This paper will analyze the use of virtual reality (VR) simulations by Imperial College London in their medical student training (Keane, 2022). The company was the first in the UK to apply VR technology to replicate emergencies and to promote experiential learning. Students are trained in virtual worlds where they are given the responsibility for patients with different symptoms like stroke or cardiac arrest, and they are supposed to come up with a diagnosis and treatment options. This VR technology advancement towards the improvement of medical education is an example of a real-world application that deserves an assessment. In the future, as VR platforms become ever more complex and widely available, Imperial’s pioneering application of digital learning in the medical field could be a glimpse into the future of the entire medical education that aims to provide an active and immersive learning experience (Keane, 2022). Nevertheless, it is essential to incorporate VR technology into the instructor’s guidance and the student reflection to achieve meaningful involvement. Studying this case with classic learning theories gives the opportunity to understand profoundly how the already existing VR enhances the trend of more effective, fair and empowering pedagogies in education.
Literature review
The idea of digital technologies being used in learning environments is a topic heavily researched and discussed among educators. Central attention has been on the opportunities and constraints of various technologies in getting a better pedagogy and the student’s learning performance (World Bank, 2021). Several major themes can be found in this research.
The Constructivist learning theory states that students get a deeper understanding of the course content through active experience than by just hearing the information being told to them. Technologies like simulations, augmented reality, and virtual reality examples are in agreement with this theory as they offer the students an immersive, hands-on learning experience (Elmqaddem, 2019). To illustrate, virtual reality is able to mimic some of the complex real-world environments which could never be recreated physically, thus, providing a very engaging constructivist learning situation. Nevertheless, a word of caution is given because scaffolding remains a crucial tool for meaningful learning. Just providing the experience of the activities in itself is not sufficient; they have to be engaged in meaningful reflection and self-reflection in order to internalize those experiences. Constructivist learning technologies without intentional guidance in making connections and extracting transferable knowledge can be directed to having their benefits limited (Woodley & Rice, 2022). Students can take ownership of their learning, and the role of teachers to support them in this through the use of technologies like virtual reality that will really make a difference and help bring about transformative pedagogies.
The generational theory talks about the learning differences between older and younger generations as they borrow and see technology. Younger digital natives, being more perceptive to innovations, are inclined to put forward their ideas that carry novelty and customization. Older digital immigrants are more sceptical and point out the necessity of responsible use of technologies, which is the main topic of the lessons. Scientists view the young as tech-savvy people who are fond of the new technologies, which allow them to feel entertained and engaged. However, the younger people consider this technology as a source of fun and entertainment, whereas the older generations think of it as a tool (Elmqaddem, 2019. This intergenerational gap suggests the fact that students may not welcome the digital technologies that are likely to be used in learning environments with equal excitement. To reconcile this gap, the implementing methodology should be inclusive and should take into consideration different preferences of the educational institutions so as to make the most impact. More research is yet to be done on how the generationally-held perceptions of particular technologies determine how the generation responds.
Studies have proved that technology can be a facilitator of student engagement when appropriately utilised. Interactive tools like personalized learning, on-the- spot feedback, badges, and leaderboards can serve as solid motivators and encourage the students to participate in learning activities. Nevertheless, research has also identified the danger of overusing game elements by introducing too many extrinsic rewards, which, in turn, have a negative impact on intrinsic motivation. The fundamental aspect is to make the most of the advantage of technologies in the engagement and to ensure autonomy-supportive environments, the core of this approach (Timovski et al., 2020). The results of the multi-study analysis indicate that the beneficial outcomes of technology integration are mostly related to student engagement. However, this research is saying that the goal of engagement is not the same as the time spent on a task – more time on a task does not always lead to better learning outcomes. Research on this topic needs to do more to unravel technology’s impacts on engagement in various aspects, and a better understanding of the most suitable application methods is required. Careful integration that focuses on the element of self-determined engagement rather than short-term behavioural compliance is necessary for the effective use of technology to ensure their pedagogical potential is maximized.
