The abuse of children presents several difficulties for society as a whole, particularly in the fields of public health, criminal law, civil rights, social welfare, and social equality. Several debates and discussions have been done regarding the recently implemented policies to recognize and react to child abuse and neglect. Abuse of children may take place in several significant ways, the most common of which are sexual assault, physical violence, psychological abuse, and neglect. Since there are so many different ways in which children might be harmed, it is necessary to have legal and policy solutions to identify and address these issues. Across society as a whole, and particularly within institutions that work directly with children, like schools, the question of the most effective method for recognizing instances of child abuse and reacting to them has been raised. When there is a disparity in authority, which is typically the case, abusive behaviour is likely to occur. The perpetrators may suffer in various ways, but they are generally marginalized and disadvantaged (Brady et al., 2020). The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child from 1989 mandates that state parties adopt legal, administrative, and social measures to safeguard children from abuse and maltreatment while they care for their parents or other caregivers.
The foundation of the mandatory reporting of child maltreatment is specific laws enacted in several jurisdictions to uncover severe child maltreatment incidents that would otherwise remain concealed(Tener et al., 2019). This is done with the goals of lowering the number of children who are victims of crime, enhancing the delivery of health rehabilitation services, and enhancing the security of children. These laws, which have taken on the form of an identification strategy, are intended to be a component of the health promotion response to the problem of child abuse. This paper will investigate the mandatory reporting laws concerning child abuse, the various types of abuse and the consequences of each, the nature and purpose of mandatory reporting laws, the effect of these regulations and laws, and any awareness campaigns regarding these statutes and regulations. The paper will also contain the upcoming research and regulation changes that are required to fully address the problem.
As indicated before, child abuse may take on several forms, including physical abuse, sexual abuse, emotional abuse, and neglect. Of these four types, sexual abuse is singled out as a category unto itself due to its associated severity, necessitating a particular reaction. Regarding the various types of mistreatment, the reporting responsibilities are focused on incidents of maltreatment which have been demonstrated to have serious adverse effects. The youngest child is especially susceptible and often the victim of child abuse, except sexual abuse. Since younger children are more susceptible to becoming victims, three-quarters of the survivors are often less than 12 (Boxall & Sabol, 2021). In addition, there has been an overall rise in oppositional behaviour linked to patterns of increasing rates of certain types of maltreatment occurring throughout the transitional periods into childhood. Neglecting a person’s education, medical treatment, emotional needs, and diet are possible. It has been said that the effects of decay are more severe than any other kind of mistreatment, with physical abuse coming in second place. An excellent illustration of this is the practice of not providing adequate care for an infant, which has been shown to have far-reaching consequences, including stunted brain growth and development and impairments in the child’s overall capacity to function throughout their lifetime. Emotional abuse may also take a variety of forms, and the degree to which it is taken might vary from one state to the other.
There is a wide variety of child abuse, each of which may have unique effects and repercussions on the victimized child. Abuse and neglect may have significant emotional, physical, societal, and cognitive effects on victims. These effects can manifest in a variety of ways. The financial expenses placed on the child and society are critical repercussions of abuse (Peterman et al., 2020). There is also the possibility that the kid will not flourish, that their brain development will be hindered or damaged, and that the child may pass away in the worst-case situation. The long-term ramifications of child abuse may entail severe implications for a person’s economic situation and educational accomplishments. The child’s potential to grow fully as a person and their dignity is hindered due to the abuse they endured as children.
Relevant federal and state regulations, laws, and the court ruling
Laws requiring reporting suspected cases of severe child abuse were enacted to respond to the problem of child abuse. As a result of this being a widespread problem within the family context, there is now a greater need for regulations and legislation to address the issue. The term “mandatory reporting law” refers to legislative legislation that requires specified people in a specific occupational category to report any instances of child abuse or neglect (Wißmann et al., 2019). This sort of regulation is known as “mandatory reporting law.” Depending on the jurisdiction, this obligation is often imposed on every person. In those countries where the responsibility is placed on a particular occupational category, the persons required to comply with it often have only sporadic encounters with a child during their profession. They may include instructors, nurses, and physicians. The laws also allow those not required to do so to submit reports. These people could be family members, people who live nearby, or friends and acquaintances.
