1. Introduction
The evolving landscape of museum audiences reflects a growing emphasis on diversity and inclusivity, underscoring the need for exhibitions like “Contested Bodies” to be accessible to all, including individuals with disabilities. This trend more and more involves everyone in the development of the common tourist area and, at the same time, connects it with the general direction towards the creation of more inclusive environments for people with disability. The documentation entitled “Disability, Accessibility, and Inclusion,” through this process of making spaces that fully include visitors with different abilities, suggests that exhibitions need to be developed with accorded accessibility to serve all visitors well. Recently, museums and galleries have been figuring out the idea that the existence of society must be closer to a diversity of spectators.
1.1 Stanley Burton Gallery Mission
The Stanley & Audrey Burton Gallery’s mission, which focuses on educational engagement and making art accessible to a broad public, emphasizes the importance of inclusivity (Woolley, 2018). In this way, the “Contested Bodies” exhibition is an important tool in the Gallery’s continual work towards becoming a place where people with accessibility needs are welcomed and the special needs of such audiences can be met. Deepening its dedication, the Stanley & Audrey Burton Gallery aspires to overstep typical limitations to arts consideration (Kaur, 2022). The Gallery is well-positioned to be the exemplary one, displaying how art can be used to create links across different communities. The Gallery’s mission shows the Gallery’s commitment to establishing places where art is really accessible, irrespective of who you are. Being accessible is not just a matter of making the environment physically inclusive but also being inclusive in cultural, socio-economic, and cognitive areas, which, of course, involves a more holistic approach while engaging in the arts.
1.2 Target Audience
The target audience for this research includes individuals with disabilities, a group historically underrepresented in museum visitation statistics. Drawing on audience segmentation theories from the “Understanding Audiences” lecture, this proposal identifies disabled individuals as a key audience segment whose needs and experiences at the “Contested Bodies” exhibition will be the focus of this research (Kaur, 2022).
Identifying the target audience is understanding deeply the peculiar experiences of disabled persons in the setting of the artificial environment, including the museum. Through the conduction of this analysis, the research targets the discovery of holes in the ongoing engagement paradigm and suggests applicable conclusions (Birchall, 2012). This audience group is not homogeneous; it includes various impairments as well, such as physical, sensory, and cognitive disabilities. Knowing who they all are and what diverse needs and tastes they have is the foundation of any form of engagement that is effective and inclusive.
2. Research Proposal
2.1 Rationale
Understanding the experience of disabled visitors at the Contested Bodies exhibition is a core factor in the play-up of the mission, which requires accessibility and inclusivity (Woolley, 2018). This study focuses on the barriers faced by disabled audience members and options for improving their experience; therefore, in this way, the Gallery fulfills its goals of wider attendance and deeper engagement with existing visitors. Being able to delve deeper into the visitor’s experience provides the museums a valuable opportunity to pinpoint details of accessibility that may have been unnoticed in the process. The “Contested Bodies” exhibition, which definitely fits the purpose of using art to highlight perspectives investigation, is a suitable setting for this experience. Discovering what visitors with disabilities encounter, the Gallery can act as a catalyst in launching innovative solutions that not only improve accessibility but also elevate the cultural dialogue around art and inclusion (Woolley, 2018). The spotlight of my research sets at the nexus of art, accessibility, and advocacy, emphasizing the Gallery’s contribution towards an inclusive cultural environment.
2.2 Methodology
This research will employ a mixed-methods approach, combining qualitative and quantitative data collection to gain a comprehensive understanding of disabled visitors’ experiences. The methodology is informed by the principles of participatory research, ensuring that the research process is accessible and inclusive and that participants can contribute meaningfully to the study (Birchall, 2012). The application of the mixed-mode research design will combine the strengths of both qualitative and quantitative research methods to provide a multi-dimensional account of the accessibility and usability issues. In conjunction, qualitative insights will offer more depth and context to the visit experiences of people with disabilities; at the same time, quantitative data will help to offer some measurable metrics that can be used to assess any possible improvements (Marstine, 2017). Through this methodology, due to the high level of detail and grounding in the day-to-day reality of those who are most impacted by this phenomenon, the complexity of accessibility issues is acknowledged, and the solutions are developed. It means, however, elevating the practice of methodological precision and presenting to the next generation of research a model for those who will follow.
