Introduction
Academic cheating has been on the rise in the current times, with many cases of academic fraud increasing daily. The issue has been brought to the limelight through the media, raising global institutions’ attention to ensuring academic integrity. Academic cheating has been heavily criticized because it contributes to poor career performance. Once a student engages in cheating, they are likely to grasp the contents that may be applicable in their field of profession and thus contribute to work environments. In the essay, I will address the issue on; Do academic cheating contribute to poor workplace performance and, if so, what mechanisms can be employed in fostering academic integrity?
Research
Anderman, Eric M., and Sungjun Won. “Academic cheating in disliked classes.” Ethics & Behavior 29.1 (2019): 1-22.
There is a relationship between academic dishonesty and disliked subjects, which calls for measures to enhance students’ compassion for all subjects they undertake. This reading aims to investigate whether there is a connection between academic dishonesty and hatred of the class. A prominent public institution in the United States provided the writers with a sample population of more than 1000 undergraduate students (Anderman and Sungjun 109). They discovered that students tended to infringe in classes they considered less enjoyable. The authors recommend that treatments designed to reduce academic cheating should reduce students’ distaste for the lectures they must take. The reading is trustworthy because it is published in a peer-reviewed journal, implying the contents are approved by a professional in the field.
Daumiller, Martin, and Stefan Janke. “The impact of performance goals on cheating depends on how performance is evaluated.” AERA Open 5.4 (2019): 2332858419894276.
Challenging academic contents contribute to academic cheating as the students attempt to ensure they record good grades. In this article, we look at how performance goals affect cheating. When the performance was judged using an absolute standard, the researchers concluded that cheating went down as the task got harder. However, when performance was judged based on a relative standard, cheating increased as the task got harder (Daumiller and Stefan 76). The authors say that when effectiveness is judged based on a relative criterion, people are more likely to cheat to increase their likelihood of success. The article’s publication in a reputable peer-reviewed journal ensures its veracity because it has already received approval from experts in the field.
Weale, S. Cheating on the Rise in UK Universities during Covid, Say Researchers. The Guardian, Guardian News, and Media,
Online studies contribute to academic cheating as students, in many cases, find it challenging to cope with the many online requirements in the course of their studies. New research shows that cheating in the UK’s universities is getting worse. The study, which was done by the University of Birmingham and the University of Winchester, discovered that since the start of the pandemic, the number of students who admit to cheating has gone from 9% to 15% (Weale 7). The study also discovered that the percentage of students who suggest they will cheat in the coming years has increased from 5% to 11%. The study says that the rise in cheating is because students are under more stress during the pandemic. Many are having trouble keeping up with the requirements of online learning. The study shows that universities need to do more to help students during the global epidemic and to stop cheating in the classroom. Since the writing is based on research conducted by the University of Winchester, there is some validity in the published contents. However, it may be disputed because it is not peer-reviewed.
Morris, Erica J. “Academic Integrity Matters: Five Considerations for Addressing Contract Cheating – International Journal for Educational Integrity.” BioMed Central, Springer Singapore,
The article talks about how integrity is important in biomedical research. The author says that honesty is essential for the success of biomedical research and that not following professional and ethical guidelines can lead to bad things. The article talks about how important it is for biomedical research to be open and honest and how researchers need to be truthful and accountable in their work. The author concludes that honesty is crucial for the success of biomedical research and that not following professional and ethical guidelines can have bad results.
Discussion
The four articles share a couple of elements in common, where they all pinpoint the issue of academic cheating. They all highlight the modern trend of a rise in academic cheating, with many students getting themselves into paid contracts with tutors on different platforms. The articles also pinpoint some of the dangers associated with academic cheating, where they associate the act with poor workplace performance. The articles have a few differences where. In one of the articles, I read that academic cheating is participated by students from rich backgrounds. However, in yet another article, I came across the revelation that even the students struggling economically at times engage in cheating, especially due to reasons such as being in side hustles or when they are unsure whether they can guarantee a good grade in a subject they feel they are poor in. The articles, however, missed a critical aspect of my inquiry question where they did not give a vivid description of how academic cheating can be evaded. The articles held that there was a need for measures to ensure academic cheating is curbed though they failed to touch on the details of the roles to be played by specific parties in ensuring the trend ends. The research is important to highlight the violation of academic integrity, the cases, the consequences, and the need to curb it.
Works Cited
Anderman, Eric M., and Sungjun Won. “Academic cheating in disliked classes.” Ethics & Behavior 29.1 (2019): 1-22.
Daumiller, Martin, and Stefan Janke. “The impact of performance goals on cheating depends on how performance is evaluated.” AERA Open 5.4 (2019): 2332858419894276.
Morris, Erica J. “Academic Integrity Matters: Five Considerations for Addressing Contract Cheating – International Journal for Educational Integrity.” BioMed Central, Springer Singapore, 27 Dec. 2018, https://edintegrity.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1007/s40979-018-0038-5.
Weale, S. “Cheating on the Rise in UK Universities during Covid, Say Researchers.” The Guardian, Guardian News and Media, 10 Feb. 2021, https://www.theguardian.com/education/2021/feb/10/cheating-on-the-rise-in-uk-universities-during-covid-say-researchers.
write