Navigating ethical dilemmas is a fundamental skill in healthcare. Clinicians regularly face situations involving complex value judgments, competing priorities, and consequences for human lives. Having a structured approach to ethical analysis is critical when dilemmas arise. Fundamental ethical principles, including beneficence, nonmaleficence, autonomy, and justice, provide a framework to guide clinical decision-making (Beauchamp & Childress, 2019). This paper will analyze an end-of-life case study through the lens of ethical principles and an ethical decision-making model.
Overview of the Case Study
The case centers around Eleanor Thompson, a 72-year-old woman with late-stage ovarian cancer. Eleanor has battled aggressive cancer for three years but is now experiencing severe pain, deterioration, and diminished quality of life. Her oncologist, Dr. Samuel Martinez, has presented the option of another experimental treatment regimen or transitioning to palliative hospice care focused on comfort (Smith, 2023). Eleanor’s family is deeply divided on the decision. Her eldest daughter, Maria, wants to pursue any possible treatment, holding out hope for a miracle. In contrast, her son Michael believes Eleanor has suffered enough and should focus on palliative care. Eleanor’s husband of 50 years, Robert, feels conflicted between wanting to honor his wife’s fighting spirit and easing her suffering.
Analysis of Ethical Issues
Several complex ethical issues arise in this case relating to benefits versus harms, quality of life, patient autonomy, and communication. Determining the most ethical and beneficial path forward requires carefully weighing the principles of beneficence and nonmaleficence (Beauchamp & Childress, 2019). The principle of beneficence supports pursuing experimental treatment to extend Eleanor’s life if possible. However, nonmaleficence raises concerns about potential Additional suffering from more anti-cancer therapies in her fragile condition. There are also conflicts between respecting Eleanor’s autonomy to make her own care decisions, assuming her decision-making capacity is intact, and making choices for her if she lacks capacity. Disagreements between family members about the right course of action represent a key communication challenge.
Using an Ethical Decision-Making Model
The PLAN ethical decision-making model provides a structured framework for analysis in this case (Smith, 2023). First, clearly establish the central Problem and ethical Question at hand—determining the “right” or most ethical care plan for Eleanor considering impacts on her quality of life. Next, Legally consider Eleanor’s decision-making capacity and any advance directives she may have available to guide care. Analyze the situation using critical ethical principles, with beneficence, nonmaleficence, and patient autonomy being particularly central. Finally, develop an ethical Nursing intervention, like convening a family meeting to discuss Eleanor’s condition, align her values and priorities, and make a collaborative plan.
Effectiveness of Communication Approaches
Some concerning communication gaps are apparent that may contribute to the family’s confusion. Best practices indicate the oncologist should have clearly explained Eleanor’s prognosis, the risks and potential benefits of additional experimental treatment versus palliative care, and all care options in an honest, compassionate manner to properly inform the family’s expectations (Macauley, 2019). The disagreements between daughter Maria and son Michael suggest ineffective communication about Eleanor’s priorities and values to date. They are projecting their hopes rather than basing decisions on what Eleanor would want. Effective communication requires expressing empathy, establishing trust, aligning recommendations with patient values, and avoiding medical jargon (Ruben et al., 2020). To remedy this, the care team should hold a family meeting focused on eliciting Eleanor’s wishes and establishing shared goals for her remaining time. Skilled moderation and motivational interviewing approaches can help ensure that all voices are heard until a consensus is reached.
Resolving Ethical Dilemmas by Applying Ethical Principles
If conflicts persist despite the family meeting, the care team has several options to determine the most ethical path aligned with Eleanor’s rights and priorities. They could request an ethics consult, which reviews the case details and provides guidance on upholding ethical principles (Saxena et al., 2019). If it is determined that Eleanor has an intact capacity to make her own healthcare decisions, her choices and preferences should guide which care options are pursued, upholding the principle of respect for autonomy. However, if Eleanor is deemed to lack the capacity to make decisions, her prior expressed wishes and quality of life perspective should direct surrogate decision-making by family members or her designated healthcare proxy. Failing to reach a family consensus, the course of action bringing Eleanor the most comfort per the nonmaleficence principle would likely be recommended. With sensitive, patient-centered communication and thorough ethical reflection, Eleanor can hopefully have a peaceful passing surrounded by loved ones who have had time to process and accept her prognosis.
Conclusion
This complex case reveals the multifaceted ethical nuances involved in end-of-life care decision-making. Compassionate communication, respecting patient values, upholding quality of life, and carefully applying ethical principles can help guide clinicians and families through difficult choices. It underscores healthcare’s moral imperative to treat patients and loved ones with empathy, sensitivity, and conscientious advocacy, especially in life’s most fragile and vulnerable moments. Navigating ethical quandaries is rarely straightforward, but systematic ethical analysis and genuine efforts to align care with a patient’s best interests can illuminate the most ethical path forward.
References
Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2019). Principles of biomedical ethics. (8th ed.) New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Macauley, R. C. (2019). Ethics in palliative care: a complete guide. Oxford University Press.
Ruben, M. A., Blanch‐Hartigan, D., & Hall, J. A. (2020). Communication skills to engage patients in treatment. The Wiley Handbook of Healthcare Treatment Engagement: Theory, Research, and Clinical Practice, 274-296.
Saxena, A., Horby, P., Amuasi, J., Aagaard, N., Köhler, J., Gooshki, E. S., … & Ravinetto, R. (2019). Ethics preparedness: facilitating ethics review during outbreaks-recommendations from an expert panel. BMC medical ethics, 20, 1-10.
Smith, C. S. (2023). Applying a systems-oriented ethical decision making framework to mitigating social and structural determinants of health. Frontiers in oral health, p. 4..
write