Detecting severe instances of child abuse and mistreatment is the primary goal of this legislation. The hidden aspects of the situation drive this purpose. This Act safeguards the reporters by ensuring that their identities are kept secret and exempting them from legal responsibility in any process, regardless of whether it is civil, administration, or felony in nature. Since other medical problems might create symptoms similar to substance misuse, these statutes do not require the reporting to be 100% accurate(Richert et al., 2020). Since the reporters need to know and comprehend the extent of their responsibility, recognize the indications of child maltreatment and abuse, the procedures they need to take, and the locations where they should report, it is also necessary for the legislation to be supported with proper training.
During the years 1963 and 1967, the United States of America passed its first required legislation. The acknowledgement of the battered kid syndrome, in addition to persistent lobbying efforts, was a major driving force behind the passage of this legislation. At first, the scope of this legislation was restricted to the need for medical practitioners to report any suspected instances of physical abuse perpetrated on children by parents or caregivers. The scope of this Act was broadened in three primary ways by the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act (CAPTA), passed in 1998 (Burton & Montauban, 2021). After that, money was allotted to the states to guarantee that this Act was carried out as intended. The modification of existing state statutes was the first step in the expansion of this piece of legislation. Any concerns of neglecting or abusing children had to be reported by members of other professional groups who were subject to this requirement. The second approach was to broaden the scope of the forms of abuse that may be reported. This now included covered sexual and emotional abuse, as well as neglect, in addition to physical abuse. In the end, the damage that must have occurred for a report to be filed must not have been qualified in any way, using phrases such as “severe injury.” Child neglect and abuse are defined by the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act (CAPTA) as any significant failure to fulfil the parent or caregiver’s role that results in the child’s death, serious bodily or emotional injury, or sexual exploitation.
The laws that must be followed define the categories of individuals required to file reports. These categories include individuals who work in the childcare industry, social workers, educators and other educational personnel, medical professionals and other workers in the healthcare industry, counselling, medical doctors, and law enforcement personnel. In addition, the rules specify the level of information and suspicion that a reporter must have before they are required to report a crime. It is necessary to have a reasonable suspicion that abuse or neglect has occurred since the reporters are not permitted to examine suspicions of abuse. In addition, the legislation specifies the types of misconduct that trigger the need to file a complaint(West & Bowman, 2019).
Moreover, privileged communication provisions are included in the required reporting rules. There is a general consensus that professionals owe it to their customers or patients to treat their conversations in private and not disclose any information to other parties. It is the intention of the reporting rules in the majority of states to allow the states to protect child abuse victims. As a result, these laws limit this extraordinary power for mandated reporters.
The rules that make it necessary to report abuse or neglect of children to authorities differ from state to state. For instance, the laws of Alabama provide that anyone may file a complaint with an excellent basis to think that a kid is being abused or neglected in some way. Regarding the institutional obligation to report, the rules provide that any public or private employer who punishes a worker for reporting a child abuse suspect is convicted of a class C misdemeanour. This applies to both public and private employers. The criteria for filing a report include that it be done so when it is known or reasonably believed that the child has been the victim of child abuse or neglect (Liu & Vaughn, 2019). This is not the case in some jurisdictions, such as Alaska, where it is mandatory to file a complaint if an adult has a reasonable basis for thinking that a child is being abused or neglected. At the same time, they are engaged in the execution of their professional responsibilities. Privileged conversations are unavailable in Alaska or Alabama, unlike in Alabama, where clergy-pertinent contacts and defence lawyer protections were allowed.
