Dhillon, S., Aggarwal, A., & Dhillon, M. S. (2020). Ethics in Sports Medicine. Ethics, 54(4).
This article has discussed in detail the current situation in sports medicine ethics. Where doctors are still under constant pressure to embrace medical intervention for sportspersons. Medical professionals are faced with serious concerns related to conflict of interest. Where they are expected to act to the best of their knowledge, and in the patient’s interest, this ethical consideration requires the doctor to perform to the best of their capability but not to act due to incentives or rewards. Sports physicians, according to this article, are faced with an ethical concern of privacy and confidentiality of a sportsperson.
Patient confidentiality is the ethical principle that requires health care providers to keep patient information private. This principle is vital in order to maintain trust between patients and their physicians. Privacy is the right of individuals to keep their personal information confidential. The concern for patient confidentiality and privacy is especially important in sports medicine. This is because athletes are often very public figures, and their health information could be used to gain an advantage over them or their team. In addition, sports physicians often work with young athletes who may not be able to make fully informed decisions about who to trust with their health information. This cannot be easy, as many people (including the media) are interested in the health of high-profile athletes. Sports physicians must be careful only to release necessary and relevant information and to do so in a way that does not violate the privacy of their patients.
However, for these issues, athletes are the people to be blamed. When it comes to mismanagement of the information regarding a player’s health, some players won’t want to give away their sports in the team due to the incentives they receive. This makes the doctors compromise the reports by concealing some facts and sometimes carrying pain management pills that may expose them.
Other ethical challenges in sports and medicine are the uncontrollable desire to win and own the honor and glory that have pushed for breaking many ethics codes in sports. These include ergogenic aids, dietary supplements, and illegal substances. The use of technology to circumvent anti-doping detection technologies is another ongoing development that violates regulations and ethics severely. To ensure law and strict adherence to the code of ethics, the professionals or the physicians should stand firm and secure to protect the principles no matter the cost. The doctor should take all necessary measures to lessen this violation and the damage to the athlete’s body.
Thornton, P., Champion, W. T., Ruddell, L., & Ruddell, L. (2011). Sports ethics for sports management professionals. Jones & Bartlett Publishers.
There are a few ethical concerns that this article has addressed when discussing moral knowing in the sports realm. First, some may question whether it is morally right to know about or participate in sports. After all, sports can be seen as a waste of time and resources, and some argue that they promote violence. Furthermore, some people may feel that it is unfair to those who do not have access to the same resources (e.g., money, time, etc.) to be able to participate in sports. Additionally, there is a concern about cheating in sports. Some athletes may use performance-enhancing drugs or other methods to gain an unfair advantage, which can be seen as unethical. Finally, there is the issue of safety in sports. Some athletes may be injured while participating in sports, and some argue that this is an inevitable and acceptable risk. Others, however, may feel that the risks are too high and that athletes should not be allowed to participate in sports unless they are willing to accept the risks.
These are just a few ethical concerns that could be raised regarding moral knowing in the sports realm. Ultimately, it is up to each individual to decide what they believe is right or wrong.
The article has given an example of students in the field playing sports. One friend is cheering the other while he notices she is cheating. The moral thing to do in this situation is to report the matter to the professor since she is her friend and feels it’s not right to sell out her friend. She decides to keep quiet and let it slide. The article refers to this as the right or wrong ethical concern. Moral knowing of doing the right thing.
Another ethical concern discussed in this article is moral valuing. The ethical concern of moral valuing in sports is that some people may feel that it is morally wrong to place a value on someone’s performance in a sport. They may think this valuing creates a hierarchy between athletes and devalues those who do not excel in sports. Additionally, some may feel that this valuing leads to a competitive environment where athletes constantly strive to be the best and may be willing to sacrifice their health and wellbeing to win. There are a few different ways to look at this ethical concern.
On the one hand, some may argue that it is crucial to value athletes’ performances to incentivize them to do their best. Otherwise, there would be no reason to push themselves to improve. On the other hand, others may argue that this value creates an unhealthy environment where athletes are constantly under pressure to perform and may be more likely to suffer from injuries or other health problems.
These ethical concerns require a good leader. A good leader who inspires and empathizes with the players. Putting the interest of the player before those of the performance need. It enables the players to be stable and effective in performing. Thus their health and their wellbeing are taken care of by the management.
Campbell, M. H., & McNamee, M. J. (2021). Ethics, genetic technologies, and equine sports: the prospect of regulating a modified therapeutic use exemption policy. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy, 15(2), 227-250.
This article has touched on the recent ethical concern in the sports realm. The modification of genes enhances better performance. There are a few key points regarding the ethical considerations of genetic modification in sports. First, some argue that genetic modification gives athletes an unfair advantage over those who do not have access to such technology. Second, there is the potential for misuse of genetic modification, such as for creating “designer babies” who are born with predetermined physical or mental traits. Finally, there are concerns about the long-term health effects of genetic modification, both for the individuals who undergo the procedure and for future generations.
The article has used the horse as the study subject, and the study aims to establish ethical complications of genetic modification in the sport. Giving the horses enhanced genes to perform better in the field. However, a different perspective has been presented where humans or animals are modified to rise beyond their inabilities. The choice for a human to become a better version of themselves through enhanced genes present an ethical dilemma. The debate must focus on the benefits of such modifications rather than their weaknesses which will be scientifically improved over time. The article further differentiates between genetic testing and gene editing, making it a controversial subject for discussion regarding ethical matters. While genetic editing prevents hereditary diseases, genetic testing is done to clone humans or animals. The robust debate depends on these two aspects, as the article presents.
References
Campbell, M. H., & McNamee, M. J. (2021). Ethics, genetic technologies, and equine sports: the prospect of regulating a modified therapeutic use exemption policy. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy, 15(2), 227-250.
Dhillon, S., Aggarwal, A., & Dhillon, M. S. (2020). Ethics in Sports Medicine. Ethics, 54(4).
Thornton, P., Champion, W. T., Ruddell, L., & Ruddell, L. (2011). Sports ethics for sports management professionals. Jones & Bartlett Publishers.
write