2.3 Methods
Participant recruitment will be conducted through local disability advocacy groups and the Gallery’s communication channels, ensuring a diverse range of disabilities are represented. Data collection methods will include accessible surveys, interviews conducted in person or via accessible digital platforms, and observational studies during visits to the “Contested Bodies” exhibition (Woolley, 2018). This method will make sure it is accessible for the participant no matter what his disabilities are, meaning following what is written in the “Disability, Accessibility, and Inclusion” guide document.
Access to research should be promoted at all project stages, including its methods, as a part of efforts to maintain inclusive research. All opportunities will reshaped as they tend to make each member of the group happy and satisfied. Such efforts could be actualized using materials in different forms, for example, Braille, large print, and audio, as well as ensuring that all the venues are physically accessible (Birchall, 2012). The methodology, however, not only displays his recognition of the respect for the autonomy and dignity of participants, but it is actually the strategy on which they are valued as equal partners in this conversation. Furthermore, the research done in this research process not only leads to rich data but also exhibits the exact principles of accessibility and respect that were the basis of the initiative, according to Woolley (2018).
3. Findings
3.1 Dissemination Strategy
The research findings will be shared in multiple accessible forms, i.e., a report published in large print as well as in Braille, with an audio-recorded summary, and with presentations at conferences that specifically deal with museum accessibility. This multi-pronged strategy will ensure that the research is available to audiences drawn from a wide spectrum, including specially-abled individuals. The other thing that makes the Gallery community engagement and transparency unique is that the output is not just heard by academics but also by the general readership outside the academic society. Our plan will obtain social media, easily available public presentations, and collaborations with disability advocacy groups, creating an interaction that will multiply the research effect (Knight, 2011). Through dialoguing with the community, art galleries can be recognized by members of the community as their own and develop a collaborative culture admired for feedback and always pursuing improvement in accessibility. This also provides them access to a bigger audience and advances the Gallery as a culturally relevant center.
The dissemination strategy approaches academic channels as well as those not so academic to facilitate a holistic connection between the Gallery and the deeper community. Through indulging in the advantages of digital outlets, the research results will be shared in visually attractive infographics and webinars as they accommodate immediate feedback and conversations (Marstine, 2017). Such an approach is not only a way to increase the coverage but also to solicit the effectiveness of this area of knowledge and the participation of a wide spectrum of people, including those who may only sometimes participate in museum-related research.
Moreover, a strategy plan on organizing all-inclusive workshops, which have been designed by the professionals in the space, as well as a roundtable discussion, provides an avenue for bringing together the museum professionals, the people who are deaf, the designers, and their experts. They will be commonplace in sharing good practices in this vector, developing alternative approaches to tackling the architectural accessibility problems and planning for future exhibitions that will be fully inclusive by the essence (Clapperton, 2017).
3.2 Evaluation
The research project’s impact will be evaluated through follow-up surveys with participants and an analysis of changes in visitor statistics and feedback at the Gallery following the implementation of recommended accessibility enhancements (Smith, 2015). This evaluation will measure the effectiveness of the research in contributing to a more inclusive visitor experience at the “Contested Bodies” exhibition. The project will be deemed a success through the observable improvement of accessibility in the whole Gallery and the wide engagement of visually impaired patients (Marstine, 2017). Feedback systems will be built to generate relevant feedback through the target group and to make the Gallery responsive to the needs of its guests. This never-ending feedback loop is what requires us to correct ourselves and experience unforeseen difficulties. The assessment approach should be considerate of all, meaning that everyone’s perspectives will matter and be taken into consideration. Such ongoing assessment provision of an adaptation to the accessibility work process reveals the Gallery’s commitment to providing an accessible space for everyone.
The project targets to adopt both qualitative interviews and focus sessions to collect more detailed feedback from disabled visitors. These conversations will give specific information on the personal experience and perception of accessibility at the Gallery. The implementation of these changes will be better appreciated by staff as they will help to create a better understanding of the impact that they have (Knight, 2011). Further, we will collaborate with disability advocacy groups and museum accessibility specialists to review whether the improvements produce the expected results. Through this cooperative system, criteria and methodology corresponding to the unique needs of the specific community are identified.
The validity of the project will be ensured by an accessibility audit carried out independently after the implementation of the recommended changes (Kaur, 2022). A planned audit will evaluate both the physical infrastructure, digital platforms, and service offerings against the accessibility standards. This is, therefore, a neutral measurement of the museum’s inclusiveness. The audit results, along with visitors’ comments and statistical analysis, will develop ideas on how to improve and make the Gallery even richer for disabled visitors (Clapperton, 2017).