Impact of Mandatory reporting laws on the Provision of Services
It has been observed that the implementation of mandatory reporting regulations has a variety of effects on areas such as the delivery of services, the establishment of budgets, the management of employees and volunteers, and the capacity to participate in advocacy initiatives. One of the effects that are well acknowledged and discussed is the safeguarding of children. In the realm of child safety, a function is played by mandated reporting roles. It has helped defend children’s rights to life and health since they do not have the resources to prevent abuse or mistreatment. This has resulted in the protection of children’s rights. According to Katz et al. (2021), the function and effect of mandatory reporting laws have served as a pivotal force towards developing additional laws and regulations to guarantee safeguarding children from maltreatment. These laws and regulations aim to ensure that children are not harmed. According to the modern components of mandatory reporting, the well-framed legal provisions effectively enable educators, good reporting practice, and appropriate intervention bodies have made it possible for mandatory reporting to exert influence against child abuse and its subsequent effects on developmental and health outcomes.
The health and economic costs associated with child abuse have been significantly decreased due to mandatory reporting regulations. Abuse of children, whether it be sexual or physical, has many negative repercussions, not just for the victim but also for society and the state. Injury to the child’s physical health and psychological well-being, such as sadness, anxiety, thoughts of suicide, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), might result in individual expenditures being paid. Abuse of children may result in a variety of adverse outcomes, including poor academic performance, problematic drug use, and pregnancy at a young age (Currie & Tough, 2021). Most children in this age group tend to flee their homes because of sexual abuse. It is important to take into consideration the fact that these effects often persist throughout maturity. Obligatory reporting laws have prevented all of these repercussions, which may continue into maturity and cause further damage to the victim, society, and the state. This has been made possible by the fact that these laws are in place.
There is consensus that mandatory reporting regulations have a positive influence on public safety as well. This is particularly clear when considering the sexual abuse of children. With obligatory reporting, a foundation is established for multiple methodologies of crime prevention approaches. This is because victims of child sexual abuse go through this experience more than once, and perpetrators of child sexual abuse often abuse more than one victim. This indicates that early intervention, which may be performed by obligatory reporting legislation, can potentially prevent further sexual abuse and suffering of children in the future.
Various reasons founded on various grounds provide that mandatory reporting law is an effective social policy solution to childhood abuse and certain types of child maltreatment. This has resulted in the encouragement and support of the employment of these laws as well as the increase of their scope. The number of complaints made about children’s abuse or neglect has also grown due to mandatory reporting regulations (Mathews et al., 2020). On the other hand, a few repercussions of the required reporting rules have been labelled unfavourable. As a result of these effects, several individuals working in the healthcare industry have called for repealing these rules. This has been accomplished in the sense that services have been made available. It has been suggested that mandatory reporting rules have a detrimental influence on the delivery of services since they increase the amount of work that must be done. When professionals who are required to report child abuse come into contact with children in the course of their work, they have the responsibility of watching out for the children and being alert for any indications that the children may be victims of abuse. Some opposed to mandatory reporting laws believe, among other things, that these regulations tend to be invasive and divert resources intended to help disadvantaged children and families. These critics also point out that the nature and breadth of child abuse are misunderstood, which led to the creation of this piece of law in the first place. They went on to say that the regulation solely protects children, which is seen as an individual reaction to an issue that affects society as a whole.
The outcomes of a report are also impacted by the type of regulations that require obligatory reporting—compared to complaints made by non-professionals, such as family members, reports made by mandated professionals had a higher probability of leading to verified instances of abuse. In addition, the implementation of universal obligatory reporting, stipulating that all adult citizens are obligated to report any instance of child abuse, has not constantly improved the discovery of children subjected to abusive treatment. Also, the scope of the Act has been broadened to include a broader range of abusive behaviours. This growth has not always been beneficial for children who have been put in dangerous situations. This may be realized when the weight of the system tends to limit the capacity and function of Child Protection Services in terms of recognizing and recognizing children in more urgent need and responding to them.