There is a positive correlation between the use of technology and learning outcomes. Meta-analyses show sceptical academic results, with most studies reporting either a neutral or a slight increase in the performance of the students and their retention. This shows that technologies can be regarded as a tool for improvements on their own, but instead, the benefits will be best seen if they are implemented correctly. For integration to be effective, it must be for the tools to be in line with learning goals, scaffolded use, and possible disadvantages like high costs or distraction. Teacher’s lack of proficiency in the new technologies is another factor which can be a barrier to a successful implementation. In general, research, therefore, may be said to give rise to a positive yet guarded outlook towards the application of technologies in education. Technologies are seen as a positive educational tool, but merely using them in the classroom won’t magically boost students’ academic results. Research of this kind should be expanded to identify the conditions and forms of social capital that might nurture or impede the intended outcomes. A sensible and student-focused integration strategy can serve to optimally utilize technology while simultaneously minimizing the associated risks; this will, in turn, open up new horizons for effective learning.
The research results, which stress the principle of deliberate and equitable implementation, point out the critical feature in determining the technology-learning relationship. It is the role of teachers to ensure that the tool is used in a manner that supports the pedagogical goals of the lesson and to offer support to students to allow them to extract meaningful knowledge. In the absence of this guidance, these technologies may lose their original purpose of helping educate and become mere distractions. The role of deliberate teacher development in building the teachers’ skill set to handle emerging innovations is a crucial factor. The technologies can also affect the differences in access to society and demographic lines and be widened if the technologies are to be introduced without thinking of the equity implications. Learners who face privileged conditions and who have numerous opportunities outside school will probably benefit most from this (Huang et al., 2019). A vision including training, inclusive access, and a student-focused approach is critical because an ideal learning environment translates to high achievement for many, not just a few. Ethical integration and reductions in technological access disparity are the main goals here for creating the digital advanced teaching and learning which can contribute to transformative and empowering the society through education.
The literature shows that on one side, there is a set of significant opportunities, and on the other side, there is a set of challenges that have to be tackled when using the technologies for learning goals. Digital innovations’ potential benefits can be harnessed through a careful approach that is based on pedagogical theory, and takes into consideration production capabilities, generation differences, motivators and access barriers. The critical element here is a sophisticated approach with research foundations which will help in optimizing technologies’ benefits in terms of short-term engagement and long-term knowledge retention. To summarize, technology, however bright the promise it possesses, could turn out to be a curse if not appropriately synchronised but could also cease to be an effective tool if not well employed. Integrating learners into the design process of the digitally enriched environment will be the right approach for producing the most effective learning experience, which will enable the learner to get the most out of the technology strengths and avoid weaknesses.
Analysis
The use of virtual reality medical training programs, like the one developed by the Imperial College, in a properly planned and executed manner can be a powerful tool to provide more engaging, constructive learning. VR’s properties of immersion are connected to constructivism’s learning-by-doing approach, which is realized through the realistic practice of scenarios (Soliman et al., 2021). Students explore practical scenarios, where they become familiar with how to go about solving virtual emergencies through action and experience. The example of VR platforms for nurse training at the University of Maryland, in which such training gives a chance for safe repetition of developing clinical skills, is one. Nevertheless, as a matter of fact, giving simulations alone remains ineffective – the students need more scaffolding to get the best possible outcomes. Follow-up discussions with supplemental instructors and thought-provoking activities to culminate VR experiences so students can get the most out of them. Factors such as cost barriers and different responses to access must also be considered so that inequalities will not be created, according to the research by Philip and Garcia (2013). By combining empirical findings with intelligent design and well-developed infrastructures, virtual reality and other digital tools can change the current model of medical learning into a more meaningful and experiential approach. However, the technology itself is not inherently innovative – true transformation emerges from its strategic application aligned to learning goals and responsive to student needs.
