In “Why We Need to Keep the ‘Community’ in Community College,” the author, Anna Clark, expresses a moving and convincing argument, emphasizing the necessity and preservation of the commonality found in community colleges. Published in “They Say I Say: The article titled “The Moves That Matter in Academic Writing”, in which a set of cleverly designed rhetorical devices is utilized and employed to help communicate the message of the article as well as to persuade the readers of the crucial importance of building a certain sense of community within these super important educational institutions. By employing persuasive rhetoric deliberately and methodically, Anna Clark manages the psychological sensitivity related to persuasion and the subsequent impact of the college community on students’ lives. Thus, the result of this work would be the call for active involvement in community life on behalf of the student body.
Ethos, the authority found in the application of the appeal to credibility, stands out among the cleverly used rhetorical figures of speech seen in the speech by Anna Clark. Her long-term involvement in the field, as was demonstrated in years of conscious work, as well as her passionate and authoritative positions, not only grant them a significantly strong power to persuade the readers but also convince readers that there is no way to refute the truth, considering the depth of their contribution. Through established expertise in a particular community college dynamics and profound insights into what this implies for the community, Anna Clark successfully communicates her message, which readers are inclined to respect due to the fact that people take the opinions of such experts into sincere consideration.
Moreover, the author also successfully exploits logos, which is the appeal to logic, by justifiably presenting an incredible number of skillfully collected data and statistics to support their arguments. Through the detailed discussion of the research that shows a very tight correlation between the academic success of students in community colleges and their strong social cohesion views, Anna Clark not only strengthens her argument but also offers us reliable empirical evidence. The speaker makes factual assertions founded on logical reasoning and statistics that clearly provide an argument for the necessity of forming a comprehensive and welcoming atmosphere in these educational institutions. Employing an evidence-based strategy yields two positive outcomes: standing as a distinctive layer that reinforces the accuracy of their argument and enhancing the convincing power, as their point of view is not based on assumptions but on clear proof of the great influence that a calm working environment can have on the success of students and other academic indicators.
Alongside the rhetorical tools of ethos and logos, Anna Clerks artistically applies pathos, considered to appeal to the audience’s emotions to spare bothering them and to cause them to feel deep care, which is the ultimate purpose of their address. Through their profound narrative, they imply the necessary, life-changing length of life for students who graduated from community colleges, especially those extending from impoverished and generally unprivileged places. By interweaving poignant incidents and deeply personal stories in the style of narration, the authors thus make sure to add a touch of humanity to the general premise of the text. The readers not only sympathize with these individuals thoroughly, but they can also understand the magnitude of their struggles and triumphs. For instance, McClenney and Bumphus use an emotional response to paint a picture that reflects the very real repercussions of not conserving the community college communal ethos, hence compellingly and exhaustively highlighting how important it is to conserve such communal ethos.
The article is also well-structured in a very convincing way that starts with a minor but very strong introduction that helps in developing the storyline. Anna Clark has skillfully highlighted the significance of the community college mission in her work. However, Clark also eloquently presents the manifold challenges it faces. Ensuring surgical precision, she would go ahead explaining in-depth the various aspects that hinder the development of a community within these learning institutions, and these may include, but are not limited to, constraints and control imposed by budgetary limitations, the new approach to educational development that is steered by the need for workforce development initiatives (Graff, Gerald and Anna, 2006). Lastly, the author not only discusses a plethora of concrete place markers but also creates an excellent road map that not only strengthens and renews the existent social fabric but also bolsters and restores the social ties within the community college. Through this, Clark portrays how the dynamic hands-on leading approach alongside developing and supporting various social programs and services is critical for actualizing the goals of cultural conservation and enhancement in such unique learning establishments.
Anna Clark masterfully employs persuasive strategies to create a strong sense of conviction in their audience, encouraging them to recognize the crucial role that creating a welcoming and inclusive community environment plays inside these vital centres of learning and opportunity. Subsequently, pursuers are also urged to think about the critical impact of organizations inside junior colleges. In any case, they are additionally spurred to find proactive ways to protect and upgrade the common ethos at the centre of these instructive organizations, ensuring that they keep on being beams of expectation and strengthening for people in the future. The powerful cases made by Anna Clark not only feature the worth of local area in junior colleges but also empower proactive contribution and backing for its upkeep and improvement. The author ensures junior colleges keep on being relentless lights of chance and strengthening by moving their perusers to make substantial strides on the side of these foundations. By doing this, they assume a vital part in deciding the course of endless lives and people in the future.
In conclusion, “Why We Need to Keep the ‘Community’ in Community College” is a splendid subordinate of expository argumentation, an artistry wave in which Anna Clark draws in the mix of ethos-logos-tenderness to successfully create their case. Through a basic reflection on the strength of validity, intelligent thinking, and close-to-home allure of their contention, the author contends the significance of keeping up with the ethos concerning a truly necessary foundation like the one noticed. In the letters as quoted, the letter writers powerfully resort to both mind and heart, generating the readers to accept and embrace the fact that community is instrumental to student success in community college’s mission.
References
Graff, Gerald and Anna Clark. Why We Need to Keep the “Community” in Community Colleges.” They Say I Say, 5th Edition ed., 2006.
write