The influence of obligatory reporting regulations could also be seen in the budget formulation process. This may be seen in the expenses that were expended to guarantee the proper execution of the law that was passed to safeguard the rights of children. The states that comply with the obligatory reporting rules must make provisions in their financial plans to cover the cost of carrying out the legislation requirements. This has a tendency to take away from the prior progress that the states had made in their budgets. In order to justify their criticism of the adverse effects of mandatory reporting laws on state budgets, opponents of these laws have pointed to the recent changes that have been made in the budgeting processes of the states. The budget development procedure has also been adversely affected since the newly enacted requirement requires increased funds and resources. Because of this, some states are compelled to decrease spending in other areas to guarantee that the law is supported in an equivalent manner. The administration of personnel and volunteers is another area affected by the required reporting rules, which also influence other elements. These rules regulate the professionals who are required to report instances of child abuse or neglect. When it involves disclosing instances of child abuse, employers have the power to affect the behaviour of their workers. The obligatory reporting rules affect the management of staff and volunteers since employers are required to ensure that their staff members behave following the terms of these laws. When workers report a suspect of child mistreatment and the parents to ask the employer about it, this may also lead to conflict in the workplace. This tension may lead to poor administration of the organization’sorganization’s personnel and the volunteers who contribute their time to it.
Mandatory reporting requirements may also affect the creation of budget proposals. One indicator of this trend is the expenditures associated with enforcing laws designed to safeguard children’s rights. States that enact mandatory reporting legislation will need to allocate resources to the new requirements (Maves et al., 2020). This often detracts from the progress made by governments in balancing their budgets. Opponents of mandatory reporting laws have pointed out that states have had to make additional adjustments to construct budgets as evidence that the rules are harmful. As the additional requirement mandated by the law necessitates more money and resources, the budgeting process has also been badly affected. If all states are to support the law adequately, some will have to decrease spending in other areas. These new rules affect the management of both paid employees and unpaid volunteers. The rules governing mandatory reporters of child abuse are set down here. When disclosing child abuse, workers are influenced by their employer’s policies and practices. Employers are impacted by mandatory reporting legislation because they must monitor personnel and volunteers to verify compliance with the law. When workers report that they have reason to believe that their employer is abusing their children, and the parents investigate, tensions may grow. This discord might lead to better management of the organization’sorganization’s employees and volunteers.
Mandatory reporting requirements have only sometimes ensured the identification of cases. This is used as an example of the laws’ success and used to argue against them. It has been observed that state legislation and policy changes regarding mandatory reporting only sometimes result in an increase or decrease in the number of reports filed or the rate at which they are confirmed. This is a significant consequence of legislation requiring disclosure. The capacity to participate in advocacy work is negatively impacted when these laws, enacted to defend children’s rights to life and good health, are not upheld (Rossetti et al., 2021). Anybody with reasonable suspicion of child abuse may report it, not only those required to do so by law. This implies that if these people do not perceive the efficacy of mandatory reporting legislation, they may be less likely to disclose any child abuse or maltreatment concerns. The need for reporting child abuse is the result of successful advocacy. This initiative significantly raises awareness of the need to report child abuse. The efficacy of this legislation will encourage additional advocacy work by the impacted persons, and the required reporting laws will influence these efforts. Nonetheless, the success and usefulness of the required reporting regulations may inspire lobbying initiatives. If advocates for reporting child maltreatment see that the laws and regulations are making a difference, they may be more inspired to continue their work.