The digital systems also help to develop more personalized strategies of instruction which are suitable to different students as per their regions of improvement and the way they like to learn (UNESCO, 2023). Teaching games and visualization can be tailored to fit the needs of various learners and difficulty levels better than traditional one-size-fits-all classroom instruction. Integrated progress-tracking and mastery-based advancement by nature of the system personalizes the flow. To make things even more interesting, VR and AI-enabled systems can be incorporated to adjust the type of content a learner receives and provide immediate feedback (Kamińska et al., 2019). Theories of generations, which have addressed the inclination of digital natives toward individualized and interactive media, may also boost the engagement of users. Research shows that individualized technology integration motivates and engages students; what’s more, is that it increases the retention of knowledge. These personalization capabilities consist of the current ‘pedagogical buzz’ that emphasizes differentiating pathways according to the diverse learner profiles.
Technologically enhanced learning environments can provide everyone with the chance to acquire advanced education, which is of social benefit. Immersive technologies like virtual reality provide an opportunity for experiential learning which is not possible for many because of financial burden and distance limitations (Jumani et al., 2022). This enables us to see more and more from outside the box, which fosters global understanding. By facilitating equitable access and training teachers to utilize the new devices appropriately, digitally enhanced environments can thus reinforce social empowerment and improvement (Kamińska et al., 2019). The strategic positioning of bridging gaps between different groups of people creates viable opportunities to gain from enriched learning experiences which are the foundation of mutual understanding and positive change in communities that have not been served well before.
Implications
Digital technology enables exposure to unrealistic high-risk scenarios, which are impossible to recreate physically and provides great experiential learning that is consistent with constructivist theory. In light of the fast advancement of VR technology and its lessening cost and accessibility, its ability to engage students, customize learning, and provide access to education will increase exponentially. Nonetheless, the price is a significant barrier to implementing such systems in many institutions, and it would be unfair to close the gap in the success of different communities without creating subsidies and training programs (Rojas-Sánchez et al., 2023). Moreover, the investigation of VR’s consequences on health and long-term learning outcomes is not enough to assess the generalization of such benefits as the adoption of VR becomes more popular. Teachers are all the more critical in scaffolding VR experiences and guiding knowledge assimilation, requiring support and skilful preparation (Beck, 2019). Overall, VR has the potential to be a catalyst for change if appropriately harnessed, but it doesn’t work in a standalone manner. In addition, the process will require further research, an equitable implementation, teachers being empowered, and a well-balanced integration of digital technology. Only these measures will be able to maximize the teaching and social potentials of this emerging e-learning setting. VR must be complimentary to traditional pedagogical approaches, not substitutes for them.
Conclusion
The study of virtual reality simulations for medical education illustrates that technology-enhanced learning environments could be used to facilitate more active, just, and efficient learning modes. Nevertheless, they can be achieved only if the learning process is designed carefully to include theories and results of research. Technologies such as VR should be employed as pedagogical instruments to support the change rather than be utilized as the driving force of the change. Their greatest value actually consists of the fact of their being used fairly to serve as additional resources that create chances for individualized hands-on learning. However, the difficulties concerning access, trained teachers, and assessment of long-term outcomes will have to be addressed in the future. The research and people’s attention to human-centred design pave the way for digital technologies to be used in a very positive way to improve teaching and learning in the 21st century.
