Hasselerharm, P.E., Gouin, T. and Koelmans, A.A., 2020. Quality criteria for microplastic effect studies in the context of risk assessment: a critical review. Environmental Science & Technology, 54(19), pp.11692-11705.
Double, K.S., McGrane, J.A. and Hopfenbeck, T.N., 2020. The impact of peer assessment on academic performance: A meta-analysis of control group studies. Educational Psychology Review, 32, pp.481-509.
Faustino, T.N., Suzart, N.A., dos Santos Rabelo, R.N., Santos, J.L., Batista, G.S., de Freitas, Y.S., Saback, D.A., Sales, N.M.M.D., Barreto, B.B. and Gusmao-Flores, D., 2022. Effectiveness of combined non-pharmacological interventions in preventing delirium in critically ill patients: A randomized clinical trial. Journal of Critical Care, 68, pp.114-120.
Golightly, M. and Goemans, R., (2020). Social work and mental health. Sage.
Hoernke, K., Djellouli, N., Andrews, L., Lewis-Jackson, S., Manby, L., Martin, S., Vanderslott, S. and Vindrola-Padros, C., (2021). Frontline healthcare workers’ experiences with personal protective equipment during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK: a rapid qualitative appraisal. BMJ open, 11(1), p.e046199.
Horner, N. (2018). What is social work?: contexts and perspectives. What is Social Work?, pp.1–280.
Lenzen, M., Malik, A., Li, M., Fry, J., Weisz, H., Pichler, P.P., Chaves, L.S.M., Capon, A. and Pencheon, D., 2020. The environmental footprint of health care: a global assessment. The Lancet Planetary Health, 4(7), pp.e271-e279.
Moudatsou, M., Stavropoulou, A., Philalithis, A. & Koukouli, S. (2020, January). The role of empathy in health and social care professionals. In Healthcare (Vol. 8, No. 1, p. 26). MDPI.
Parker, J., (2020). Social work practice: Assessment, planning, intervention, and review. Social Work Practice, pp.1–264.
Salawu, A., Green, A., Crooks, M.G., Brixey, N., Ross, D.H. & Sivan, M. (2020). A proposal for multidisciplinary telerehabilitation in the assessment and rehabilitation of COVID-19 survivors. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(13), 4890.
World Health Organization, 2020. Health workers exposure risk assessment and management in the context of COVID-19 virus: interim guidance, 4 March 2020 (No. WHO/2019-nCov/HCW_risk_assessment/2020.1). World Health Organization.
write