Understanding the changes that may arise for accessibility needs on a regular basis, the Gallery would create an annual review of its accessibility strategy, being ready to introduce new technologies, design principles, and visitor feedback from persons with disabilities into the document (Birchall, 2012). This solid commitment to maintaining the state of perfection stresses how the Gallery would like to have the “Contested Bodies” exhibition and other upcoming exhibits as welcoming as they can to visitors with or without physical and sensory impairments. This way, the Gallery ensures that visitors with special needs not only enjoy visits to the Gallery but also that cultural establishments meet the accepted set of accessibility standards.
4. Conclusion
4.1 Future Audiences
The insights gained from this research will guide the Stanley Burton Gallery in making informed improvements to its exhibitions, ensuring they are accessible and engaging for disabled visitors. By addressing the specific needs and barriers identified through this research, the Gallery can attract new audiences and strengthen its relationship with existing visitors, ultimately fulfilling its mission of accessibility and inclusivity for all. Moving forward, this study will serve the Gallery as a source of expertise on accessibility for the arts in the community. As a result of this, current practices will be modified, and future exhibitions and art programs will be created with inclusion in consideration. The Gallery will strive to meet the new guidelines, which will help it reach a bigger audience and enrich the current cultural diversity of the community. This interactive stance means that the Gallery will not only react to current needs but also introduce its vision for the design of the art interaction in the future.
4.2 Importance of Understanding Audiences
The Gallery’s mission is based on the understanding of different types of audiences; therefore, every element of its work is shaped by this factor. Make this project a paramount step in developing a cultural platform that promotes different aspects of life and stories with the same competitive chances. It is mainly through listening to the needs and preferences that these disabled guests desire and prioritize that the Gallery shows how the culture of the art world does not only pursue ideals but achieves this. By being dedicated to the development of a proper understanding of the audiences’ requirements and adjusting to suit the listening needs of our audience, we will have greatly added to our mission of making art accessible and approachable to all individuals – including those with disabilities.
Reference
Birchall, H., & Yeates, A. (2012). Do not Ask for the Mona Lisa. Lulu. com. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=mOOOAwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA3&dq=Audience+Inclusivity+at+the+Stanley+%26+Audrey+Burton+Gallery&ots=pt5OgHk64W&sig=Df-paeKX4kyMFCOQy9YkEs7e7as
Clapperton, S. (2017). Making it Real: Methods and Materials of British War artists, 1914-1919. Volume 1 (Doctoral dissertation, University of Glasgow). https://theses.gla.ac.uk/40926/1/2017ClappertonPhD_vol%201.pdf
Kaur, K. (2022). Embed sustainability in the curriculum: transform the world. Language Learning in Higher Education, 12(2), 605–616. https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/cercles-2022-2061/html
Knight, C. K. (2011). Public art: Theory, practice, and populism. John Wiley & Sons. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=qkxClDeTCbQC&oi=fnd&pg=PT6&dq=Audience+Inclusivity+at+the+Stanley+%26+Audrey+Burton+Gallery&ots=_GXRo2yw-5&sig=55LbtUJCS6G1V73pYxceqKI_0CA
Marstine, J. (2017). Critical practice: Artists, museums, ethics. Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9781315272016/critical-practice-janet-marstine
Smith, M. (2015). Making Things Perfectly Queer: Art’s Use of Craft to Signify LGBT Identities (Doctoral dissertation, University of Brighton). https://research.brighton.ac.uk/files/4754843/Complete%20E%20Dissertation%20Jan%202016.pdf
Woolley, D., & Herrington, K. (2018). Still life: things are devouring time. https://lau.repository.guildhe.ac.uk/id/eprint/17432/2/StillLife%20Things%20Devouring%20Time%20Catalogue.pdf
Zebracki, M., Sumner, A., & Speight, E. (2017). (Re) Making Public Campus Art: Connecting the University, Publics and the City. Public Art Dialogue, 7(1), 6-43. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/21502552.2017.1288537?casa_token=fNdLKWi6I8wAAAAA:ysUjLj-aabVgwMHioBCFyEdPFAKcWwWiyP0Vjk25dAEqL_3Futk_qB8l-KE7jX8vhXhY69vp0IY7UuU50w
write