References
Beck, D., 2019. Augmented and virtual reality in education: Immersive learning research. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(7), pp.1619-1625. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0735633119854035
Birckhead, B., Khalil, C., Liu, X., Conovitz, S., Rizzo, A., Danovitch, I., Bullock, K. and Spiegel, B., 2019. Recommendations for the methodology of virtual reality clinical trials in health care by an international working group: iterative study. JMIR mental health, 6(1), p.e11973. https://mental.jmir.org/2019/1/e11973
Elmqaddem, N., 2019. Augmented reality and virtual reality in education. Myth or reality? International journal of emerging technologies in learning, 14(3). https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Noureddine-Elmqaddem/publication/331110141_Augmented_Reality_and_Virtual_Reality_in_Education_Myth_or_Reality/links/62609115bca601538b5b56f4/Augmented-Reality-and-Virtual-Reality-in-Education-Myth-or-Reality.pdf
Gourlay, L.,2021. There is no ‘virtual learning’: The materiality of digital education. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 2021, 10.1: 57-66. (Attached at the end of this section).
Huang, K.T., Ball, C., Francis, J., Ratan, R., Boumis, J. and Fordham, J., 2019. Augmented versus virtual reality in education: an exploratory study examining science knowledge retention when using augmented reality/virtual reality mobile applications. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 22(2), pp.105-110. https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/full/10.1089/cyber.2018.0150
Jumani, A.K., Siddique, W.A., Laghari, A.A., Abro, A. and Khan, A.A., 2022. Virtual reality and augmented reality for education. Multimedia Computing Systems and Virtual Reality, pp.189-210. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Dr-Rajeev-Tiwari/publication/358362955_Multimedia_Computing_Systems_and_Virtual_Reality/links/621e03696051a165820283d7/Multimedia-Computing-Systems-and-Virtual-Reality.pdf#page=204
Kamińska, D., Sapiński, T., Wiak, S., Tikk, T., Haamer, R.E., Avots, E., Helmi, A., Ozcinar, C. and Anbarjafari, G., 2019. Virtual reality and its applications in education: Survey. Information, 10(10), p.318. https://www.mdpi.com/2078-2489/10/10/318/pdf
Keane, D., 2022. London University becomes the first to use virtual reality to train doctors. Evening Standard. https://www.standard.co.uk/news/health/imperial-college-virtual-reality-train-doctors-emergency-situations-b1036731.html
Kyaw, B.M., Saxena, N., Posadzki, P., Vseteckova, J., Nikolaou, C.K., George, P.P., Divakar, U., Masiello, I., Kononowicz, A.A., Zary, N. and Car, L.T., 2019. Virtual reality for health professions education: systematic review and meta-analysis by the digital health education collaboration. Journal of medical Internet research, 21(1), p.e12959. https://www.jmir.org/2019/1/e12959/span[
McGovern, E., Moreira, G. and Luna-Nevarez, C., 2020. An application of virtual reality in education: Can this technology enhance the quality of students’ learning experience? Journal of Education for Business, 95(7), pp.490-496. https://www.academia.edu/download/88386250/08832323.2019.170309620220708-1-xn3ex3.pdf
Rojas-Sánchez, M.A., Palos-Sánchez, P.R. and Folgado-Fernández, J.A., 2023. Systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis on virtual reality and education. Education and Information Technologies, 28(1), pp.155-192. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10639-022-11167-5
Soliman, M., Pesyridis, A., Dalaymani-Zad, D., Gronfula, M. and Kourmpetis, M., 2021. The application of virtual reality in engineering education. Applied Sciences, 11(6), p.2879. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/6/2879/pdf
Timovski, R., Koceska, N. and Koceski, S., 2020. The use of augmented and virtual reality in education. http://eprints.ugd.edu.mk/27294/1/The%20use%20of%20AR_VR%20in%20education.pdf
UNESCO., 2023. UNESCO 2023’s global report on the use of technology in education (“Key Messages”, pp. 3-4; introduction/chapter 1 pp. 7-14).
Wajcman, J., 2002. Addressing technological change: The challenge to social theory. Current Sociology, 50(3), 347-363. (Attached at the end of this section).
World Bank., 2021. New World bank report: Remote Learning during the pandemic: Lessons from today, principles for tomorrow. https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2021/11/18/new-world-bank-report-remote-learning-during-the-pandemic-lessons-from-today-principles-for-tomorrow
write