Future research and policies required to address the issue
The need to report incidents of child abuse has several challenges, one of which is that the rules and regulations in place do not adequately safeguard children’s rights. Several approaches may be taken to solve these problems, as well as adding new policies to the ones already in place to make them more efficient. Researchers have discovered several obstacles that prevent the proper reporting of instances of child abuse or neglect, despite several rules that detail when and how to make such a complaint(Forsner et al., 2020). A lack of familiarity with the regulations and the particular incidents that must be reported is often cited as a factor that discourages reporting. A further problem with laws that require certain individuals to report instances of child abuse is that those individuals worry that the reports they are required to file could be inaccurate because they are typically based on the child’s self-report in the absence of any physical evidence showing that the child was harmed (Tener et al., 2019). In addition, experts have a natural tendency to be concerned about the potential legal and ethical repercussions that may arise if the report is shown to be false. There are other problems, such as vengeance from the child’s relatives, which may make things worse for the youngster and put their life at even more risk (Schissel, 2021) . Because of the problems described, there is a pressing need for more investigation to be carried out to look for answers to these problems. It also highlights the need for legislation that will assist in better addressing the concerns described earlier in the paragraph. A greater emphasis will be placed on receiving training, which is one of the primary policies. Reporters who are required by law to provide information play a crucial part in preventing damage to children. However, when confronted with various challenges and obstructions in their attempt to perform their duty, concerns about the efficacy of their training begin to emerge (Alawawdeh & Alshtaiwi, 2020). There is a need for more studies to identify how professionals may be appropriately taught to undertake the complicated process of mandatory reporting appropriately. According to research done in various fields, the vast majority of professionals have insufficient training to recognizerecognize instances of child abuse and report them appropriately. It is possible for service providers to be held accountable on both a personal and professional level if they do not get enough appropriate training.
Another topic that has to be investigated shortly is the part that cultural norms play in reporting child abuse and the steps that must be taken to develop cultural competency. Most of the research on child abuse has not focused on racial or ethnic differences. Since a very long time ago, the vast majority of the study on cultural proficiency in child safety have been nonexistent. Because of the vast cultural differences within our communities, culture and the expertise it has in matters about the safety of children need much greater attention, which may be achieved via the implementation of reporting requirements. According to Brottman et al. (2019), sensitivity to social standards might make it chateachingiduals in cultural competency. The ther challenge is a need for further study to develop a way to teach mandated reporters and guarantees that they have cultural competency. It has also been shown that one of the most significant issues with obligatory reporting is the problem of erroneous reporting by the obligated specialists. This necessitates the investigation and the imitation of new rules to assist those obligated to report instances of child abuse or neglect factually (Nouman et al., 2020). In addition, the training for mandated reporters has to be made more rigorous and intensive to guarantee that all issue areas are addressed and that the reporters have a complete understanding of what is expected of them per the required reporting rules. This will guarantee that the stipulated regulations and laws are strictly followed and considerably eliminate the correctness of the professionals’ reporting.
References
Alawawdeh, N., & Alshtaiwi, M. (2020). FOREIGN LANGUAGES E-LEARNING: CHALLENGES, OBSTACLES AND BEHAVIOURS DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC IN JORDAN. PalArch’s Journal of Archaeology of Egypt / Egyptology, 17(6), 11536–11554. https://archives.palarch.nl/index.php/jae/article/view/2983
Boxall, H., & Sabol, B. (2021). Adolescent Family Violence: Findings from a Group-Based Analysis. Journal of Family Violence. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-021-00247-8
Brady, B., Chaskin, R. J., & McGregor, C. (2020). Promoting civic and political engagement among marginalized urban youth in three cities: Strategies and challenges. Children and Youth Services Review, p. 116, 105184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105184
Brottman, M. R., Char, D. M., Hattori, R. A., Heeb, R., & Taff, S. D. (2019). Toward cultural competency in health care. Academic Medicine, 95(5), 1. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000002995
Burton, A. O., & Montauban, A. (2021, June 1). Toward Community Control of Child Welfare Funding: Repeal the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act and Delink Child Protection From Family Well-Being. Papers.ssrn.com. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3905041
Currie, C. L., & Tough, S. C. (2021). Adverse childhood experiences are associated with illicit drug use among pregnant women with middle to high socioeconomic status: All Our Families Cohort findings. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03591-1
Forsner, M., Elvhage, G., Ewalds-Kvist, B. M., & Lützén, K. (2020). Moral Challenges When Suspecting Abuse and Neglect in School Children: A Mixed Method Study. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 38(6). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-020-00680-6
Katz, I., Priolo-Filho, S., Katz, C., Andresen, S., Bérubé, A., Cohen, N., Connell, C. M., Collin-Vézina, D., Fallon, B., Fouche, A., Fujiwara, T., Haffejee, S., Korbin, J. E., Maguire-Jack, K., Massarweh, N., Munoz, P., Tarabulsy, G. M., Tiwari, A., Truter, E., & Varela, N. (2021). One year into COVID-19: What have we learned about child maltreatment reports and protective service responses? Child Abuse & Neglect, 105473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.105473
Liu, B. C. C., & Vaughn, M. S. (2019). Legal and policy issues from the United States and internationally about mandatory child abuse reporting. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 64, 219–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2019.03.007
Mathews, B., Bromfield, L., & Walsh, K. (2020). Comparing Reports of Child Sexual and Physical Abuse Using Child Welfare Agency Data in Two Jurisdictions with Different Mandatory Reporting Laws. Social Sciences, 9(5), 75. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci9050075
Maves, R. C., Downar, J., Dichter, J. R., Hick, J. L., Devereaux, A., Geiling, J. A., Kissoon, N., Hupert, N., Niven, A. S., King, M. A., Rubinson, L. L., Hanfling, D., Hodge, J. G., Marshall, M. F., Fischkoff, K., Evans, L. E., Tonelli, M. R., Wax, R. S., Seda, G., & Parrish, J. S. (2020). Triage of Scarce Critical Care Resources in COVID-19 An Implementation Guide for Regional Allocation. Chest. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2020.03.063
Nouman, H., Alfandari, R., Enosh, G., Dolev, L., & Daskal-Weichhendler, H. (2020). Mandatory reporting between legal requirements and personal interpretations: Community healthcare professionals’ reporting of child maltreatment. Child Abuse & Neglect, 101, 104261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.104261
Peterman, A., Potts, A., O’Donnell, M., Thompson, K., Shah, N., Oertelt-Prigione, S., & Van Gelder, N. (2020). Pandemics and Violence Against Women and Children. https://cgdev.org/sites/default/files/pandemics-and-vawg-april2.pdf
Richert, T., Anderberg, M., & Dahlberg, M. (2020). Mental health problems among young people in substance abuse treatment in Sweden. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13011-020-00282-6
Rossetti, Z., Burke, M. M., Hughes, O., Schraml-Block, K., Rivera, J. I., Rios, K., Aleman Tovar, J., & Lee, J. D. (2021). Parent Perceptions of the Advocacy Expectation in Special Education. Exceptional Children, 87(4), 001440292199409. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402921994095
Schissel, B. (2021). STILL Blaming Children: Youth Conduct and the Politics of Child Hating (2nd Edition). In Google Books. Fernwood Publishing. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=WwF0EAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=.+There+are+also+other+problems
Tener, D., Newman, A., Yates, P., & Tarshish, N. (2019). Child Advocacy Center intervention with sibling sexual abuse cases: Cross-cultural comparison of professionals’ perspectives and experiences. Child Abuse & Neglect, 104259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.104259
West, J. P., & Bowman, J. S. (2019). Whistleblowing Policies in American States: A Nationwide Analysis. The American Review of Public Administration, 50(2), 119–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074019885629
Wißmann, H., Peters, M., & Müller, S. (2019). Physical or psychological child abuse and neglect: Experiences, reporting behaviour and positions toward mandatory reporting of paediatricians in Berlin, Germany. Child Abuse & Neglect, 98, 104165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.104165
write